http://www.understandingprejudice.org/asi/
>>77619818
Notice how the male/female symbols are accompanied by a Star of David in the top left of the main page.
>>77619818
>This male quip captures something essential about the face of sexism: an ambivalence, or doubled-edged way of thinking, in which women are sometimes treated with contempt and sometimes adored.
>How can adoration qualify as sexism? To answer this question, you are invited to take the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory and explore the dual nature of prejudice toward women.
So basically they are saying: you cannot be neutral towards women.
Thanks fuck. That's basically the definition of "having sexual orientation":
>non neutrality towards a gender
What I argue against is how much they shill for a negative connotation of that.
Under these social psychologists' eyes, even adoration becomes a stigma.
They tell us:
>we noticed hostile people can be dangerous
Of course. But they add:
>Also an exceptionally benevolent person can be a dick when you betray the boundaries of his benevolence
Well... thanks fuck.
Hostile Sexism Score: 4.82
Benevolent Sexism Score: 3.64
>>77619818
Proud hostile sexist reporting in.
>>77620329
>>77620708
Am I so mild compared to you?
But I notice you are also well qualified White Knights!
Apparently, this means you haven't yet digested your redpill.
Serious scores should be:
5.0 Hostile
0.0 Benevolent
>>77621234
I tried to be as sexist as possible with the chivalry thing.
I did not check if there would be "benevolent sexism".
What does it mean that my benevolent sexism is so low?
3.73 hostile, 1.00 benevolent.
women are cattle
Answered honestly
Hostile Sexism Score: 4.27
Benevolent Sexism Score: 3.09
>>77621668
It means that you're a true shitlord m8
>>77619818
Hostile Sexism Score: 4.36
Benevolent Sexism Score: 2.73
>>77621668
That means that you think, that your wife should give you everything whilst you give nothing in return. If I understood it correctly.
Hostile Sexism Score: 4.45
Benevolent Sexism Score: 0.82
Honestly guys.
why are your benevolent levels so low? pls tell me you are trolling.
I hate women. Why wouldn't I? They've always been cunts towards me.
Hostile Sexism Score: 4.64
Benevolent Sexism Score: 0.91
LMAO. I just believe women are not special snowflakes and apparently i'm shitlord
>>77622445
Because of a conflict between idealism and pragmatism. When answering these questions there is a conflict between what you would answer in an ideal world and how you would answer in today's society. I think most of us would have a higher benevolent score if society was not in the state that it was in with regards to "women's liberation" "sexual revolution" etc.
>>77622445
Modern (white) women are fucking traitors, we hate them
Is Europe in the same situation with muslims?
>>77622726
I see
>>77622844
But you are the man, its your fault.
I am not blaming cis scum. The fact I blame the males is because they have responsibility over women, and they fucked up.
I have a good female friend (we could have been a couple but she was to ugly when we were younger) she really started falling into feminism, I didnt make her a perfect women for myself, she is still buthurt because I had a girlfriend. But hey, she is not a fucking femenist and is not that left as she would have been without me.
Care for white women, they give birth to white children.
By hating them you just hide your weakness.
>>77619818
>http://www.understandingprejudice.org/asi/
>what is your race
>white
>Are you latino?
>>77622445
if you put women on pedestals you are beta
>>77623399
your score is about that of a femenism, also you are wrong.
Women are weaker then man, physicly and mentaly, its our duty to protect them.
As it is their duty to care for the home and children.
>>77623399
I hope you get drafted and raped in the army, you angry dyke.
>>77623568
I picked 2 at that question.
A good women deserves love, I would have picked a 2.5 if that would be possible.
Hostile Sexism Score: 5.00
Benevolent Sexism Score: 0.00
If you get anything else, you are not redpilled about women.
>>77623368
Women are naturally treacherous, they are biologically programmed to follow their hypergamic instinct.
That's why you always see them welcoming the refugees, because they subconsciently know that increasing competition among males enhance their prospects.
That's why you saw so much of them betraying their people and voluntairly sleeping with the nazis under occupation.
Loyalty is not something present in women.
Our grandfathers fucked by giving them votes and allowing feminism, we, our generation, literaly did nothing wrongs, the dices were already thrown decades before our births.
>>77623908
>>77623808
The way I worded that was misleading. I meant that both men and women aren't golden statues. I am a dude. We are just hunks and flesh, and caring more for someone else than yourself is fucking retarded.
