You seen this shit /pol/?
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fdf_1432986955
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/29/how-israel-was-busted-nuking-yemen/
Discuss, this could have been the first aggressive use of Nuclear ordinance since 1945.
>>79234911
That is not a nuclear bomb you fucking retard.
It was an Ammunition depot blowing up.
Kikes must have it, they're way too confident, gotta balance this shit.
>>79234911
wtf i love Israel now. they just need to do mecca next.
>>79235036
I am not 100% convinced yet that it was a nuke.
Care to refute what I posted?
>>79235036
this
just an ammo dump
>>79234911
Its an ammo dump blown up by an airstrike by Saudi Arabia like 8 months ago.
Saged.
had it been a nuke the camera would've fried instantly, specially at that distance
not saying its above the kikes to do so but its not the case here
>>79235154
>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fdf_1432986955
Did you even look at the date it was posted?
If there was a Nuclear bomb detonated, especially a year ago, it would've been all over the fucking news.
The airplane that hit the Ammo dump was an F-16 type fighter, PLANES DONT DROP FUCKING NUKES, especially single or double engine planes.
Most of the worlds uses Missiles to deliver nuclear payload.
>not a nuke
>not new news
>not even Israel
The /pol/ Who Cried 'Jew'
I remember this, wasnt it an ammunation storage that got bombed
>>79234911
Really makes you think...
...of saging and reporting.
>>79235048
Loving the people who made america into a pile of degenrate shit.... kys
>>79235391
>PLANES DON'T DROP FUCKING NUKES
The B-29 is definitely a plane you leaf proxy dingus
>>79234911
>no blinding flash
>digital camera still records, thus no EMP present
not a nuke
>>79234911
What the fuck does that have to do with us?
No seriously. Why the actual fuck would we bother getting involved? The fat saudi sheikfags can manage on their
.. own
>>79234911
>911
>>79234911
Nobody commented on OP's fucking 911 get? Don't you see what Kek is telling us here?
>>79236269
Reminds me of the Assassination Bureau, perhaps the most gloriously Late Sixties movie besides Casino Royale. It takes place before WWI. Diana Rigg tries to warn of a bomb to be dropped from a Zeppelin. Nobody accepts the premise of "dropping" a bomb.
Could have been a small EPW nuke
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_bunker_buster
>>79234911
Ammunition store
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMs4IJQVRYM
>>79237493
We already know the kikes did 9/11. Old news.
>>79234911
>ttp://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fdf_1432986955
Yeah this looks like a small tactical nuke.
>>79235391
Google B61 nuclear bomb you flying fart fucker
>>79237694
You think you understand, but you do not.
You think you see, but you are blind.
There are depths to be fathomed that you did not.
Praise Kek, for he has granted us another message; but feel shame for your short-sightedness in the comprehension of it. Better yourself.
>>79234911
It's a munitions depot blowing up you dip
>>79237493
That we should call the cops and report that a retard escaped from a group home and is shitposting on /pol/?
>>79234911
I remember this
It was an ammo dump. If it was a nuke, the camera would have been blinded, same with the camera man, and he would have been burned alive.
>>79237980
I am a retard, you say? Right, right.
Think what you will, for the fool that you are will be proven in time; not by my actions, but by Kek's intervention upon our mortal world.
>>79234911
>veteranstoday
The creator of this site admitted 40% of the content posted on there is bs
>how-israel-was-busted-nuking-yemen/
Haha! Caught you nuking!
>>79234911
we had a thread about it the day it was posted to liveleak, look it up in the archive. we decisively determined that it wasn't nuclear you retard
>>79237493
look at the post above yours fucktard
>>79238167
Not you, dumbass, the OP.
That's not a nuke.
>>79238351
I am but a mortal, it is to be expected that I would be late to see Kek's message. But I am working on that. Are you?
Are you bettering yourself? Probably not.
Kek has granted us an opportunity for transcendence, and yet you waste your time berating me? Waste of breath; breath that could be used to Praise Kek as he deserves. The Culling approaches.
