There are literally no good arguments against anarcho-capitalism.
>>79323954
Unfortunately, the amygdala doesn't care about facts, only about feelings.
It's a real shame that we will never have a society where people actually viscerally understand that violating property rights is immoral and will never achieve positive results.
I love him and I wish he was my dad
>>79323954
In an anarcho-capitalistic society what stops a really powerful corporation from taxing people?
Don't answer "just start your own business rofl"
>>79323954
not an argument
Unregulated free market would have no protection from corruption and the use of force. If you choose not to regulate, your society will erupt into a war among different groups of wealth.
Eventually one group will win, and their rules will become the rules by which society functions.
Explain the distinction between this entity, and a government.
Pro tip:
>you can't
>>79324685
freer the market, freer the people bruh!!!!
There are no good arguments for anarcho capitalism.
Stefan, if you're reading this, I start to cry about halfway through all your videos because I wish you were my dad and not the dad that nature gave me. Normally I want to have sex with the men I admire but when it comes to you I just want you to be my father, okay
>>79324859
Dumb post.
Didn't they try an anarcho-capitalist society somewhere in Chile modeled after Ayn Rand's vision, and it completely fell apart within a matter of months?
>>79324685
What stops employees from just shooting their bosses and taking over the corporation themselves when their boss starts doing something immoral that makes him fair game for all of society?
Why would shareholders even be okay with letting the CEO undertake such a risky attempt at branching out from business to violent oppression?
>>79324416
I want you to talk to me about property rights. You gave them to you?
>>79325078
Since when is Ayn Rand an ancap?
>>79325072
Non-argument
>>79324685
>what stops a really powerful corporation from taxing people?
Everyone else
Infrastructure is best developed by the Government.
Africa has 40% of the world's fertile soil, but there isn't enough infrastructure to grow anything there.
Most of what they have is left over from colonialism, which was more of us bringing them up, than us enslaving them.
>>79325237
excuse me?
>>79323954
>anarcho-capitalist society cant handle a war with other country.
>anarcho-capitalist society will turn into individual and tribial society and on going fights with each other
>anarcho-capitalist society wont be able to have infrastructure because some people are just not intelligent enough to live in such society
>>79324859
>Explain the distinction between this entity, and a government.
Your stuff is imaginary nonsense, the government is a very real danger to our liberty and lives.
>>79325262
How will everyone else stop them?
>>79325246
You're right. Just an observation.
>>79325262
The same ones who stop a corrupt government? We have already seen how effective gibs are at neutralizing any opposition.
>>79323954
There is not an argument.
>>79323954
>>79324800
>>79324956
>>79325246
>>79325511
Listen here you filthy fucking faggots, there are numerous arguments presented, just because you can't fathom the intricacy of the arguments doesn't mean that it isn't an argument. You hypocrits who post not an argument are literally the ones without arguments. Now shut the fuck up and go back to worshipping your cult-leader. This is an argument.
>one company becomes abnormally successful
>humans prefer comfort and familiarity to choice and freedom
>demolishes the competition
>becomes the government
>becomes the police force and military
>taxes everyone
>uses military power to destroy everyone else directly
Oh look at that you were supporting aristocratic medieval feudalism all along.
>>79325451
>>79325509
>No problem can be solved without someone giving society a list of rules
>>79325400
My example is a description of the development of a government.
>>79325078
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_South_American_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita
argentina and chile are doing very well as far as south america goes
>>79325565
Austrian economics is a joke past Hazlitt.
>>79325823
I'm not talking about Chile itself, idiot.
>>79325565
>1 post by this ID
How stupid do you think we are?
There are literally no good arguments against using magical fairy dust to solve the world's problems.
>>79323954
dadddy hi daddy
>>79325683
Wait, what is this society you speak of?
>>79326019
>1 post by this ID
>>79323954
no capitalism without property
no property without law
no law without states
checkm8 rebellious teens, nulla salus sine caesare
>>79326336
>one post by this ID
>>79325361
>falling for the liberal meme.
