Hillary Clinton is a disgusting human being.
She planted Guccifer 2.0
>>78065396
who is jeremy brinster and why should i care?
fuck hillary
>>78065636
https://guccifer2.wordpress.com
DNC and HRC campaign are "leaking" documents themselves and calling it a hack.
Guccifer 2.0 is a DNC mole and the MSM is slowly picking it up as a REAL hack rather than a plant by the DNC.
>>78065636
>>78066065
This is a classic leak to distort reality so she she gets all the dirt on her opponent out in the open and take the heat off of her own mishandling of emails.
Let's get to work, guys, we don't have much time.
We can't let these corrupt assholes into the White House.
Is anyone going to help with this?
Her opponent doesn't have the budget that she has for Oppo attacks. This is the only way she will win—through misinformation. This is the staple of the Clintons—winning through misinformation.
We can't let this happen.
Leaking the Trump attack document was brilliant. The media covered it in depth because it was 'confidential' and secretive. It exposed bullet points of topics she wold never be able to get an audience to listen to in a debate. She could dump 'contoversial' attacks that would be considered bad taste if she said them in public.
The leak of 'suggestions' for people to donate more than is legal is brilliant. Easy way to spread the word when spreading the word is illegal. " don't ask for more than 5,000 even though they are allowed" and the media disseminates the message for her.
>>78068771
I agree—they are running a brilliant campaign and demolishing the opponents public image by tactics that the See Eye Ay invented.
What does this mean, though? Does it mean that no one can win against the establishment?
She has a lot riding on this, it's her last chance to gain power after being dumped by Obamur as Secy of State.
>>78069333
You already lost.
>>78070700
Don't be so negative—there's still hope.
>>78070700
>You already lost.
Are you a shill?
$0.15 has been deposited to your account on behalf of DNC/HRC campaign.
>>78070700
Try shooting a (((money printer's))) family instead of crying over Donald Trump being a big mean bully.
>>78065396
the lies
>>78075356
>>78070700
wew
>>78065396
Someone please explain
>>78065428
>>78069333
How retarded can someone be to think the DNC is leaking this on purpose?
>>78077522
Read some of the follow-up posts.
>>78077848
>How retarded can someone be to think the DNC is leaking this on purpose?
You obviously haven't and don't understand political espionage.
Go read a damn book or two. These are tactics the See Eye Ay and Kay Gee Bee used to use.
>>78066065
>>78066383
You guys conspiracy minded idiots. It can be as simple as the following: What this, and everything else, shows is that the DNC was supporting Hillary Clinton from the beginning at the expense of other candidates, despite there being a large democratic will to support the other candidate, Bernie Sanders. If they were willing to help HC before she even ran for president, what other methods would they be willing to help during running for president?
>>78080805
People used to say the 9/11 shit was conspiracy too and look at where that is now.
You're a tool if you think some Romanian hacker got into the DNC server once again that easily. This "leak" benefits Hillary more than her opponent.
If you've ever studied how the government agencies like See Eye Aye operate, then this is basic 101 misinformation.
This is basically free information to the public that they released so MSM can take it apart and see that DNC is running a "squeeky clean" campaign. They also KNOW the GOP would have salivated over this and they didn't take the bait.
God, man, go read a book and red-pill yourself a little more.
>>78082047
how does this leak in any way benefit her?
>OPPO RESEARCH: TRUMP IS A DICK
>DEFENSE STRATEGY FOR KNOWN HRC ISSUES 1-120: LAUGH IT OFF AND SAY TRUMP IS A DICK
I'm genuinely curious as to what you think the benefit of this is. There's too many skeletons in the HRC closet for it to be a "lets get it all over with asap", only one issue will catch fire at a time. These are all known quantities, nothing here is a surprise to any of the anti HRC pundits.
>>78065396
That fucking OS.
>according to the data.
>>78082047
>you're a tool if you think some Romanian hacker got into the DNC server
if there's ANYTHING you should have learned from the Obama administration is that they have zero ability to protect their servers.
>USIS is breached
>OPM is breached
>Keypoint (USIS replacement) is breached
>Keypoint is breached again
>OPM is breached again
>OPM is breached AGAIN
These were the treasure troves of governmental PII, and the breaches all occurred within a 2 year span. The DNC is a mixture of extremely competent individuals and social media whores, acting like there isn't a massive attack surface is laughable.
>>78083011
>I'm genuinely curious as to what you think the benefit of this is. There's too many skeletons in the HRC closet for it to be a "lets get it all over with asap", only one issue will catch fire at a time. These are all known quantities, nothing here is a surprise to any of the anti HRC pundits.
Go read some of the posts above, there's plenty of explanations in this thread.
It comes down to this. If ALL info is already out there about her, now, this early, then there won't be much for her opponents to cling to. That means, there won't be any "revelations" being picked up by MSM.
The political climate is this, right now.
Hillary: Yeah, she took money from foreign leaders. Yeah, she stuck with bill after he fucked a WH intern. Yeah, she fucked up with her private server. Yeah she overpowered Sandbags by being DNCs favorite. And so on. There's a lot of dirt out there on her, and a lot of it will be sweeped under the rug because MSM will make it seem like it's just a conspiracy to take her down by the Republicans. The Clintons have been doing this for 30 years. In the 90's whenever something would happen, they would blame conspiracies and the Republicans.
So in other words, releasing "insider info" on Trump as OPPO research is a win-win for the DNC/HRC campaign. This will allow MSM to pick up and cover all the dirt on trump and continue the narrative on Trump (See below)
Narrative:
Trump: Racist, misogynist, bad at business, fascist, Nazi, Literally Hitler, hates everyone, bad for economy, selfish, dangerous, etc.
Who do you think will hurt more from these "leaked" documents? HRC or DJT? Think about it.......there's so much "conspiracy" surrounding the Clintons that these "leaks" will not do any harm to her campaign in the eye of the public, but will do more harm to DJT than her.
It's very simple to understand.
>>78065396
They are research papers... He's a researcher... Hacker is leaking the original docs...
>>78077848
>>78077848
these are the same people who used and abused Monika Lewinsky to save Bills presidency from the Paula Jones fallout
>>78084178
>Only a researcher
The ignorance from some of the deniers in this thread is what got us into this in the first place.
If you're ignorant, your government will treat you like an ignorant person.
People have been letting the Clintons get away with illegal behavior for decades and we have to put a stop to this family.
>>78083860
>plenty of explanations
>literally 2 posts of OH MAN IT'S PROBABLY THE DNC DOING IT
a few sentences of conjecture and a cat gif is hardly an established argument. Again, whether or not "ALL info is already out there" is irrelevant. Trump is an idiot, but he's a pro shitposter and will be rehashing anti-clinton rhetoric that hasn't previously made it past drudgereport. When the MSM picked up his implications about Vince Foster I almost spit on my screen. The things that the DNC has managed to laugh off for the past 20 years are still revelations to the general public, and they're hardly going to pay enough attention to this leak to learn them all now and stop caring by November. The only hope they have of this benefiting them is if they can confront every attack with a "shut up about that damn server hack" response like they're doing with the emails.
