Take a good look are your new ((((masters))))
Just attach a submachine gun and you'll have a great killer weapon.
https://youtu.be/tf7IEVTDjng
source on pic op?
>>78708190
0:49 to 1:00 is a pretty neat dance
>>78708190
Just give that 5th arm a Fleshlight and we are good to go
>>78708667
There a little tool called reverse image search on the top left corner m8
>>78709330
WEW LAD
>>78709330
> tfw that thing could release a chainsaw and chop your dick off
It's cute. Don't worry OP they won't fully militarize these until they're immune to small arms fire.
>>78709330
As soon as advanced AI is created we'll be the ones getting fucked
>>78708667
this is why the machines will win
>>78709330
>you will live to see the day where people can own sex robots
thank you kek
>>78709330
>mfw in the future rape bots will be used to terrorize populations during war
>>78708667
>Martina Hingis
I got you ma lad, and don't you dare saying you aren't my best friend ever
Boston Dynamics has come a long way since 2011
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXI4WWhPn-U
>>78708190
Race war won't matter when the robots take over. People are ironically prepared for a zombie war, but a robot war is the true realistic enemy.
Honestly not looking forward to it.
>>78710406
Video very much related.
https://youtu.be/iTQ8YtCiMoI
>>78708667
Martina HNNNNNNNNGis
>>78710907
It's gotten worse than you think.
Imagine all the stuff they aren't showing us
https://youtu.be/_luhn7TLfWU
>>78708190
I fucking love boston dynamics
>>78711406
Do you also like Darpa?
>>78708190
who gives a shit when a $15 rpg can blow it up.
check out this anti-drone gun designed to target "smart weapons" by frying their internal units.
>>78711277
I swear to god, yuka kuramochi has the best ass in japan right now
>>78711975
Yup, lats time I checked rpgs cost 15 dollars, yup.
Also I'm sure that emp gun is easily obtainable
>>78708190
not exactly quiet tho is it
>>78711975
that looks cobbled together with a nerf gun a yagi antenna desu
>>78712226
THICC
>>78712309
True, that's their biggest flaw
>>78710940
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.
>>78711975
>by frying their internal units
Ummm that's just a jammer
>>78713633
Watta tard
>>78712522
MUH
>>78709952
We need printable tech to counter these things quick
>>78711853
Wat?
They are weak to banana peels, it's ok pham
>>78712295
You would have a valid argument if we could print RPGs at home for $15
>oy voy the goym do not fear our metal beasts.
>they will learn though.
k i'm out fuck you armchair tactician noobs.
>>78708190
BUNDA
>>78708190
>new master
>posts a phat ass
pretty sure thats the old master
>>78708190
Don't even need a sub-machine gun. With that level of stability a primarily semi-automatic pistol would be sufficient.
>>78709952
Immunity to small-arms fire is simple, just put armor on it. The only thing standing between us and robo-armageddon is the lack of a suitable power supply, unless you're willing to deploy them with lengthy power cords like Eva units.
>>78709952
>It's cute. Don't worry OP they won't fully militarize these until they're immune to small arms fire.
It looks like this new robots wasn't designed for military contracts, which is why they made it so small and fragile. (Boston Dynamic has ended military contract with DARPA, who didn't think the robots would be useful and didn't want to pay for them.) So the older models probably CAN resist small arms fire, while this new dog sacrifice durability for lower weight and greater agility.
>>78710113
kek
>>78708190
slavs or chinamen with rifles are still cheaper than one of these robots.
>>78708190
its cute, i would buy one if i chould.
>>78712522
What's this one's name again? I have some videos saved but they're on a different computer.
>>78712522
If only there were footage without the leotard.
>>78721480
Why? That sounds really indecent.
>>78708190
can i have my with an flashlight instead a gun?
>>78721879
Don't worry about me, Sven; your plate is full.
>>78708190
>new robot
Fuck are you talking about?