>>77619818
Hostile Sexism Score: 4.45
Benevolent Sexism Score: 0.45
>>77624566
>the dices were already thrown decades before our births
so what? there is never an ending for our race as long as one white man stands on this earth
>>77624739
>caring more for someone else than yourself is fucking retarded.
caring more for something then your kind is retarded you fucking libtard.
That is the exact reason why a man should love his wife like himself and vise versa.
>>7762339
reposted >>77623399 because I fucked it up
I don't buy into the redpill bs about women. I also don't think they deserve special treatment.
>>77623368
>But you are the man, its your fault.
>The fact I blame the males is because they have responsibility over women, and they fucked up.
>Blah blah blah it's men's fault women are so shitty blah blah
You're a fucking idiot Why is there always at least one beta white knight KEK who makes this moronic "argument" in every thread about how treacherous, selfish, narcissistic and worthless modern white women are?
>>77625296
>>77619818
Apparently I am an asshole.
>>77619818
>4.27 hostile
>0.09 benevolent
Proud misogynist. Women are nearly subhuman.
>>77619818
Dunno how to take screenshots, but I got a solid 4.2 Hostile, and <1 benevolent.
>>77622445
because they wanted to be men, so they get treated like men
Benevolent Sexism? I thought sexism was a bad thing
H 4
B .27
The questions were mostly of preferential treatment. I'm surprised they purport the mean scores to be so low when it's [idolize] or [impartial].
>>77619818
I got a straight up 4/0.
I guess actually thinking people should be absolutely equal means I hate women.
>>77625799
I didnt understand what you wanted to say.
>>77619818
>being benevolent
I love how hostile sexism is largely based on what you think of the word feminism. Not behaviors. Not specific beliefs about women. Just how you fell about the word feminism.
Shitty academic research is shitty. People get paid, get tenure for this bullshit.
>>77626577
>>77626352
Shit like this shows that feminism was never about equality.
>>77626323
women are not rational!!!
you need to take decisions for them, their decisions are not vaild!
that is what I am saying
>>77621668
It means you don't honor or respect every woman you come across simply on the basis that they're female. You don't believe that women are inherently superior to men (i.e. more cultured, sophisticated, pure, etc.) or that they should be coddled/protected by men while spitting in man's face. Women should earn the respect and opportunities they desire through personal merit, not because they have a vagina. Congratulations, you're not a beta cuck.
>>77627107
i know their decisions aren't valid which is why they shouldn't vote
in fact, as soon as we develop artificial wombs they should be exterminated
>>77619818
Hostile Sexism Score: 5.00
Benevolent Sexism Score: 0.73
>>77621318
Living in Sweden must be tough.
All that cucking going on.
>>77621668
It means you're no white knight.
>>77627265
>exterminate women after artefical wombs
how are you even able to say that?
I know trolling and shit is important for some people, but that is not even funny.
>>77622445
I was wondering the same.
Germanbro... are we an exception in /pol/?
>mfw I realize that most people here are not ironical as I expected them to be
>mfw I realize that all my "creative" friends on /pol/ are convicted felons
>mfw I realize I have been sharing jokes with ppl that do not joke at all
>>77622683
>Hostile Sexism Score: 4.64
>Benevolent Sexism Score: 0.91
Meanwhile in Singapore:
Hostility = 0.36
Benevolence = 4.09
>>77627651
Welcome to /pol/
>>77627651
but I hope you hate jews and embrace racial purity, do you?
That are the 2 most important things for me.
>>77624739
No need to hide, faggot.
>>77619818
I've had enough of useless cunts waving their vaginas for better jobs :^)
Hostile Sexism Score: 3.64
Benevolent Sexism Score: 0.36
is that good /pol/?
Pleased to say not very despite spending too much time on here
>>77627969
>but I hope you hate jews and embrace racial purity, do you?
Er...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
Let's say I want to feel included in this group, okay?
>>77627928
>Welcome to /pol/
Thank you mate.
How was the election? I didn't follow the news really.
>>77619818
Does not giving a fuck/embracing Machiavellian mindset count?
>>77628161
good enough, read Mein Kampf then. This book really helps to get solid views out of these you allready have.
I would have answered the same at my question before I have red this book.
>>77628237
For now van der Cuck (+30.000 votes) is designated president after the rigged postal votes were counted...ask again when the constitutional court is done with challenging the election.
>>77628459
Proud to share a flag with you, kinsman.
>>77627473
by reducing female births
>>77628479
>good enough, read Mein Kampf then. This book really helps to get solid views out of these you allready have.
