ITT: Sum up the referendum in one picture
>>78505064
he should have died in that crash
>>78505064
Merkel's mad one of her cash cow told her to fuck off
>>78505064
>>78505064
Fuck your fourth Reich
>>78505064
>>78505064
Eat shit Merkel
>>78505159
Eat pork Ahmed
>>78505064
>tfw most Germans unironically believe this
Fuck off. There are plenty of European countries outside the EU and there's no reason Britain can't be one of them.
>>78505605
P O O
>>78505064
geez, if anything it's only more proof that he's protected by God
>>78506093
Muhammad
>>78506318
No anon Gott just let him alive to strafe England
>>78505064
That's more like the EU if we stayed.
>>78506655
That only reason for this response at would be is the absurdly high tariffs that exist for trading to the EU outside of it. Almost all the arguments against Brexit weren't arguments for leaving as such, but the existence of the EU, or at least it's heavily anti-free trade policies. The EU should never have been in a position in which it could bully member states into staying in by threatening them with massive tariffs. The EU gains nothing whatsoever in imposing tariffs on non-member states and this contributes nothing whatsoever to the original dream of a peaceful Europe. Protectionism never works. The immense dishonesty of the In campaign was never acknowledging that all the reasons for staying it were due to regressive policies imposed by the EU on the rest of the world. There might have been a compelling reason for the UK to say, there was an immensely greater reason for the EU either to become irrelevant or to disband.
There's no fucking defense whatsoever for the level of protectionism the EU imposes to maintain its unity.
>>78506792
whoa! calm down, nigga
>>78505064
>crashing the plane
>still survives
bigger than your average big guy
>>78505064
That's amazing he lived. Every time I see it I'm amazed.
>>78506718
i like this meme
>>78506913
This was a well written response that highlighted some key points. How about you git gud.
>>78506913
I won't. It's something that's concerned me ever since I accepted that there would be objective and unavoidable short-term, yet devastating consequences from Brexit which, while certainly detriments to the UK, make the current EU infrastructure indefensible. Absolutely nobody can fucking defend blackmailing states to stay in at the price of arbitrary and imposed isolationism, and possibly much worse, having this policy for every other country on earth. The free-trade argument against Brexit, while somewhat valid, was immensely more effective at showing how regress EU protectionism is.
>>78507603
Does this guy go around doing wacky shit?
>>78507306
That's why you shoot a man before throwing him out of a plane.
>>78505064
Any got the time to pack your bags picture? I'll trade for it.
>>78505064
>>78505064
>>78506093
>>78506361
>tfw germany is so cucked he can't even start a POO chain
>>78505064
Germans butthurted because they've lost another World War (the third one, dudes, I can feel your pain).
XD
Duetchroaches are mad this morning.
>>78506792
>>78507676
so there really are americans who will enforce TTIP by any means and destabilize eurasia on purpose and yet you all have the nerves to oppose a unifying force in europe? So you are telling me that doing the same like the americans in their revolutionary war is a catastrophic failure?
everything, the EU is trying to accomplish is not a unification, but multinational trade agreements through a unified law which is flexible enough to provide some buffer in case something goes wrong through national enforcement.
So what you are saying is basically:
leave enough room for black rock to take over the rest of germany
leave all american military in europe right where it is
still occupy 4 european states
sell them windows, so it's easier for our surveillance
Regarding the general mood at the viennese university of economy, technology and the faculty of law, the american politics are highly questionable
>>78507888
Kek
Trips of truth
I don't think I'll ever get tired of bane posting
>>78505789
>>78505064
>>78508665
>TTIP
That has almost nothing to do with my post. I don't have a strong opinion either way on TTIP. These arguments would have been valid long before that was an issue.
You didn't address my argument at all, which is that the greatest argument against Brexit were regressive, protectionist policies that have no reason to exist. There's no reason whatsoever that UK should be hit with Tariffs merely because it isn't in the EU, which has nothing to do with TTIP.
I honestly don't know what the fuck you're saying mostly in your post. It's seems like a random combination of conspiratorial ideas with bad English. My argument doesn't relate to America at all. Call me dishonest and delusional. I don't give a fuck.
>>78509103
at least the still have the Falkland Islands
>>78505064
Daily reminder that german flag = Muslim.
>>78505064
Wow, I didn't know he was in a plane crash.
He got fucked up!
>>78509787
jep i know :^)
that cuz the map is 100% realistic
>>78510141
So many german smug faces today. Ouch.
>dayum migrants be takin ma jobs and wymen
>>78509496
Grrer you angry
>>78509327
WHAT GEAM!?
