Based Supreme Court tells Obama to shut his mouth and tells illegals to get the fuck out.
>post your face when you heard the ruling
Who wouldve guess a bunch of diverse kikes and cucklics would do this.....
>>78335691
B
A
S
E
D
>>78337333
>diverse
its literally as diverse as an 80s action flick judging from that pic
>>78335691
>>78335691
how many in the supreme court is jewish?
>>78337949
Oy vey
The jew is a quintessential part of America
>>78338304
Oy vey SHUT IT DOWN
>>78335691
Spot the (((judge))) who was against the ruling
>>78337949
I'm going to have to cite Predator.
hillary is a criminal
OBONGO BTFO ETERNALLY
>>78335691
I never knew Ruth was such a hobbit
>>78338855
Bunch of slack jawed faggots round here also
>tripdubs
Our Supreme Court is shit. Half of them don't follow the Constitution. They vote on feels and legacy.
>>78335691
>>78338304
>The jew is a quintessential part of America
The Jew and Mexican is part of the melting pot that refuses to melt and expects the rest of us to do so.
>>78338236
Kagan, Breyer, and Ginsburg are Jewish. The rest are Catholics.
>mfw libtards are too busy spamming #beckywiththebadgrades to realize what's happened
>>78335691
Explain. Did i miss something?
Affirmative action won and Obama isn't going to deport them anyway, so it was a hollow victory.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/23/obama-most-illegals-still-wont-be-deported/
>>78341114
>>78338625
>>78338236
>>78338304
>>78337949
Half of the Supreme Court is kikes, if you count Garland.
>>78342733
Supreme court ruled against Obama's immigration executive order.
>>78342930
wonderful
>>78335691
It was a 4 on 4 tie wasn't it? I'm going to guess it was these four that voted for it.
>>78342930
no they didn't. they were split 4-4 therefore the lower court ruling stands.
>>78342930
Is it BTFO for good, or will they vote again since it was a tie?
MFW.....I am Jewish and am a rampant anti illegal immigration poster
>>78343311
Clarence Thomas is probably the most conservative justice on the SCOTUS, dummy. He's the black one, since you obviously didn't know. No way in hell he supports affirmative action.
>>78343311
> I'm going to guess it was these four that voted for it.
wrong.
>>78343311
Replace the darkie with the cucked looking effeminate white male in the back, and you'd be right.
>>78343786
>>78343875
Well shit, who's who?
>>78335691
Walls, deportations and good fortune will follow you because of Clarence Thomas, but only if you reply "Is this nigga Obama serious?" to this post.
>>78343311
How dare you slander the name of Clarence Thomas you imbecile.
>>78344161
Is this nigga Obama serious?
>>78343311
>>78344121
>>78344044
I have a question.....
If they only deport the "violent" illegals, how do they know which ones are violent. Do we have records from every slum in Mexico, etc or do they just wait till an illegal hurts/kills and American and then decide they are violent?
And if we deport them, and there is no wall, what fucking difference does it make to deport them?
I swear you right wing cucks are so easy to trick. Read Ruth Bader Ginsburg descent for the hobby lobby case and see will show you the light.
>>78344161
>thomas
>not the biggest fucking moron on the court
>>78341420
>melting pot
It's a damn salad bowl now. We should've listened to Teddy.
>>78343437
Which is a good thing regardless because fuck illegals
>>78335691
There's a ghost in that picture.
>>78343450
This case is settled, but because it was not a majority it does not set a meaningful precedent.
>>78345359
>The ghost of constitutionalists past
>>78345849
On the other hand, it's enough to cow someone like Obama into not trying the same thing twice.
Does anyone else find it silly that judges still wear dresses?
Also thank goodness. I'm tired of Obama awarding criminal behavior. What the fuck is wrong with that nigger.
>>78344161
kind of RARE
>>78344599
>>78346599
F
;_;7
>>78335691
If it was a tie, how does that change anything?
Not baiting, genuinely curious as to how it affects the legal process.
What the fuck are you talking about. How about source or it didn't happen.
>>78344161
>>78346599
good riddance
>>78346926
previous ruling stands, no precedent set, can be reviewed again at any time
>>78346926
The previous court has ruled it was not constitutional and since SCOTUS ended in a tie the lower court's opinion is upheld but sets no federal precedent.
>>78335691
Is physiognomy real?
You can almost tell which judges are liberals by their appearance.
>>78343786
Not just on the SCOTUS. Probably in Supreme Court history, but arguably the most conservative still breathing in America.
>>78347177
>>78347275
Thanks. I thought so but was unsure.
>>78342840
Garland isn't a Justice
>>78346599
I'm going to miss reading his comments. They were always the best.
F
>>78342840
BASED NIX
Anyone have any stats on how many people are killed by illegal immigrants without guns as opposed to innocent people killed by non-gang related gun violence?
I'm curious if illegals kill more people without guns than people getting killed from guns.
>>78341114
>Judge Napolitano will never be a Supreme Court Justice.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YZmYxc4Hm38
>>78346599
>dead face
It still hurts, all these months later.
;__;
