Motion fails on the first of the four gun control proposals voted on today. Only 3 more to deal with
Source
https://www.google.com/amp/insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/49846?client=safari#
>>77960536
>77960536
Link? Live stream? Anything?
>>77960648
http://www.c-span.org/video/?411372-1/us-senate-takes-gun-control-legislation&live
http://www.c-span.org/video/?411372-1/us-senate-takes-gun-control-legislation&live
Votes being counted on something right now.
Cmoooooooon hat trick.
>Sanders
>Aye
>Votes in the affirmative
>Kirk
That fucking traitor did it again.
Which one?
>The Democratic proposals:
>Brought by Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., it would give the Justice Department the power to stop anyone from purchasing a gun if that person has been on the federal terrorist watch lists sometime in the past five years. This measure would also make it easier for the government to halt a gun purchase, based on "reasonable belief" as opposed to "probable cause" that the individual will use the firearm to commit terrorism. The White House backs this measure.
>An amendment by Chris Murphy, D-Conn., would close the "gun show loophole" by requiring every gun purchaser to undergo a background check and to expand the background check database. It would also extend background checks to Internet sales.
>The GOP proposals:
>This one from John Cornyn, R-Texas, would require that law enforcement be alerted when anyone on the terrorist watch list attempts to buy a weapon from a licensed dealer. If the buyer has been investigated for terrorism within the past five years, the attorney general could block a sale for up to three days while a court reviews the sale. The government would have to show probable cause that the person is a known or suspected terrorist.
>An amendment by Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, would clarify what it means to be found mentally deficient, and giving people suspected of serious mental illness a process to challenge that determination.
>>77960694
>>77960760
I leave for 10 minutes to make this thread and this is what happens. The fuck is this uppity nigger babbling about Africa for? Why is everyone in the room a women
>>77960536
im surprised there aren't more threads on this. seems kinda important.
i guess /pol/ is too busy responding to datamining "what is your opinion on X" threads
>>77960536
Cmon boys, get in this fucking thread
>>77960850
I think it's the second one? The way they worded it is different for obvious rhetoric reasons. They called it the one to increase funding and resources for national background checks
>>77960536
>Motion fails on the first of the four gun control proposals voted on today. Only 3 more to deal with
Good luck, but I'm not optimistic.
I raise my SSG08 in salute to you.
>>77961236
2nd one just failed pretty badly. 2 more to go.
only cloture voting on limiting the debates.
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1880146_4_gun_control_bills_to_be_voted_on_tomorrow.html&page=10
>>77961224
Yeah the second one is being voted on now. Not sure which the first one that failed was, I guess the first Dem one?
>>77961303
>2nd one just failed pretty badly. 2 more to go.
Are those voted on right away or can I go to sleep? Will it be archived?
When seconds count, police are minutes away.
>>77960536
One does not merely take on the Gun Lobby. They are a duel Donor/Constituent alliance, the most powerful kind of alliance in Politics.
>>77960536
read somewhere today that 96% Americans agree that if you shouldn't be able to have a gun if you're on the terrorist watchlist
Apparently I am with the 4% because I don't know who the fuck is on or how to get on the watchlist because it's all classified information.
I don't have any guns yet.
I'd have a shit fit if they got anything through before I save money for funs.
>>77961433
They're being voted right now. It's live.
http://www.c-span.org/video/?411372-1/us-senate-takes-gun-control-legislation&live
Voting for delays on purchase for people on the no-fly list right now.
So is there going to be shit about banning military style semi automatic weapons?
>>77961619
As opposed to the gun prohibition lobby, which is literally just urban millionaires and billionaires who have personal bodyguards.
>Delay no fly list gun sales for 72 hours
>This will still fail somehow
>>77961714
Yeah I got it open now. Fuggit, time to watch.
Why are they saying names but not giving their votes?
No one is even at their desk how are they voting
>>77961743
One of these fuckers can just walk up there and add something to it to ban them, it could even be already hidden inside one of the laws. No one reads that shit.
>>77961878
Yeah idk how this works but why are people just standing around and talking in the front; this looks like a mess
>>77961828
I think they are voting, then afterwards they'll read off the yays and nays.