>I would have answered the same at my question before I have red this book.
What if I did and found it unconvincing?
On the contrary, Evola and Spengler sound okay. But they are, so to speak, beyond anti-semitism.
>>77628819
your bait had high enery at the beginning to be fair.
>>77628645
>For now van der Cuck (+30.000 votes) is designated president after the rigged postal votes were counted...ask again when the constitutional court is done with challenging the election.
When will you set the Bundestag on fire?
Just joking. Fire will never cleanse your politicians.
>>77628692
Cheers.
>2016
>not being a hostile female sexist (red-pilled)
>being a benevolent sexist (white-knight)
>>77628915
learn to spell you roastie fuck
>>77628928
>Bundestag
In Austria it is called "The Parliament Building".
We would never set it on fire. We would hang the traitors outside, so nothing gets dirty.
Is this now good or bad?
>>77628848
these two sound very intresting, thx for those names.
But how come you find Mein Kampf unconvincing?
There is ofc some dogmatism, but I fit my own thinking in those holes. Also he writes quite propagandistic, but thats fine too.
>>77629577
You dont despise the vaginal jew enough.
>>77629577
I think they want you to feel bad about that. Mine looked almost exactly the same.
3.5 and zero
>>77629658
Pff, I hate a lot of women but I hate no one just for being a women.
>>77629829
I don´t feel bad for it, I think benevolent sexism has a bit of relevance but "hostile sexism" seems to be just a measurement of how much you hate the cancer that is modern feminism.
So if you dont bend over backwards and give up your entire paycheck to women you are a bad person. Yeah that quiz wasnt biased at all.
Hostile Sexism Score: 5.00
Benevolent Sexism Score: 0.45
>>77619818
>>77629650
He's basically gathering rancour from all sides of Germany and channelling it into convenient targets (or in favour of convenient groups).
The positive part of the story I remember was all the support to ethnic Germans who were living beyond the borders of the Republic.
However, support for them decreased as he rose to power. And he dig it out again just to wage war.
Then there is all the framing of the Jews, which... you know... they were assholes. But no more and no less than basically everyone else in Europe. So actually in my opinion he retaliated against a minority, which, in the end, was creating jobs.
He did create jobs, of course... but many were just place-holder jobs meant to artificially reduce the unemployment percentage of the time... and economy kept expanding because of the armaments effort. It was not an economy of peace.
So it's not even the book itself. It's more what happened later that somehow transformed a genuine nat soc into something a bit more retarded, and heavily more retarded in the long run.
Limiting myself to the book... you can tell it's one sided. I am not saying anglo books are neutral (they are far from being neutral!). But if I keep being suspicious of everything, why should Hitler get a suspicion-free voucher?
Said I was a middle eastern immigrant woman to skew the polls
>>77619818
>http://www.understandingprejudice.org/asi/
4.01 hostile
3.18 benevolent
if only they knew what kind of porn i watched
>Hostile Sexism Score: 5.00
>Benevolent Sexism Score: 0.00
What does this mean
>>77622683
>posting on pol
>not being a shitlord
>>77630822
This is actually a great idea, we should all do the test a couple of times in max sexism mod and pretend to be middle eastern men.
That will brainfuck the feminist how created that shit.
>>77630972
You hate modern feminism but you don´t buy into classical female stereotypes or you have abandoned them after you saw the degeneracy of western women.
>>77630972
it means you have a functioning brain
>>77629829
>I think they want you to feel bad about that. Mine looked almost exactly the same.
The whole website is rigged.
I mean, sometimes we feel so strong about this or that argument that all questions about it will be perceived as threatening just because they are questions. Like breaching a taboo or something like that.
So I acknowledge sometimes we are on overwatch and overreact to every question.
However, regarding this specific website, I have my qualms. They clearly have an agenda. And it is ideological, not just scientific. They want to get your registration to provide you with "educational material" and shit.
I got redirected to a test on dietary preferences that turned out to be the result of the most refined vegan propaganda.
They were asking questions like:
>A or not-A?
You answer A, but just because. You know reality is not just black/white... but you want to get over with the test.
>B or not-B?
I answer B for the same reasons as above.
>Are you aware that B entails not-A.
>We have strong evidence for it, but this evidence will be provided you later.
>So why did you answer A in first place? Can you explain your views? Do you think they are inconsistent?