I haven't read the Trump OPPO piece, but I'm assuming it's the same kind of stuff you'd find in a motherjones piece? Has anything fresh about him been revealed or is it the same stuff the MSM has been screaming since he became a viable primary candidate? There's no benefit to HRC here, these were already daily talking points with reporters trying to do deep dives into things they could call racist/misogynist/etc
The only thing of any substantive value that seems to have come out of this so far is some details on the PAC donors and how the Clinton campaign has been getting sneaky with their funds. Not that this is anything new, but having concrete numbers and a "source" to point to when discussing previously theoretical arguments of general graft and corruption will at least slightly benefit the NeverHillary camp.
Sometimes a leak is just a leak
>>78086122
Ignoramus.
Do you really think the DNC would allow it to be hacked that easily?
Stay ignroant. Just the way they like it.
>>78086122
>Sometimes a leak is just a leak
If you know anything about Watergate and the CIA-covert Ops, you'd easily come to the conclusion that this is done to their own benefit.
Either:
A) The hack was real, and DNC only let a really old/unpatched server run with shitty documents on them that aren't big revelations.
or
B) They released it on their own.
The CIA and FBI are known to use informants to get what they want.
Most recent example is the Orlando shooter. They tried to get an informant to get the shooter to commit an act.
Do you really think the DNC doesn't have ex-CIA people on her side?
In the Watergate scandal, Nixon (through Haldeman) hired ex-CIA agents to keep tabs on the DNC...and this was 50 years ago. Don't you think they have better ways to do cover-ups now?
>>78086551
>doesn't acknowledge the poster's points
>posts happy merchant and calls him an idiot
never change /pol/
>>78086551
They're total incompetents, of course they're easy to hack
>>78087529
What points, m8?
>>78088159
>South Korea
>>78086551
>>78087151
see
>>78083668
Part of my job is network security, breaches happen every day. Just got my letter in the mail from my old university revealing to its userbase that they were breached 2 years ago. Keeping networked resources "secure" at scale is insanely difficult, even if all your users are security minded. Keep in mind Clinton & Co. like to play fast and loose with their "secure" server setups and employ an army of interns with the opsec skills of a 12 year old.
>only one server with uninteresting stuff was compromised
anything truly dangerous to reveal probably isn't kept on a public facing server, particularly in plain text. This is exactly the kind of mundane shit you'd expect to find on a network share where many people need concurrent access to it.
>they have people who are really good at opsec, counter intel and cover ups
and people who are also really bad at it. That's what happens when you are a large organization. The DNC isn't made out entirely of NSA-tier technicians, the attack vector was likely Paula in HR doing something really fucking stupid that she'd been told 20 times not to do, or someone setting up their servers fucking up the formatting on a single command, or one of an unending number of 0days that the entire fucking world is at one time or another vulnerable to.
People who don't have a background in tech seem to think that "security" is a known quantity... It's not.
right so I know Hillary has done something bad here but can someone explain to a retard (me) what >>78065396 actually means?
I am not schooled up on this too much so if someone could give me a quick and brief explanation that would be fantastic
>>78089470
Your post will not kill the thread.
>>78089470
honestly? no idea.
OP is seemingly stating that because someone who worked at the DNC has their name on a document supposedly leaked from the DNC that this is proof of collusion between the DNC and the hacker. Was every other document's signature wiped clean, or written as "LOL GUCIFER" or something?
If these things had been noted as being copied into fresh documents for some reason and his fingerprints were still on it, this would be an issue... But that doesn't seem like the case. Did Gucifer list the date of the exfiltration as before april 2015?
>>78089123
>People who don't have a background in tech seem to think that "security" is a known quantity... It's not.
Knowing enough about networking leads me to believe that, yes, someone from HR was a point of entrance, but it also leads me to believe that the DNC is not that stupid. No one is saying they have NSA-tier techs working for them, but this is obviously dumb info that plays out well in the public.
Meme warfare is real, believe it or not.
They used to do this kind of stuff without server hacks, but through the media and written paper.
Good fileshare of Guccifer2
https://guccifer.sharefile.com/share?cmd=d&id=sbe49b6cdcf94f0a8#/view/sbe49b6cdcf94f0a8?_k=gsh7n9
Pass: #GucCi2/0
//Include the #
>>78091911
It's just too convenient for "Guccifer 2.0" to release this shit around the same time that all this stuff is going down.
There's just too much contradicting information with DNC and the hack.
They just want to get all the info out there so GOP won't have much to attack them with.
>>78092971
22 replies by this ID
>>78093237
>22 replies by this ID
So what? It's my thread, nigger.
>have your candidate stink of hack scandals
>intentionally leak info and call it a hack
Is being this stupid really a part of her plan?
>>78094020
>Is being this stupid really a part of her plan?
Yes. Her whole public image has been dindu nuffin' while she does sneaky shit behind closed doors for 40 years.
Imagine, if her server didn't exist...we would've never known about her dirty ways of working behind closed doors.
>>78065396
>half the posts in this thread by this ID
the fuck is wrong with you?
>>78068771
no it wasn't you fucking idiot. the plan was from late December and only had shit that the other republican candidates had already beaten a dead horse with.
go be a shill and/or retarded somewhere else.
>>78095162
Fuck off nigger.
Go read a book.
>>78083860
>Who do you think will hurt more from these "leaked" documents? HRC or DJT?
Hillary dipshit, everything in that file has already been blasted over the airwaves for the last 6 months. the leak shows that the DNC is just as incompetent with its internal servers as Hillary.
>>78095463
>Hillary dipshit, everything in that file has already been blasted over the airwaves for the last 6 months. the leak shows that the DNC is just as incompetent with its internal servers as Hillary.
You idiot, you still don't get the big picture.
She's fucking untouchable.
>>78094329
>Hillary runs campaign saying Trump isn't competent enough to be president
>does this by purposefully making herself look retarded
people will just look at her and think she's retarded. playing dumb might work when you have an FBI investigation breathing down your back, but not on the campaign trail.
>>78095419
not an argument
>>78095732
>She's fucking untouchable
just because no one has actually tried to hit her with something doesn't mean she's untouchable
>>78095847
How dumb are you, shill? Do you even know her history? Have you ever worked with people like her who play victims and always get it their way?
You clearly are 16 and have no job or real life experience.
>>78095997
>just because no one has actually tried to hit her with something doesn't mean she's untouchable
Hope you're serious. The Clintons have survived like 20 Lolocausts.
Fuck outta here Hindu shill. Disable your proxy.
>>78096070
>>78096126
>concern trolls
>calls me a shill
oh that's rich
>>78093237
What's your point fuck wit pay attention to id's.... anon is the fucking OP
>>78096380
Shoo
>>78096380
He's right ya fucking autistic shill
>>78096669
>>78096689
so now i'm a shill because i think Trump will win?
you jews have really lost your edge
>>78065396
>Hillary Clinton is a disgusting human being.
Tell us something we didn't already know, OP.
>>78097032
It's not about Trump, you fucking moron.
I don't even care about Trump.
The point stands. The Clinton's are the shadiest political family in U.S. history and nothing is above them.
You thought the Bush's were bad, you watch out.
Now fuck off and go vote for that rusty cunt in the general you idiot.
