Modern art BTFO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNI07egoefc
>>78115100
Hitler knew who was behind degenerate art.
>>78115100
Isn't modern art just a convoluted form of money laundering?
>>78115100
Really makes ya stink...
>>78115100
Car design of the future looks awful too.
>>78115100
I mean, I agree, but by what metric is artistic standards being measured?
This is nearly as embarrassing as your average climatology infographic.
>>78115879
You could judge art by the mediums used (oil painting requires more skill than photography), the techniques used (impressionistic vs applying a photoshop filter), the correct understanding of anatomy and perspective (often severely lacking in modern art), and many other areas
>>78115879
This
It's like that one anti christian chart
>>78115721
Lots of (((families))) like to hide their money in $5,000 plain white paintings.
>>78116938
It wasnt ment to be scientific. It was just to help explain his points. "Art used to be good, then declined and hasn't recovered over time"
>>78116190
Those are some nice standards
>>78117066
Then why fucking use a chart?
>>78117294
Why have a video? Illustrating arguments helps others understand your argument.
>>78117415
First off, what you said could've been said in the video
Second, if they wanted to illustrate it, then they could've used something else
>>78115100
Wow nice chart faggot.
What the fuck is the unit used to measure the Y axis,dead artists per painting?
>>78117415
Not not demonstrate it artistically instead of pseudoscientifically?
>>78117524
>First off, what you said could've been said in the video
It was along with the graph.
>Second, if they wanted to illustrate it, then they could've used something else
What is an easier way other than a graph to illiterate a change over time?
I used that screencap as the OP because it summarized the point of the video. I didn't expect anyone who could speak English to have difficulties comprehending why it was in the video. Maybe you should watch the fucking video before you say what it should've or should not've been.
>>78115100
>that graph
>no art after 1970 is good
Sage.
>>78117716
You're really fucking stupid, ain't ya?
>>78117717
Oh you're saying I'm not comprehending english because I think a shitty chart is not going to convince people, and would be better if the person said the point (which he did)?
>>78117952
Jesus christ, I'm out. It's a fucking picture. holy shit. /pol/ average age is 12 tonight.
>>78118008
You can fuck right off mate,and take your shitty chart with you
>>78118008
Excuse my autism, but you're the fucking twelve year old for thinking that an amateur graph is worthy of anything
Do you like this one too?
>>78115100
oh no my portrait of a dyke fisting a binary gender gentile is not considered art by these snobby pricks oh whatever will I do
>>78117760
that's not what the graph says. the graph says that after that year it became acceptable to deem art good even if it did not meet any defined standards. this doesn't exclude art which does meet standards from being deemed good.
>>78118277
That one is actually more informative,as the Y axis is clearly fedoras per capita
>>78118464
Kek
>>78116190
>correct understanding of anatomy
Nope nope nope fuck thay shit. Realisn is boring and ugly. Manga and anime don't give a fuck about correct anatomy and they are far more beautiful and interesting than ugly boring realistic crap. Your standards are shit.
There are plenty of great artists out there right now, but this participation award everybody gets a trophy society does not have the balls to call bullshit on all these art school pelotudos painting drumpf in period blood and calling it a masterpiece
>>78118870
*that
*realism
I know you autistic psychos will attack typos and ignore the message so here.
>>78117827
You must have made that thing yourself and consider it to be art. There's genuine irony there.
>>78115100
Great video
>>78115588
fpbp
