Was Feudalism all that bad?
>women knew their place
>every man was basically guaranteed a wife
>every man had an occupation
>excluding famines and wars it was pretty safe
>>78737618
Bumb because rurouni kenshin best anime
>>78737618
Famines and wars were pretty common. Plus you had to do back breaking labor and didn't had a lot of stuff to do on your free time
>>itt /pol/tards literally proclaim how backwards they want to be.
>>78739681
>2016
>visits /pol/
>doesn't want tribalism
Purest form of government mate
>>78739532
>Plus you had to do back breaking labor
>implying people don't have to do that sort of stuff now
The hardest labor in feudal societies was farming, but even then you would only be working for 3/4s of the year and you would be basically self-employed. Also if you had a trade you would be able to avoid doing massive amounts of physical labor.
No centural government is asking to be conquered
>>78737618
The biggest problem is the rigid social castes. The whole idea of the American Dream is that anyone can become anything if they're willing to work at it. You can go from living on the street to living in the penthouse, it's happened many a time. And that gives people hope and makes life not-miserable, the thought that you could make it big one day.
In feudalism there is no hope. If you are born a poor serf you will stay a poor serf your whole life. Besides the most simple pleasures in life you have nothing.
>>78739681
>history moves in one direction
nice meme
>>78740522
>He believes in the bootstraps meme
>>78740522
>The whole idea of the American Dream is that anyone can become anything if they're willing to work at it.
Right, but now that we know that isn't true, we should focus on more realistic social structures.
>>78740721
>He doesn't
>>78737618
>excluding famines and wars it was pretty safe
You mean the two things most responsible for death in human history? I'd take feminism and immigration over the occasional famine or local war any day.
>>78737618
That is not what Feudalism was about bro. You could have these things now if you wanted too. Just give the existing government the same power over you life that the Lord in his Castle had over his serfs back in the day.
>>78737618
>have plenty of food
>no need to fight
>easy work (food mostly grows on its own)
BUT THEN
>hey go-guys wanna give me half your stuff?
>btw I need you to fight to the death against this guy
>hope you don't starve!
no feudalism was bullshit
>>78740832
Reminds me of that meme picture of that poorly drawn commie nu-male explaining the social structure of communism, then when asked if he would be a farmer or laborer he said, "Haha no man, I'd be a card-carrying party member haha"
I'm guessing you wouldn't like that "realistic" social structure if you were at the bottom of it along with most people
>>78737618
dont forget about whorehouses and gambling dens
>>78737618
Except that 0 social mobility thing. You were born a peasant you will die a peasant guaranteed.
>>78737618
>Was Feudalism all that bad?
Yes.
>>78737618
>excluding famine and wars
So...basically 90 percent of the time it was shit, and every Sunday it was okay?
Let's not pretend. Old times were shit to live in.
It's fine and good to glorify knights and samurai and things as awesome, and the time periods as mystical and fantastic. But, I'd rather do that from the comfort of my modern house, with air con and spider-repellent, without the looming threat of being conscripted into the third war this year, or running out of potatoes.
>>78741579
not really, if you are able to make profit your pretty much set, social mobility correlates to wealth.
>>78741907
Except that you couldn't make profit because your Lord took all the excess aside from what you needed to feed yourself if you were lucky. Not to mention under current systems we can someday retire. Under feudalism once you can no longer work, and it was manual labor that wore down your body so that's like.. 40, you just died.
>>78737618
but what type of Feudalism tho
1890 japan?
or what?
>>78742224
at least i will be able to spend my money on whores and booze, i will die a happy man
>>78741907
The only people who 'profit' are the lords whose land you live on. No matter how much you grow, you only get to keep enough to survive on. The rest goes to the lord of the land. If you refuse or rebel against the lord, he might decide to 'look the other way' while bandits raze your village.
>>78740522
Well social mobility is not really that much of a thing in most capitalist societies but I will admit that there certainly was a lot less of it in Feudal societies. But then again, why do you need to be a feudal lord when you can just lead a nice life as a blacksmith or something?
>>78741253
Nice strawman.
>>78742470
but you
>guaranteed a wife
>women know their place
>legal whores, even lolis
>have occupation
>have land
>no feminism bullshit
>you can openly hate anything you like without being called, racist, intolerant, bigot
>>78742470
Bah you are an idiot.
In the european medieval feudalism people payed 10%-15% of what they produced/earned to the landlord("war"-nobility).
That is why that tax was called a "Zehent" (tenth part) in german and I think "tithe" in english back then.