>>77961878
>>77961828
You walk up to the lady and say aye or nay. Once everyone's voted they announce who voted for what.
>>77961793
Exactly. The Gun Lobby consists of large groups of angry Rednecks backed by Industrial corporations. Even Bernie Sanders is smart enough to let that sleeping dog lie.
It'd be easier to take on Goldman Sachs than the NRA, no actual lie.
>>77961992
But she's going so fast
>>77961913
I read the amendments, there's nothing like that in the terror watchlist bills.
Also FYI guys they're just voting on cloture. This is to end debate and go to the actual vote on whether or not to pass the amendments.
>>77961992
Oh. I thought you pressed buttons on your desk which is why there were "scandals" before of people pressing buttons at other people's desks while they were away
>>77961878
Do most japs speak English?
>>77962054
Good.
so at least some of these are going to get shot down? omg i can't wait for the shitlib SHAME ON YOU BLOOD IS ON YOUR HANDS tweets i'm already erekt
>>77962054
The NRA is literally 5 million dues-paying members, most of whom are common citizens, and random people who contribute to the NRA-ILA. They should be more powerful than some liberal fucks from NYC who will never be affected by these regulations.
>>77962054
>It'd be easier to take on Goldman Sachs than the NRA, no actual lie.
Because at least the ladder believes in American laws
>>77962068
Have a (you) for being the one guy in America who might have actually read the amendments
>Rubio not there again
>>77962175
Same family comfy as fuck
I know this is just for cloture, but why are people standing in the front and talking
>>77962175
All of these bills are dead in the water. I don't know why the gunphobes have set themselves up for failure, especially when liberals won't get out to vote because of this but conservatives will comes out in droves.
>>77962095
No.
>>77962175
I imagine all will. The 72 hours for no fly list sales seems pretty harmless though.
>>77961803
Intentional and arbitrary inconvenience of citizens trying to exercise their rights should fail. Innocent until proven guilty.
>>77962297
how does one get on the no-fly-list?
who is on the no fly list at this moment?
>>77960847
Fuck that motherfucker.
>>77962247
>>77962175
We need a thread for those when they happen
>>77962257
Probably the few who take their job seriously and are trying to convince each other.
>>77962061
If they go one at a time it will take hours.
>>77962257
Nobody seems to really give a fuck in that room.
No wonder voting records tend to be such a mess. Many probably forget what they are voting on.
>>77961626
Get you a nugget or an SKS they are cheap, 300 or less.
>>77962387
Posting anti government stuff on 4chan is a good way to get on those lists
>>77961033
It's politics as usual
These bills crop up after each major shooting, and they fail each time
incremental gun control takes place at the state level, the legislature won't pass anything meaningful, and even if they did, they need another SC vote to make it final
>>77962297
The main concerns about the no-fly list are due process. It's a secret list that the government can arbitrarily add people to, and there's no appeals process or any way to get off the list.
>>77962266
Showmanship. They can later say we proposed all these bills to stop gun violence but those mean ol republican bullies wouldn't pass them. Now vote for us please
>>77962451
better just to spend an extra $200 and get a basic AR-15 desu senpai
>>77962507
This.
post yfw all 4 measures fail
>>77960536
Thanks for this thread, OP. I didn't know this was going down.
And thanks for the link >>77960694
>>77962125
MURRICA
Cruz voted aye?
>>77962387
i think i heard mark levin say there was more than a million people on the no fly list
WTF did i hear "Cruz" in the affirmative???
>>77960536
i sincerely hope this all leads to less gun laws now that the fags are waking up to the reality that they're a backseat issue and they need to defend themselves.
>>77962266
They think it will gain them support in the upcoming Congressional race.
>>77962387
You don't get off, they decide to whether to take you of or not. I have a buddy from my college days who has been on the no fly list since he was 3 because he shares the same name as a guy from the IRA
>>77962407
Indeed, anyone know when the actual vote is on all this?
>>77962628
Paul as well.
>>77962507
>>77962552
Yeah, but the showmanship means nothing to liberal voters. They have a bunch of things they care about more than gun control. Conservatives are basically single-issue voters on this and they -will- show up to the polls to vote Trump if you hold a gun control vote a few short months before the election.