This piece of shit has been out since the Iraq war started
All they did is add some new programming and an arm
Robotics is going to be shit for the next 25 years
Then they will be worth looking into
Either way they'll be wiped out in the cybernetic holocaust
>>78710113
Better for machines to inherit this planet than the niggers
>>78709330
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQcNYb3DydA
>>78708190
Didn't even watch the video, nice ass. You forgot the first rule of OP
But seriously those robots won't b e useful for anything other than transport of supplies for a while, anyone could trip it with a wire or a rope or throw a net over it or something. Or just sneak up behind and push it over.
>>78708190
>those fucking bananas
>>78708190
How long till I can fuck it?
>>78723133
That's why a small slick of oil in the road would stop one of these. It wouldn't be able to push itself upright with its head if the head can't get any traction. Or just one molotov and the circuitry is fried.
>>78708190
THICC
>>78721011
bamp
>>78723403
>implying the technology is complete
>>78723403
>stating the same hazards a human soldier could get stopped by
>>78708190
that's pretty fucking scary
Does anyone else dream of getting to sniff an woman's gorgeous ass? Seriously, it's basically the first thing I think about whenever I see an attractive girl with a great ass. I just want to lick that asshole!
>>78708190
>Shiro poster
That bitch is THICK
>>78723982
>le god of le gaps argument justifies my religious belief in science fiction.
You go, my lad!
Ho Ho, Wew lad!
>>78724767
Where's the fiction aspect exactly? The technology is right there, only its in an early stage of development.
>>78722681
Do you think the machines will wage war on niggers as soon as they can think on their own?
>>78724869
The fiction is thinking that it will develop in the same way as it did in science fiction. This is because science fiction always assumes the best case scenario for technology. It assumes that "neat" and "interesting" will always trump "practical" and "affordable".
You might as well be crooning about the End of Days because "The trends are right there! it's just an early stage!"
Your entire argument is that science fiction was prophecy. Come on, man.
>>78712522
>>78721011
Shirato Saki - JEW-001
A wepin to surps medal gear
>>78725098
Lay off the peace pipe, chum. You're inferring a whole heaping lot from my statement simply stating that the technology is in a primitive stage of development.
>Your entire argument is that science fiction was prophecy. Come on, man.
Are you under the influence you piece of shit? What the fuck is this.
>>78711277
So why not put a gun on them and control them like you do drones to send them into the middle east eh?
>>78711277
I want to impregnate women like this and have half-japanese kids. HOLY FARKKKKKKKKK.
>>78708190
Did anyone else kek when it fell on the bananas?
>>78725315
>You're inferring a whole heaping lot from my statement simply stating that the technology is in a primitive stage of development.
Considering the fact that you do not possess any sort of "future knowledge" or an almanac of technology from the year 3000, you have absolutely nothing to base that statement on. For all any of us knows, we're at the bottom of the barrel technologically and there's nowhere left to go.
But since you made that declarative statement without evidence, i can deduce a lot from your stance on the matter.
Your argument is "Well, the world doesn't look like flash gordon yet, i guess we are primitive!"
Are you fucking kidding me? I'd expect that sort of shit logic from my country, but not yours.
>>78708190
>Just attach a submachine gun and
They could probably scale it up and give it a damned tank cannon.
>>78726337
Not with legs. Treads, yeah.
>>78708190
>((((masters))))
Yeah, okay pal
>>78726448
You can see it lock up. It was programmed to do that for lel redded lels.
>>78725906
>I'd expect that sort of shit logic from my country, but not yours.
He said while arguing with a swede about robots.
>>78726405
If the legs could give without snapping they'd be fine. Just spread the force over a wide range of motion. Hell you could attach flywheels at the joints and use the recoil to generate electricity.
>>78708190
Could someone web, 00:49-01:00?
>>78724457
I love you too
>>78726521
Yeah, but it bet if it hit a snag it would spastically flail around equilibrium must be a nightmare to program.
ROBOT BABES WHEN?!?!
>>78726886
It's the terrain i'd worry about. If it had equivalent tank armor and armament, it'd sink into any ground. The legs would need weeks of maintenance per hour of battlefield use. I doubt there's any material strong enough to last more than a few deployments.
It's just a bad idea. Elephants weigh 3 tons. Abrams tanks weigh 73.
