>communism and capitalism fail
>National Socialism completely eclipses any system that has ever existed
>y-yeah, democracy + capitalism is da besttt!!!
How utterly moronic can you people get?
The evidence, the logic, the reason and the solution is staring you right in the face.
There is literally no good argument against national socialist policies. They're completely flawless.
National Socialism without the war mongering is perfect. Close off all borders, live in Autarcy, say fuck to all other globalist countries.
>>78127540
>National Socialism completely eclipses any system that has ever existed
Try again, leaf. You can thank capitalism and globalization for your high-speed internet devices and mongolian shadow-puppetry board before killing yourself.
>>78127540
Agreed.
4th Reich when?
How long did NS regime last?
>w-war
Which they started because their policies of rearmament were unsustainable.
>a fucking leaf
>>78127813
>implying the Internet is a good thing
Made us sedentary, weak and servile. Made us waste time arguing instead of fighting.
>>78127681
>war mongering
Tu es stupide.
>>78127813
That can happen without globalization and capitalism. Thank you for proving how moronic you are. Falling for stupid memes like "without capitalism, you wouldn't have this or this!".
Stupid slave puppet.
>>78127824
>implying that war was part of the system or somehow implies that the system is ineffective
>literally "mountain negroid"
>>78127540
How has capitalism failed? I've been living in this system since I was born and I prefer it over anything else.
>>78127972
>That can happen without globalization and capitalism
Yes, but not at nearly as rapid a rate. So point still goes to capitalism/globalization
>>78128171
It creates major class inequality and exploitation.
>>78128466
False. It has nothing to do with the speed.
>>78129159
>It creates major class inequality and exploitation.
You can reach that equality and exploit others if you work hard enough and have the brain capacity. Capitalism is what has been pushing us forward because it forces people to actually contrivute to the development of the country.
>>78129159
>False. It has nothing to do with the speed.
So a world of completely insular, socialist societies where your grandchildren's generation still hasn't invented combustion engines is better than the world we live in today because muh traditional values were preserved?
>>78129244
You can't. The market is limited, not unlimited.
>>78129456
Nice strawman.
Apparently you can't be technologically innovative under the 3rd Reich's policies.
Did you forget that under national socialist Germany, technology bloomed and completely eclipsed that of any other nation on earth?
>>78129469
The market is limited only to a small extent by the government, but it is practically unlimited.
>>78129625
It isn't unlimited.
You're implying that an unlimited amount of people can buy every single product on the market at a constant rate.
>>78129625
>>78129866
Well, there are only around 7,4 billion people on earth. Most of those 7.4 billion (by most I mean those living in captalist countries) can buy anything they want as long as they can afford it.
>>78130052
Yeah, because these 7.4 billion all live under one government with access to everything in a nation, right?
What the hell are you people on?
Capitalist-cucks are just as insane as communist-cucks.
>>78127540
>capitalism failed
capitalism is the best wealth distribution system that humanity has ever implemented.
>There is literally no good argument against national socialist policies.
except that they lost. then got curb stomped. then the commies fucked half of europe.
all you bootlickers deserve to get your ribs broken by gestapo for not yelling heil hitler loud enough at a rally.
also, what's with the rampant statism? your parents didn't pay enough attention to you?
you feel it's better the state decides how to life your life?
>>78130198
>Yeah, because these 7.4 billion all live under one government with access to everything in a nation, right?
When did I say that? I said the opposite.
>What the hell are you people on?
>Capitalist-cucks are just as insane as communist-cucks.
N O T A N A R G U M E N T like your entire post
>>78127972
>Stupid slave puppet.
the irony is precious.
>>78130321
The whole fucking world barely beat Germany, and it took a damn good while to do it. No nation can stand against the world in battle, you idiot. That Germany went on for so long, and as well as they did is unmatched in military history.
>>78129159
>It creates major class inequality and exploitation.
sitting in the same basket as the commies.
it's a wealth redistribution system, it has no agency.
the fact you view it as exploitative and as a creator of class inequality just demonstrates you have no deeper understanding, and label it bad because it goes against your feelings.
>>78130583
what you seem to be missing, my friend is that the history is written by the winners.
in case of natsoc, it is obvious as a bright day that the number of supporters is small.
the common folk shut down at a mere mention of natsoc.
getting people to actually support and legitimize natsoc is nothing short of a miracle.
it matters little how well they did, and how great they were, when they are just a page in a history book.
>>78127540
Are you the same ass that spends every day here trying to make yourself feel better for being such a loser?
Protip, hatman: you don't amount to shit because you spend too much time proclaiming what a loser you are.
Get out of the house. Find a job.
>>78127540
>There is literally no good argument against national socialist policies.
You are literally the stupidest "human" online.
>>78129596
Not a strawman, since I've in no way misrepresented your argument, sorry.
At any rate, Nazi Germany is in no way representative.
>"completely eclipsed" is a gross exaggeration
>only references a short period of time, in which deviation from the mean can be more exaggerated
By your metrics, I could say Communism is the single greatest economic system in the world because of how rapidly the Soviet Union's economy developed in its first few years.
>>78130583
Wrong, one half of Europe struggled to beat the other half of Europe, then about the same time the Axis started losing, Japan went and pissed us off enough to stop ignoring the rest of the world's retardation.
