>The tables have turned in this week’s White House Watch. After trailing Hillary Clinton by five points for the prior two weeks, Donald Trump has now taken a four-point lead.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch
>>79294818
Fuck yeah.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/political_commentary/commentary_by_michael_barone/going_out_on_a_limb_romney_beats_obama_handily
>>79294818
Kek is watching over him
>>79294818
>rasmussen
Oh yeah, the same poll that had Romney beating Obama. How did that turn out?
>>79295007
He would have, but his campaign infrastructure collapsed a few days before the election.
>>79294818
So funny. Yesterday there had to eight or nine threads with that graph showing Hildog ahead by six points - today, it's crickets chirping.
Trump 2016
>>79295212
We could say the same with the polls with a Hillary lead, and when they said Trump had no chance to win and that the beginning of the end of his campaign was happening again and again an again and again.
>>79295893
It's pretty common knowledge that both Rasmussen and Quinnipac (the other poll that Trump is citing) have a record of turning out higher than actual results for the Republicans
>>79295007
>>79295212
trump is no romney
>>79294818
>people thought he has a chance of losing
>believing polls before the debates
>No ground game
>Nearly no money left
>GOP threatening to hijack the nomination at the convention
>Losing key demographics by YOOGE margins
Yeah, I've got a couple of tons of popcorn ready to watch this shit show unfold.
Following polls is fucking retarded, and I support Trump. It was the same shit every month until Trump became the nominee.
>jeb is leading the polls!
>oh wait, trump beat him!
>carson is beating trump is x poll!
>trump is beating Carson in y poll!
>carly is winning now, it's over!
>trump is winning in the latest polls!
>cruz...
>rubio...
>cruz again...
It's all fucking meaningless. And they're all within 10% anyway. Trump and Hillary haven't even debated yet.
>>79296456
>thinking polls are any indication at all
>>79296456
when do the debates start?
Also,,,,,,,,,
>believing polls
>ever
>>79294818
>http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch
I'm going out on a limb and predicting Trump wins in a landslide.
Rasmussen is admittedly conservative. 10-15 years ago this poll might have had some meaning since Rasmussen was as accurate as anyone. In the last 5 years, though, they have been less accurate and other pollsters note that they stop polling a few months before an election thus making it hard to know how accurate they are. Polls gain respectability by polling just before an election and correctly predicting the results.