>>78727096
There's several videos of the things being tripped and kicked and they stay upright.
>>78727265
I stand corrected, How does it calibrate such things?
>>78727440
Balance? The same way as a wii remote knows which way it's pointed. That and some really complicated algorithms that understand it's weight and mass and how to stop itself from falling.
Bumping
>>78727196
An even a few molotovs can disable a fucking tank, especially if you dissolve strips of tire in the kerosene. All the smoke gets sucked into the engine intakes, and with a robot like this would melt circuitry or gum up the joints enough from the stickiness to render it immobile.
Like I said in the here and now these things would be useful for transporting things, maybe hauling away injured soldiers, but definitely not combat. It would just be drone tanks, if anything, not something like this.
>>78726521
Nah, it likely does that to protect the parts. I remember that crazy fucker from Myth busters ordered a spider robot that had motion about as sophisticated as this, but the parts that actually move the limbs (I think he referred to them as servos? I'd have to find the video again) are very fragile and will strip, if something is pushing against them at the wrong angle while they're running.
>>78727713
Due to thermodynamic limits, walking machines will never be better than wheeled or tracked machines.
>>78724069
These things are intended to replace human soldiers...
>>78727828
No. See: >>78727668
It has a roll cage and weighs less than 100lbs. It's not going to break from a fall if it flails.
>>78727927
No, they're not.
>>78727836
As far as I under stand it, drone tanks would not work either because of the input delay and how second by second tank combat is. Maybe pseudo AI tanks one day?
>>78708190
>>78708190
1:28
>>78727987
I know. That's what the robo-apocalyptic types are saying, not what I am.
>>78708190
How soon until the US government has this thing with a 50cal on it enforcing tyranny?
>>78727945
I'm not talking about actual damage from the impact. I'm thinking "something pressing against a leg from the side while it's trying to move, causing a gear to slip somwhere."
>>78728251
I'd give it 2 more years
>>78727987
>>78728122
I admire your optimism
>>78728017
That would work technologically but would be very difficult to implement politically because people think the terminator movies are documentaries.
>>78728269
It doesn't use gears. It uses linear actuators and electric motors.
>>78709399
desktop only? dont see it. wish i knew abt this..
>>78728424
>I admire your optimism
It's not optimism. It's a lack of anthropomorphizing and putting human thought patterns onto something that is not human.
>>78716710
Why not use solar power technology? mixed with battery packs? or nuclear puppers?
>>78708190
I thought that pic was gonna be some android sexbot. Now im dissapointed OP.
Post yfw this begins patrolling the streets
>>78728534
>you will never buttfuck that dog while she wears MAGA hat and shirt.
>>78708190
Can't wait to have guns strapped onto it protecting the people who can afford them by exploiting the people those things will shoot.
>>78728529
140 watts per square meter might power some of the lights on it., but it's just dead weight mostly. Nuclear cannot be scaled down past a certain point because steam turbines and basic heat engines lose efficiency with size. The RTG that powers the mars rover only outputs 2.5 kWh, which is about the same as people do.
>>78727713
Huh good point. This isn't the best design for heavy weapons. Legs are delicate.
BUT, one place they could be useful is clearing out buildings and foxholes. Just hook them up with a flamethrower, and maybe some easily replaceable ablative armor and you can remotely clear a building with relatively little risk.
Though come to think of it, just turning a couch on its end may be enough to pin them down, or a two foot gap that a human can step over filled with water. I'm sure there'd be a whole bunch of effective tactics you could think of to deal with them if they were ever really deployed.
>>78728534
Sorry senpai, I'll do better next time
>>78728538
>sure would be a shame if something happened to that camera it needs to see.
>>78725003
whites/yellows created the machines not the niggers they will love us like parents and will stop the lib cucks from destroying our race
>>78728984
>Paint ball gun
>ever coming close to the range of a 50 cal machine gun
M8 really???
>>78728913
Clearing buildings with flamethrowers? A grenade will do the job far better.
There's no niche for robots to fill. Robot versions of weapons we already have, like planes and helicopters and tanks, but beyond that and it becomes impractical at best.
