>49% of the country don't want something
>50% of the country wants that something
>1% doesn't care
>The 50% group gets their goal
>Democracy
>Works
pick one.
>>78509580
u mad ?
>>78509580
That is literally what Democracy is.
What you're doing is called crying.
Good thing the usa is a republic
>>78509580
Yeah and what's the other option? Monarchy? Dictatorship? Both can so very easily be subverted and undermined by foreign influence or bought by (((big money))). They cannot afford to bribe or blackmail all of us, but they sure as fuck can do it to a select few.
>>78509580
democracy never works, it never worked, it never will work.
Maybe people will start getting it through their thick skulls now.
Governing kings are the best.
>>78510281
Odd considering you live in a pretty damn good direct democracy
Get fucking rekt, homo.
No one ever said democracy works, quite the contrary. That's why every "democratic" country is a republic, operated by elected officials. If you want to blame someone, blame the dork you elected who put it up for a democratic vote and then cried about it.
>>78510281
you re a disgrace to your country, cuck.
>>78509580
Cry more fucking Leftfag
You were shitting up the sticky last night when you thought Remain was going to win
>>78509580
>1POST BY THIS ID
>Hide thread
>move on
>>78509580
we have to draw the line somewhere. would you rather it be the will of 0.00001%
>>78510445
not swiss though, and leaving soon.
and it's trash as well here. It makes more sense with votations, but it's still trash.
>>78509580
>Democracy only works when the left gets what it wants.
Fuck off libshit. What do you want? Authocracy? Dictatorships? That kills the left.
>WOW, YOU'RE ONLY REPRESENTING 50% OF THE PEOPLE
>WOULDN'T IT BE BETTER IF YOU REPRESENTED NONE OF THE PEOPLE?
PROPOSE SOMETHING WITH 100% REPRESENTATION YOU FUCKER.
Oh, you can't? Democracy is literally the best way to represent people?
GO FUCK YOURSELF, CONTRARIAN REMAINER.
>>78510985
why represent the people? why not represent the people's best interest?
>this notion is too complex for the average democratard
>>78509580
Blame the 1% for being lazy fucks
>>78509580
Don't you learn anything from school? You divide and throw away the remainder.
Unless you are an anarchist then this is true of all political systems you bottom feeding troglodyte
>>78511144
How do you know what their best interest is you cave dwelling cheese Jew? Monarchists are even more retarded than communists
>>78509580
1% apparently don't give a fuck either way, so they are irrelevant. Democracy worked fine here.
>>78511144
>you
>someone else
Pick the option that knows your best interest.
>>78509580
>talks all his life about oppressive fascist telling the people what to do
>talks all his life about how good democracy is as it gives the people a voice against the establishment and patriarchy
>finally has a public referendum, pure democracy
>complains that the majority of people got to decide what they want for their country
>angry that democracy did exactly what it's supposed to
>harps on and on about equality
>claims to be progressive
>wants to take votes away from the poor and old
Can't make this up
You should get on practiced knees and thank fuck that half of your country is willing to stand up for your sovereignty even when you're too cucked to do it yourself.
>>78511421
>trump or shillary
I mean I would but...
>>78510872
well actually referendum are retarded, and politicians should try to work out compromise that makes the most people happy.
I support brexit.
But yes, democracy is very authoritarian.
>>78509580
51.9% but okay
>>78509580
At least you can still nominate and count the vote. And you can cry out loud freely if your party lost. And you can talk shit about the winner.
In my country, only the elite members of the Communist Party can nominate and count the vote.
>>78511144
Who decides what's best?
I'm all for brexit, but i wont pretend i don see your point OP.
I'd prefer it if decisions of such constitutional importance have a threshold of around 60 percent
>>78511604
Wow, he can't even answer the question.
Typical antidemocratard.
>>78509580
Apparently 1 million+ isn't enough of a swing for this fucking massive faggot of an OP. Kill yourself promptly, without trial or vote, so we can post about something less important.