The landlord used that tax for building and construction, feeding and gearing the guards and knights to protect the people (btw the guards were always sons from the people and would have never harmed their own, or let them be harmed)
If the evil evil landlord would have decided to "let" bandits raid a village his own guards and knights would have killed him. (Praetorian tradition)
Also the nobility did not have unlimited power - according to popular belief. They were bound by law. Also the village/town etc. councils (heritage of the things) had a say in local things. Lords did not actually mess with day to day local decisions in the villages on their land. Large decisions or emergency decisions were made by the lord alone.
>>78744207
what about whores? are they legal?
>>78744359
Whores were always around since the beginning of mankind everywhere.
Even in tightass musli saudiarabia there are whores.
>>78744359
Never, under any circumstances, can you trust any image like this on /pol/.
>>78744359
>>78743083
>>78742246
>>78741907
>>78741534
one of these is not a trap
wtf anon?
>>78744532
why?
>>78744532
dw senpai my trap senses aren't tingling at that pic
the rest are traps though
>>78744485
man that sure is nice
can you call a black person nigger in the public?
>>78737618
The actual system wasn't really, but life under feudalism sucked just because standards of living were so much lower then
>>78744841
In medieval times?
There were not many moors or niggers in Europe at that time.
>>78745038
but you can, right?
like calling people retarded and not being throwing into jail for hate speech.
>>78744655
you want trap?
>>78744960
Popular myth.
During the medieval, twonlove was vibrant and active.
They celebrated basically all the time.
The average farmer was "wealthier" in medieval standards then the average worker today.
They could affort to throw feasts for relatives and frieds every two weeks with ease.
Also their protein consumption was much higher, since there were unbelieveably many artificial fishponds
>>78745279
>>78745321
what about property ownership?
>>78745321
>The average farmer was "wealthier" in medieval standards then the average worker today.
Bullshit. Source?
>>78745385
what? you dont like traps?
>>78737618
Is Kenshin the greatest anime of all time?
>>78737618
This motherfucker was fast as fuck, but not as fast as the legendary Kenshin
nothing is wrong with it.
caste system is the true redpilled traditionalist way to structure society.
>>78745611
maybe
>>78739377
The films were actually surprisingly good too. Really good production quality.
>>78745777
>>78745321
but do you auctlly own stuff tho, what about prima nocta?
>>78745215
Yes. Back then the rule was to punish ACTUAL crime very hard. Anything else was like "whatever".
Call your lord, or some higher churchguy names was probably never a good idea.
Everyone else, like the inbred guy who lives near the river, you could call retarded.
>>78745504
My brain, I studied that 2 years in universtiy before I quit. I usually was the only fuck who actually sat in the faculty library all day.
There are some pretty good documentations about this and also some books.
Go and look for them on youtube, or google.
Funfact: During the outgoing late madieval some brainfucked writers wanted to smear the centuries before them so show everyone how "progressive" this new age was. Nearly all myths regarding the medieval times originate from those handful of shitheads.
>>78746005
Prima nocta was as good as never executed. There are a few examples, but it never was the rule and usually those guys who did that were either killed by their wives with poisen, or by the cousin of the husband who happened to be part of the guard.
>>78746005
You could not "own" land but had a nearly unlimited usufruct.
>>78742394
You can legalize prostitution without feudalism.
>>78746389
man thats nice, have some non trap qt
>>78746590
Um..thx
>>78746483
not possible
for the sake of progress, it wont be allowed.
>>78745279
seen that one already faggot, you're in that other thread aswell
post fresh shit
>>78745572
>>78745471
>>78745778
>>78746005
STALE
>>78747666
i dont think you are ready for what im going to post
>>78740178
>only be working 3/4ths of the year
>while your children starve and die from infectious diseases during the other 1/4
I suppose nobody on /pol/ actually has a spouse or children though so they wouldn't care about that
i do think legalize prostitution solve certain problems, but back then women knows their place
they care for the family, not like now, just bitches and sluts
>>78747861
>hile your children starve and die from infectious diseases during the other 1/4
>implying that it was impossible to save food for the winter
>implying that medicine did not exist
Really?
>>78737618
>excluding famines and wars
It's precisely that that made it shitty. Also, if you didn't own land, you had to be the servant of whoever owned the farm you lived on.
>Women knew their place
That doesn't mean they weren't bitches.
>>78747861
they have waifus
The reason women didn't want to work back then and knew their place is the same reason feminism went on the rise. Because back then the only work to be had was back breaking manual labor. Feminism only took off because now the jobs available including jobs where you could sit on your ass in a comfortable space.
