>>77991342
>>77991342
How am I supposed to forget about it if it's all these chucklefucks bring up?
May I remind you op, of two most important things.
First, you are a faggot.
Second, if the state regulates what defines a well regulated militia, then what will define the rebels who eventually conquer you?
What about the explicit mention of the people?
Isn't it possible that the intent is for the people to be armed for numerous reasons, namely, though not exclusively, as members of an old fashioned late 18th century militia?
>>77991342
The Supreme Court has reaffirmed an individual's right to bear arms, regardless of whether they are 'war-useful' weapons.
Don't bump this thread after my post.
Reminder to every idiot that actually believes this: every adult is considered part of the state militia.
>>77991342
>the security of a Free State
No one knows what this means, tho.
Learn grammar faggot (pic related)
>>77991342
solomente un post para id
>>77991342
A militia can't fight if it's limited to single shot bolt action rifles. Honestly the militia (that means every citizen of the US btw) should be able to have selective fire firearms as well.
>>77991342
Really makes you think
>>77991342
Regulated in traditional parlance is a synonym of equipped, standardized, and organized.
The long-term liberal strategy is to change the very concept of the word over time.
Well Regulated in those days meant in working order. Not overly legislated.
>during the Tiananmen Square Protest. Before arriving to the U.S., she remembers sucking on a popsicle and observing the people as they gathered around to protest.
LOL
& she still wants to ban guns like her glorious people's republic of China did, that she left
Fuck i hate immigrants who come & bring their failed policies with them
>>77991342
Words don't mean what you think they do.
>>77993054
>Fuck i hate immigrants who come & bring their failed policies with them
Literally this. I wouldn't mind Hispanics half as much if they dropped their retarded leftist leanings when they came here, their neighborhoods turn into Little Mexico overnight, complete with police corruption and cartel hideouts.
>de-federalize the military
>states now have teeth when they threaten secession
Probably won't happen
>>77991342
>1 post by this ID
>>77991342
>we just wanna take away automatic weapons
>we just wanna add restrictions
>we just wanna ban semi autos
>the 2nd amendment means the national guard, only police and the military need guns
>>77991342
Militia Act of 1903
Shall not be infringed
Fuck off commie.
The US hardly had an army at the time. Common sense "well regulated" meant properly trained. And 1903 militia act cements that US citizens are the militia.
>>77991342
Says the gook. Nothings more annoying then non-whites trying to tell you what's right and wrong in your own country
>>77991342
The answer to this question is well explained in the DC vs Heller Supreme Court Ruling in 2008 I'll paraphrase:
At the time, well equipped professional soldiers were referred to as Regulars and rag-tag militia-men were known as Irregulars. Regulars (being well equipped) all had muskets of the same caliber allowing them to mass produce bullets and distributed them as needed. Irregulars brought their guns from home, each in it's own caliber with it's own tool to make bullets. They tediously melted their own lead to make their own bullets after every engagement. This gave Regulars a huge logistical advantage. A "well regulated militia" simply means well equipped, able to fight on par with a real army.
We know the founders didn't mean "Well Regulated" as in "strict government regulations" for 2 reasons:
1st because the bill of rights was always written with the perspective of of preventing the government from infringing on individual rights (they CAN'T infringe on free speech, they CAN'T force you to be a witness against yourself, they CAN'T seize your property without cause..ect.) The whole point of the bill of rights is to establish things that the government cannot do to the people. To interpret Well-Regulated as giving the government power to limit an individual right would be the contrary to the rest of the document.
2nd: If they meant that the government can establish a militia to which it has strict control (government regulations,) why would they include the second phrase "..., the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed?" It completely contradicts the idea of government regulations. Well-Regulated couldn't have meant "government regulations" or else the entire amendment would've been a contradiction and essentially meaningless.
Just read DC vs Heller, it covers everything including "assault weapons." Well regulated=well equipped flows right into protections on weapons in common military use.
>>77991342
>Shocking fact: it is not ACTUALLY your God-goven right to own a private arsenal
Straight into the trash.
>witnessed tiananmen square as a child and saw what a government that is no longer afraid of its citizens is capable of doing
>writes about a dystopian society where a militarized government oppresses its powerless citizens
>"having guns in 2016 is bad and wrong, turn them in to the government, you can totally trust them"
>>77993741
>1st because the bill of rights was always written with the perspective of of preventing the government from infringing on individual rights
Forgetting about the 10th amendment aren't we? The second as with the 10th is about protecting the domain of state sovereignty.
The militias are the state armies. The second amendment exists to prevent the federal government from disarming them, as the enumerated powers of the federal government include the power to define the discipline of the militia and to provide them with arms.