>>77962598
Even if any of these pass the senate they also have to pass the house. So nothing is going through.
>>77962628
and Rubio
>>77962628
Yeah he's a little rat bastard RINO don't you know?
>Feinstein
>>77962534
To each their own.>>77962598
>>77962628
>>77962667
It's a cloture vote, not the vote to pass the amendments. They're voting on whether to end debate and hold the votes. The real votes are probably going to start around 7PM Eastern.
>>77962534
This nigga gets it.
Not my gun btw.
>>77962659
I think this is the vote - for cloture. If it passes, then it goes to vote. Cloture is the vote to start the vote basically. If it fails here it fails as I understand it.
>>77962470
>>77962654
>>77962623
yup
I got blocked by Owen Cuckboy Jones last night on Twitter for saying "welcome to public office kiddo."
If he reports me to the speech police will that put on me on a no fly list to prevent me from going over to england to laugh in his face over a Brexit?
>>77962353
>Innocent until proven guilty
A delay of a gun sale to a suspect isn't claiming they are guilty. If a suspected serial killer is in jail awaiting trial they have yet to be proven guilty, should they be allowed to have guns delivered to their cells?
>>77962387
I know, the "due process" meme, but I somehow doubt there are millions of Americans on the list there wrongly, and again this is at most a 72 hour delay? That's it?
I can't even imagine what crime that would end up preventing, but the fact it would fail anyway is funny.
>>77962494
Well this isn't even preventing the people on those lists from getting a gun.
>This one from John Cornyn, R-Texas, would require that law enforcement be alerted when anyone on the terrorist watch list attempts to buy a weapon from a licensed dealer. If the buyer has been investigated for terrorism within the past five years, the attorney general could block a sale for up to three days while a court reviews the sale. The government would have to show probable cause that the person is a known or suspected terrorist.
>The government would have to show probable cause that the person is a known or suspected terrorist.
Surely you can't think this is THAT unreasonable. Delaying a sale for max of 3 days and the government has to show some proof as to why they are on the list to begin with?
>>77962780
>>77962798
Thank you for clarifying
>>77962620
They know these bills are going to fail, but they're voting for them so they can tell constituents that they tried to play nice and negotiate.
>>77962387
There's absolutely no exact requirements to actually get put on the list. My aunt, a very conservative christian woman, who had never even been out of the state, went to fly to California for business, and she found out she was on the no-fly list.
The issue also lies in the fact that there is no set way to appeal to get off of the list, so if you get randomly put onto it, or falsely put onto it, there's no way you can be taken off. You'll never be able to fly, and if gun control laws pass, purchase a weapon to protect yourself, either.
>>77962686
This is true as well. Gun Control really only happens in a state-by-state progression, but desu pol that's actually fine by me. If I want to live New York City, then I have to play by New York City's rules.
>>77960536
>>77960536
>>77960536
And third one fails. One more, lads.
On its face the proposal from Cornyn seems pretty reasonable, can someone show how it isn't?
>Requires the government to show probable cause
>>77962095
He's probably some military faggot in Okinawa.
>>77962507
So much this.
>>77962762
>((((Feinstein))))
>>77962798
Thanks fellow burger
I would be okay with Cornyn's amendment if it included repealing one of the random useless regulations we have to comply with, or otherwise had some compromise to benefit gun owners. I don't think we should be "compromising" by only letting gun grabbers get part of what they want and not getting anything in return.
>>77962963
>the government would ever willingly give up control
>>77960840
Bet my ass he'll say yes to all
>>77962937
Didn't even think about that
>>77962818
>I know, the "due process" meme, but I somehow doubt there are millions of Americans on the list there wrongly, and again this is at most a 72 hour delay? That's it?
That's just the start of it. I still don't know what they did wrong and why their even on there. It's all a big secret and it freaks the hell out of me.
>>77962963
Oh, you.
>>77960850
I'd be okay with Cornyn's. Onus is on the state to prove reasonable proof of terrorist/flight risk. Grassley's too as it's imperative to have an accountability and chance to challenge issues.
