Nazism is the inferior ideology when held up against Transhumanism. I get the gist of why a meme-related board would like the nazi belief system since nazism was pretty much one of the pinnacles of propaganda (until they got destroyed since they ambitiously wanted to take over the world and destroy all other races deemed inferior). However, after pondering the fact they are best known for gassing a specific race (among other kinds of people) and desiring to destroy/conquer everyone else (and probably down the road would've just gotten more picky with the races that deserve to live but hey that's just speculation) maybe we shouldn't promote them. I am not saying abandon the desire for a master race. I am saying nazism promotes an improper means of obtaining it transhumanism does much better.
Benefits and reasons to switch /bmw/ from nazism to transhumanism:
1. When all races eventually disappear with the advent of virtual realities where there are no races, we won't fade into obscurity since the superior race card will become utterly meaningless. Racism is going to some day be impossible to have when people are abandoning their races altogether. Even aryans are going to be 2nd-gen wannabes of a digital semi-immortal body without race. Transhumanism promotes the application of technologies to create immortal digital selves.
(2. cont in next post)
2. In the mean time for people not wishing to transcend reality into the digital world, even in the biosphere there will still eventually be a widely-available means of achieving a universal master race without murder. When we start accessing technologies capable of putting all races on equal footing in any aspect, we won't fade into obscurity. Now this in itself would actually promote developing a superior race, but that race would be universally accessible and there would be no point in killing races to access it since they can choose to evolve into it through the use of biotechnology. It might seem fictional now but the decades are going to continue passing and it is only a matter of time till we break down the walls of limitation put up by our current bodily forms. Transhumanism promotes the application of biotechnology/neurotechnology to enhance the human condition.
>>78682698
3. Transhumanism focuses centrally on the evolution of technology which is a step up from Nazism which does not keep that advancement at its core which it should have done. Though Germany was known for their technological advances, such advances were not essential to their ideology and simply treated as a means of carrying out their short-sighted ideals of wiping out the inferior and obtaining power over all other nations. If you want to focus on destroying inferior races, why take the underhanded route Nazism offers that has a probability of causing unnecessary suffering and being shunned by all opposing nations? Transhumanism removes all races because the fact is humanity as a whole IS ONE BIG INFERIOR RACE. Transhumanism seeks to trascend the boundaries humanity has put up AND does not require murder to do so like nazism grimly does. Animals are inferior to humans but nobody enjoys killing them save for the sick of mind. Humans are but animals desiring to evolve themselves beyond their boundaries which is a universal feeling shared by everyone. Why take the destructive route that far fewer people subscribe to when transhumanism is seeking to do things realistically and peacefully in a manner all countries can get behind?
>>78682779
4. Beyond mandating a focus on removing human suffering and transcending the human condition by means of technological advancement, you can politically believe whatever in transhumanism. If you want to be a totalitarian you can be a totalitarian transhumanist. The two stances are perfectly compatible.
>>78682819
5. In a way, one can successfully argue transhumanism does retain the core part of nazism desiring a superior race since transhumanism literally does away with all races as being one big inferior race -but does so in a manner NOT killing and torturing people of other races. Everyone can become part of the master race without needlessly causing or receiving death and suffering. This also gives the opportunity to make a transhumanist black sun symbol. It'd be fucking weird but I think it'd be cool. I can see it now: a black, white and blue new symbol with a big transhumanist h+ icon at the center.
For these reasons I believe this board should switch from the nazi belief system to the transhumanist belief system as it goes far beyond the scope of the nazis in their desire for a master race and does so in a manner we are already naturally progressing towards without requiring the death and suffering nazism has in the past required.
>evolve nigger into superhuman
>it eventually chimps out with superhuman efficiency
There still needs to be care about such things.
Thank you (((merchant))) you are our greatest ally.
>>78682593
There are two more historic events in our human history which demonstrate why transhumanism will be catastrophic and a generic observations about different lifeforms.
When a technologically advanced civilization meets a less advanced civilization, the less advanced civilization will get destroyed or enslaved. Let's look down the list of history proving this point
- when Roman marched northward into Europe, they've killed, captured and incorporated any barbarian tribe in their way
- when China was unified, it steam-rolled through its jungle barbarians called the Vietnamese
- when the Middle East was in its Islamic Golden Age, they ran slave runs on Europeans and even attacked and conquered Spain (lookup "Moors"). Massive sex-slave market of Euorpean women ran
- when the French / English / Spanish / etc landed in North America, I can't say it ended too well for the warring Native Americans
- when the Spanish landed in Central/South America, can't say it ended will for the Incans and other Native peoples
- when Japan attacked USA, can't say it ended well for them
>>78683178
Having seen what happens in history, what do you think will happen when the superior technologically advanced transhumanists decide their fellow humans are obsolete?
Now, the most important historical event is where and when have seen in human history the peaceful co-existence of two similar humanoid species? There is none because it ends in genocidal warfare and forced interbreeding. This story is the story of our human ancestor and his/her conflict with the Neanderthals. Our ancestors where aggressive, war-like, dumb and waged a genocidal war against the peaceful and intelligent Neanderthals. Historical records show our ancestors ganged up and made the first move: They killed them on mass and forced interbreeding with the Neanderthal women which is why we now have some of their DNA (see: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaic_human_admixture_with_modern_humans#Neanderthals). In my personal opinion, transhumanists will consider themselves (if not already) a new homo superior to us homo sapiens and history, like our ancestors, will repeat itself.
Finally, I'd like to ask what do we see when two non-similar lifeforms compete for resources in an environment? Either sharing, mutual benefits cooperation or dominance. How have humans interacted with other life-forms in general: dominance. I can go down the list of domestication of crops and animals, the extinction of food prey (Dodo birds, etc) or killing for fun/sport. Question now is, if transhumans start modifying themselves so radically as to warrant them classification as non-human lifeforms then how will they co-exist with current existing human lifeforms when resource consumption threatens the existence of the other.
Transhumanist generally make me worried because they talk more of utopia & "what ifs" rather then honestly talk about the dangers.
>>78683225
Look this video, it's unrelated but look at how all theories trying to prove Utopias work end up crumbling / turn into nightmares when attempted empirically: http://youtu.be/0Z760XNy4VM . Is it too crazy to believe that maybe, just maybe, transhumanism might not be a good idea?
>make post
>it gets deleted in 5 seconds
janitor guy pls don't bully
I support transhumanism but I don't think it simply removes races.
People will still have their consciousness which won't just be hard-formatted, and preference for skin conor, body, etc.
>nigs would still have a tendency for chimping out, probably less so though
>>78683268
Nevermind, my post magically reappeared.
>>78682850
>>78682593
it is literally a philosophy thought up and pushed by kikes!! How cuckolded can you fuckers be?
>Let's see (((they))) thought up:
-Socialism/Communism
-multicultralism
-Christian zionism
-critical theory/ Cultural Marxism
- modern day capitalism
Hmmmm let's give the merchants another chance. Surely, they won't try to fuck us this time.
So what, microchip brain implants? Robo-organic brain hybrids? How does it work?
Are you really okay with giving up your humanity for the promise of godhood? Are you at all concerned about the possibility of being completely manipulated by a digital system in ways no human has ever experienced before?
Fucking bullshit hivemind infestation. Complete rebellion against God. 0/10.