>>78748025
if i wound found a party for government, it would be whore party
>legalize prostitution
>institutional breeding program
>space program for space sex
Feudalism is one of the most redpilled political systems there are, because it recognizes the need for hierarchy. Feudalism was overall a good thing.
>>78748764
and my motto would be "Through dick, unity"
>>78748384
Women used to toil in the fields with the men though. In fact many feminists have argued that women had more "freedom" during that period than they did during capitalism (up until recently of course.)
>>78748125
>excluding famines and wars
>It's precisely that that made it shitty. Also, if you didn't own land, you had to be the servant of whoever owned the farm you lived on.
Nope. Also you posted a pic of the black death (mid 14th century - medieval times ended mid 15th century and started in the 6th century)
People were not "servants" in the sense of the modern meaning of the term.
>Women knew their place
>That doesn't mean they weren't bitches.
Adultry was punishable and women were kept in check by strict moral standards and shaming.
>>78748900
nice dubs, have some asian qt
>>78748799
You cannot oppress merchants in a market economy. That's probably why it failed. Merchants everywhere got sick of it and revolted.
>>78743007
On a whim, your lord could take everything you have. Cuck you, kill your family, the works. Even with a strong religious authority, you are in no way protected. Literal slavery for most people. IF you were a lord though, pretty dank living I guess.
>>78749235
They did not revolt. They indebted the kings and emperors and forced them to discharge the "war-nobility"/natural nobility and noble them instead. Since those rich merchants did not give a crap about the people and their land many of them were killed by their own guards/knights.
That is why they pursued rulers to abolish the warrior-class so they weren't reliant on then and could hire sellswords instead.
>>78739377
It had some amazing music.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_3X9FNiQW8
>>78749293
so is now, a person with wealth and higher social status is better then most people anywhere, i dont see it as oppression, but rather human nature, as there will always be alphas and betas
>>78749790
Richfags cannot legally force you to let them fuck your wife under penalty of death. That's the difference. Coercive powers belong only to the state in most capitalist societies.
>>78749790
With feudal systems , the threat of resistance is quelled by not allowing the people to be armed with anything besides farming tools. IN today's current system, I can protect myself with guns. And even if we were in the same technological era, a capitalist system still affords FAR more safety then Feudalism.
>>78749293
Think about this:
The nobility up until the late medieval had their lands for generations. Their bloodline was tied to their land and the people on it. Their guards were the sons of their people (not good idea to piss them off by being cruel).
The Lords were bound by the law. They could not simply make arbitrary bullshit decisions. The knights and also the guards of the medieval continued the praetorian tradition - originated in ancient rome - and would kill off a cruel arbitrary Lord who would harm their families and relatives.
Actually the Lords often protected their people from the religious authorities.
They were depended on the wellbeing of their people. Only healthy and content farmers, hunters, builders etc. are efficient and freely give the tithe for the landlord.
It was not slavery. They simply did not own land but had basically unlimited usufruct.
Also see:
>>78744207
>>78745321
>>78746094
>>78746263
>>78746389
>>78749110
>>78749626
>>78750342
There was virtually no crime in feudal societies though.
>>78750459
That's to be expected when there are far fewer boys and men running around fucking everything up.
>>78750342
Think ancient Greece. IT was shitty, but less shit than Feudal Europe. God, Germans really ruined everything for everyone
>>78750547
cus of whore houses
>>78750574
They had something like 50 slaves for every one free man. They weren't much fun for commoners.
>>78750342
Up until the late outgoing medieval times - EVERYONE (7+,12+) in most parts of Europe - had to be armed by law 24/7.
That was the best strategy to protect people from bandits, and the land from invasions.
>>78750459
>>78750547
Nearly everyone (12+) was armed and punishment was extremely harsh.
>>78750459
Banditry has been pretty common all around the world. THe more immediate threat is your owner killing you arbitrarily because no higher power exists to punish him for it. Feudal lords can be however brutal and unpopular as long as their military remains loyal
>>78750700
Define "armed."
>>78746094
So you don't have a source and you just read stories about king Arthur and lotr while you shirked classes because you're just oh so smarter than your professors, and think that's how it was.