If we were getting something in exchange for it I would be okay with "da evil loophole'. But I don't want them agreeing to that shit without a quid pro-quo - say repealing those import bans or making CCW permits recognized in any state from any state.
Cue the lecturer in chief throwing a bitch fit when these fail because holy shit gun control failing gets him more mad than terrorism, murder, or ISIS.
>>77961033
Go to /k/ I'll bet there are a ton
>>77962780
So if cloture doesn't end, what happens; is the amendment just thrown away or what?
>>77962904
Still allows constitutional rights to be violated without notifying the US citizen or pressing charges against them.
Due process should begin the moment you go on the list, for it to be constitutional.
>>77962904
Because like most legislation, there's some wording, or obscure addition that allows the government to do something it damn well has no business doing.
Shooting down gun control seems to be the only thing the GOP is good for anymore.
>>77962963
Dems would just call it a "poison pill" amendment and vote against it. Not that that would be terrible.
>>77962893
NYC's rule is that you have to get murdered by Jamal when he breaks in to rape your waifu dake and steal your television though.
We already decided as a country whether the states can use state sovereignty to deny people their human rights. We decided it in 1865, at the end of the Civil War, and the answer was "no." I don't think there's any value in revisiting that question with regard to gun rights.
>>77963148
Nah. Mods purged that shit from /k/ years ago. Apparently gun politics belongs on /pol/ because "politics."
>>77962885
>The issue also lies in the fact that there is no set way to appeal to get off of the list, so if you get randomly put onto it, or falsely put onto it, there's no way you can be taken off.
>appealing
this
you have to have this before you can start taking away rights of people
even if they are terrorists, they still should have a right to appeal an unfair decision
>>77962387
Everyone who's not a muslim is on no-fly list.
>>77963244
>We already decided as a country whether the states can use state sovereignty to deny people their human rights. We decided it in 1865, at the end of the Civil War, and the answer was "no." I don't think there's any value in revisiting that question with regard to gun rights.
By that logic, "Trans-Bathrooms" could wind up being a thing, irrespective to local traditions. Be careful what you wish for. This line of thinking only creates chaos.
>>77960536
It'll all fail.
EVERY SINGLE TIME there's a push for gun control, the liberals lose more seats in the house and senate. They do NOT want to give up more power now, so they're not going to push hard on this at all.
It's just smoke and mirrors, same old same old.
>>77962475
Many states (pretty much all of them outside Cali, NY, Conn and NJ) have been loosening gun restrictions for the past 5 years or more. My state, for instance, is working on having constitutional carry.
3/4 so far nice one mates.
This last one though, how many of you back this? I mean I really don't think suspected terrorists should be able to purchase these guns, even the NRA supports this one I think
Then again I'm just a stupid leaf.
Wish you all the best burgers <3
>>77962598
>>77963427
They used it to give us fag marriage and they'll use it for other things as well.
Just wait and see what they'll start calling "basic human rights" in the future.
>0 for 3 so far
top fucking kek
>>77961626
Get an AR15 lower. I saw some for 50 dollars or so. It's the FFL part of the AR15 which means you have to get it from a gun dealer or whatever.
I have a 226 and a shottie but I will make sure to get a lower before the election. My concern is the guns I'd really like are further away from my being able to afford them right now so I really need Trump in for the next 4 years (or worst case scenario Republicans still have senate or house).
>>77962893
If it stayed like that I wouldn't like it but I'd accept it, but you hear powerhungry cocksuckers like Quomo and his ilk bitching about guns coming from other states (kudos to the communist for laughing at Hillary when she started to talk about Vermont guns coming to NYC) so they want to apply it universally.
>>77963453
The worry is the noise about the horrors of sandy hook and Pulse will change that, or more aptly the amount of monies being flooded by the NY assholes will.
Hell feinstein didn't use the corrupt money she and her husband got from nepotistic dealings to go after other states but NY is sure happy to do so.
I can only hope to god anti-gun politicans lose nasty this election.
Incoming butthurt 1/2
Is the ban of sale to no fly list the final measure?
