>You now realize that the decline of America is due to Soviet funded Jews "marching through the institutions."
>You now realize that when America slayed the Soviet bear, our great foe inflicted a fatal wound.
>You now realize we are dying from that wound.
>You now realize this man was one of the greatest Americans ever to live and should have statues of him in every American city.
>You now realize that the Soviet Jewish agents will never allow that to happen.
>>78109412
I agree.
>>78109412
I already realized all those things.
This was especially true in the 70s, there was a deal to let russian jews leave russian and go to israel but most came to america instead
t. Half Jew Half Euro Masterrace
>>78109412
> Soviet funded
pretty sure it was the other way around
Jews paid for the bolshevik revolution
thank Wilson and his "hurr durr let's give control of our money printing to jewish banks" great idea for that
>>78109412
>mfw I war right all along
>>78109412
McCarthy was like an IRL W.T.Snacks: he swung the banhammer freely and occasionally hit an innocent but it was worth it since he kept America cancer free
yes but they also formed a faction to make money in order to fund black opps ,thus began the importation of cocaine ,heroin ,amphetamines into clean american schools destroying the family unit. these trillions of dollars have funded technology u wish u knew exsisted.
>>78110101
> cancer free
> after 1913
too little, too late
>>78109924
The Soviets didn't sit on their hands in the cold war. They spent many rubles and countless hours infiltrating American peace organizations and other subversive groups. These subversive groups eventually wrested away our academic institutions, through sheer Jewry at the collegiate level, and through teacher union thuggery at the local level. Just as KGB agents taught them, as was their doctrine.
Our civilization is falling precisely because our children, for at least two generations now, have been taught day in and day out to glorify extreme left-wing politics, which have piecemeal chewed away at who we are - especially due to leftist immigration policies championed by the Jews in the media.
>>78110271
semi-cancer free*
>>78109924
pretty sure America sent Nicholas some troops at one point during their first attempted coups
>>78110101
most people here will never know who that was.
What is the decline now other than obesity rates?
>>78109412
You're missing some key details, the most important of which is the British royalty, the enemies of all mankind. The Jews as we call them, are little more than agents of the Crown, much as Israel is a British (U.S., no difference honestly) satellite state, it was created as such and remains by all accounts. Upon Israel's creation, the final stages of setting for the kingdom on Earth had been set, all that was left was to lead the goyim to the apocalypse. The "death" of the West is for the purpose of summoning the Beast and in the end, crowning the false king of mankind, that is, the (psuedo-Jewish) usurpers that refer to themselves as "royalty". The Soviets were puppets, not a force, a puppet of the Jews, who are puppets (slaves) of the institutions created by the Crown. Also Britfags, don't waste your time, your royalty haven't been ethnically British for years, nor are the current generation.
>>78110274
> They spent many rubles and countless hours infiltrating American peace organizations and other subversive groups
A healthy organism has a strong immune defense to prevent that
USA as the founding fathers had designed it was injected with Herpes in 1965 and then HIV in 1913
Very little would have happened differently even if the soviets were not involved
>>78110741
WT Snacks or McCarthy?
4channers will know the former, muricans will know the latter
>>78110688
Nope. The Polar Bear Brigade was just to minimize civilian death, after the Tsar was out, and was controlled by the same traitor government that kept the Bolshies alive with critical aid and money.
>>78110836
so the eternal anglo was NOT a meme
kek
>>78110861
* 1865
>>78110861
No, the HIV was very much in 1965. It is immigration that has done us in. A white America could withstand anything, any threat, financial or otherwise. Which is precisely why we had to be taken down by immigration, so that we could become non-white, and thus incapable of even existing in any meaningful form, much less able to fight back.
>>78111058
I screwed up, meant to write 1865
nice scapegoating, usa has been under globalist control for nearly a century
>>78111058
1865 is where the HIV (the 14th ammendment) was injected
That ammendment is the legal support for everything from anchor babies, to section 8 housing, to gay marriage
>>78111058
This. Jews are okay with the consistently anti-Semitic nonwhites because they are confident of their ability to control those idiots. Whites terrify Jews into preferring Muslims.