>>78097032
No your a shill because your fucking autistic post
>>78097185
>The Clinton's are the shadiest political family in U.S. history
no shit retard, doesn't mean she won't get indicted
>>78097361
>no shit retard, doesn't mean she won't get indicted
Why are you swaying this informative thread you shillcunt.
Also she'll never get indicted you moron. Worst case scenario (which will never happen) she'll get a pardon.
Now eat a dick you salamander
>>78097233
1) nice syntax
2) nigger, have you even read this thread? highlight OPs ID, read the shit he's posted, and try to tell me that he's not a concern troll.
>>78097361
>implying
They've had dozens of people killed before for interfering in their business. Ill Bill was raping women and fucking children, but nobody cares about any of that, it just got buried. No, she won't get indicted. Some FBI official is going to "disappear mysteriously" or commit suicide by shooting themselves in the back of the head twice, and then then the issue will disappear.
>>78097499
>she'll get a pardon, which is just as good as admitting to guilt
Fixd
>>78097763
Still not as good as throwing her in a shark tank and locking the keys so she gets mauled.
She's way above the law of almost anyone in U.S. history.
The things that this family has done are so ridiculous that it makes Dick Cheney blush.
>>78097499
>informative thread
all you've done is point out that the author of the original document was linked to the document after the document was leaked. you then went on to wildly assume that the DNC did the leaks themselves and declared that they are evil masterminds that can't be stopped while implying that Trump will lose because they are such evil masterminds that no one can stop. this is laughable at best.
the DNC is a bunch of idiots with an agenda that's used to running against other idiots that don't know how to push their agenda. this leak was not their doing, it was the doing of some backwater gypsy because the DNC doesn't know how fucking computers work
>she'll get a pardon.
she has to actually be charged and found guilty to be pardoned.
also
>saying "worst case scenario" and not "best case scenario"
you've gone and exposed yourself with a Freudian slip shill.
>>78089123
> breaches happen every day. Just got my letter in the mail from my old university revealing to its userbase that they were breached 2 years ago. Keeping networked resources "secure" at scale is insanely difficult, even if all your users are security minded.
This. Unrelated funposting story time.
I used to fuck around at the university I attended. Keep in mind, this is not a podunk skeez university, a major tier-1 research state uni on the west coast. How did my naive fucking around BTFO them?
> go into academic computer lab
> dicking around
> wow how nifty its pretty g-eazy to write a keylogger in python that doesnt come up as anything in Symantec Norton Enterprise Expensive Edition blahblah
> over the course of a day, sit at a random 5 computers in the lab that has hundreds of people floating through all day, install keylogger
> keylogger periodically dumps to text file, uses campus no-auth SMTP to bounce logs to throway address
> neato fritos guys
> get loads of FB normie accounts, campus ID logins (grades/transcripts/online classes)
> deface some FBs, just for giggs
> one day an interesting login acct appears
> some (presumably) IT guy uses a domain account with the word 'admin' in the name to access a network drive
> convert py to .exe, drop on network drive
> this domain user has remote process start ability thru grouppolicy on AD (you fucking retards)
> start_keylog_on_interesting_machine.exe
> someone on this machine uses another domain account which has global admin on domain
> start panicking
> reset password on every account in the faculty, admin, IT usergroups
> oh man they use single sign on for email
> freaking out oh god oh god
> WMI script to grab all outlook data for each and every user as ,pst
> scheduled task on domain to run script right now
> every single person's complete email history, student, admin, IT, professional, etc now backed up to file
> zip files, flash drive
> my dick is spaghetti, run home
>>78097934
if shes charged with breaking US code title 18 section 2071 and pardoned, she'd still be ineligible to hold public office.
>>78098255
This guy is the biggest cuck of all time.
Someone needs to punch you in the dick for being an idiot.
U.S. education system is a total failure, and you're definitely a product of public schooling.
Your inability to comprehend this whole ordeal is beyond my ability to explain to you in lamen's terms, so you resort to ad hominem attacks just like a typical jew nigger who blindly eats hamburgers because "they taste good."
Fuck off, you low IQ inbred sperm stain.
>>78098377
Did you died?
>>78098746
not an argument :^)
>>78066383
>>78066065
Here's the thing - even if it was a leak, we are the only ones autistic enough to read them
>>78098898
>not an argument :^)
Your comprehension level is disturbing because what sucks about this whole situation is that I have neighbors that have low IQ just like you and it makes me feel terrible that I have normies around me who can't understand the bigger picture.
>>78066065
>>78098942
>Here's the thing - even if it was a leak, we are the only ones autistic enough to read them
It was bait. Case closed. It might make a comeback before November, but not right now.
>>78098769
neigh. they said "there has been some kind of network problem", set 'user must reset password on next login' = 1 for all domain users, and never found out
little do they know i am laying in wait, 3 years after graduating
i probably shoudl have extorted someone by now but i'm too lazy and squeamish
>>78098746
>gets btfo
>resorts to ad hominem attacks
heh
>>78099712
How did that fag poster BTFO me?
His argument is "Hacks happen."
Very thoughtful and articulate.
>>78099208
ad hominems aren't arguments bud
>>78099988
Are you having a Budlight right now, bud?
Good taste. Continue on.
>>78099905
more compelling than your "hacks neber habben, it must habe been da DNC demselbs :DDDD. hilary ids ebil and ids suber smart, she cand be sdobbed :DDD"
Still going to read it all either way
And how do you want to get to work? The obvious is reading it all and developing counters, and also the leaks have dirt on Clinton that can be expanded. So stop bitching about where it came from and read up fucker
>>78099505
>not using normie fb passwords to get nudes from
>not going through emails looking for nudes
>not getting the nudes
At least put them in a torrent for the rest of us.
I don't know. It does seem odd that the DNC immediately admitted to getting hacked, and they even claimed it was russian hackers.
It also happened when the msm was obsessed with the orlando shooting. So if they didn't want a ton of media exposure, now would be the time to do it.
Some really good shills in this thread, take notes.
Anyone saying this shit is on purpose or the DNC is unhackable take a page out of their defacto leader Shitllary.
It seems they're all levels of fucked up we can't even begin to think of, and that sort of corruption has apparently bred a laziness that makes their info ripe for the taking.
Don't believe the super-jews here.
>>78065396
I agree.
>>78100734
Timing is everything.
>>78099266
>>78099208
>>78098746
>>78097934
>>78097499
>>78097185
>>78096669
>>78096070
OH FUCK, A RARE SIGHTING OF AN ACTUAL EXPOSED SHILL.
How much do you get payed?
>>78101019
This is the problem though, even if they leaked the documents during a time when nothing else was going on, the vast majority of normie msm wouldn't even bother covering it. It would just be Fox and breitbart and infowars. Then the dems can just say those silly ole republicans are complaining about her emails again.
>>78101065
>How much do you get payed?
$0.00
Fuck off niggerfaggot
OP is painfully obvious as a shill
/pol/ being pol.
It's a giant leak, I don't think they would deliberately leak like that
How do you proof the whole thing to make sure nothing damning is on it?
>>78101192
Come on man, everyone in the thread knows you're a shill, give us something good!