>>78509580
The most fucked up point is that in a manner of weeks it could flip the other way. Our future is practically decided on a coin toss.
A better solution would be something like: a referendum a month for a year. After the year, the average majority wins.
>>78511785
your trusted queen.
if she actually had any power left.
>>78511975
>no question
>wow he can't answer the question
you got me there.
>>78511820
Why? What would be the point?
You have to factor in how many people didn't care enough to vote, so can basically be said to be OK with either option. Add that to the majority and bingo, you have your threshold
>>78510539
you need to remove that baguette from your ass.
>>78512216
mandatory voting single referendum is better
C'mon guys, I mean really. Do you love democracy so much you would accept Hitler?
yfw you realize it's always like that because womens suffrage counts 50% of the population
>>78512299
Why should it be the queen? There are people far more native British than her, or more educated, or anything really, why her?
The leave side actually got 37% of the vote because of 71.8% turnout
Enjoy getting fucked over by the senile minority
>>78512216
>average voting
Do you even see the demographics of Britain? Do you not understand that your island is being undermined. Jesus fuck you loony nigger!
>>78512299
>monarchy decides what's best
This bullshit argument again?
*COUGH* Austrian elections *COUGH*
>>78509580
So how would you resolve the situation? Don't do anything and make the 49% happy or do something retarded and make 0% happy?
>>78512370
you need to remove that BBC from your wife s ass.
>>78509580
its better than the alternative, which is one or a few guys just deciding
>>78512405
>Hitler was elected democratically
The ignorance in this post, just wow. Next he tells us that the "Ermächtigungsgesetz" was also decided democratic - but I would bet he never heard of it in the first place.
>>78509580
queen wanted to leave so you would leave with democracy or without
>>78512405
That's funny. Hitler was democratically elected true but was also democratically warred on and removed from power.
>>78512596
>the people decide what's best
in case you didn't know, britbongs just voted out of the eu.top please
>>78512538
because it needs to be arbitrary, someone with legitimacy that can ensure stability, that is able to plan decades ahead instead of "one term" ahead.
No one is educated in everything. But she can have access to people who are. If you can't delegate, you're probably a wagecuck anyway.
>>78510281
based switzerland
Good thing 52% wanted to leave then!
>>78512299
Oh my bad, I should have formatted my request to be a less threatening question.
Doesn't really change the fact that you tried to dodge it.
Who knows your best interest, you or someone else?
>>78509580
>Being this mad
Its like you dont want to put the Great back in Great Britain
>>78510145
Nice post you have there anon :^)
>>78509580
>tfw moved investments out of EU 3 weeks ago
The only thing im making is 50% profit mate.
>>78513056
oh
sorry didn't understand
someone else whose job is to take care of the nation's interests.
I know people will disagree with me, but that's what I actually think.
>>78509580
> WHY DOES IN A DEMOCRACY THE MAJORITY WINS?
Fuck off retard.
>>78510281
but it literally has worked though really makes you think huh smart guy
>>78513024
It was much more of a win than 52% because a lot of remainers are immigrant rapefugees. If the vote were limited to people who had ancestors in Britain the vote wouldn't even be close.
if they didnt let the muslims vote it would have been at least 40 60
>>78513295
no it hasn't.
>>78512991
But why an "arbitrary" monarchy? Why be stuck with potential retarder successor to the throne? Why not a vote for an emperor or leader for say 20 or 20 years if "one term" isn't long enough (but I understand your point on shortsightedness). Why be stuck with potentially retarded successor in a monarchy system.
Switzerland there's a reason you guys are eternally neutral, if because when you take a stance it's always fucking retarded and you're better off not.
Let's just set up a Dictatorship, except when the guy in charge wants to do something, the people vote on it first and the side with the most votes is what the guy in charge will do.
If I win by 51%:
>Well that is Democracy, Democracy works, deal with it.
If others win by 51%:
>Democracy failed, we are doomed. I don't feel safe.
>>78509580
This is where you propose a better alternative.
