So where do you guys actually get your news and analysis from?
4chan.org
>>78180279
fpbp
/pol/ is all you need desu
>>78180279
/thread
>>78180231
Daily Stormer
>>78180540
>>78180435
>>78180279
What about thinktanks? Do any of you actually read shit like the Heritage Foundation? Demos? Cato Institute? Human Rights Watch? AEI? NBER?
It just scares me how 'informed' /pol/ llikes to act when most of its users only read one or two notably biased sources.
>>78180540
>>78180279
this is the only right answer
>>78180231
stratfor is god tier, doesn't mean it's all true but the analysis is probably the best you can get for not much money.
>>78180231
this
>>78180279
I knew about the ukraine uprising, based assad and his crew and the orlando guy before it was even reported in the UK
You poofs are my best source. Now gimme the scoop on mcdonalds linked to moobs
>>78180540
ALL YOU NEED IS /POL/
DANDADANDANDAAAAN
ALL YOU NEED IS /POL/
DANDADANDANDAAAAN
ALL YOU NEED IS /POL/, /POL/, /POL/ IS ALL YOU NEED
>>78181320
please, /pol/ is a bunch of teens in their early tweens who think they know everything. in reality they're just a bunch of losers.
>>78180231
Mainstream
-----------------
Reuters
Independent
------------------
Anything that has credible sources.
>>78181455
I unsubscribed last year. I enjoyed Friedman's book - 'The Next 100 Years' or whatever it was called - and should probably give it a reread.
>>78181320
The heritage foundation doesnt hide facts, though. They pretty much proved that the war on poverty has not worked in 50 years.
>>78181573
/POL/ IS ALL YOU NEED!
>>78181573
alright. Now vocaroo it.
>>78181758
definitely read it again. not a big friedmann fan but he's an intelligent fella and gets things right most of the time.
I prefer reading about facts.
>>78181320
You're barking up the wrong tree, here. I tried making a daily think tank thread a few years back and was met by memers ruining the thread.
I'm subscribed to:
RAND Corporation
Stratfor
Gatestone Institute
CFR
Warsaw Centre for Eastern Studies
A few more, but I haven't looked at them in ages.
For daily news I use Reuters. Sometimes AP. Rarely AJ and BBC.
There are tons of regional news sites that have english versions as well. I'll check yonhap and korea times every so often for Asia news (asian news is terribly biased no matter what country you're in.)
>>78181938
>>78181928
>>78181573
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1ahtuvpUlc2
Local news and resident experts
>>78180231
reuters and voa
>>78181758
Stratfor is fucking amazing. I'd consider it a political think tank for the layman. Easy to read and they cover subjects that are otherwise buried in news websites but are equally as important as any headline news. Really great book recommendations, too.
The annual subscription is a bit steep, but totally worth it.
>>78180231
BBC wo4ld service/NPR
4chan
One America News Network.
Or here, I suppose.
>>78183876
I had this channel when I had U-verse but had to switch because U-verse went suck but don't get this channel anymore, liked that it didn't have commercials and that most of it's bias stuck to the opinion shows. They also did some international news which was nice. But to make up for it I get BBC World News and NHK World (on a local station's subchannel ) now as well as NY1 news (even though I'm not in New York) and local news on Time Warner Cable News. Hopefully one day this channel comes to us.
>>78182940
Our uniforms would be a lot snazzier.
>>78180231
you have to look at all the sides
i like jacobin mag
>>78180231
Breitbart, The Indepedent, The College Fix
I used to like Rebel Media.... but then they started a pay-for-access scheme. Fuck that shit.
>>78180231
>the guardian
please fucking neck yourself
>>78180231
4chan.org/pol normally spams it whenever there is something newsworthy that matters to me
>>78180231
American Renaissance.