Anything else out of your mouth everyone just ignores since you've exposed yourself you bumbling fuck.
>>78101184
>Then the dems can just say those silly ole republicans are complaining about her emails again.
That's exactly what's happening and will happen.
The biggest voter base in play here are the independents and this leak doesn't really hurt the DNC, it actually helps them muddy the waters a bit so they can figure out some other way to take out the opponent.
They want it to be bait, but the opponent didn't take it. I think that was smart of him.
>>78101192
>he does it for free
you're being ripped off freind
>>78101474
Ride the train, faggot.
Easier to be sheep than a leader.
What have you done in your life that has any authority or leadership, you neckbeard?
>>78101785
Who sent you? Why do you even try?
Are you from reddit? Or are you actually from some dumb hillary shitposting outpost?
As >>78098255 pointed out, you've completely discredited yourself and it's now obvious to everyone in this thread that you're a shill.
We don't ask for much, just tell us a little bit about yourself and then you can go think over it over a small bit of diner at the office cafe!
>talks of sheep
>makes a mistep a fucking toddler would be guilty of
The only sheep here is you right now, now bend over and give us something good!
>>78101936
What mistake are you talking about?
Your hivemind mentality is no better than fageddit's.
>>78077848
Hi Hillary!
>>78102212
There are more hillshills here than I expected.
>>78102114
>fageddit
Except literally nobody says this
>>78101251
What a cunt... if anyone is shilling it's you and the other 3 faggots in this thread calling op a shill.....
>>78102114
pic related is you
>>78102114
Come on, quit beating around the bush, where did you come from?
Oh, looks like he got a friend >>78102212
That's two shills, two very good shills-they're definitely learning.
They seem to be somewhat competent, but still very stupid.
The shills have been identified as:
Ult7Hm6r - but more information is needed on this >1 post by ID
However MLc6C6at has been confirmed via anon and their own FUCKUP to be a legitimate shill. If you've ever wanted to see what a good shill types and acts like please look through their posts! Take note of all of their methods for further use.
Oh, looks like MLc6C6at has called for backup, new ID's appear to back them up! Seems he's got friends!
Hello >>78102577
Could you tell us all where you and your other two friends are from?
Underrated thread
>>78102618
Negative you are fucking autistic and it's obvious who the shills are in this thread cunt
>>78102683
Or your a fucking shill and trying to turn it around on OP you fucking cunt
>>78102784
>implying everyone on 4chan isn't autistic
wanna know how i know you're a shill?
>>78102784
>>78102878
Where did your old friend go?
Did he call quits and now you're trying to change out with a new face?
Do you honestly think anyone will believe you, or your friend, you've been exposed, now pay up with some information on where you're from. You fucked up and can't unfuck yourself, may as well give us something in return!
>>78102976
Nigger please the few cents your going to make aren't worth it....
>>78102878
>defending OP
>ever
all you're doing is confirming that you're organizing together.
so where are you from friend? reddit? cripplekikechan? correct the record?
>>78103044
Fuck you cunt I'm from Henry TN you fucking autist go fuck yourself
>>78102340
>Except literally nobody says this
>Hivemind
Exactly my point, idiot. You just exposed yourself for being part of the hivemind.
>>78103169
Yeah because anytime someone doesn't agree with your cunt ass it's a conspiracy..... kys
>>78103169
Based on how they type, speak, and act, I'm leaning towards leftypol
They seem to be pretty good at seeming like a channer and using the lingo well enough, they seem to have an understanding of how we work too.
It's a teo idiots from leftypol try babies first falseflag thread-episode!
That's my guess anyway.
Jesus, this thread became more ass fucked than r6gSGxGM's mother's gaping asshole.
>>78098377
>tier 1 research uni
>entire exchange server contents fits onto a flash drive
7/10, you had me going there
Damn, Arguments on /pol/ are always so fucking embarrassing to read. Seriously, reddit tier shit in this thread.
>>78103422
Another autistic cunt steps forward....
You can go fuck yourself as well...
>>78103532
You frequently visit reddit enough that you know that? Fucking kys
>>78103564
+$50 sHill coins deposited to your account
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/04/22/pro-hillary-pac-spending-1-million-to-hire-online-trolls/
Take note of the rampant retardation by the two shills in this thread.
They're not making it exactly hard to figure themselves out. Now they're just throwing a tantrum since they're so agitated their game has been found out.
You two shills newfags or something? You're really bad at this, just stop and go fuck your wife or something.
>>78103422
How is OP a hillshill if his thread is against Hillary?
>>78103652
Yeah, I must be a norime or something.
>>78065396
can someone explain?
>>78103718
Oh yeah because siting hillary's cunt ass paying for support makes me a shill for not agreeing with you.....
What a cunt you are... this thread had potential but you fucking cunts ruined it. Anytime someone doesn't agree with your autistic faggotry they are a shill.... go fuck yourself
>>78103968
T. 4my(you)
>>78103874
One person is posting over 45 messages to try and force some angle on a leak that is contrived at best.
At this point I don't think what he is proposing is true, but I suppose I will have to see.
>>78103721
Not an arguement
It is an autistic opinion though. ...
>>78103874
Lol nothing to explain just read posts and enjoy it
>>>>>trust me
>>78104063
See this is a based post... doesn't necessarily agree but is curious and open for discussion....
You other fucks should jump off a bridge...
>>78103731
>How is OP a hillshill if his thread is against Hillary?
>Assuming some of the anons here have IQ above 80.
>>78104030
>>78103731
>what is concern trolling
OP is merely pretending. if you read through his posts, you'll see him not too subtly praise the DNC for supposedly leaking the the information the themselves and imply that Hillary can't be stopped.
>>78103968
Anon, at best this is someone pushing a very weak and tenuous angle on something that'd otherwise be good (and does have good information against Hillary such as the speech fees and the dates of the speeches), a more middling explanation is someone trying to "connect the dots" ala A Beautiful Mind, and at worst a shill discouraging us from utilizing the information in a decent leak due to it being a plant.
This wasn't a good thread from when the OP started making 30+ replies.
>>78104063
>At this point I don't think what he is proposing is true, but I suppose I will have to see.
Do some research on your own and see for yourself.
OP was merely to expose the Clinton Machine's capabilities, but I was attacked left and right because apparently my opinion doesn't count because it's not popular enough.
>>78104214
>....
Elipses are rather poor form. Avoid using them on an image board. Try to use images to convey meaning instead.
>>78092918
>Having file extensions hidden
>Having MS Office instead of Openoffice/libreoffice
>Using windows.
You're a special kind of idiot.
>>78104419
this the shills abound and here they arefound
>>78104385
>you'll see him not too subtly praise the DNC for supposedly leaking the the information the themselves and imply that Hillary can't be stopped.
This guy is the biggest idiot in the world.
How is that praising the DNC? It's merely suggesting that they have unlimited funds and most of the kikeworld on their side, so it is more difficult for them to lose. You really don't think they have some of the best political people working on their side? You must be stupid if you don't think so.
The Obama machine is probably second to none at being the least transparent admin in history. Clinton is second.
Jesus, man, get a fucking grip on reality--you're making something out of nothing.