>>78111095
Niggers were here from day 1. They have always been our problem and we knew best how to handle that problem. It was contained. It was not until the post-war era that our perfectly fine containment policy began to be undone by communist agitators., with de-segregation, civil rights, and the implementation of our welfare system.
It has been immigration from Latin America, predominately Mexico, that has exacerbated all these things by further empowering the inheritors of these very communist institutions.
>>78109412
I agree 100%.
Luckily for the USA there an awakening going on. The more the SJW's push the more disgusted normal, everyday, "BBQ and throw the football around" type of people start waking up. just look at /pol/... normal (well kinda normal) people sitting around speaking out against degenerates.
just like in Weimar Germany, the more the Jews/communists overplay their hand the more society wakes up. Let them preach that theres an unlimited amount of genders, that whites are evil, or that we should be ashamed of ourselves for being the best/most successful people on earth. The more they preach the more average football watching, soccer mom van driving, simpson watching people will wake up and decide to fight against the degenerate jews.
>>78111310
> Whites terrify Jews into preferring Muslims.
Let's hope ISIS can change that
> mfw /pol/ does not realize ISIS is their greatest ally
McCarthy was incredibly popular. It's ridiculous to portray him as some bad man. The guy didn't even know what the jews are, so he let one into his office and guess what? was betrayed.
>>78110919
You have no idea how many newfags there are who were never here for even moot, let alone Snacks.
>>78111389
> our perfectly fine containment policy
that containtment was not going to survive a 14th-ammendment challenge in the supreme court (and it in fact didn't)
>>78111303
But that's the thing. The 14th Amendment did not create anchor babies. That was a total invention of post-war legal leftists, mostly of Jewish descent. In fact, the myth comes from some footnote in a Supreme Court decision written by a Jewish justice in the 1980s. Nobody thought the 14th Amendment was talking about illegal Mexicans until then. Nobody.
>>78111590
Again, this is a post-war decision. We went into the cold war with a balanced, and well maintained segregation system in the states that felt they needed it, and we came out of the cold war with none. That's a fact.
>>78111708
> All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside
Is this a John Birch Society meeting?
>>78111913
The part you need to focus on is "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" The chief author of the 14th Amendment said in the Senate that this meant no illegals.
The Jews in academia, and the lawyers they produced, simply erased this "footnote" of history.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX3EZCVj2XA
This explains how Russians became the based ones while amerifat & co turned to shit. How ironic, to win the war but lose everything else.
>>78112004
Yeah.
>>78112068
> The chief author of the 14th Amendment said in the Senate that this meant no illegals.
do you have a source for that? I find it weird that a senate filled with radical republicans of the 1860s would be concerned with something like illegal immigration
>>78112068
That's total crap. You obviously haven't read the whole 14th Amendment debate just some cherry picked quotes taken out of context.
There wasn't even such a thing as "illegals" then. Also if some one is "illegal" aren't they by definition subject to the jurisdiction of the law? If they aren't subject to the legal jurisdiction of the United States, they wouldn't be illegal to begin with under the law. They would be extralegal or something to that effect.
>>78112343
They weren't concerned with illegal immigration from Latin America, they were concerned with Indians claiming their children to be citizens on settled land.
http://www.cairco.org/issues/anchor-babies
>Senator Jacob Howard worked closely with Abraham Lincoln in drafting and passing the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which abolished slavery. He also served on the Senate Joint Committee on Reconstruction, which drafted the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In 1866, Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment by writing:
>Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."
McCarthy redpill is among the best senpai
>"innocent people" had their lives ruined by unlawful interrogation
>identifies communists in america
>the enemy
>wortheveryjimmyrustled.McCarth
>>78112343
The industrial revolution was happening. Immigrants were pouring into this country for work. People were getting nigga rich. Of course they were thinking of illegals.
>>78112343
He doesn't. It's revisionist propaganda.
>>78112595
>who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States
You realize that he is saying only foreigners with diplomatic immunity. The word "who" modifies foreigners and aliens it's not in addition to them
>>78112592
I'm not cherry picking anything. I am quoting the guy who wrote the fucking amendment straight out.