You haven't read Ayn Rand if you think she was ancap. She hated libertarians dude, for the same reason most nationalist conservatives hate libertarians.
>>79323954
It's unsustainable because the states as we know them for centuries are the default and natural state to which everything else eventually evolves.
Yeah I would love to be under feudalism.
Be honest with yourselves, it would be fucking hellish. Enjoy being in a Chinese-tier sweatshop for the rest of your life.
>>79323954
This is a long shot but does anyone have that picture of Stalin reacting to the modern sjw/socialist/communists and hitler laughing from the sky?
>>79325565
>>79323954
nonsense.
There are no good arguments against is not the same as that is not an argument.
Please note that the absence of a good argument against X does not imply that there is no good argument against X. There might be a good argument against X but it merely hasn't been presented yet. That's a common scenario.
not trying to be a grimmer nazi here but just saying...
here's some flowers to make peace,
The strongest argument against Anarcho-Capitalism is the fact that it relies entirely on the idea that Capitalism is perfect.
Capitalism has a lot of shortcomings like damaging externalities, inherited wealth, boom and bust cycles that need to be controled and iminishing marginal utility to name a few.
These shortcomings can only be fixed in a market/command economy.
>>79325565
Not an argument.
>>79326336
>1 post by this id
>>79323954
There are several issues that are involved in a completely no government. The first is obvious. People have an incentive to lie to you. Especially in big businesses. While the government doesn't prevent fraud, makes sure those people get punished and therefore deters it. The second issue I can think of is that this makes the assumption that people are rational. You expect people will behave exactly the same with or without a government. I don't believe that is the case, but can be convinced otherwise. The third issue is that government can sometimes help an industry. Out of the most important inventions in the previous century, many of them derived under inventions created by the government (computers and fertilizer for instance).The fourth issue is that government control of the economy can sometimes be beneficial. Minimum wage as been shown to work in some areas with minimal job loss. While $15 dollars an hour is too much, 7.25 is too low (in some areas).
Allahu akbar
>>79324459
>>79323954
>>79325005
>>79325381
>stefan molyneux
>jew
>zionist
pick all of em
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UjywNCbY8c
The only argument against ancap is that people will always seek to form a state somehow, however miniscule it might be. So its not a sustainable system.
There are two solutions to this problem.
The more realistic one is to have a libertarian state. You write down a strong constitution limiting it's powers, which imo should only be representation of the people in foreign policy. Because it has a constitution it can be more sustainable.
The other solution is to get rid of nation states. Instead, companies create 'nations' (akin to the free cities of past millenia) that people can subscribe to and unsubscribe. Basically people could choose a provider that offered the best service for them and sign an actual 'social' contract that you could quit if your needs change. That would basically be ancap but it is very futuristic scenario and I doubt any of us will be alive to see anything like it.
>>79323954
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91YLkT2I66E
>>79326708
>>79323954
Somalia
>>79323954
It doesnt work in reality you stupid fags
>>79326729
>There are no good arguments against is not the same as that is not an argument
wat
How long precisely does one wait for a good argument to come along exactly?
>>79327226
1 post by this id
>>79325139
I wonder why no one has rebutted this argument yet. Probably because the amount of arguments against this argument is 0
>>79324859
>Unregulated free market would have no protection from corruption and the use of force
Competition + economic ostacricism
If a big corporation tries to gouge its employees or do something otherwise shady, those employees can leave somewhere else, power companies and water companies could ostracize them, people could sue, other competitors could sweep up their market share, shareholders could drop the stocks, they could lose goodwill, etc.
>>79331879
/thread
anarcho idiots BTFO
>>79323954
By what mechanism do we prevent private defence agencies from distributing justice unfairly between its clients and aggressors? I.E If x client steals from y non-client of a private defence agency how do we stop the defence agency from preventing justice by defending the customer?
I'm on your side, but this is a litmus test.
>>79325565
>cult leader
>literally the first ting you'll find when you start to research into Molyneux
>trying to b8 newfags with no research skills this hard
Shill or retard I can't decide.
>>79323954
>no such thing as violence
>>79325565
Not an argument.