I thought the "well regulated millitia" was referring to the people being able to band together to take on tyranny?
>>77994785
Not the people. The state.
If the people rebel against perceived tyranny, they will be subjugated by the state militias. This happened on several occasions.
>>77993741
heller also upheld the idea that the 2nd amendment has limits, but people ignore that and just spout "shall not be infringed" like retards without understanding anything about the constitution or their rights
>Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.
>>77993054
She's probably a Chinese plant.
>pic-related is a true Chinese immigrant
>>77992689
>>77991803
Where are you guys getting this idea from? That everyone is in the militia? Not disagreeing with it, I've just never heard that before and I'm curious where it came from. Did the Founders say that?
Wew
>>77993594
>also known as the Dick Act
Can't make this up
>>77991342
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
THE RIGHT OF
THE PEOPLE
SHALL
>>77992182
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Where was this image yesterday when I really needed it.
>>77995375
NOT
>>77994938
What occasions? You're wrong btw...
>>77995521
INFRINGED
>>77995131
The Supreme court did, but the intent of the founders was that the US had no standing army, so to defend herself every able man with a rifle was a member of the militia if we were invaded, or our government became tyrannical.
>liberals not understanding grammar or historical context
Not surprised
>>77991342
According to the law as it stands, absolutely not.
>>77994972
Yes, there are limits--just like how you can't yell "fire" in a crowded building. So no nukes (but tanks are still totally legit.)
I remember them saying that weapons in common military use are protected under the 2nd and that cities can't really restrict concealed carry. Overall I thought they came down squarely on the pro-gun side of the issue.
>>77995984
>>77991342
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/311
suck my cock fagget.
>>77991342
people also tend to conveniently forget the lack of an abortion and marriage amendment
10 U.S. Code § 311 - Militia: composition and classes
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 14; Pub. L. 85–861, §1(7), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1439; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title V, §524(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1656.)>>77996077
SJW ASIAN BITCH
>>77992182
This. Imagine being so desperate that you disregard a very basically structured sentence to make your argument sound more legitimate.
Leaving alone the fact that a militia is usually comprised of unprofessional fighters and citizens anyway. It's not like it's specifying a paramilitary group or something.
>>77995527
Shay's rebellion doesn't count?
>>77993741
Yes, well-regulated was a phrase used at the time to me "level headed, as usual, or as one would expect to function."
So read in modern parlance, the 2nd amendment means that in order for a militia that you would expect to be able to properly perform its duties, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
>>77991342
Cause the amendment literally says People need to be able to own guns in order for well regulated militias to be formed. Are people this spastic?
>>77996077
Saved. Thanks bud.
>>77995129
I can't handle this much freedom.
>>77996422
Was it the people rebelling or the state?
>>77992182
>still not getting it
It literally calls for a domestic police state.
>>77996722
People
I'm not sure I follow your train of thought. Are you saying that there's never been armed revolts in the US?
>>77991342
Liberals tend to forget that "well-regulated militia" constitutes the general public and is cited an example for necessity, not a prerequisite.
In short, she's a dumb cunt.
Also,
>1 post by this ID
>>77996933
The person I was responding to originally said well regulated militia meant the state and not the people. Maybe I just interpreted it wrong.
>>77996247
Women can't own guns. Ok.
>>77992182
Even if you completely ignore this a militia is just a group of people that bring their own arms, you can't be in a militia without having the right to keep and bear arms.
>>77996793
>every person is a member of the police
Huh?
>>77997209
You're a fucking retard.
>>77995131
The militia composed all men able to bear arms and was intended to empower the states and the people as a check on the federal government. Here's a relevant passage from the author of the constitution, James Madison (Federalist paper 46):
>Let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger.
>The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms.
>This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.
>To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence.
>It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops.
>Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms, will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it.
>Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.
>>77997446
no, it means that only us citizens should be allowed to police us citizens. it's like in italy, where the cops are chinese nationals. how would you feel if Juan Pedro, a mexican citizen, was the one pulling you over in his taco wagon?
it goes a little further but essentially we police ourselves for our own protection
>>77992182
should have payed attention in them ESL courses
shiiiieettt
>>77997830
K i get your point now. I thought you were arguing against it.
>>77991342
Thanks for the incorrect information yet again, OP.
>>77997637
Sex classifications arent given the highest level of scrutiny and even if they were they could be justified on grounds of biological sex differences.
Does it say "the right of the MILITIA to keep and bear arms..."? No, it doesn't.
What is a militia comprised of? People with arms.
And there are two types of militia: the National Guard and the unorganized militia.