>>78104419
No you fucking cunt you fucks started attacking his point of view be a use your cunt ass didn't agree and instead of discussing you called OP a shill like the fucking dumb cunts you are.... what is a packet sniffer you autistic fucking cunts it's not hard to find the god damn shill, but you cunts wouldn't know a fucking shill if they stuck a keyboard up your autistic ass's.
>>78104730
>>78104819
so how much does Hillary pay you guys to come here?
>>78104599
Fuck off
>>78104472
your opinion doesn't count because you post shit like >>78069333
the very beginning of this thread was nothing but you desperately trying to bump it. you even replied to some guy twice and called him a shill despite him only posting 3 words.
i'd be a hell of a lot less insulted if you weren't so obvious with this.
JIDF used to send their top shitposters here and now we're stuck with you rejects.
>>78104472
>Do some research on your own and see for yourself.
I have. Vince Foster and the death list being quite suspicious (Mr. Foster being outside without much mud or dirt on his shoes, carpet fibers etc...) so I don't underestimate them.
>OP was merely to expose the Clinton Machine's capabilities, but I was attacked left and right because apparently my opinion doesn't count because it's not popular enough.
It doesn't count because the evidence you are providing us is week, and it comes off as you trying to discourage us from using the parts of the leak that are good for the Trump campaign.
You are making a very big claim, that the DNC leaked this to secretly advertise messages they otherwise wouldn't, and aren't providing the strongest evidence. Vaguely referring to previous disinformation campaigns done by the CIA or KGB (when the Clinton crew are most likely don't have the discipline or training to pull off such feats) and the fact that the leaker could've been a former Clinton staffer (Somewhat legitimate point) is not strong evidence for a pretty big claim.
>>78104932
I'm very anti hillary you cunt. I just think it's funny when you autistic fucks think your redpilled on her. OP is closer then you faggots will ever be and it's laughable.
Don't worry OP I feel the same way
And fuck the shills
Just read this entire fucking thread. Jesus Christ. Hillary is not going to lose because of rape, bribery, or emails. She's going to lose because of these fuckwit shills have no clue what they are doing.
>>78104932
Not a arguement fuck wit move on to your next thread.....
>>78104730
>DNC gets hacked by a gypsy
>OH WOW YOU GUYS, THE DEMS ARE ACTUALLY RUNNING A BRILLIANT CAMPAIGN. THEY DID THIS TO THEMSELVES. HOW CAN TRUMP EVEN COMPETE. THE ESTABLISHMENT IS UNSTOPPABLE.
yeah, im sure couldn't be categorized as praise.
>>78104472
your opinion is based on pure conjecture and has been critiqued as such multiple times. Every time anyone pushes you on it you either shitpost or deflect. Again, what about the trump attack piece that was leaked does anything damaging to him? These talking points have been around the whole time, and on the MSM for months. Nothing new has been revealed about him or his campaign.
The only real fruit on this tree seems to be the specifics of Hillary's pay-to-play system, which itself was to this point only theoretically well known. Putting numbers and names to it will lend credence to the investigative reporters who have been singing this song for years. The OMG THE DNC WAS THINKING ABOUT HRC BEFORE THE PRIMARY WAS OVER stuff is laughable, but again the plaintext confirmation may do a bit to promote the people who have been saying this for months. Might loose a bunch of BurnOuts over this. All of these narratives are already known, but these documents make them harder to laugh off as pundit bias.
>>78105078
this thread is shills basically saying
> IT HAS ANTI TRUMP THINGS
> DO NOT READ IT
> DO NOT DOWNLOAD IT
> IGNORE EVERYTHING ITS A PLANT
> SHHHH DONORS DONT MATTER
> SHHH SPEAKING FEES DONT MATTER
> NOTHING TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG
WHOS JEWING WHO HERE
IS HRC TOAST???
plz b yes
>>78105232
I'm not arguing against you simply asking you the shekels per post
>>78104819
Yes. On an imageboard based around the discussion of politics and politically incorrect, you attack others viewpoints based off of the way they post and what they post. Discussion would be poor if there was a taboo on hostility. If you can't defend your points well, then you shouldn't have them.
Pic somewhat related.
>>78105001
Man, must suck being you in real life.
To actually take a post of mine and pull that shit on me makes me really sad.
I've defended /pol/, breitbard, drudge, even weirdo alex jones for more than a decade and this is how I get repaid? By being called a shill?
That really hurts.
>>78105327
If that's what you got from the thread your a fucking retard... and I can't help you
>>78105433
/pol/ is not your friend, nothing you do matters are you new here?
>>78105463
please enlighten me, what was I supposed to get from the thread lay it out for me
>>78105001
I miss the JIDF and I miss Uiharu anon/Flower Girl. The JIDF were usually dedicated and good enough that they occasionally brought up fair points and the discussion was interesting
>>78105429
Ummmm are you fucking stupid there is no point to argue other than your an autistic cunt without the means of intellectual discussion.... and anyone who doesn't agree with your retarded point of view is a fucking shill.... go fuck yourself.... again
>>78105433
do you really think you're fooling anyone at this point?
>>78105071
>and it comes off as you trying to discourage us from using the parts of the leak that are good for the Trump campaign.
Not discouraging for anyone to not use this leak. Actually I said
>Is anyone going to help with this?
>Her opponent doesn't have the budget that she has for Oppo attacks. This is the only way she will win—through misinformation. This is the staple of the Clintons—winning through misinformation.
>We can't let this happen.
Maybe I should've reworded some of the posts, but I posted out of passion and hate for the DNC and Hilldog.
My whole point was for all of us to really look into this and expose this vile piece of shit as much as we could, but now, I guess, I'm a shill just because my angle doesn't fit the /pol/ narrative?
>>78105362
The shills are digging her a deeper hole. Screen shotting and saving this whole thread to spread around
>hillshillsattemptsdisinformation.jpg
I've said this from the beginning. Nothing about the "leaks" were new information or anything that would make Hillary look criminal. It was only made to reinforce the mantras and the ideas behind the Hillary campaign and to create a controversy surrounding her.
It's been so obvious from the get go.
>>78105090
>Don't worry OP I feel the same way
>And fuck the shills
Thanks m8
I swear on me mum not all of Americans are as dumb as some of the USAfags in this thread.
>>78105601
I'm not your fucking teacher boy learn on your own or stay fucking autistic if you weren't such a cunt on the rest of your post, I would feel obliged to do so. As you are an autistic cunt and this is waste of my time other than telling you that you're an autistic cunt, you can go fuck yourself
>>78105647
the JIDF at least knew how to be subtle.
used to be you could mistake a JIDF thread for an honest /pol/ thread until further inspection.
>>78105259
>yeah, im sure couldn't be categorized as praise.
kys
>>78105734
> donor lists
> speaking fees
haven't even read them and already you are wrong, I mean shit at least make an effort
>>78082047
9/11 isnt a conspiracy retard, it was just handled poorly by everyone involved and thus buried.
>>78105890
wow are you okay friend it seems like you put alot of hard work into this shilli-- I mean thread and now that people are disagreeing you can't seem to handle it
>>78105679
When did I specifically call anyone a shill? I said that there was a possibility because someone being this dedicated a topic is rare.