>>77963524
I think the last one that just got defeated was Cornyn's bill that the NRA supported. The last one (4/4) is (((Feinstein's)))
Rato spotted
>>77960536
If they do fail, the AR bubble will burst. Prices drop to $300 for a whole AR, numerous companies will go under. AK's however will be up in price.
I need to see how my state's scumbag senator votes.
>>77963185
>>77963378
By including the government's responsibility to prove probable cause, it seems to me like the logical conclusion would have to be the ability to appeal. If they have to say "This is why", it SEEMS logical that you should be able to respond with "No that's wrong". I understand due process, innocent until proven guilty, etc, but I actually think this could ultimately be a step towards correcting the way no-fly lists function.
Do I just have too much faith in a broken system?
>>77963693
>>77960536
2/2
Also wtf I'm OP why'd my id change
>Rubio showing up to work
I'm impressed
>>77963524
It needs due process, and probable cause. It also needs adjudication. "Reasonable belief" is bullshit, and opens up far too many cans of worms.
>>77963524
>a
>fucking
>leaf
No one wants gun control besides for soccer moms and children too young to vote who have never seen a nigger before.
>>77963734
>the AR bubble will burst
That has already occurred.
I don't get this one. Isn't it already in human control?
>>77963427
Except there's no human right being violated by telling men to use the men's room, especially in a privately owned business.
>>77963524
There's currently no due process to put someone on the list. If the list is used as a means to deny access to guns, then it's just a backdoor gun back with no oversight.
>>77962475
Thanks for putting my Orwellian nightmares to rest for a bit longer mate.
>>77962598
>>77963734
You may well be right, but we're likely to see another bubble around election time. People that got price gouged after Sandy Hook on ARs should have dumped them last week.
It's also possible that prices will stay high right thru the election...and if Hillary wins (God forbid), beyond.
I HEARD POCAHONTAS
>>77963734
t.fudd
>>77964132
>>77964132
>>77964132
Last one just failed. FUCK YEAH!!! To celebrate I"m gonna get me a couple burgers and be like "FUCK YEAH!!"
>>77963524
I'm not afraid of terrorists having guns, leaf.
That's why the 2nd amendment was written, it gives me the power over life and death should I choose to exercise it.
>>77963843
Sort of, but the fact 30k AR's have sold recently in a short period of time, it will only go lower once the panic stops.
>they all go down
>>77963789
I can agree with that.
>tfw drinking after work but still talking about due process
>>77964193
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PXSK3iDeAI
God bless
This is now a butthurt celebration thread
Final measure has failed mates. Time for celebration!
>>77964232
If Trump wins the entire panic bubble will pop and Bubbas everywhere will be flooding the market with used ammo and guns.
If we get Hillary, Bubbas will effectively ban guns themselves by drying up the market beyond reasonable access or prices.
AUDIO-ONLY STREAM FOR SLOW INTERNET FAGS:
> - - - - - - - - - -
http://www.c-span.org/networks/?channel=radio
AMERICAN GIRL
Took you long enough McCain
Where you in a fucking tiger pit?
>>77964365
Glorious
>>77963960
>>77963806
Ah okay, now I get it, yeah that' bullshit.
Thanks for the clarification, really appreciate it.
>>77960850
Third one seems like a reasonable concession.
>>77964365
I guess they wouldn't get raped if that were the case
>>77964257
WE DID IT [REDACTED]
>>77964403
>>77964232
>>77963843
>>77963734
Soooooo what you're saying is gun speculation > property speculation?
>>77960536
Is there any Executive Action that Obama could enact?
>>77964365
Why is it that women can only ever come up with "muh vagina"?
In an argument, when insulting others or when trying to make a joke, that is all they can think of
I'm late, what happened? I hear they just voted 'no' on this subject. what does that mean? have all 4 gun measures failed?
Glorious day
Fuck you gun grabbers on both isles
>>77964697
a noose to hang himself with
There are 54 Rs in the Senate who is the traitor
>>77964697
He can make an EO for whatever he wants. Not that it will hold up in court.
I'm trying to push his buttons
>>77964788
kek
What are they voting on now?