>>77996422
Well it doesn't guarantee you win your rebellion. It gives you the right to try.
>>77995129
>they forgot to put screaming eagle in the background.
But no kidding, based Lily
>>77995129
Once again the based asians prove themselves worthy of being honorary whites.
>>77991342
Dipshits tend to conveniently forget the part where it says civilians owning guns is the only way to ensure that militias can form themselves and become regulated.
>>77997198
The militia is a state run organization. It has people in it.
>>77991342
https://www.billwhittle.com/firewall/your-second-amendment
Watch or read, if it was like those Facebook liberals say, then the discussion would be over in a day at the Congress
>>77997960
for more random facts look up police state and it's original definition
HOW MANY POSTS BY THIS ID?
>>77993198
Culture is a racial construct.
>>77991342
Considering she has no idea what the term means, no.
>>77996715
>>77998138
>>77998189
If you think she's based check out this mother fucker
https://youtu.be/eZo4hbGJjVI
>>77998228
I don't work for the state and I'm still part of the militia.
>"it's not your God-given right to own a personal-arsenal"
Can't you burgers own tanks, jets, attack helicopters and battleships legally?
>>77998984
Because the state has the right to conscript you into public service.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZrcR3guGG0
Steven Crowder did a pretty nice video on the whole "its just for militias dumb conservashits XDD" argument .
> also I will probably never own an AR 15 during my lifetime
> pic related
>>77999040
Of course.
>>77991342
SHALL
>You will never be so mad you have to furiously edit in your argument you never made to some image you saw as a "controversy section".
>>77999040
Yep.
>>77999071
Your non sequitur is not an argument.
>>77999071
It was already posted in this thread, but if you need help interpreting it, I will be glad to help.
10 U.S. Code § 311 - Militia: composition and classes
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 14; Pub. L. 85–861, §1(7), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1439; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title V, §524(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1656.)
>>77999199
it's for home defense *cough cough.
>>77999199
I fucking love you Americans.
>>77993594
>>77995343
>also known as the Dick Act
I guess that's why it's just pussies that want to ban them
>>77991342
Shocking fact: despite 80% of them having poetry or literature degrees, liberals don't know what a comma is
>>77997446
So true, Roger. So true.
>>77995610
/thread
illuminati is real
infowars.com
>>77999447
You aussies are pretty cool too, hope the Emu puppet-government lets you have your lever-actions back.
>>77993203
This guy gets it.
>>77999314
>>77999327
Continue to the next section of the us code and you see militia service described as a duty to which few are exempt and that the militia generally may be called upon to suppress invasion or insurrections.
>>77993203
And we will get our shit stomped by a regular army just as in 1812.
>>77991342
Man, all this bitching and whining about banning guns has made me want to get a semi-automatic rifle for myself. I've been thinking of joining the local shooting range for a while now, as it's just a ten minute walk away.
Did a lot of shooting in my teens when my middle school offered it as an elective, and I won almost every competition we had, so it would be fun to pick it up again.
>>77991342
gungrab = civil war
>>77991342
I'll bite.
How will we have the arms for a militia in the future if tye government takes our guns now?
>>78000216
Meaning you.
>>77993254
1 post by this ID.
>>78000568
Thats why we have a system of laws and institutional checks and balances.
>>77994343
> the militias are the state armies
You're wrong.
Title 10 U.S.C. 311. Militia: composition and classes
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are -
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
The militia is separate from the people. A militia is necessary for the security of a free state. Therefore the people must be armed so that when the time comes they can form a militia. How can that necessary militia exist if the people aren't armed? If we are not armed then we are no longer a free state, just a nation of cucks like Britian or Germany.
>>78000911
Indeed.
>>78000937
>10 U.S. Code § 331 - Federal aid for State governments
>Whenever there is an insurrections in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection.
>>77991342
I always read it as we have the right to a well regulated militia AND the right to keepn and bear arms.
>>78001283
Organized or unorganized?
>>78001218
>If we are not armed then we are no longer a free state, just a nation of cucks like Britian or Germany.
How are you not? America started going to shit long before Britain and Germany and you're far worse off. You've taken in so many immigrants that whites can no longer elect their own leaders. Mitt Romney got 60% of the white vote, but lost.
I'm not saying this to shit on America, but it's just the truth.
>>78001480
Whatever he wants. That law is written down two sections away from the definition of the militia. Its on the same page in the law book. Its not controversial that it refers to the militia as previously defined.
>>78001676
So you agree that people are the militia. Why are you arguing again?
>>77991342
No she doesn't. There's plenty of precedent for citizens owning military grade arsenals.