And there was a method of legal immigration back then. So there was a concept of illegal aliens, even if they didn't use those terms back then. And it wouldn't matter anyway. The children of unnaturalized foreign nationals are not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. if they're subject to the jurisdiction of Mexico. They're not supposed to be here, have zero rights here, and are not given any mechanism whatsoever to force the federal government's hand to recognize them or their offspring. The fourteenth amendment was to grant citizenship to their slaves and offspring, not a bunch of filthy heathen Spanish Indians as they would've been seen as then.
Noticed last week watching "Goodnight and Good Luck".... the man had some funky eyebrows.
>>78112832
No it doesn't. It was a spoken speech before the Senate, he was just continuing to list the excluded types before other members of Congress who were demanding an explanation of what this passage meant.
>>78112843
No you are taking his words out of context and and misinterpreting them to boot.
There were no illegal aliens because there were no border controls or passports or anything like that until decades later. There were no laws barring people from immigrating.
In the debate on the 14th Amendment they only excluded Indians who lived in the wild on reservations who were not subject to the normal criminal and civil laws of the United States. In other words not subject to the full jurisdiction of the United States. Indians who lived off the reservation and were subject to the full jurisdiction of the United States became citizens. Read the whole thing. Not just some cherry picked quotes from a bullshit website.
>>78112595
> This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States,
that text is a mess.
does he mean "born to foreigners"?
If he does, does he imply that not even the children of legal immigrants can have american citizenship?
that would contradict his own ammendment
Joseph McCarthy was right
>>78113018
Completely wrong and in fact in the debate the proponents of the amendment explicitly discuss the fact that Chinese and "Gypsies" would become citizens if it passed.
>>78109412
REEEEEEEEE
>>78109412
The other night I watched two films with mt girlfriend, Good Night and Good Luck and Trumbo.
All I gotta say is being red pilled has ruined my fucking life. I enjoy nothing and everything makes me feel hopeless .
McCarthy was fucking right. HE WAS RIGHT
>why didn't you listen
>>78113264
Also whites born to foreigners prior to the 14th Amendment became citizens under existing law. Thus, under the context of what they were doing, they were extending the same principle to all persons of any race.
>>78109412
Roy cohn was Mccarthy right hand man. He was Jewish and gay and headed the army trials that conveniently discredited the movement forever as they failed tremendously. He later died of aids.
>>78113623
> Thus, under the context of what they were doing, they were extending the same principle to all persons of any race.
this is what I would expect out of the radical republicans
>>78109924
Wilson was a bought and paid for cuck by Jacob Schiff. Schiff is also the man who bankrolled the Bolsheviks, and bankrolled Japan in their war against Russia prior to that. He was also a founding father of Zionism, and through Wilson got one of his personal friends appointed as the first Jew on the Supreme Court.
He is probably the most influential individual of the early 20th century, but you never hear anything about him.
>>78113215
I didn't take anything out of context, I put them in context for you. And by the way dipshit, before 1875 the states had their own immigration laws, so to say that there were no passports or federal border control doesn't mean there were no immigration laws. That's why the Page Act was passed, taking that away from the states and consolidating it in the federal government.
And your explanation of the reservation Indians, which I already fucking acknowledged if you paid attention, kike, does not hurt my point even in the slightest. There is simply no difference between an Indian on a wild reservation subject to the laws of his tribe and a Mexican from Mexico subject to the laws of his tribe. Both are aliens, both are excluded from the 14th Amendment.
>>78113264
There was no long-term naturalization process back then like we have now. You were either an alien, or you were a citizen. There was no middleground. Aliens had no rights. If they wanted them, they had to become citizens. If they have a baby here before they do that, tough fucking luck.
>>78113264
>that text is a mess.
Welcome to United States Constitutional law, where the phasing is ambiguous and the spirit of the law doesn't matter.
>>78113623
That was because of a federal law mandating it, dipshit. It wasn't done via the Constitution. That question was never decided until 1988 in the Wong Kim Ark case, when the Court first decided that legally domiciled foreigners gave birth to Americans via the 14th Amendment. Prior to that, it was the Naturalization Act of 1790 which was still good law through the 1800s.
>>78114225
Meant to say 1898.
>>78113853
You are the dipshit faggot. Read the debate in it's entirety and come back and tell me what you are saying with a straight face:
https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=073/llcg073.db&recNum=11
There were no state laws setting any significant immigration controls. Prior to the Page Act there really were no immigration controls whatsoever.