>>77962598
>>77964808
7.62x54R
>>77964761
yep, our glorious burger bros just BTFOd 4 gun control measures once again.
>>77964544
(((reasonable concession)))
>>77960536
3/4 down, the one that got approved by the NRA didnt even pass.
>>77964365
>muh gun show loophole
Aka, the "private citizens have no means of accessing the NICS to perform background checks" "loophole".
>>77964920
>no punctuation
Either way, keep us posted.
>>77965021
Russians are always traitors
>>77962647
Sad thing is the dems actually believe their vote over a round of kneejerk legislation will actually win them brownie points with their constituents. The truth of the matter is by November most Americans will barely remember Orlando. I actually try to keep track of these things due to professional interest, and I had already almost forgotten Chatenooga even after FPcon got bumped up nationwide. If anyone remembers anything they'll remember IS got us good the last two years and we need to do something about it.
>>77965021
Like pottery.
>>77963339
Nah, gun politics are allowed on /k/ because it's weapons related. However once a thread starts ranting about duh j00s or is nothing but calling clinton a cunt, it gets shoveled off to here.
>>77964625
Nope, investing in guns is of limited usefulness. It is a controlled/monitored item that may be subject to more restrictions and maybe even confiscation. I could see if you are interested in what you own but anyone looking at it from an investment stand point is retarded. Pic related.
Background checks at gun shows how retarded is that lol
>>77965496
There already are
>>77965496
Wait I thought they already voted on this.
>>77965563
Then why is there a vote on that right now
>>77965496
Really retarded, since there is no due process for being put on one of these no-gun lists.
>>77965420
>It is a controlled/monitored item
Pretty shitty monitoring desu.
>that may be subject to more restrictions
Not likely after today
>and maybe even confiscation.
Not likely ever.
>>77965622
>liberals understanding the process of buying a gun
>>77965496
That's already a law, gun grabbers are THAT retarded. Anyone that sells more than just a gun or two (a business, 95%+ of sellers at gun shows) has to do background checks on people before they sell them a gun.
What's to stop people from just walking outside the gun show and selling one gun privately from their car?
>>77965680
>Not likely ever.
Maybe at the federal level but you now it happens at state level.
>>77965622
Because democrats want universal background checks but won't say that out right
>you need a background check to hand/sell your rifle to a family member
People freak out and tell them no
>hurr criminals are going to GUN SHOWS and buying assault rifles with no background checks!
"We need to stop this!"
>>77964920
keep strong anon
>>77965622
Because Private sellers don't have to do a background check (because they don't have access to the NICS) but the majority will ask to see a CCW/PPP to make sure that you have passed a background check and haven't done anything to get it taken away.
>>77964808
Mark Kirk
I hate my shithole of a state
Gott strafe Illinois
Gott strafe Chicago
>>77960536
USA USA USA!
Good stuff bros. Not an inch.
How many more amendments need to be voted on?
>>77965938
I thought it was only 4?
>>77964808
It's always Mark Kirk. He's a reliable Democrat vote despite the fact that he shows up on TV with an R next to his name.
>>77965938
This is an appropriations bill, there will be lots of amendments to it.
>>77965938
Just 4. It's over. Maybe some Senator will try to filibuster again and whine about people having different beliefs for 12 hours.
>>77964625
Not really. It's a limited investment option. You can only sell so much of it a year before the BAFTE shoot your dog.
>>77965828
IL's been turning around on gun laws recently, most states (barring CT, CA, MA, NY) have been getting more lax in the past 15 years with no signs of stopping.
A few have even thumbed their nose at the feds with nullification laws (which is pretty radical no matter how you look at it)
There's no sign of this trend slowing down or reversing.
>>77965862
>but the majority will ask to see a CCW/PPP to make sure that you have passed a background check
This is fucking horse shit, I buy and sell shitloads of guns and people that ask for paperwork are a minority.
As long as you are a resident and don't look like a thug they don't care.
Inhale freedom
Exhale only slightly less freedom
Any Democrats vote no?
Why don't the Democrats realize they are supporting stigmatization of the mentally ill and racial profiling of Muslim people (who are more likely to be on that terrorist-watch list)?