Henry Clay's cousin, the Kentucky abolitionist Cassius Clay owned several cannon's he would use to fend off racists
>muh hypocracy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassius_Marcellus_Clay_(politician)#Political_career
>>78001806
I'm arguing that you are a member of the militia because you are subject to conscription.
>>78001590
Exactamente ése! You tell them.
>>78001898
How can I be conscripted into something I'm already a part of?
>>77991342
>>77991342
Also
>1 post by this id...
>>77999040
If you can bear it.
To bear means to carry.
>>78001922
I don't know to insult you or not. At least you stayed in your own country.
>>78001939
You may be conscripted into service; into fighting for the interest state or federal government as permitted by law.
>>78001218
We aren't a free state. In a free society you can call a spade a spade. Pic fucking related, they only released it after outrage over the (((omitted))) version.
>>78002166
The militia is independent of the draft.
>>78002547
see
>>78000937
The only difference is the draft is to send you off to foreign wars.
>>78002173
Damn I'm giving up my guns now.
>>78001723
This.
>>77991342
> one post by this id
>>78002547
They don't need to draft you because you as part of the militia are already a pawn of the state. They just haven't given you the order to kill yet.
>>78003066
I love that man
>>78002015
If you think muskets in the civil war were used more for bayoneting then you're a god damned retard.
>>77998883
>tfw an Asian ESL immigrant is more articulate and persuasive than you are
>>77992753
Stupid pic by a stupid newfag.
It's a communist guy who tried take power over germany and got what is deserved.
>>78003066
Jesus, what happened to the Democrats?
>>78002044
He's visiting so he can bring the rest of the family.
>>77995131
The Dick Act.
It states that every able bodied male between a certain age, 17 to 40 if I remember correctly, is legally a member of the reserve militia. The "active" militia is the national guard
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4zE0K22zH8
4 out of 8 of the current Supreme Court Justices think she does. Soon to be 5 out of 9.
>>78003997
>they knew the time might come when they'd have to do that again
when will it happen /pol/
>>77991342
> A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
The amendment states both that a well regulated militia is important and that people have the right to own guns. It does not say that this right only applies to members of this militia as the dumb cunt in OP would have you believe.
>>78003205
You seem to forget that the right to bear arms gives you and your neighbors the power to refuse the state if it is being tyrannical. Same with the Fed
>>77998883
Do you know where the other Henson Ong video is located?
It was regarding an underground shooting range which was near a school.
As someone just getting into the history of firearms legislation in US history, how big of a deal was DC vs Heller?
>>77991342
Women arent capable of having valid points in 2016, didnt read.
>I need assault weapons and semi automatic machine guns to protect me from gubment XDDD
>*government drone launches a rocket at your house*
Guess it didn't do you much good, eh gunfags?
>>78005416
It created the individual right to bear arms out of the blue. Never had the second amendment been read in this manner prior to Heller.
>>78005313
No it doesn't.
Because we need a militia to protect our free state, congress can't make any laws that infringe on people's rights to own and carry guns.
>>78005631
Why are you against the 2nd?
>>78005791
Because Heller is wrong as a matter of legal interpretation. Because the second amendment is irrelevant to modern military organization and is in need of revision.
>>78002015
Now list the militia's enemies then versus the militia's potential enemies now.
>>78005916
Too vague. Continue.
>>78005916
The second amendment is specifically a check against the government military and it applies to the people's right to own tanks, warships, submarines and fighter jets as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Meaning_of_.22well_regulated_militia.22
>>77999447
We love you too, you cunt.
>>78006181
im sure scotus agrees with you.
>>77995610
Your founding fathers really thought things through didn't they?
>>78006273
Yes, even though its a state issue, look into and what it takes to buy one, if you weren't a broke bitch who needs a government to do everything for you, you could probably even afford one.
>>77991342
You can't arm and regulate a well trained militia AFTER they're needed. They need to be well armed, trained and regulated during times of peace so that they can effectively protect themselves and their country during times of duress
>>78006501
good luck trying to buy a nuke, faggot.
>>78006590
Probably legal with a tax stamp.
Notice, however, that the Liberal needs to jump to nuclear weapons before he can even pretend to have a legitimate point.
>>78006590
The US military does not condone nuclear deployment, just like land mines, so it is not legal for citizens to own because they are no longer government armaments, they are deterrents.
>>78006690
feel free to show me where you can get get fully armed versions of any of the things you listed.
>>77995129
tfw you will never be an American or free
>>78005547
The ironic part is how you think people being armed isn't a powerful force. There is a reason Iraq and Afghanistan fucking suck and that is that everyone is a threat regardless of how well they treat you face to face. The same shit can be for Americans if the government tries shit. They may drone a few people but there are those close that will pop them in their sleep or driving down a road.