You people are pathetic, unable to make something of yourselves in a free society, at the most technologically advanced stage in history thus far, so you convince yourselves that some ruler would give you everything and romanticize the feudal life. How are you any different from the lazy liberals who beg for gibsmedats from Daddy Government in exchange for freedom? Absolute waste of space. You're fat, weak, and stupid despite the fact that your ego has convinced you otherwise and you wouldn't last a day when you get the feudal society you think you want. You'll be the first to get put against the wall, you traitorous scum
>>78751624
t.I failed history
>>78748084
>"""""medicine""""
Yes, just rub some salt on those smallpox. Clearly that would have stopped the 1/3 infant mortality rate. If only the wise anime posters could go back and say everyone that died due to ignorance
What "medicine" are you talking about exactly you retard?
>muh waifu
>muh simple life like in one of my japanese animes
>muh rice farm
Top kek, go outside
>>78751807
Unlike Hans over there, I actually finished college but nice try, leaf.
>>78751359
Axes, hammers, daggers, "Messer" (longer than dagger, shorter than sword), clubs, etc.
Those who could afford it had swords. Those who wanted a sword but could not afford a quality went with cheap swords with fake smithmarkings on it. Those were circulating in entire Europe. Like fake leatherwares today.
>>78751624
No need to be an asshat, man.
You don't know me and are simply implying some crap.
I don't give a flying fuck if you believe me - truth is I am simply too tired to get my notebook out of the closet, plug it in and post links or "infographics" here.
How about you move our ass to google and look it up yourself. There are more than enough well-made documentaries on the internet and more than enough articles.
I'm not there to teach some cursing prick anything.
>>78751963
>college
not university
>>78737618
Most men were cucked by those with weapons.
>>78743028
Nearly all my friends are communists. This is not a strawman.
>>78751963
>Went to a college
>Probably community
>Murican education
>>78751963
Boy, I finished commercial college, before I went to university - I never graduated there, I give you that - but I was sitting there simply because of me being extremely interested in certain time periods and read books + publications from archeologists.
Also I did not study some "become history teacher crap", I went with pre- and early history since my plan was to become an archeoligist, specialized on Europe.
>>78752077
All universities are colleges, but not all colleges are universities.
>>78751963
what did you learn tho, laying pipe?
feudalism is basically communism except the government keeps all your money and spends it on themselves. you can move to north korea if you want
>>78752533
>mental gymnastics
>>78752077
>>78752212
If you want to be pedantic about it, I finished "university", where I played "football" and shat in a "loo".
>>78752051
You admitted to being a dropout and used muh brain that couldn't handle coll- I mean "university", as a source. You spout nonsense that virtually all serious historians reject but I guess that's just because you and your big ol brain know more than at least a century of scholars.
>>78737618
It would be alright, i am pretty good at black smithing and other metal work could be adjusted for cruder tools.
>>78752462
Care to recommend a good documentary?
I'm very interested in the era
>>78752785
Yeah I dropped out after ~2 years, since my grandma had severe cancer and I deemed it more important helping her and spending her last time with her more important.
Yeah so what - people read and tell others what they read about. Look it up yourself, as I said, instead of being a douchebag, shitposting on /pol/.
What reason would I have to make shit up and lie my arse off, huh? For the lulz or what?
Whatever it is late and finally a bit cooler in here, so I will lay down.
gn8 /pol/
>>78753087
There is this bald, i think british guy who did a good series about debunking popular myths of that timeperiod.
sec.
>>78737618
I hated that fucking cunt's guts. The most satisfying moment of the entire series was when Kenshin finally kicked his ass and left him live so his edgy philosophy would collapse on itself and he'd have to actually get a life.
>>78752785
You certainly have no education on medieval history, because your conception is way off.
You can hate it all you like, but Mr. Austrian is depicting the era very accurately
>>78752785
> posting on an anime image board
why you got ta be like dat man, why so much hate
>>78747604
Nevada and the Netherlands say otherwise.
also, what "money" would you have as a peasant. Your lord takes everything aside from what you need for bare survival.
>>78737618
Feudalism is fine until you interact with another society which is operating under a freer market system and get blown out by the superior technology they have developed because feudalistic systems suck ass at advancement.
>>78740178
It's actually more like working your ass off for 1/4th of the year, and then doing whatever you feel like for the other 3/4ths
We work significantly more nowadays than at any other point in human history barring the early industrial revolution.
No one on this board who advocates for being the peasants in a feudal society should ever call anyone else a cuck. This is nearly the most submissive political affiliation you could have. You bash Communism and you're praising feudalism?
Jesus christ this board is a bizarro tumblr.
>>78753180
I think it is Mike Loades. Maybe I am too sleepy but I can't seem to find the series where he debunkes the pupular beliefs.