>>78105685
If that is your point then my view of you changes slightly. Try making yourself a little less defeatist sounding. Just by the nature of this being leaked, it shows she isn't nearly as unstoppable as she thinks she is. She is human as much as anyone else, no matter how much money she has to her name.
Also, people have found some good stuff and have begun compiling interesting things. Such as the dates for speeches not matching up with her flight schedule.
>>78105265
>your opinion is based on pure conjecture and has been critiqued as such multiple times. Every time anyone pushes you on it you either shitpost or deflect. Again, what about the trump attack piece that was leaked does anything damaging to him? These talking points have been around the whole time, and on the MSM for months. Nothing new has been revealed about him or his campaign.
There's more truth to this POV than anything else I've seen in a while.
I've said it multiple times that the NARRATIVE that the DNC is running on is that their opponent is evil and unsafe and this "leaked" document is basically a free-for-all buffet for any gullible idiot and msm-shill out there to use against the GOP candidate.
Think of it this way.
A candidate cannot give money to a SuperPAC directly, so they "indirectly" release a document so the SuperPacs (or whoever) can use for their own benefit.
I don't like the fact that my opinion is being rejected based on the fact that hurr durr I don't have a fucking Likeleak link to a nigger getting shot in the head.
Jesus, 4chan really pisses me off sometimes. There are a lot of really good minds here and some of the shit I see posted here really boggles my mind.
>>78106059
Nigger if anyone here with intellect disagree's than im more than happy to oblige. Where as your an autistic cunt that doesn't deserve intelligent discussion.... back to your minimum wage job in the morning.
>>78105894
Yeah. I liked them actually. Kept the discourse fresh. There were subtle things they'd do or be mistaken on such as various speech patterns or not understanding names/Sage, but other than those minor things they could make somewhat sound arguments.
>>78106208
> there are alot of really good minds here
> alot of really good minds
> really good minds
> good minds
> minds
touche you made me chuckle
>>78105601
>/pol/ is not your friend, nothing you do matters are you new here?
No one wants to be your friend, faggot, but I continue to believe that some people here have a good head on their shoulders and once in a while do good things. Rest of the time they want to watch the world burn.
>>78095732
>untouchable
>$0.01 has been deposited to your account.
>>78106426
55 posts by this id, inordinately polite to the shitstains who come here
> nothing of value added
>>78106208
Your concerns are valid, but there isn't much we can do about it without making us look like schizophrenics other than utilizing the good parts of the leak.
In other words, I think your concerns are valid upon further analysis, but how do we combat this?
I don't think trying to prove that the leak is fake or orchestrated would be particularly effective or conclusive simply because I don't think there is hard evidence that it was.
So the optimal recourse at this point is simply being aware and cautious while also utilizing the parts of the leak that is useful against Hillary.
>Reddit losing their fucking minds over Hillary and Bill making millions from speaking fees
Literally everyone important does this. What a bunch of retards. This is the least story-like of all possible things you could make hubbub about int he leak.
>>78105734
>I've said this from the beginning. Nothing about the "leaks" were new information or anything that would make Hillary look criminal. It was only made to reinforce the mantras and the ideas behind the Hillary campaign and to create a controversy surrounding her.
>It's been so obvious from the get go.
That's exactly my point.
Shit's too fishy and looks too clean.
I looked through most of the "hack" and it's just bullshit we already know.
If /pol/ really cares about saving the west from mudslimes, then we can do a better job than the DNC when they leak dumb empty faggot files online.
uh guys... GUYS!?!
>>78106084
>Also, people have found some good stuff and have begun compiling interesting things. Such as the dates for speeches not matching up with her flight schedule.
THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO DO.
Jesus, that's MY WHOLE FUCKING POINT that's why I keep posting in this now-dead-as-hillarys-pussy thread to begin with.
There is NOTHING revealing in these documents, I quickly looked through them.
Giving speeches is NOT illegal.
Flying on an airplane is NOT illegal.
The Clintons have walked the gray line for over 30 years and I don't--we shouldn't-- allow them to get away with it this time.
I think people are underestimating her as an opponent.
>>78106696
needsGaySexWithHatsOn/10
>>78106294
>I've said it multiple times that the NARRATIVE that the DNC is running on is that their opponent is evil and unsafe and this "leaked" document is basically a free-for-all buffet for any gullible idiot and msm-shill out there to use against the GOP candidate.
>Grammatical errors
Who gives a fuck. We're all autists here, but some of you are retarded and need to go to a mental institution.
>>78107024
no one said it was illegal shill, we want anything that could be damaging to her already tarnished image. I hate to tell you but no we do not underestimate hill or the shills, we've already garnered useful information such as the involvement of mrss with the clintons.
>>78105685
>the /pol/ narrative
your angle doesn't fit logic
you're arguing that this is a disinfo/psyop/controlled opposition move rather than a fuck up. HRC has been known to fuck up with technology, and damage herself doing so. This makes your scenario unlikely.
To logically defend your scenario, you'd need to have some reason or explanation for why your scenario makes sense. AGAIN: What has this leak done? You've said: DJT attack piece will damage him. Donors will get ideas to exploit loopholes from piece about exploiting loopholes. HRC scandal is now fully exposed and will blow over.
None of these make any sense if you think critically about them for 2 minutes. You also seem to ignore the fact that the only real irrefutable data that's come out of the leak is documentation of HRC and HfA accounts.
>>78106208
The "free-for-all buffet" has been given 90% of MSM coverage since a month into the primary. There is literally no one left who a faked leak of the exact same talking points that they see on tv 10x a day will convince of their accuracy. This argument makes no logical sense.
>>78106617
take everything you see on the internet with a shit ton of caution, but leave your mind open to the possibility that there is knowledge to be gained. Occam's razor says HRC has been for sale for years, the DNC does network security about as good as any fortune 500 company, and OP is from >>>/x/
>>78107024
>it looks like there may be evidence of direct corruption due to scheduling conflicts with events for which a person was paid being impossible to attend
>THAT'S WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO THINK REEEEEEEEEEEEE
dude. what?
>>78107138
its not a grammatical error senpai and nobody is looking at or spreading the anti-trump talking points that by the way are nothing new, there is no new dirt on trump anyways. All we are looking at is if there are any connections we can make that make the Clintons look bad. You give people too much credit is was what I was saying.
>>78105990
que?
>>78107024
You are correct in that it isn't "illegal", but that isn't the point. Why would something like that be illegal when the corrupt people who benefit from it make the laws?
Something doesn't have to be illegal to be worthy of criticism or unethical, which is exactly what it is. Being payed to give speeches you couldn't possibly be present for? That is fits into exactly what Trump, and many others such as Roger Stone, have been saying; she is CROOKED. Whether what she does is illegal is irrelevant when it is clear to anyone with the slightest bit of common sense and moral value that she is taking bribes from questionable organizations.
This is useful information because it confirms a narrative as not just likely, but almost certain beyond a doubt.
>>78106617
>In other words, I think your concerns are valid upon further analysis, but how do we combat this?
That's what I'm trying to figure out. I've been following Hilldog and her email for the last year and a half and silently thinking about how this bitch functions.
