Why don't you support free-trade?
>>78148818
"free trade"
If something even has free in it you better steer away.
because it fails to mention that china is included
Because it has about as much to do with trade as the patriot act had to do with patriotism.
We have high standard in EU compared to USA. In EU, the policy is that the safety of the public comes first, but that is not the case in USA. Uncle Sam loves to suck cock of big corps, cuz muh wealth and invisible hand.
>>78148818
Because fuck you Korean fuck
stab your fuck eyes out
>>78149255
But your workers should have to complete against Chinese workers who are paid in moldy acorns and die in the iPod polishing machines because their country has no safety regulations.
If you can't complete you need to try harder, remember efficiency in the market is the most important thing goy :^}
>>78148818
Because all of us would go to jail
>>78148818
Because according to the internet, somehow, and I don't really know how, TPP will fuck up comike. So I'm against it. Simple as that.
>>78149456
this. and our national standard is even higher than in the EU. I don't want tainted food filled with garbage and gmo's without it beeing properly labled.
additionally - the super-national courts that can impose fines on countries for limiting trade are absolutely not democraticly elected.
>>78148818
Each region have different regulations.For example most EU countries won't accept GMO food,while in the US it's not a problem.Untill they won't find a solution to theese kind of problems,It's useless to talk about supporting,or not.
>>78148818
Nothing is free
>TPP
>free trade
kek.
>>78149456
/thread
But i do...? Globalisn is the future.
>>78148818
>TPP
>free trade
Choose one.
>>78148818
STFU japoon.
>>78148818
because it is a way for Cooperate America to replace the WTO, without losing their power, because China and Russia gaining more and more saying in Global affairs, and the special group of people is affraid, that the chinks will take their fair share of control
>>78148818
It destroys industry inside the country. VAT's are the way to go for non shit countries.
The TPP is a trade regulation document. Do you think genuine free trade would require such an enormous document full of shady shit?
Because it's not trade in the traditional sense and "free" is questionable considering the highly protectionist nature of the agreements.
>>78148818
Because my unskilled countryman can't compete against countries that pay almost nothing and have a country that has almost no business taxes. I don't give a fuck about people in other countries standard of living, that is something they need to worry about. America has to worry about having it's national economy being strong from having the highest standard of living.
>>78148818
Why don't you discuss the underlying terms of the trade deal you want to push, in a transparent fashion, instead of trying to meme a crooked deal into being by appending the word "free" to whatever slave labor type of bargain merchants pay you to shill?
>>78152321
Not a lot of people were alive to remember NAFTA but it was same thing, but they rammed it through without discussion. Anything like this the terms and the details should be made public and the public should vote on it via a referendum.
>>78152074
This. TTIP is a much better example. Currently under 2% of products traded between the US and EU are subject to tariff. And yet we have thousands of pages of documents. TPP/TTIP aren't about tarriffs ut regulation, specifically aligning regulation. Now consider 90% of the lobbyists are corporate. Does anyone think they'll be aiming for a high safety standard or looking to bring the most lax regulations in across the board?