>>78510438
I would actually be a little pissed if the UK actually stayed, because it was only based on policies the EU imposed that should not exist and proof that bullying and blackmail works not only on a diplomatic level, but a democratic one, and that I realized the source of the problem shortly after the final tally was counted.
But UK voted to leave. Get cucked, EU Federalists.
Madmen
>>78510489
google says: Elite Dangerous
>>78505159
hi Achmed, get gassed
>>78505064
The unrelenting butthurt from Germanistan is a beautiful thing to behold.
You are in the first stage of grieving my friend, you are still in denial.
>>78505064
>>78509496
that's why it didn't even adress your argument. All I was trying to say was, in simple terms, the following:
1: stay the fuck out of europe
2: never even think of a trade agreement
3: stop destabilizing it with nifty agreements
4: keep your foreign relations where they belong: in the trash
now for your half-hearted argument as I stated partly before
you are a protectionist state, telling others not to oppose a threat of destabilization, which, in the end, happened today. You are unable to see, that with tight political and financial binding, rules and policies apply, which, of course, were negotiated in detail long before. To comply only with the profitable parts and stay away from the more important process, namely to help and strengthen eachother, is not just an abusive action but even more a pathetic sign of inability as well as puny, wrongdirected and unnecessary patriotism. So yes, in compliance with applicable law, there should be sanctions. Not just for the breach of an agreement, but for all the distress and loss the UK just caused.
regarding the writing errors:
I hope you should be able to use your brain to an extent, where you can (or should) understand most of it. Writing everything on mobile and not being able to have a second look at it should count as a burger. Thank, you for your time
>>78505064
Watch them start another war
This is what they do, they're always starting shit with europe. They haven't changed at all, pirate scum. I hope they shove it in englands anus and break it off next time. They need to be put in their place with no one coming to rescue them
>>78507164
>>78512349
LOL
>>78511120
Kek
>>78512493
>BAZINGA!
xDDD
>>78505064
this picture will never stop to amuse me
as for the referendum, people are blowing this shit out of proportion
in the end it won't be as severe
>>78511849
>1: stay the fuck out of europe
This hasn't been an issue since the Cold War, with the exception of Russian antagonism, which barely concerns the EU, and would be the same if there were only independent nation states.
>never even think of a trade agreement
I don't know what this is supposed to mean. Are you referring to TTIP? Naturally, the U.S. would make trade deals with any country that becomes independent in Europe, as every country will.
>stop destabilizing it with nifty agreements
Outside of foreign policy relating to defense purposes, (coalitions against ISIS, Syria, etc), the U.S. has about zero influence on European affairs diplomatically. The Obama administration did fuck all to influence Brexit.
>keep your foreign relations where they belong: in the trash
I generally disprove of the United States' major foreign policy decisions, so that's probably for the best, though with the threat of ISIS, any influence the US will have will probably be warmly welcomed.
>telling others not to oppose a threat of destabilization,
What is meant by this? The administration of our executive branch was against Brexit, but 80% of Americans were for it, but I still think we had no influence on the election.
> You are unable to see, that with tight political and financial binding, rules and policies apply, which, of course, were negotiated in detail long before.
Are you talking about TTIP? That's only tangentially related to Brexit.
> namely to help and strengthen eachother
I have no idea what the US's policy would be towards this end, though militarily, the US would prefer a strong Europe to oppose Russia and the Islamist threat, but I don't think the US will have any significant impact on the stabilization of the EU. If Trump wins, he'll speak out for more exists. If Hillary wins, she'll speak for more unity. This will be the extent of our interference: i.e., minimal.
>>78513419
He just said get the fuck out of Europe
Where is the hard part?
>>78511849
> So yes, in compliance with applicable law, there should be sanctions.
So here we get to the heart of the matter; I completely agree. While economists today were nearly unanimous in opposing Brexit, would be as equally unanimous in opposing the imposition of punitive tariffs on Britain for leaving because protectionism against Britain doesn't help the EU as such. More importantly, it's a form of isolationism that bullies states into perpetually staying in the EU or risk being punitively isolated, and it damages the free trade that Europe should generally have with the rest of the world. With this mentality, the EU is like some cult that isolates apostates and demands that its dwindling members must be isolationists, if even partially, with the rest of the world.
>Not just for the breach of an agreement, but for all the distress and loss the UK just caused.
Seriously? I doubt even most Germans or Swedes are this intolerantly cucked. This is literally what cult members do to apostates and those who leave the group: they demand that members isolate themselves from the leaving member, as a punishment to anyone who might want independence.