Just because you are pussy and are afraid to fight doesn't mean everyone else is.
>>77991342
As for this, a well regulated militia was any adult aged/military aged male that represented his family. Thusly anyone who has a household to protect was armed and part of that areas militia. Anyone now who owns or rents a place should be armed as they are the protective force of their area and their personal stuff.
The good news is, the more you fear guns and try to take them away, the more your kind get killed while armed ones like me live. You are only eliminating yourself and doing the dirty work for us.
>>77991342
we all know the second amendment exists for the government to protect itself from the government disarming itself
right?
...right???
p.s google the definition of regular
>>78006829
I know you are used to other people doing everything for you, but those things usually get assembled, but you can check the milweb.net classifieds to buy parts from other people's projects.
>>78007449
oh so i was right. you cant buy them. good to know, stupid nigger.
>>78006829
See:
>>77999199
I don't have a link but Google is your friend. You have to register the main gun as a destructive device with the ATF, but it's legal.
>>78001878
>Cannons
>Kentucky
Never change, Kentucky.
>>78007545
>you can have a gun if the atf lets you
yeah thats not a right if you have to ask for special permission.
>>78007537
No, you are just too stupid to look the website I told you to look at or buy the ammo seperately.
>>78007727
there were no subs or fighter jets on there. all the tanks had decommissioned weapons. so basically nothing you said was actually there.
>>78007537
Also, your original point was that they can't be owned, not that you can't buy them all fully assembled assembled and delivered from someone who will fully train you and explain how everything works.
>>78007683
>What is a form4473
>>78007856
Must be in someone's garage then faggot.
>>78007917
>form4473
something that bans you from having certain things if you're addicted to any stimulant. pretty sure nicotine is a stimulant. pretty sure it's perfectly legal to be addicted to.
>>78008197
Wow your so smart. How did so many guns wind up in the hands of American citizens then? You have to fill that out and get an FBI background check to buy a gun from any dealer.
>>78007856
You said you only needed to see one of the things (google and there are places to find subs and fighter jets like globalplanesearch.com/usa/warbirds, but you will keep moving the bar anyway), but did you not see they have an aviation and marine section or do you not understand how classified ads work?
Nobody claimed there is a huge market for it and you can buy them at any corner convenience store, the only point is that it is legal to own and there are people buying and selling them all the time.
>>78008197
It asks if you are an *unlawful* user of stimulants, retard. No wonder you faggots can't understand the Constitution. Go back to school.
Isn't there a journalist that tried to buy a semi-auto rifle to prove a point and got rejected because his background check showed up a history of alcoholism and other physical abuses towards others?
one day im gonna fill out a form 1 for a nuke
>>78008347
>your so smart.
>your
>>77999199
i love this fucking country
>>78008486
no it asks if you are an unlawful user of or addicted to stimulants.
learn to read, nigger.
>>78008669
>>78008727
Just put no then nigger. There's not a cigarette registery yet.
>>78003066
ffffffffuuuuuuuuuuck me,we've fallen far.
>>78003972
>The Dick Act
>>78008846
that's a felony. so now i have to commit a crime to keep my rights?
>>78008928
Go blow up the ATF if you don't agree with it. Don't whine to me.
>>78003630
they stopped serving in the military. no reasonable person enjoys violence, but enjoyment doesnt matter in national security.
>>78003630
Communism + cultural marxism
>>78008928
www.armslist.com
>>78007119
Washington never said that,i'm afraid
>>78007856
>decommissioned weapons
Its a giant hassle and huge wait to transfer weapons, the reason most people selling their tanks do it this way is because its much easier to sell quickly with minimal liability issues and they buyer can worry about all the paperwork for making it a registered destructive device, so you don't have to put the sell on hold for months while the paperwork is processed.
>>78006755
>>78006690
US nuke labs have been privatized for decades
>>77991342
The "well regulated militia" is an explanation for the right ot bear arms, not the absolute condition.
>>77993741
Probably unrelated, but can we get a copy of your constitution for Germany/all of Europe? Because at least 75% of the problems we have right now could easily be solved if we were, you know, actually free citizens and stuff. Just saying. Maybe invade us again and make us adopt your constitution? Pretty please? Leave some guns maybe? Because I like guns - I can't own them in Germany because I don't own any land I can hunt on and am not part of a shooting club, but whenever I visit my uncle in Mississippi he lets me shoot his entire arsenal.
TL;DR: Please gib copy of constitution, gib freedom, gib guns. Will gib beer in return.
>>77991342
the prefatory clause has no bearing on the operative clause
