Post liberals being retarded
>all regulations are bad
Go live in China if you want to see what a lack of regulations (and lack of enforcement of regulations) does.
>>77894226
No one really thinks all regulations are bad, but generally less is better.
China did average 10% GDP growth per year for a few decades though.
>>77894226
>Go live in a communist country if you want to see how badly we need government regulation
I always knew leafs were the worst shitposters
>>77897608
I always knew Americans were ignorant about other countries.
>>77894104
>implying people having less and less control over their own lives is a bug and not a feature
The plutocrats that run both parties know exactly what they're doing. Any step toward back toward defacto neo-mercantilism is a step toward them ingratiating themselves the levers of control for generations to come.
Glass-Steagall was a regulation. WAS. How'd that go?
>>77894104
Fucking libertarians.
>>77897499
That's because they illegitimately inflated their GDP with currency manipulation.
>unregulated capitalism
>ever being a good thing
Why are libertarians so retarded? Like the USSR is an example of socialism or communism (like you like to point out all the time) every example of less regulated capitalism ends with child labor and private armies.
>>77899352
forgot my photo
>>77897608
>China
>communist
hello grandpa
>>77894226
That free-market paradise, China.
>>77899352
whats wrog with private armies?
>>77899426
they may not be communist but the power the goverment has is disgusting
look at what they did to their stock market and don't try to use the great depression as a counter argument, that was all the FED
>>77899558
They're the ones responsible for all these false flags and secret wars
>>77899672
slavery and child labor are matters of morals not economics
>>77899672
the mossad is private?
>>77899863
no he's just an idiot spouting retarded statement
>>77894104
>implying regulations are bad
shoo shoo libertarian faggot.
>>77899771
How are you dividing them?
Business in the west already lobbied to eliminate export tariffs just so they could have products assembled in developing countries to cut the cost of labor. Is that not immoral? They don't care about how they're affecting quality of life. Absolutely anything they can do to increase profits becomes the goal.
>>77894104
![9269a6101917267021938708478d818c5cb501788482e6ae8e273071b4016409_1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/BQG3lyj.jpg "9269a6101917267021938708478d818c5cb501788482e6ae8e273071b4016409_1[1].jpg")
>>77899771
So edgy. How's summer school?
>>77899931
the edge never stop
>>77899428
That beautiful place with no environmental regulation
>>77899672
our governments are responsible for those, actually. don't be naive.
I was trying to talk to this guy about trump, but he's a fag and couldn't handle it, so he blocked me.
>>77900024
>photo
I don't get that argument anymore since you get a tax write-off for charitable donations. And that isn't even monetary. You can donate old fucking rotten clothes and pay less in taxes for it.
>>77900024
>Giving a handful of central planners total control of the means of production is the same thing as letting people who want to donate do so
>>77894226
>liberal retard that can only deal in extremes
>>77900024
Socialists sure are fucking retarded if they think poverty is fixed by giving them money.
>>77900108
>Weeb calling other Weeb retearded
>>77900015
thats why i am a libertyaryan
>>77899771
There needs to be the threat of violence to discourage immoral business practices. Finger wagging doesn't disincentivize anyone.
>>77900007
I'm anti-neoliberal but it's pretty easy to argue that sweatshops are just part of the progression of liberalization. The guided age was a horrible time for most Americans. Today is a horrible time for a lot of Asians/Latin Americans/Africans. We're already seen outsourcing move out of India as they modernize, I think all those other places will follow and outsourcing will move to even less developed places.
![libertarian-logic-add-this-the-ever-growing-list-dont-like-u-politics-1393969543[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/4WKBDCI.jpg "libertarian-logic-add-this-the-ever-growing-list-dont-like-u-politics-1393969543[1].jpg")
There will also be a group of people that wish to subjugate another group. This is why we need rule of law that takes into account morals.,
Logic 1
Libtertarians 0
Checkmate, angsty teens.
>>77900372
dude we had a civil war and riots over both issues
i don't get what you're saying
>>77894226
Ah yes, good old Laissez-faire China
>>77894104
Here's a couple of videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmSzgvaJCn0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5mku6s7vOI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_23z9yJAq0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxHGMvrwa7U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTOoYxOf92s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r7cwWegXCU
pol classic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avep_1vbUOA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_JPcBwYGmo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ufk7IXdxc-c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVTE37FNJSU
I have more videos but that should keep you entertained for a while.
>>77900437
Slavery was part of the law dipshit.
...the slaves weren't free until the law was changed
>>77900466
In terms of lack of establishing a standard for labor practices and environmental protection they are pretty good Laissez-faire.
>ITT people will conflate liberals with leftists
>>77900644
It wouldn't be very hard for Koch Industries to set up a system of exploitation akin to slavery if all regulation were to suddenly disappear. Monsanto already does this with their seed rental program in Latin America and India
>>77900813
farmers hate gmo seeds, they have publicly come out against it
but since the goverment has so much control they shove down their throats
>>77900959
Monsanto/all the other multinationals have control of the governments via the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. Through those "government" agencies the multinationals shoehorn legislation favorable to them.
>>77900813
Law established property rights.
It took government to say you could own another person.
Without government you couldn't own someone, you would have to hold them captive by force.
You are just another government worshipper. All good comes from the almighty regulations.
>>77901203
so you agree goverment is shit?
>>77901469
I'd rather live under a government than in the wild where I could be killed/exploitated at any moment. When a government becomes too overbearing and begins to do exactly what it was supposed to protect me from then I have a problem.
>>77901214
You can easily exploit people with and without government. You dove right into the semantics of ownership, a topic irrelevant to the concept of exploitation.
I like regulation because it prevents some people from trampling over others.
>>77900053
I've been to China. They do have environmental regs, but the authorities choose when and where they enforce them.
It's actually a beautiful country. Pity it's full of yellow kikes.
>>77902155
>regulation
Slavery was regulated also
To make a blanket statement "I like regulations" implies they are all good and necessary.
Regulations are equally capable of enslaving people.
Regulations enable people to trample others.
>>77897499
Because they based theirs on building and the country is full of empty cities.
>>77902588
You're being pretty pedantic. Read my reply to the other guy in that post and you'll understand the extent of my appreciation for regulation.
>>77900704
Fuck off /leftypol/
You both need to be gassed.
>>77900000
CHECKED
>>77903001
What's your economic stance then?
>>77900108
Every single person involved in this picture except for Trump himself should be gassed.
>>77909478
Wow I'm a shill for hill now
>>77900250
>thinks giving a handful of central planners total control of the means of production is socialism
>actually has the gall to publicly make statements about socialism
>>77894104
Strong indapandant femon meets Religion of peace
>>77900108
Why did you even engage him? Their replies are common and predictable, bro. You didn't even have your Trump talking points. Gotta be prepared if you're gonna argue in the internet
Don't move with the conversation until they've answered your questions sufficiently.
>how will Mexico pay for the wall?
Remittances
Anyway, if they're like this, it might be better to use humour instead with reverse-psychology
Pic related perfectly expresses the liberal bind on the third world.
>oppose things third worlders do in abundance
>hold third world culture as sacrosanct
>cry whenever they're given burgers
Reminder that they voluntarily take on western capitalism and benefit greatly from it, "preserving native culture" just means maintaining a world zoo so guilty whites can feel good about diversity and shit.
>>77910911
These bitches are always kinda good-looking.
So the question is: are they *paid* activists?
I know paid activism is a thing. Some people do it professionally.
The question is: who is giving them their shills?
>>77913329
Femen are Soros funded.
>>77900108
The way you fucking morons talk makes me want to neck myself, fucking 12 year olds trying to be edgy.
