[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Should polygamy be legal?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 31
Thread images: 5
File: polygamy_0.jpg (143 KB, 1228x810) Image search: [Google]
polygamy_0.jpg
143 KB, 1228x810
Should polygamy be legal?

not polyandry
>>
Surely with more people in the household it would be economically feasible. All those bodies drawing in income to provide a good future for the children, and able to pump out more children before the women grow infertile
>>
File: thumbs up kid.jpg (23 KB, 398x500) Image search: [Google]
thumbs up kid.jpg
23 KB, 398x500
>>78024679
>>
I've never heard a good argument against it other than it sometimes exploits women.

Well then, make exploiting women illegal, not polygamy. Consenting adults do as they please.

The problem is that it's tied to religion.
>>
File: qt.jpg (55 KB, 281x615) Image search: [Google]
qt.jpg
55 KB, 281x615
on a side note, this one is a real qt
>>
Don't expect the Government to manage that contract. Marriage laws are already a clusterfuck with two people.
>>
>>78024679

Big love was an awful program.
>>
>>78024679
>implying the women wouldn't want you for themselves

Imagine a divorce in a polygamous marriage
>>
>>78025576
Multiple contracts would probably be better than an all-inclusive contract. Unless someone draws up a comprehensive template-contract to better everyone's lives
>>
>>78025798
Wouldn't having that many wives make it better than a single wife? Instead of taking 1/2 she takes 1/5?
>>
Polygamy wouldn't work really. First of all it encourages the men with the most wealth to snatch up most the women. Look at Middle East, you have bunch of unmarried young men. They're angry because the older men get like four wives each, plus bunch of mistresses. They're stuck with nothing. If they had a family jihad wouldn't be a thing.
>>
>>78024679
>Should polygamy be legal?
here is the britbong answer
>>78025643
>>
>>78024679
More that one woman in your life? You must be a teen, masochist or plain stupid.
>>
>>78026610
It's a burden but the outcome will often be passing on your genes to and raising more children than you otherwise would have.
>>
http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royptb/367/1589/657.full.pdf
In short, it increases crime, degrades women's rights, and promotes child abuse and murder.
Some quotes:
[Wealthy men had more wives than poor men.] While wealthy men had more total off- spring and longer reproductive careers (33 years for wealthy men compared to 22 for poor men), the chil- dren of poor men had better survival rates for their children to age 15. For poor men, 6.9 of their offspring(per wife) survived on average to age 15, while for wealthy men only 5.5 of their offspring (per wife) sur- vived to age 15. This is amazing, given that the poor men had less than 10 per cent of the wealth of the rich men
[...]
The reduced supply of unmarried women, who are absorbed into polygynous marriages, causes men of all ages to pursue younger and younger women. The competition also motivates men to use whatever connections, advantages or alliances they have in order to obtain wives, including striking financial and recipro- cal bargains with the fathers and brothers of unmarried females [...] More competition also motivates men to seek to control their female relatives (e.g. sisters), as demand for wives increases. This results in suppressing women’s freedoms, increasing gender inequality and stimulating domestic violence.
[...]
(i) creates competition among co-wives, (ii) expands the spousal age gap, (iii) decreases the relatedness within households, and (iv) reduces paternity certainty (which increases male sexual jealousy). Allocations of household resources to another wife’s children mean fewer resources for one’s own children. [...] Polygynous marriages also create elevated risks of intra-household abuse, neglect and homicide
>>
>>78025426
did u see her porn?
>>
>>78028979
no
>>
>>78029171
google chloe svengly or w/e her name is and porn and u can see her swallow a l0ad
>>
Why does the goberment needs to regulate marriages at all though?
Just make an inheritance and that's it.
>>
Its Biblically okay. So no real reason religiously to ban it. Many wives, one Husband. Its the divorcement that God got upset with. There is only one reason anyone can get divorced and that is fornication.
>>
Marriage is one man and one woman in the Bible
Our laws should coincide with biblical morality
>>
>>78031720
>>78031315
>>
I'm not sure American women are comfortable being in a fucking house with other women. See Twitter for instance. Imagine several Twitter women in the same fucking house. nigga, you'd have to be swingers or some shit.
>>
>>78031315
>>78031812
>http://www.gotquestions.org/polygamy.html

Question: Why did God allow polygamy / bigamy in the Bible?

Polygamy is not God's intent for marriage
>>
File: image.jpg (59 KB, 640x630) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
59 KB, 640x630
Sure, why not

The idea of a stable family is fucked now, parents who are married are desperately clinging to moral values.

Now we have single mothers because men are betas who leve their partner and child

Then theres faggot families who cant offer a caring mother figure, or dykes who cant offer a strong masculine figure

Then theres the race mixers who tear apart their childrens identity because they cant process who they really are

So why not watch as your father fucks multiple men to teach them: if you dont like it, get another.

Because why commit to anything right? Just show no emotion to anything, dont see value, dont care for one person who you love. Just do what the fuck you want and disregard everything else

WHY WONT RUSSIA JUST LAUNCH THE FUCKING NUKES NOW!!!!!!
>>
>>78024679
TV show by jews designed to deride American Christianity. Imagine if there was a show on TV about a cabal of jews, such as a show about a Hassidic family - where the wife is forced to wear a wig, and incest and sexual abuse is rampant. Just imagine.
>>
>>78024679
Alpha... as... fuck.
>>
Just make it legal to buy women eggs and surrogate mothers.
>>
File: You know where this is going.jpg (60 KB, 600x300) Image search: [Google]
You know where this is going.jpg
60 KB, 600x300
>>78025644
>Big love was an awful program
Agreed. shit made me cringe so hard my neck hurt

HBO should stick to what they know best. Midgets, rapists, blatant feminist propaganda, and flaccid penises on screen every seven minutes or lest
>>
>>78031874
Might have better luck in Utah, but these days even there it might be tricky.
>>
>>78029691
Wasn't that from some shit art house movie she did with that faggot guy?
Thread replies: 31
Thread images: 5

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.