Even back in 2008 her camp (Sidney Blumenthal, a vile piece of shit) gave Obongos "Birther" movement and then Trump picked it up and now Hillary's hands are clean and everyone blames Trump for that.
When Hildog was hired as Secy of State (probably cut a deal so she would drop out) Obongo told her not to hire Sidney Blumenthal (lifelong Clinton companion of 20+ years) and she still did. She put that fucker on payroll at the Clinton Administration.
So once again, her hands are clean as fuck. She's GOOD and people think she's gonna let go of the 2016 election that easily?
>>78106617
>hard evidence
>Clinton's
LOL
>>78107024
the importance of the leak was never anything incriminating against Hillary personally.
the big issue in the docs is that the DNC has been intentionally snubbing the rest of the dem field in favor of her.
there's some other minor shit in there that makes the DNC and Hillary look bad as well.
>>78106682
>Literally everyone important does this. What a bunch of retards. This is the least story-like of all possible things you could make hubbub about int he leak.
And that's exactly what the Hillmachine wants low IQ idiots to do--to focus on dumb ass speeches -- something that's legal and everyone does it.
We need to attack this broad from multiple directions. I'm not ready to give the White House to this bitch and then see this beautiful country be cucked beyond Canada for another 4-8 years.
>>78107574
I don't think she's especially good. I think that was her Husband's role, but his failing health has hampered that advantage. She has mishandled the media and has failed to subdue an almost senile communist and it looks the DNC convention will be in chaos more so than the Republicans which hurts Hillary's image as a unifier and her assertation that Trump is a divider.
>>78107608
That is why we shouldn't pursue the angle of this being a conspiratorial link because we don't have hard evidence and it will make us less credible.
>>78107760
being paid for speeches you couldn't possibly attend, basically masked bribery,
> don't focus on the speeches
>>78107574
>So once again, her hands are clean as fuck.
the FBI already has enough evidence to get an indictment, the only thing stopping them is the DoJ, and they can only postpone that for so long without pushing the FBI to full revolt.
>>78107959
It is hardly masked, more like writing on a piece of paper with a sharpie "TOTALLY NOT A BRIBE".
>>78107181
>we've already garnered useful information such as the involvement of mrss with the clintons.
Yeah good job. Idiot.
Shit posting won't get Trump to the White House. No nigger or spic above 40 gives a fuck about twitter.
>>78108227
the fuck are you talking about do you even know what mrss is?
>>78107320
>Occam's razor
Jesus, go back to l.eddit.
>>78107417
>she is CROOKED
>Hurr durr LE CROOKED HILLARY LOL BTFO'd
You idiot, you still don't understand what she's running on? She is running on "I'm not Trump".
Think about that for a second and maybe go outside of your moms apartment and walk outside for a bit....really think about it.
>>78082047
>"If you've ever studied how the government agencies like See Eye Aye operate, then this is basic 101 misinformation."
Looks legit.
>>78108530
....
this might finally be the thread that convinces me people care enough about /pol/ to shill it
if trolling, 10/10
you've earned your (You)'s
>>78108707
Jesus navas my head hurts from the cognitive dissonance
>>78108707
She will lose on "I'm not Trump". She needs more than that because if she is revealed to be completely and totally corrupt, as the speeches help demonstrate, then suddenly being "Clinton" is worse than being "Not Trump" to independents.
Why is what I am saying wrong?
>>78107629
>the big issue in the docs is that the DNC has been intentionally snubbing the rest of the dem field in favor of her.
How's that news? Have you ever looked into r/chickenuggets in the last 8 months? Their whole movement is based on Le DNC Election is Rigged Against Our Chicken Nugget Master.
You REALLY think the chicken nuggets are going to vote for Trump? You must be delusional.
If you had half a brain you wouldn't reply to my posts like a fucking buffoon.
>>78109021
They may not vote for Trump in large numbers, but if they hate Hillary enough they may vote for Jill Stein, write in Bernie, or not vote at all. Which would be good for Trump.
>>78108530
>omg gb2rebbit
>>78109021
>bruh, how have you not see this on rebbit already?
>>78107959
>being paid for speeches you couldn't possibly attend, basically masked bribery,
Still legal. Doubling down on the "Crooked Hillary" shit may backfire soon.
The GOP can't only depend on the Republican vote, they also need to depend on the nigger and spic vote.
>>78108033
>the FBI already has enough evidence to get an indictment, the only thing stopping them is the DoJ, and they can only postpone that for so long without pushing the FBI to full revolt.
OK let's say the Obango admin postpones it until January and gets into office and the GOP literally tries to impeach her for 4 years. So what? They impeached Ill Bill and he wasn't kicked out of office.
Nixon resigned because he had decency. Hilldog doesn't.
>>78074446
Delete your account.
>>78108959
>cognitive dissonance
>>78108974
>Why is what I am saying wrong?
Because you underestimate the Low IQ voter -- ie the beaten down nigger and spic and muslim and wymyn. The SJWs have been cucked to the max thanks to Obongo, do you really think people are going to have a "change of heart" and "OMG Hillary lied!" and vote for Trump? Do you even understand how the human psyche works?
You clearly don't have enough understanding of U.S. politics to realize that it is always harder for GOP to win.
I don't even want to know how old you are or your life experiences because you're super gullible.
>>78109955
they can't postpone it until januarary shill, the FBI and the rest of the intelligence community was threatening to quit a few months ago. i imagine they held that off by tossing them a bone and asking them to get more evidence before they finally decide to act on the evidence.
>>78109268
>but if they hate Hillary enough they may vote for Jill Stein
They won't.
Historically, a lot of people make up their mind in the polling booth.
The primary bullshit is just a show anyway. Most independents make up their mind the last minute.
>>78110304
The independants aren't usually the types you are describing. I didn't say that SJWs would vote for Trump; I said independents would. I also think the SJWs will be demoralized by not having Bernie run and thus stay home.
If you had better understanding than me, you could demonstrate how the SJWs are also the independents and why either group is likely to vote for Hillary if she continues to be outed as corrupt.
>>78110359
>they can't postpone it until januarary
Obongo JUST postponed the fucking FOIA request for Shillary's TPP emails until AFTER the election, you dolt...what makes you think Obongo can't push until the last minute?
http://freebeacon.com/issues/state-department-predicts-will-respond-foia-request-november-31-not-real-date/
>>78110496
>Historically, a lot of people make up their mind in the polling booth.
>The primary bullshit is just a show anyway. Most independents make up their mind the last minute.
I am curious as to whether you have evidence?
Albeit that is an unverifiable claim since you can't really know when someone decided or not.
>>78110767
FOIA requests and emails aren't criminal investigations that can cause a constitutional crisis.
They can't postpone this once everyone finds out what the evidence is with all these leaks that have been going on recently. It would have worked if nobody knew, but with each leak they risk bigger and bigger backlash from the public if they choose not to indict.
>>78110596
>I also think the SJWs will be demoralized by not having Bernie run and thus stay home.
Ole' Grandpa will either endorse her or help her and the sheep will follow (he already said he will do whatever it takes to help defeat The Don).