>>78513295
I am antidemocratic
democracy is a scam, letting sjw idiots dictate who's going to rule me is bullshit
the UK's democracy managed to do the right choice and leave EU is pleasant to hear but it's not symptomatic of it working.
Moron.
>>78509580
What if it had been 52% remain?
You faggots lost deal with it
>>78512991
>because it needs to be arbitrary, someone with legitimacy that can ensure stability
Because stability is always better, huh? Have you heard of a slow and peaceful death?
Just because you're not experiencing SHTF doesn't mean things aren't getting shittier.
>that is able to plan decades ahead instead of "one term" ahead.
Because as we all know, planning ahead will always guarantee success. The 5 year plans were so successful, you know?
>No one is educated in everything. But she can have access to people who are.
Being educated does not mean being loyal to your people.
Rather, it just means your elite will be that much better at taking advantage of their populace for self-enrichment.
>If you can't delegate, you're probably a wagecuck anyway.
You want a monarchy advised by NEETs?
>>78513295
it really isn't
>>78513787
Well just ask some fellow Germans about how they think about "Volksabstimmung".
Almost all Germans that I have talked about this (excluding my own family) are against it.
They somehow think that our current political system protects us from the "idiot masses" that would throw this country into "chaos".
They are so authoritaian, it hurts. It hurt so much.
50% for with 49% against still means that 50% is the majority.
>>78513285
And what if the one person you are trusting to take care of your interests lies to you?
And how do you determine who actually knows your best interest and who is just faking or appointed to the position based off of nepotism or party loyalty?
The great thing about the people is that they are loyal to themselves always.
Maybe it could argued someone could know better than the people, but can they be trusted better than the people to actually deliver and not act in self interest.
>>78509580
>your tears
>my laughs
Free to leave, but you won't.
>>78509580
you're pathetic ahmed
>>78509580
pack your bags m8
>>78513813
>>78509580
This. Propose better or get the fuck out. Oh you allready did, LOL BREXIT!
>>78509580
Welp... get rid of ALL governments, then the resources you're able to gather through your intelligence and morals become the power. And without the welfare, the muslims will show themselves out.
Everybody wins. Or die of starvation. Which means mankind wins on the long run.
>>78514308
In Bavaria we abolished parts of our government, the Bavarian senate, by "Volksabstimmung" because they were useless.
This is unprecedented in history of Democracy and you will never hear about it because of that.
And I am also against nationwide polls.
As a Bavarian I would never subjugate myself to some Prussian "will of the people".
Boris for PM
>>78510046
Winner takes it all is an american thing. It also applies for direct votes like these, but it's not the norm.
>>78515588
>governments removed
>now the biggest powers are businesses
>businesses prompty setup tyranny with their influence
Ah, yes, brilliant idea, leaf. Businesses may have intelligence, but trust me, when they are liberating you from your resources, they will not be using morals.
Seriously, anarchists are fucking jokes.
>>78516208
>but it's not the norm.
Its is in democracy, but you dont even know what that is under your Fuhrer Merkel.
>>78515986
Are you fucking stupid? Boris Johnson is just another slimy politician.
>>78516876
but goddamn is he a cute
>>78516876
Boris has the best chance of becoming leader of the Conservative party and therefore taking over from David Cameron.
>>78516208
It is everywhere around the world the norm.
The German proportional system is the exception.
It has some advantages and also has a lot of problems.
For example we have no democratic way to decide on half of our representatives, and these representatives will vote on the Chancellor and President.
>>78516578
>businesses prompty setup tyranny with their influence
lolwut? If they do, they lose their image, and then their profits. Megacorporation who can afford destroying the environment are those who are funded by the state with money taken at gunpoint.
The only way to ensure an unbiased rule in an autocratic state is to let a super computer do the ruling.
>>78512917
>There are people who have no idea who Paul von Hindenburg was
I can't stand this man
>Bremain wins
>DEMOCRACY WORKS!!!!!
>BREXIT wins
>DEMOCRACY DOESN'T WORK!!!!!!
