Would /pol/ have fought in WWI?
>Relaxing before the carnage: Heartbreaking photos of our troops on the eve of the Somme 100 years ago
>The weeks leading up to the bloodiest battle in British history were gentle, compared with the horror that followed
>Rolling countryside north of River Somme was home to more than a million British servicemen, mainly volunteers
>Haunting photographs from 100 years ago show the men relaxing, released to mark the centenary of the WWI battle
>But the lush, green, springtime lands would shortly be turned into a muddy moonscape by the horrifying conflict
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3666866/Relaxing-carnage-Heartbreaking-photos-troops-eve-Somme-100-years-ago.html
>>79238484
I would have. I'd either be forced or shamed into doing it, or maybe do it myself out of patriotism for the Empire.
It sounded like a horrible fucking time though that broke a lot of nations and empries. Disgustingly bloody too.
I mean on the first day apparently the entente had around 20k DEAD. Today we all cry and OYYY VEYYY over 3 dead and 5 wounded soldiers. I get why, but it's just weird.
>>79238484
No. I'm a comfy NEET.
>>79239083
>Today we all cry and OYYY VEYYY over 3 dead and 5 wounded soldiers.
remember that people had 12 kids and half of them died do to diseases
People were more used to death
>>79238484
I'm a man, my male privilege would have forced me to do it.
>>79238484
Fuck no.
>fighting in WW1
>ever
lol nah
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4Pd527GN48
No ww1 was shit , i "would " rather fight in ww2 and die fighting against capitalists and communists pigs
>>79239303
Christ I fucking hate women.
I want a world war where feminists rot in the trenches.
>>79239256
Was it worth it /pol/?
>>79239700
I want to see Hillary Clinton get shipped off to war. Then we can all pity Bill Clinton for being the real victim.
