>>78612910
1st
>>78613195
2nd
>>78613285
3rd
>>78613329
Enough
On behalf of all Brexiters everywhere, I'd like to say thank you to Mr Trump for blessing us on the day of the referendum
>>78612910
""""""scientists"""""
You mean those faggots who waste millions on that retarded Hadron Collider that has amounted to absolutely nothing.
>>78612910
>could
>scientists crying over fear tactics
dumb as fuck, m8.
Yeah but what did science ever give us?
>>78612910
WHOS GOING TO INVENT THE NEW IPOD NOW!!!!!
>>78612910
Well In 2015 the UK paid 13billion into the EU. In return the EU spent 4.5billion on the UK, 1.4billion of which Is that science money. So, If my math Is correct, fuck the EU.
>>78613438
Those faggots, wasting mony on some stupid electricity, nobody needs that
Those idiots wasting money on some nuclear fusion, it's a joke!
Those morons trying to cure people with bacteria, stop funding it.
Yeah, maybe it's better that you leave EU.
>>78613438
Good thing you use the benefits of those millions when you use phones, computers or the internet.
Rolling
dont forget to sage
>>78612910
>UK scientists can lose 1.4 billion
Does that mean they are all going to go on youtube and shit talk like Thundershit does since they'll be out of work?
>>78613753
You completely missed the point of the post but k den
>>78612910
>uk scientists
>>78613753
>implying the LHC has amounted to anything even remotely like that
again, syrians were allowed to flood throughout the EU, why would the brits be restricted? seems like alarmist bullshit.
>>78613887
fuck off retard
ill sage what I want
>>78613748
EU membership has boosted UK's trade with europe by 55%. Thats adds up to a shit ton more than 7ish billion
((((scientists))))
((((could))))
>>78612910
>Science sucks
>uses a computer
2edgy4me
>(((Scientists)))
you mean the people who indoctrinate students with gender studies and socialist theory?
the fucks who spend their lives "proving" that it would be best for us all to submit to the inevitable socialist world republic?
The only worthwhile science is being done under the sponsorship of corporations anyway..
the EU funds its own vanity projects.
>>78614337
Yes, now that Britian doesn't take orders from EU bureaucrats, all their trade will completely cease!
>>78616433
Shut up Ahmed. Neither of those are sciences, they're humanities.
>>78613748
This.
Where else does /poltards think the EU gets all that money it gives out?
Greece? Portugal?
>all the GOTfags voting remain becuz muh eu pays for production...
>>78612910
>pay £13 billion to the EU
>get £4.5 billion back in the form of wildly inefficient subsidies and programs
>leftists think this is a good deal
>>78613753
Thomas Edison wasn't sponsored by the government.
>>78616884
If they want to keep that trade in the same way, they'll end up having to follow EU orders anyway and nothing will change, except they no longer get a say in the rules
>>78616991
they call themselves "social sciences" though
>>78613753
Reposting it from last thread:
Scientist A discovers something and publishes it in a journal and gets a pat on the back, a Nobel prize and such information is available to all.
Scientist B works in the private sector, discovers something and his company goes on to manufacture a load of goods based on this discovery, generating money and consequently tax to the nation the company is based in.
The private sector funds a lot more research than grants ever do, it's just that they keep their research private to make money off it to carry out further research.
Grants are pointless really when it comes to the scientific industry as if it has any real world value to humanity, the private sector will research it to produce a good from it.
>>78617945
>social 'sciences'
>'Democratic' Republic of Congo
>'People's Republic' of Korea
>National 'Socialism'
>>78618042
grants are important for basic and/or fundamental research. things that do not immediately translate into a competitive advantage.
still, most of public science funding goes to useless garbage and might as well be cut.
>>78618375
I agree that publicly-funded research is important to frontier research, but if we're talking about the economics of scientific research, it's irrelevant.
Say NASA discover means through which we can mine precious metals on Mars, such research is required to establish that it is feasible, but any company could then use such publicly-funded research for private gain. And if we're talking in terms of economics, it's only that second part that counts.
>>78617674
Yeah except the part where they can make trade deals with the rest of the world as well.
Fuck you are thick.
>>78612910
>could
oh no we're so scared
>>78617674
You only have to follow EU orders if you're exporting to EU countries. Currently in the UK you have to conform to EU rules, even if you have no intention of exporting to an EU nation.
>>78620176
They already do. Europe is simply a better market which they will no longer have good access to
>British scientists
>>78620492
The EU is 13% of your export market. Nobody wants that trade to stop
>>78620492
>>78620682
Not to mention you will lose access to cheap european imports and will have to get those goods from somewhere else, with all the extra costs of shipping
>>78620503
>which they will no longer have good access to
We'll have the exact same access as before, they need our money and they know it.
>>78620567
>see image
>>78612910
Thundercuck mad about losing his gibs?
>>78612910
> chavs and Welsh pig farmers determine the future of Britain
Well done lads. Thanks for all the keks.
>>78618197
the nat soc is invalid is your argument
>>78620837
Britain is not going to have the same access, you will be subject to the common customs tariffs that non-EU members are subject to.
>>78616650
>The only worthwhile science is being done under the sponsorship of corporations anyway..
This is utter nonsense, and you know it. Probably bait, but I do know some people still believe this.
>>78620837
>We'll have the exact same access as before, they need our money and they know it.
Far less that you need them. My original numbers were wrong. 44% of British exports go the EU and 55%of imports come from them
Thats 13% of British gdp coming from european exports, while only 3% of european gdp comes from british exports
>>78622930
>>78620837
Besides which I actually agree, trade with the EU will stay pretty much the same. But so will free movement and immigration, as well as EU regulation. Brexit keeps everything the same except britain has a worse bargaining position and no influence on EU law
They could cost cut by hiring all female staff and offer them lower wages.
>>78617036
lol now uk will pay even more just to access the market,and wont have any say on what happens in europe
i made this.
>>78612910
How is this even posted?
The money that goes in and the money that goes out was calculated and the difference is about -15 billion € a year for UK. So how less money loss would be a menace for reseach financing, cultural subsidies or agricultural subsidies, since they can finance these areas even better?
>>78613887
ncncnxmxm
>>78613887
rollin
