Any other libertarians having the dilemma where they would rather not have someone with authoritarian tendencies in the White House but believe the Islamic invasion of the West must be stopped at all costs including deportations/force?
yes. lesser of two evils, fire with fire, etc etc.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-back-pedals-on-banning-muslims-from-u-s-1467058774
he won't stop shit. deep down, you know it.
>>78984624
That would be me.
Libertarian, disagree with 80% of Trump's policies, and am supporting Trump all the way.
>>78984624
The next president will be a totalitarian dictator no matter what.
You can have only one:
You have access to guns with the 2nd amendment.
You DONT have access to guns with the 2nd amendment.
You can be Trumped or Merkeled.
I can personally say, because I can sense people being deceptive. Trump will try and honestly care if Americans think badly of him.
Hillary will not care if her gun confiscations kill hundreds or thousands of families.
>>78984624
>Implying that I should be more concerned with radical Islamist than the odds of some putz veering across the center lane during my morning commute.
You guys are patsy's.
>>78984624
Get shot
Pussy
>>78984624
Normally I would agree, but still have a shitload of guns, so I personally don't need an authoritarian to protect me from the camel fucker hordes.
>>78984624
Yes. I've come to realize libertarian voluntarism can only function with whites, and only then if they exert some kind of self-correcting cultural influences on one another rather than decay into leftist degeneracy. The contradiction is that it might take government intervention to lead to such a thing.
>>78985131
The fact that he's at least willing to acknowledge that Islamic terrorism is a problem facing our country and we need to deal with it as such makes him appealing regardless of how the issue ultimately ends up getting solved. Obama is basically an Islamic apologist who is more interested in fighting """""""""""""""racism""""""""""""""" than protecting US citizens from terror attacks, and Hillary has made it apparent she intends to continue all of his policies.
>>78986045
Yeah because domestic terror attacks are such a huge problem in the U.S. I can't remember the last time I went months without a terrorist attack affecting my life or anyone I know....
>>78986639
Yeah because having bombs dropped on us is such a huge problem in the U.S. I can't remember the last time I went years without the bombing of Pearl Harbor affecting my life or anyone I know. Stop being so Japanophobic president Roosevelt. It's like, 1941, GOD.
>>78984624
Thankfully Hillary is running against Trump so it's like a choice between having to wear an ankle bracelet and getting your feet cut off.
>>78984624
if you want to stop immigration and incentivize self deportation cut social security and kill every welfare system, muslim are in a full global conquest motto but yet they don't invade south america in waves, all conquest needs its supply lines and welfare in the developed western countries is their main supply line for the muslims
the answer is very simply, Gary Johnson is the true hero in this story
>>78991326
>Gary Johnson
He's a liberal basically.
His platform this election is pretty much what you'd get from a Democrat in 1970s or 80s.
>>78991651
>kill income tax
>kill welfare
>kill obamacare
>kill the NSA
>liberal
everything that the trumfag pull against Gary Johnson is nothing but memes
>https://www.isidewith.com/blog/9066243-interview-with-gary-johnson