Many independents will vote for trump, but not enough and Trump needs minority votes. The spics are driving out in troves out of their taco shelters and getting their burrito moms and dads to vote for for Shillary.
In 2000, Dubya had 44% of the Hispanic vote.
That was 16 years ago, there are more spics now and spics are going nowhere near Trump, unfortunately.
>If you had better understanding than me, you could demonstrate how the SJWs are also the independents and why either group is likely to vote for Hillary if she continues to be outed as corrupt.
You forget that people get numbed and move on very quickly. SJWs and Independents KNOW Hilldog is corrupt. OK more emails about her speeches? Wow! What a revelation!
Idiot.
>>78110883
>I am curious as to whether you have evidence?
Look at last few elections. Do your own research.
Do you want a breitbart link and a reach around too? Lazy fuck
>>78065396
>>78065428
5 TrumpShekels have been deposited to your BLACKED.com account
>>78111319
>Leaf
Leave. This doesn't concern you.
>>78111179
I think its too early to speculate on the general election when we have all these leaks going on
We still haven't had the RNC and DNC conventions, which will likely be a very violent riot and I wouldn't be surprised if Trump were assassinated there. Hillary still needs to be indicted
>>78111179
>Ole' Grandpa will either endorse her or help her and the sheep will follow (he already said he will do whatever it takes to help defeat The Don).
Even if he does endorse I am not sure that would be enough. Especially because they are considering rioting at the DNC. I don't think those people are going to be easily convinced to vote for her, regardless of a Sander's endorsement.
>Many independents will vote for trump, but not enough and Trump needs minority votes. The spics are driving out in troves out of their taco shelters and getting their burrito moms and dads to vote for for Shillary.
I have a point to make later in regards to what you said.
>In 2000, Dubya had 44% of the Hispanic vote.
>That was 16 years ago, there are more spics now and spics are going nowhere near Trump, unfortunately.
>You forget that people get numbed and move on very quickly. SJWs and Independents KNOW Hilldog is corrupt. OK more emails about her speeches? Wow! What a revelation!
Okay so people get numbed easily, except for the hispanics and people who vote against Trump? That seems a little bit inconsistent.
>>78110767
what part of "the entire intelligence community is threatening to quit" didn't you understand?
which do you think the administration cares more about: Hillary getting indicted or having half the FBI, CIA, DHS, NSA, etc. resigning right at the end of his administration?
they'll throw Hillary under the bus as soon as they know they can take her out of the picture without her spilling whatever secrets she knows about the obamas. until then, all they can do is postpone until they have to give the FBI what it wants.
>>78111466
Up to 76 posts.
You do know you are crazy right?
>>78111319
t. dogfucker pierre
Sad!
>>78111518
>Okay so people get numbed easily, except for the hispanics and people who vote against Trump? That seems a little bit inconsistent.
You're maneuvering what I said so it fits your narrative.
What I said is, people become numb from misinformation (an old kike CIA tactic) and become disilusioned, so all they will see is:
HILLARY: NOT SO GREAT, BUT NOT TRUMP
TRUMP: EVIL SCUM
The hispanics wouldve never voted for Trump anyway especially after his comments on calling some Mexicans as rapists.
The other group is the black vote. You will get some black votes but the black vote always goes to DNC because of LBJ and the Civil Rights act of 1964.
There is no way the fag vote will go to Trump (maybe a small portion due to latest violence against them).
So what does that leave?
White male votes and independents.
>>78106696
Take a look everyone at pic
>>78111592
>Up to 76 posts.
>You do know you are crazy right?
You know I'm right, baby.
Come help us get this bitch out of politics.
>>78111566
>the entire intelligence community is threatening to quit
Show me.
>which do you think the administration cares more about: Hillary getting indicted or having half the FBI, CIA, DHS, NSA, etc. resigning right at the end of his administration?
Will never happen. Obongo admin has alienated most of those departments anyway. They hate him. He is a super leftist and can't lose the White House to Trump.
>they'll throw Hillary under the bus as soon as they know they can take her out of the picture without her spilling whatever secrets she knows about the obamas.
This I will agree with. She definitely knows a lot of shit about everyone especially Obongo.
>>78104649
>implying thats not a screenshot of a vm
>>78065396
>ITT people pretend that they will have an effect on the election
>>78112149
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3502676/FBI-chief-James-Comey-increasingly-convinced-Hillary-s-secret-email-server-broke-law.html
http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/01/klein-comey-and-a-lot-of-other-fbi-agents-will-resign-if-hillary-is-not-indicted-video/
https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2016/1/6/will-the-fbi-revolt-over-indicting-hillary/
>>78111898
Yes they do become numb to misinformation. It isn't just misinformation against Hillary though. They will become numb to the misinformation against Trump as well.
Not only that, I think many Hispanics are afraid to say they support Trump in person or on the phone out of fear of being reprimanded by other hispanics so I don't think that is going to cost him the election.
I don't think Hillary will pull in enough of the black vote to be considerable simply because she is not Obama and also because Bill is not lively at all this time around.
Fag vote may stay at home more so since many of them aren't too fond of Hillary due to her previous comments and many of them were strong Bernie supporters.
I am pretty sure you are overblowing his weaknesses and overplaying Hillaries strengths while also ignoring that she doesn't excite anyone.
>>78112149
>constitutional crisis will happen if she is indicted
>>78112149
>Will never happen. Obongo admin has alienated most of those departments anyway.
Obama cares about his legacy, and you can be damned sure he's not going to let it be squandered just to spite Trump
>>78112209
>>ITT people pretend that they will have an effect on the election
Best post in this thread.
I won't deny tho, some of my shitposts have been twitted by Trump before. So shitposts do work.
>>78112372
Boring links. Seen em.
The president has enough power in DoJ (Loretta Lynch) to not indict her. It will just fall into "Gross negligence" category.
>>78112427
>They will become numb to the misinformation against Trump as well.
Not the shit he says about other ethnicities, etc.
Being called racist/sexist/etc is worse than having committed "white lie" fraud like speeches etc.
You have to be psychotic if you think Messicans will forgive Trump and switch sides. He alienated the Messicans just like the GOP alienated the niggers since the 60s (Thanks Barry Goldwater!).
>>78112460
Yeah because allowing the biggest criminal in US History to get the white house after Obama isn't gonna ruin his reputation at all. People only remember Nixon for Watergate. Obama's legacy will be selling the white house to a global criminal enterprise black market and effectively destroying everything out country stands for
>>78112656
>The president has enough power in DoJ (Loretta Lynch) to not indict her.
and the intelligence community will rebel if he does that. he already caved in and allowed them to continue their probe.
>It will just fall into "Gross negligence" category.
THAT IS STILL A CRIMINAL CHARGE AND WILL MEAN AN INDICTMENT YOU FUCKING RETARD
>>78112800
it can reasonably be assumed that Obama hates both Hillary and Trump. the only reason he's endorsing Hillary is because she has dirt on him.
>>78112447
You mean if she's forced into following the law?
>>78112797
The shit he says about "ethnicities" is misinformation since illegal isn't an ethnicity, nor is jihadist or ISIS supporter. They portray it as such, but it isn't.