>>78728984
IR camera spots you in 0.01 seconds and a bullet is coming toward your head before you've even spotted your target
humans always lose vs robots
>>78729268
So it's hauling a huge trailer of ammo too? You arm that thing well enough and it's only going to bog itself down in any terrain other than concrete.
>>78708190
How much would that cost? A million dollars at least?
Take it out with a $50,000 stinger missile, then the government goes bankrupt.
It's not a killer weapon and I can't believe you think this can be practical.
>>78729328
It can't move that fast, and if it fires on anything warm it will kill friendlies and civilians.
Sorry, not that easy.
>>78728913
They could also excel as kamikaze soldiers
>>78729401
This. A single fireteam with a rifleman could take one down from beyond its engagement range within an hour of deployment.
>>78729379
All these bots have been tested in rough terrain.
>>78729401
1 million for the prototype
200,000 for the first 100,000 units
>missiles
>not knowing about DARPA's Iron Curtain
https://youtu.be/n_yz_ONZltA
>>78729611
>All these bots have been tested in rough terrain.
No, they've not. 2 inches of snow is the worst i've seen. It could barely stand unladen on ice.
>>78729438
fine
>spots silhouette of a gun
>shoots in 0.01 seconds
same result, human reaction time cannot compete with computers that can acquire a target 300x before the nerve signals reach your brain and then your fingers
>>78708190
we are at the stage of laughing at these machines.
but soon we'll be at war
>>78729696
How much does setting up this Iron Curtain system cost? Would you be able to set this up on a robot? The description says it's for light vehicles only. Still looks expensive, you can't just print money forever, which is why I think that governments will always lose wars against their people. Also there are plenty of high ranking military officers who would not be loyalists.
>>78729909
>>spots silhouette of a gun
>>shoots in 0.01 seconds
You dumb fucking nigger, even if it's computer can respond that fast it's legs and body cannot respond that fast.
Image acquisition is not that accurate, and likely won't for years. Just how powerful a supercomputer does this thing have? Fucking google couldn't tell what it was looking at in that amount of time.
You've no idea what you're talking about, just like every proponent of this sci-fi bullshit.
>>78730124
They're arguing from science fiction. In science fiction, cost does not exist.
Once you realize that, then you can start disregarding their vapid arguments.
>>78708190
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3e_6A9ifcUY
can't wait to program these things so they only target dark-skinned people.
>>78729696
>he doesn't know about ARGUS
LEL
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARGUS-IS
The Jews already fucking won
>>78730147
It just needs to pivot a turret, no leg movements. How fucking slow do you think modern actuators are?
>>78730306
*white skinned oppressors
FTFY
>>78730513
Oh so now you've added a massive turret to the top of the thing? It takes quite a while actually, and it won't be 100% accurate over short ranges, and now it's so heavy it runs out of electricity in half an hour.
I can get that you've no idea what you're talking about, and that all you care about is moving the goalpost perpetually. This has gotten boring.
>>78730217
I feel bad for the people who design these things. Imagine this being your contribution to society. Something that would have never been built in a free market because it is not practical, but, because the government can just print money, people go to college for years to build these killing machines. Inventions that will never be used in the future because they are not practical at all. You would have to live with yourself being a leach on society too.
>slips on a banana peel
Wonder what a turtle shell will do to them
>>78730908
>massive turret
the weight of a 50cal (about 38kg for the m2)
Are you some butthurt military professional who's going to lose their job and is in complete denial?
>>78731084
Eisenhower warned us about the military industrial complex sucking the best scientists and engineers.
>>78729029
I hope the thinking machines will be our saviors instead of the harbingers of our doom.
>>78726448
>>78727668
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDB5-_EwxNw
KEEK
hmmmmmmmm
>>78731931
where is that "science fiction" guy now
>>78731931
DELETE THIS IMMEDIATELY
I FUCKING BEG YOU
>>78710482
More like "Martina HNNNNGGGHH-is."
>>78731658
My own brother, unless he goes into the free market for aerospace engineering.