>>79234911
>veteranstoday
>>79234911
It's nuke, KEK wills it.
>>79238813
>>79238256
>>79238256
>>79238813
The VeteransToday editor is literally a militant mudslime
I don't know who is responsible for his or whatever, but that is a neutron bomb. A type of small yield tactical nuke.
>>79236269
oh ur right we would totally use those in ww3
>thinking we would use old technology in modern days.=
>>79234911
That looks absolutely nothing like an atomic bomb explosion. Not even a bright flash at detonation.
>>79235391
B-1B B-2 B-52 plus different config's for fighter/bombers
>>79237920
How fucking Canadian do you have to be to believe that a nuclear bomb went off in Yemen?
>I can smell the syrup
>>79236478
Why do they look so cool?
>>79238979
F-16s can drop tactical nukes.
>explosion very similar to other ammo dump explosions
>article implies you can tell how radioactive something is based on how much light is detected on the CCD
>a CCD is actually a terrible method for measuring radiation without complete darkness
>not a single lap capable of gamma spectroscopy detected a single particle from a nuclear explosion despite the fact that the cloud would have released more than enough to be detected somewhere
>article goes on to dismiss anyone who disagrees as a troll
>article doesn't mention that a nuke costing millions would be pointless against an ammo bunker since a conventional bunker buster would do just fine and cost half as much
based on what Mordechai Vanunu leaked, Israel doesn't have tactical nukes and is more concerned with a deterrent over an actual battlefield weapon
Yeah, wasn't a nuclear warhead.
(Pic Related, what radiation on a CCD actually looks like)
I love how idiots report every large explosion in the middle east as a nuke
Seems even ISIS has nukes
>>79239117
Because they're by far the most powerful man made device in the history of our species.
>>79234911
OH BOY HERE WE GO AGAIN DAT BOY IS BACK TALKIN NUKE SMACK
Chased you your kind off many months ago. Everyone else now knows the true story. Stop obsessing over these small splosions as nukes.
>>79239140
>>79239143
Yeah I don't know about you guys but I'm a huge war nerd and have been watching war footage since I was a kid. I've seen ammo explosions and every other kind of conventional explosion. The sparkling points of light, the length and color of the glow in the mushroom cloud, the brightness of the explosion, the size of the explosion, it's nothing like an ammo dump exploding. The flash and glow is there and gone within a second or two, none of the sparkling effect either and not as bright. I don't know the real story behind this, but just by looking at it this is obvious. Show me another explosion besides the one that caused lightning in Syria that looks like this if I'm wrong. I'm sure you'd be able to prove me wrong with any of the thousands upon thousands of videos of combatfootage on youtube and liveleak.
Looks like a bunker buster
>>79235048
>Unironically this retarded
>Sees flag
Checks out
>>79234911
> veteranstoday.com
>>79239790
Hey Bro, shitposting again? How's electrical engineering?
>>79236112
>obama = jew
?
>>79234911
>"proton bombardment" begins ~3 seconds after the flash
>neutron bomb mysteriously causes a huge fire underneath it
t. people who don't understand how nukes work
That is clearly an ammo dump or something similar going up, which is why it remains burning after the fireball is heading for the stratosphere.
A neutron bomb, like any other nuke, releases the overwhelming majority of its energy, both in ray and particle form, in the first hundred milliseconds of explosion.
>>79234911
>Camera man not instantly blinded
>Camera man not going deaf
>Nobody's clothing and hair is catching fire from intense thermal radiation
>The entire picture is not a blinding pure white as the radiance of the explosion eclipses that of the fucking sun
>>79240185
>A neutron bomb, like any other nuke, releases the overwhelming majority of its energy, both in ray and particle form, in the first hundred milliseconds of explosion.
Kind of a strawman anon, there's enough energy left to make that red glow, but not in an ammo dump exploding. There are literally hundreds of videos of huge ammo dumps exploding on Youtube, show me one that looks anything like this.