Maybe you'll find something. I really need to lay down now m8.
>>78753297
>Your lord takes everything aside from what you need for bare survival.
That's only if you are a merchant. Peasants usually had it pretty good as far as taxation was concerned. The real risk for them involved conscription.
>>78752603
History. Now comes the part where you insist that I just fell for a kike ruse, and carry on with your revisionist roleplay, because you desperately want to escape your current reality where you're a complete failure, and would rather blame your shortcomings on some boogeyman ("bogeyman" for you cucks) and convince yourselves it's all capitalism/feminism/kikes/nigger's faults that you're retarded slobs.
>>78740990
Pulling yourself up by your bootstraps is physically impossible; that's where the saying comes from and why it exists.
When you tell someone to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, you're literally telling them to go do the impossible.
>>78753087
sry
This:
>>78753565
>>78753297
man ur a downer, the type of legalize prostitution is like whore house in every city, not only one city
>>78753584
>complete failure
>/pol/acks
pick one.
>>78753363
Why is feudalism assumed to be antonymous with the free market?
Many Austrian economists (the freest market) advocate its return due to the protection of private property rights above all.
The era is wrought with misconception.
>>78753584
not really, i don't project my failures on others, i just post pics for all to enjoy
>>78753603
Excellent, thanks
>>78753739
Feudal lords weren't really known for respecting private property rights though.
>>78753613
But they CAN legalize prostitution in every city. It just needs to come up on the ballot and people vote on it, or your legislators need to stop being sticks in the mud.
Making it illegal just makes it more dangerous for one.
>>78753102
thank denmark have good nap
>>78753922
agreed
>tfw you will never enjoy a whore
>>78753739
>Why is feudalism assumed to be antonymous with the free market?
You can't really start a business or do much if you give half your produce to the lord so he either uses it or sells it to turn a profit in exchange for the right to live in his personal land and you need his permission for everything. Feudalism fell apart once merchants and traders started making more money than their lieges.
>>78753907
Says who?
The nature of feudal government was private property; that is, the title of the lords were seen as their private property, in contrast with today's notion of the government being a public institution.
If the lord were to breach the private property of his people, then his own rights were subject to the same.
This is just one element of a large system, under which property rights were sacred.
As I said, the popular conception of the middle ages is largely false.
>>78753739
>why are oligarchic restrictions on the economic roles of individuals antonymous with the free market
Because they are quite literally contradictory.
No matter how you structure feudalism, its defining aspect is the fact that the obligations of serfs are strictly defined and enforced and the control is strictly managed by the government (usually a monarch). The free market means the FREE market, i.e. as little regulation as possible (ideally none), not just "something someone calling themselves an economist said."
>>78754112
Austria lmao, not Denmark.
>>78739377
This. Batosai the Manslayer is goat.
Did you guys watch the 4 OVAs that served as a prequel? They were so brutal.
>>78754426
whatever their like right next to each other
>>78754465
didn't kenshin died of AIDS or something
>>78754465
Yeah. Loved it when Kenshin fucked that widow during her period.
>>78754608
>die of aids
Nigger what?
>>78754154
You have no idea what you're talking about. It's evident that you never studied the era, as you're regurgitating a vague narrative I'm sure you heard on the history channel or something.
Income today is taxed exponentially more than any rate imposed during the middle ages.
>>78754291
Serf obligations come from the land ownership of the nobles i.e. private property ownership.
See this post>>78754199
Serfs were free after a period of working the land. Once they were, they were free to move, start enterprises, and even purchase their own land and become low noblemen themselves.
You're grossly overstating the institutional power that lords had. It was moreso over their land than their tenants.
>>78754608
i remember it was some sort of fuck disease, and Kaoru purposely want it to lighten up kenshin's burden or something
>>78752785
Big words for a college grad
>>78737618
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6yURz5vtVc
Kenshin is literally anime made for men.
>>78754608
Turberculosis I think
>>78751935
if we are to entirely put aside the ridiculous mortality rates to pretty much everything, they didn't have it too bad in terms of labour and had plenty of free time and it only gets easier when you go further up the chain, land owners, anyone with a craft, and nobility had it even easier.
of course there's the constant warring and need for soldiers, and all other things that cause death, but that's all the big negatives i can think of.
>>78754947
Can we implement a modern feudal system successfully?
>>78755033
Nah, the capitalists are far richer than they were due to increased efficiency. They would never let it happen.