The EU might actually do something like this, but they'll sugarcoat it because almost nobody is this fucking delusional about maintaining their glorious diplomatic experiment, except the politicians, who would just make ship up because the ends justify the means.
>I hope you should be able to use your brain to an extent
I was mostly confused because you started talking about the US and TTIP, which has almost nothing to do with Brexit.
>>78512363
>>78513983
The US "getting out of Europe" is a complex issue, but has almost no relation to the events of today. It's like if we're discussing Tibet being freed from China and somebody discusses Japanese influence in the region. Completely separate issues. I wasn't even defending US policy. I just explained how it relates little to member states of the EU gaining independence.
It seems like you didn't read my response and added nothing, you stupid Pollack.
Requesting the Britain vs the universe wiki battle infobox, will trade rare farages.
>>78514513
>>78511849
>I completely agree
This should have been "I completely disagree."
I'm quite enjoying this ride of butthurt
First I was like well remain will win theres so much schekels in that
And when I saw the result today it warmed inner feels
>1919
>1945
>2016
>>78513419
>>78514513
listen, buddy. I gotta say I a admire you for staying so civilized but you sure are stubborn (as it's the case with everybody here I guess, including me).
you want to exchange telegram contact data or something else to carry on the dicussion? I don't have much time as to continue for now
1
> no you still have many military bases, including ballistic missile facilities. yes, I mean those installations by "please remove them"
2
>trade agreements
I am still (as mentioned multiple times) referring to TTIP
3
>diplomatical influence
m8, please. I'll provide you with necessary literature here:
http://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/banken-versicherungen/blackrock-die-heimlichen-herren-des-dax/4150978.html
hope you know how to use google translate
ahh just screw it, I can't chew you everything beforehand, I don't have the time
but 3 last things:
you didn't mention the NSA again ;^)
you implied ISIS and the other destruction the US caused in the middle and near east should now require america to stabilize it again? what?
google and microsoft are already thinking of closing down business? you still say 80% were for it? rednecks, I suppose.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/17/microsoft-comes-out-in-support-of-uk-remaining-in-eu
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-17/microsoft-says-u-k-should-avoid-brexit-and-stay-part-of-europe
AND ONE LAST THING:
> have no idea what the US's policy would be towards this end, though militarily, the US would prefer a strong Europe to oppose Russia
THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I MEANT!
Come on, we are not interested in that. Everybody knows you are to be held accountable for those waves of migration and now you want a strong europe? By "helping it"? Feels like you are stealing german rocket engine technology all over again!
but my time's up.
telegram offer still applies
Contributing
>>78511541
That is literally Twitter/Tumblr and 4chan right now.
>>78516920
I am not defending the US's policy in Europe or anywhere else and I don't think it has anything to do with Brexit. Anything I said that might have been construed as a defense was only my explanation of why US policy has little to no relation to the potential exit of EU member states. Why won't you get that?
>Everybody knows you are to be held accountable for those waves of migration and now you want a strong europe?
Even if I allowed that the migrant crisis the fault of the US, we aren't going to change our policy because of the tangential effect of the EU member states leaving. The Iraq War was a horrible mistake, but were we supposed to avoid it merely because toppling Saddam should have been foreseen to create a destabilization in the region, which would lead to the creation of radical groups gaining power, which would lead almost a decade later to the region in Syria becoming destabilized, leading to a radical group controlling territories and destroying regions by war, resulting in a migrant crisis; I say, if we're supposed to determine policy by these considerations, I would kindly say fuck you.
![article-2276944-03644BD60000044D-755_634x444[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/9U7KA0j.jpg "article-2276944-03644BD60000044D-755_634x444[1].jpg")
>>78505064
hope you like this one, otto
>>78506318
he's protected by satana
>>78516920
>Come on, we are not interested in that.
It the EU develops a military capability to oppose Russia merely because of the country being the US's geopolitical foe, you are more gullible than I thought. There's no chance of this happening, and even if there were, it would mean more diplomatic unity among Europeans, not less. But again, Europe isn't going to form an army because of Russia, nor should it. You would have like decades before Russia reached Poland at this rate.
I mean, I was really reaching with the example of Russia. Aside from arming Poland with missile capabilities, the US will have almost no diplomatic influence in Europe. This, again, has absolutely, positively, nothing to with with Brexit.
>>78505605
i think you mean neo Soviet Union
I don't have any pictures of analocalypsed kraut numales sorry.
The face of modern Britain.
>>78515265
i got you senpai
>>78512423
So that's COD4 Remastered? Not bad.
>>78512493
REEEE