"Man -- I answered -- the only inconsistency is between my mind and the way you are trying to frame me with questions that propose false dilemmas. It is perfectly fine to entertain both A and not-A in our minds because we are not robots but complex beings with complex emotional attachments to things and other individuals. So I can very humanely say I love animals and yet eat them. Similarly, I can say animal suffering can be ethical because there are value systems that think diminishing suffering ranks lower than other things in life.
So basically the whole thing sounded framed to me because all those false dilemmas make you cringe and anyway you end up having to explain your views... which could have clearly included as an option.
>>77630683
I can agree with your philosophy,
But you cant denie the fact of wealth during 1934-40. I cant really imagine how that would have worked with waroriented economy, war costs money doesnt it? (But I never understood economics to be honest)
Also, why a book should be neutral? there is no reason for that. This book would allmost be worthless...
>>77630822
>Said I was a middle eastern immigrant woman to skew the polls
I wrote what follows:
>Other: fuck racial profiling
And in the comments:
>Racial profiling is ludicrous. And anyway, how can you put native Americans and Aboriginals under the same label? Just because they both suffered colonialism? They are entirely different from a genetic and cultural point of view. Aboriginals and Pacific Islanders might be a thing... but Aboriginals + Native Americans? What do they share? Yes, they both got invaded... but this doesn't make them similar.
>>77619818
ok
>>77619818
>http://www.understandingprejudice.org/asi/
Sweet I scored High do I win a prize. I hope its the crystallized hatred and tears of all feminists.
>>77631806
Kill yourself white-knight.
>>77631817
4,9 "Hostile sexism"
Proud multiracial woman from austroolia here :)
Gotta give em the right data
>>77631806
Rare flag but you are a fucking white knight cuck for scoring high on benevolent.
Hostile Sexism Score: 0.45
Benevolent Sexism Score: 0.00
i think social media over saturates us with immature women. i have the same personal standards for women as i do men in life.
>>77631751
>Also, why a book should be neutral? there is no reason for that. This book would allmost be worthless...
Not neutral... but fact checking is wanting. At least facts should check.
>>77631751
>But you cant denie the fact of wealth during 1934-40.
I am pretty unsure about this. I watched a conference that said Hitler was doing it right. Wasn't it for other countries fighting him, he would have succeeded.
And I watched a conference in which they basically showed how the nice figures were actually artificially inflated and there was overall amateurism and no long-sightedness.
>>77631888
>>77631963
it is wrong why?
>>77631806
Typical Laos WHITE knight.
>>77619818
4.5 hostile
0.0 benevolent
Such is life as a redpilled gay. Women should never have been given power, they are far to emotional and easily persuaded leading to the current societal issues we face in our culture today. Every problem with today's nations can be traced to women achieving suffrage and finding places in the workforce. Certainly there exists forces behind the movement for "women's rights" that forced it on us but until we fix the problems with women we will never actually be able to deal with the people behind the scenes because our forces will remain divided.
>>77631947
Feels good being and evil CIS white male more people should try it.
>>77630972
Based Estonia.
>>77632161
As long as you get a classy wife that is not poisoned by western feminism it´s fine I guess?
>Hostile Sexism Score: 3.73
>Benevolent Sexism Score: 1.36
Guess I'm a pussy whipped faggot :(
>>77631806
cuck
>not putting pussy on a pedastal means im sexist
>>77632092
I agree with the first point
>2 conferences
I just take the one that seems more realistic
so I take the first.
There is no way it was amateurism, I mean they won against the marxists, official numbers confirm that.
Look at their technologies, how are amateurs able to organize such research and engeniering?
>>77619818
my score
>>77619818
cool
>>77632942
hi chris. Bernie supporter huh?
>>77633290
trump all the way
>>77632712
why ?
Absolute bullshit.
Well fuck me
>>77634270
You're more chivalrous than I am
>>77622445
Because the wording off the questions is ambiguous and filled with sweeping overgeneralisations?
Take note of the inconsistent use of the words 'many', 'some', 'most' or nothing at all.
For example : ' Women seek to gain power by getting control over men.'
While it would be insane to assume that NO woman does that, you are labeled as sexist for any answer but 'Disagree strongly'
This type of neglience of proper structure and wording is typical for your average government grant whores.
What else would you expect from someone with a degree in parroting propaganda?
>>77632301
White knights need to get out
>>77619818
hostile - 5
benevolent - 1
>>77636604
Sven, that´s not very tolerant.
>>77636604
SWEDEN NO
