Can someone please explain to me how this works? Polls are supposed to be from a limited number of individuals, therefore when one candidate goes up shouldn't the other go down? How could it be that Trump and Hillary are both gaining ground on each other? just makes no sense.
>>78613359
Here is how you read the polls: If both Hillary and Trump are gaining, that actually means Trump is overtaking Hillary.
>>78613359
Johnsons bleeding his 10%
>>78613635
That makes no sense. At all
Hillary: 48 / Trump: 42 / Don't know & other: 10
Hillary 50 / Trump 44 / Don't know & other: 8
Never trust polls, look at Brexit, remain was suposed to win with 10%.
Same for the prez elections here 2 years ago, our socialist cuck PM was supposed to win with 65% of the votes and he lost by almost that.
>>78613847
from 100% to 102%
>>78613359
there are other candidates you retard, as well as undecided people
fucking americans i swear to god
45.3+39.4 = 100, according to you?
jesus christ man, get a grip
>>78613847
>102%
>>78613635
I love the poorly educated!
>>78613659
i sometimes bleed from my Johnson
>>78613359
RCP's general average still includes data that presents third-parties and "Don't know/neither" as options
Which is to say it's a fucking shit methodology regardless of the steaming piles of bullshit they feed into it
>>78613847
>Hillary 50 / Trump 44 / Don't know & other: 8
Common Core in action.