>>78755033
classic feudalism had everyone much closer to the king, they all knew the king depends on them but they also all depended on the king, and there was the aspect of honour and serving your family or bloodline by gaining the respect of higher-ups and thus securing a better starting point for future children
what we have currently could technically be called a remote form of feudalism, since the "kings" own just about everything, including the government, and they would be entirely useless without the labour and funds of the vast populous beneath them, but there's no honour and no impressing the king, as most people don't even know the king exists
>>78754768
It doesn't matter what you call the entity restricting your rights, whether you call it "the government" or whether you call it "private land owners" the existence of an obligation is entirely contrary to the very heart of the free market. What you're describing sounds like a federalist structure where the relationship between state (in this case, feudal lords) and individuals is the execution of near-absolute power and then focusing on how the relationship between the government and state is pretty normal.
>>78739897
"Hurrr durrrrr!!! Hierarchy is inherent in nature and necessary for orderly societies. That's why we must reject the tyrannical and unjust domination of our kind by Jews.
and PC libtards!
and the SJW narrative
and Cultural Marxists
and women who fuck too much.
and Muslims
and the fed
and welfare recipients
and the public sector
Hurrrr durrrrrr!!!"
>>78755522
Our current lives are empty and devoid of meaning. We look at our society and feel disgust. Why wouldn't we want to see it destroyed?
>>78737618
Not necessarily feudalism, but Neo-confucianism pretty much..
I've never had things so "familiar" explained in such detail and ease before, yet "Confucius" is one of those things people look at and are like "So obscure and indecipherable". I'm the product of living on an island off the east coast, and I'm from a culture that is conservative, because we've been relatively isolated because we keep to ourselves. He calls it "Propriety", but we understand it as "honour". Chivalry and Bushido are very similar. I came into confucianism, because I already had an ideology laid out, and confucianism surprised me, because it was the only thing that basically reworded everything I've ever written true.
>>78755440
Wouldn't you say this is a result of the world as we know it becoming much bigger, though?
As we have some form of global feudalism where the individual lords own far more workers and land.
>>78753613
It's decriminalized in Australia, most of them pose as "thai massages"
>>78755692
>Our current lives are empty and devoid of meaning. We look at our society and feel disgust.
Speak for yourself faggot
>>78756616
Tell me what meaning there is to your life beyond baseless and entirely pointless selfish hedonism and preservation of your self?
Historically stateless societies were not invaded so much. It is more difficult.
>>78756895
True, it is difficult to invade something where the power is not centralized in one place. Best you can do is take over parts one by one instead of going directly to the capital where the law, money and leaders are.
>>78742224
Not true. In the life of Louise the pious a peasant became wealthier than his lord. Louise even paid a peasant for killing a thieving lord.
>>78754805
but he looks like a trap
>>78737618
Economic advancement was impossible unless you changed your identity and started a new life, because your family name was inherently tied to a very narrow choice of careers and fixed economic and social lifestyles. If you're a poorfag now you'd still be a poorfag under a feudal system, and you'd probably have less rights and personal freedom even as a man.
>>78737618
You can't go back to feudalism as it was. The social structure existed only due to the limitations of technology. As tech advances, so must the society in order to compete with other ones. Ever notice that cavalry stopped wearing armor? It wasn't because they were trying to get killed. Tech advanced further than the advantages of armored knights.
>>78740832
>It doesn't work for me so it doesn't work for others
Fuck you you degenerate communist fuck.
>>78749733
I like you, anon
>>78754608
no that wasnt cannon, he lived hpapily ever after
>>78760083
>cannon
>"Kaoru convinces Kenshin to infect her with the disease through sexual intercourse"
kaoru a slut
>>78756841
we worship myths that aren't true to feel morally, intellectually and culturally superior to anonymous users on a japanese picture-sharing website
>>78760510
She's like 17 and in love with a bishounen. It's not her fault.
>>78760510
tell me again how kenshin didnt get aids
>>78760816
bukkake when?
>>78755522
I want to fucking murder you to be honest
>>78750459
>There was virtually no crime in feudal societies though
how about those london registries showing one adult in four dying a violent death? which is huge seeing how diseases competed with killers on who can get the guy first?
how about explaining how crime levels were lower than today in an age before forensics? getting away with murder was almost guaranteed. they knew very well what they were up against, hence the cruel punishments; when the probability of getting caught is low, the cost of getting caught must be driven up.
>>78742246
Of course Poland, you weeb
>>78763076
http://bedejournal.blogspot.com/2011/11/steven-pinkers-medieval-murder-rates.html
Not true