>>78113496
His reincarnation is giving us one more chance
>>78114312
I don't need to read it. If you have a point to make, make it. Or move on. Because repeatedly saying "there were no immigrations laws" doesn't move your position forward any. It does not matter one way or another. They still would have been considered foreign aliens whether it was lawful for them to be here or not, because they were not citizens. Your very argument cuts against you. Because there was no federal law on immigration, there was no such thing as a permanent resident like we have now. You were either an American citizen, or you were simply a foreign alien. At least at the federal level. Again, states had immigration laws prior to the Page Act.
>>78113995
that is not the position of a radical republican
in fact, it would make the entire text pointless
the whole idea was to make it so slaves, which were treated as non-citizens / aliens, and as such had no rights, could automatically acquire american citizenship
I will have to assume that he is talking specifically about aliens who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, not to every single alien, specially given that the children of foreigners did infact get automatic american citizenship (otherwise the grandpa of Donald Trump would not even be american, to give you an example)
>>78110919
rule 46 rule 46 rule 46
>>78114608
p.s bring thy newfags to me
>>78109412
that man was right. shame we turned our back on him and destroyed this great nation.
not the world will fall into 1000 of dark ages and i mean DARK. SHIT SKIN DARK. SLAV SHIT DARK TO. fucking monkeys are taking over the world and we all sit here eating doritos and drinking mountain dew 360 no scopes. FUCK YOU MILLENNIAL SCUM BURN IN HELL ALL OF YOU.
>>78114595
A radical Republican trying to sell a country-changing amendment to a mixed Senate who were none to keen on the idea of foreign Indians inching their way onto our settlements via anchor babies of any kind. Nobody wanted it then, and nobody wants it now. lest you forget, you are Spanish Indians.
And no, your argument is simply kike logic. The text would make perfect sense, but it was designed to create an exception to our traditional rules. Precisely because the negroes were of a sorts aliens to our republic, and exception had to be made, specifically for them, to usher THEM in as citizens. A whole new rule system wasn't created, Shlomo Ramirez, an exception was made to a pre-existing system. That's why an amendment was needed.
>>78113995
That's not true. There were slaves, free blacks, and many others who were not US citizens but who were not foreigners either. In fact, that still exists today with persons born in unincorporated territories (and thus outside "the United States") that have not been granted citizenship by statute, such as persons born in American Samoa, are US nationals but not US citizens.
>>78114569
Typical dodge. You lose by default faggot.
>>78114869
I think you are getting a bit unhinged m8. Debate isn't useful like that
I shall insist that the 14th amendment was the HIV infection that allowed the cancer to grow, and I have not seen evidence proving otherwise
good night
>>78109412
>tfw the fuhrer is dead
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEeSPc5oTcM
>>78109412
A loss for America, a victory for the people
>>78114958
Nice source. Do you have evidence that non-citizen freedmen were not considered alien under antebellum common law? Let's see it.
>>78114999
Not an argument.
>>78115085
Also not an argument. Good night, amigo.
>>78115475
>Nice source. Do you have evidence that non-citizen freedmen were not considered alien under antebellum common law? Let's see it.
No less than the Dred Scott decision mentions aliens separate and apart from slaves and free non-whites:
"The word white is evidently used to exclude the African race, and the word "citizen" to exclude unnaturalized foreigners; the latter forming no part of the sovereignty, owing it no allegiance, and therefore under no obligation to defend it. The African race, however, born in the country, did owe allegiance to the Government, whether they were slaves or free; but it is repudiated and rejected from the duties and obligations of citizenship in marked language."
>Not an argument.
Indeed, you made no argument. So none is made in return. You lose by default. You are a cherry picking faggot who can't be bothered to read the entirety of the text from which your quotes were cherry picked. Context matters.
>>78114869
"We are entirely ready to accept the provision proposed in this constitutional amendment, that the children born here of Mongolian parents shall be declared by the Constitution of the United States to be entitled to civil rights and to equal protection before the law with others."
- Senator John Conness of California, proponent of the 14th Amendment, during the debate in the Senate
The exception was for everyone even "Mongolians" (Chinese), not just for freed slaves.
