https://web.archive.org/web/20160624123146/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brexit-us-donald-trump_us_576caf80e4b0f16832392137
Look at this shit, /pol/:
>But the two empires — one faded, the other holding on — share a centuries-long history and a common imperial culture in which the ideal of “white man’s burden” — to quote Rudyard Kipling — is a privileged inheritance and a sacred identity.
>The pro-Brexit vote in the U.K. is a cry of defiance by what’s left of that Anglo-American white tribal faith, and the decision to leave the European Union should send a shudder through those who think that Donald Trump is a xenophobic, racist nationalist with no chance to win the U.S. presidency.
>A glance at the U.K. referendum results show that Brexit won handily in England, especially in the rural, traditional towns and cities least dominated by immigrant cultural and globalism.
>Trump is riding the same tide of anti-globalism that propelled the likes of Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage in the U.K.: against waves of immigrants, against global corporate dominance of trade, against Muslim claims that terrorism is not intrinsically part of their religion, against the control of power by internationalist intellect and capital.
Being anti-globalist and anti-free trade is now a racist position. This is the last card left in their hand. Nobody bought the economic arguments because nobody thinks the west should have to compete against child labor and literal slavery in Asia.
This is what they've been reduced to. And hilariously enough, it's coming from Huffington Post, a liberal rag that railed against the TPP They're finally starting to show their true colors. The people finally drew blood against the elites, and they're panicking.
We are winning.
>>78519510
Let them embrace their globalist positions.
For Americans globalism means pointless foreign wars, offshoring of jobs, immigrants your company brought in to replace you. It's a foolish strategy to try and counter America First with shame.
Anti-slide bump, I know shills are out in full force right now.
>>78520154
It's all they've got left at this point. They're scraping the bottom of the barrel. "Muh jobs" didn't work, "muh China" didn't work, so now it's "everyone who is against globalism is a racist Trump supporter."
I think they're trying to lay the groundwork for Hillary to have another convenient epiphany on the TPP, personally.
>>78519510
Yes we are winning, anon francais!
>in the rural, traditional towns and cities least dominated by immigrant cultural and globalism
Fuck all of these shit for brains libtards. Thinking people are canceling their self proclaimed "rights" to steal others' identity and wealth, so they instantly shout racism.
Wait until Trump wins... oh the global butthurt!
Its not a good argument, but for the most part they aren't wrong
>>78520926
Explain.
>>78520926
>Trump is riding the same tide of anti-globalism that propelled the likes of Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage in the U.K.: against waves of immigrants, against global corporate dominance of trade, against Muslim claims that terrorism is not intrinsically part of their religion, against the control of power by internationalist intellect and capital.
That is perfectly correct.
>"tide of" anti-globalism
>propelled "the likes of"
Sad jounalistic attempts at making common sense seem evil.
>>78522665
It's really pathetic. You know they've run out of arguments when they start claiming "anti-globalism is racist."
>>78519510
TPP is horrible. hillary shilled for it for like 7 years or something. but now she is against it. after it was put into effect. after nothing could be done. they cant even rewrite any of it for like 70 years .
you ever wonder why neither side ever undo what the previous side did as soon as they take power? most of the time they only slap a 5 or 10 year wait on revisions
the only way to get rid of it is with the supreme court and targeting the corporate tribunals since they do not have any constitutional right to sue the government without a trial and almost self govern through the power to excessively sue without the government being able to defend itself
>>78524242
But can't they use the "muh treaty" defense? I thought the reason the U.S. repealed country of origin labeling on meat products was because the WTO ruled that it violated NAFTA.
sheesh