>>79239523
ammo dump in russia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzxkZMx4koY
>>79240383
You win anon. I stand corrected. Definitely not a nuke.
>>79239523
Here's a video of an ammo dump in Russia producing a very similar explosion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVe4_G2eT0Y
To tell you the truth, I honestly don't think you've seen much footage of explosions this big in colour since it wasn't until the last few years that people who're more likley to encounter large explosions have the means to film them in colour.
Here's another video of a an explosion in Ukraine, slightly larger and with a much brighter flash.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chD7uFjsfH0
Again, why would Israel use a nuke in Yemen, using up a the precious resource plutonium when you can use a conventional bunker buster and achieve the exact same result?
>>79234911
>first aggressive use of Nuclear ordinance since 1945.
It isn't, the Ukraine was nuked not too long ago, many other places too actually.
>>79240628
Probably a combination of either petrol or diesel fuel and slow burning propellants for some weapons system or another. Really reminds of the Tianjin explosion on a much smaller scale.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO1q3HwB0y0
>>79239117
If by cool you mean fucking horrifying sure they're cool as mate
sage goes in all fields.
>>79240356
Show me one nuclear explosion where peak particle output, which occurs at nearly the speed of light, is measured multiple seconds after detonation at a distance of ~10 miles. That is not how a nuclear explosion works.
Nukes let off the overwhelming majority of their energy in the first few fractions of a second of the explosion, when the core is together enough to sustain the fission/fusion reaction. Then it blows apart. After that, you're dealing with a fireball that is largely the result of X-ray heating of the surrounding air, which when it expands and compresses further heats the air -- but all that energy was dumped into the air in those first few fractions of a second.
Nukes do not explode and then start emitting masses of fast neutrons/protons seconds later. At that point you don't have the nuclear reaction that produces them any more, because the core has blown apart into the big ball of hot air that is the fireball.
Whoever labelled that video is either a moron or deliberately lying.
That's not how nukes work
>>79240934
>all these places getting nuked
>not a single lab on earth has detected the fallout
Seeing as Japan is testing more soil that anyone else on earth, they'd be the most likley to detect something, and it doesn't take much to send alarm bells ringing. Gamma spectrometers are incredibly sensitive and are used in thousands of labs across the world to test everything from geological samples to archeological studies.
Yet not one found a fission isotope that would indicate a recent nuclear explosion.
Not one.
not even going to bother reading a thread. the only people who would think that OP's video is a nuclearr explosion either don't know what a nuclear bomb actually does, or is incredibly fucking stupid.
like, holy shit, do you people not even understand how absolutely devestating a nuclear bomb actually is? A small nuclear bomb wipes out entire cities. A large modern nuclear bomb would wipe out a swathe of land so big it would be visible from fucking space.
if OP's bomb was atomic, the video wouldn't exist because the phone would be vapourized from the fucking blast.
>hurr it didn't ignite the atmosphere and leave lots of radiation it's not a nuke derp
You dumb faggots realize there is a huge spectrum of atomic weapons, right?
>>79235391
>PLANES DONT DROP FUCKING NUKES
get a load of this goy
>>79234911
FAE
Fuel air explosive
>>79234911
>no flash
>tiny yield
Come now anon
>>79234911
That looks like a chemical plant blowing up. Definitely not big enough for a nuke.
>>79235036
see?
>>79234911
>>79239523
you people are fucking retard.
no flash, no nuke. if you stare directly at a nuke detonating you go blind."
now fuck off.
>>79234911
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IFYUR76p0E
>>79243910
>Bright orange fireball
>Slow flame front
It's not even a detonation. Might not even be high explosives going off there.
>>79234911
Below the minimum yield of runaway supercritical. Not even tacnuke.
>>79234911
>See's big explosion
>NUKE NUKE ITS A NUKEEEEEEEEE
If it would have been a nuke the fucking guy with the camera would be fucking dust right when the shit blew up.