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
>>77961624
Or how to get off it. There is an eight year old kid who has been on the "special security and extra screening list" since he was two, and can't get off it.
>>77965346
I remember Zimmerman threads getting purged back in 2012.
did all 4 fail?
>>77962598
>>77966196
Because they don't care
Their agenda is no more guns for anyone
>>77966252
Yep.
Nice.
Also these threads really show how fucking ignorant most of /pol/ is when it comes to anything more in-depth than Trump memes lmao
What's with the girls sitting on the steps?
Could they not afford enough chairs for everyone?
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
wait, did something just pass? What happened?
>>77960536
SHALL NOT INFRINGE
CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP
>all 4 fail
Fuck yes
>>77966310
You can be in-depth and still post trump memes
>>77966196
They don't give a shit, they just want to ban guns. They complain about drug laws that imprison black people at higher rates than white people, but gun laws are worse in that sense and they're all over it. Democrats only care about minorities when it's advantageous to them.
ALL FOUR HAVE FAILED
BETTER LUCK NEXT TIME, FAGGOTS
>Portman bringing bantz
>talking about fucking sports
>>77966515
2 were semi progun that would have actually helped.
>>77962963
Cornyn's ammendment was drafted with NRA help. They want due process too.
>>77966442
>makers
my man
>>77966442
What brand of cigar do you smoke anon? Its hard to find fellow cigar smokers who arent 50+
>>77966583
>/pol/ - Apehoop
>>77966310
Phampai I've never even seen a gun that wasn't on a cop, much less owned one.
That doesn't mean I can't care when my freedoms to own weapons are under attack by niggers such as yourself.
Get fucked with a brick.
Is this a filibuster?
God dammit Portman, get to the butthurt. I really don't want to hear your opinions about sportsball.
>>77966310
What's with all this fucking anti-Trump butthurt? Did /v/ spill into /pol/ again?
>>77966609
Elaborate my fellow american.
All 4 bills about gun control fail
>WHO CARES ABOUT GUNS LET'S GO CAVS WOOOOOOOOOO
top tier bantz
>>77960536
LIBSHIT STATUS:
>BLOWN
>THE
>FUCK
>OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>77966249
Because that was definitely /pol/, if it was about the gun itself or defense tactics it would be fine but current events are a bit iffy.
>>77966609
>>77966721
Yes, please explain, you dirty fucking commie
>>77966725
>>77960850
Based Texas.
why is this cuck talking about nigger hoop ball?
>>77966727
>>77966639
Usually Cohibas when I'm up north.
When I'm in Florida I try to get only genuine Cubans(getting a lot easier)
>>77966609
Explain my fellow burger
>>77966733
BS. I'd been on /k/ for years and it was okay to discuss stuff like that. The mods were just being faggots back then for some reason. They even started shuttering military politics discussions (always allowed on /k/) onto /pol/ as well.
(((FEINSTEIN))) BTFO TWICE IN ONE DAY
>>77961033
really makes you think
>>77963924
>implying politicians are human
>>77964510
No
>must be compensating
I'm kind of disappointed...
>>77966609
No you, fuck off faggot
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
>>77966893
Didn't the fine Cuban cigar makers leave since they had the money and took tobacco seeds and talent with them?
>>77966721
1 was for more funding for NICS checks which should mean better/father background checks
2 was a 3 day delay on people on the terrorist watchlist for guns
>on list
>go buy ar15
>3 day delay
>gov has 3 days to prive you are a terrorist
>3 days expires
>go buy guns
Although I am against it, it would have sated libshits and may have negated specific incidents like orlando since the feds would then pick up the terrorist.
Don't get me wrong, I am against background checks in general but in a world where we have them anyways we might as well apply them properly to terrorists without infringing on the rights of the law abiding(too much).
>>77966943
(it's because /pol/ became cancer, even more so after the cuckening)
>tfw reading huffpoop comments
There is nothing better than anti-gunfag butthurt. Prove me wrong.
>>77967086
Yes, IE Cohiba and other DR brands.
But I'm autistic and smoking Cubans impresses normies and work partners.
Harry butthurt incoming.
>>77966727
