Was giving Women the right to vote a mistake?
>>77481776
Yes.
>>77481867
fpbp
Maybe.
But I think it's really about the Jews and their cultural subversion.
>>77481776
Yes.
>>77481776
I'd give her a right or two.
yes it was
>>77481776
The first mistake was giving Money Printers control over all currency that is printed.
Take away their rights to print money and pick who gets loaned all the new money (usually a Mega Bank that will break the loan into smaller loans.)
Each time a loan is created, interest is charged. That is how they get free money to run the system.
If your wife or your fuck bunny can't see that, she should not be giving her opinion on anything and you should tell her to shut her mouth often or dismiss her (leave her, that is.)
>>77481776
No shit it was
>>77482024
Exactly
>>77481776
Biggest mistake ever made along with allowing them to decide themselves who they fuck with.
>>77481776
yes. it was our biggest one
that Austrian populist would've won in a landslide if only men could vote, Trump would win in a landslide if only men could vote, etc
>>77481776
Yes.
Women exist to fuck and create children. Let thr politics with men, like in Old Greece
>>77481776
my ballsack just exploded
>>77481867
fpbp
Yes. Disinfranchise women immediately.
>>77481776
Undoubtedly the biggest mistake. Women voting is the primary cause for the erosion of western values and civilization into a degenerate mess
>>77481867
Only 2 things I agree with you muslim sand niggers, how you deal with women and fags.
The right to vote used to belong to households, and they voted as a unit, with the man (father) as the representative and arbiter of the vote.
He was able to decide what political path was best for his family. Now his wife has the choice to cancel out his vote. Even worse, thousands of single harpies can vote against families.
It was a brilliantly divisive strategy to give women the vote. It was the beginning of our downfall.
>>77481919
spbp
>>77481776
No shit.
The people who pushed for women's suffrage were lesbian feminists, Jews, and beta numales.
Some things never change.
>>77482160
Anon, that's why our entire economic system is as prosperous as it is; debt and credit are extremely important.
Have you ever taken a basic macroecon course, or has your hatred of "muh money-makin Jews" made you think that ignorance is a virtue.
>>77481776
Suffrage to anyone was a mistake.
Monarchy ftw.
>>77481776
Sage
1pbtid
>>77481776
so does she get her tits out or what
>>77482747
23rd post best post.
>>77482733
What do you hold against the freebanking era?
Also, Economic history > macroeconomics.
Yes, but we're only starting to see the effect now.
>>77481776
Yes.
Let's just say that for most of human civilization, men generally ignored the opinions of women and here we are with computers and smart phones.
>>77483071
^ KEK
>>77481867
fpbp
>>77481776
The ancient greeks also knew...
>>77482911
>What do you hold against the freebanking era?
laissez-faire capitalism and banking being inherently volatile, albeit maximally efficient.
Hamilton was absolutely right, and Jackson was a backwoods swill-drinking idiot.
>>77481867
Close it up, we're done here.
>>77481867
fpbp
Women should be property.
We seriously need to start movement eb repeal the 19th amendment
>>77481867
Pakistan is on the ball today.
>tfw even though muslim countries are full of filthy inbred brown people they'll either wipe Europe in a couple of generations or force Europe to become nationalistic and traditional again because the weak cannot survive
>>77482847
>1466093275802.jpg
Americans, waiting for a .jpg to move, cute
Yes.
They vote overwhelmingly in favor of bigger government because they have an instinctual desire to be taken care of and value emotional arguments over logical ones. The arrival of welfare states is correlated in time to women's right to vote in every Western country; migrants are overwhelmingly flocking to countries with said welfare states. The bigger the government, the more women taken care of by the state, the less they need men, and the less they marry. It contributes to the single mom epidemic and has enabled the enactment of policies that incentivize childbirth for mothers with low socioeconomic status among other dangers.
>>77483071
Computers and smartphones we invented only after men started listening to women... Really makes you think
Is it realistic at all that we could ever revoke women's voting rights? I can't see it happening
>>77481776
If giving women the right to vote was a mistake, so was universal male suffrage, for the latter inevitably leads to and justifies the former, barring metaphysical ideas of sex dominating politics.
The problems banning women from voting is used to solve would be better addressed with property ownership requirements (that's actually how it initially worked, sex-based voting bans came in later).
>>77482290
>Trump would win in a landslide if only men could vote,
>get sent to work just like men
>think this is a good thing
The poor fools
I don't believe giving women the vote was neccecary a bad thing, it evolved us into a good direction, it's just that it have now went too far. We should have stopped it somehow. 110 years since they got the vote and only recently have we started to go to shit. I think it's more because of circumstances than anything else.
I think we found something that all of /pol/ can agree on today
>>77483532
Not really. You could start your own company and only hire men as decision makers, that's as close as anyone can get now.
Absolutely
>>77483532
Of course it is. It will take a major happening though like an economic collapse, civil war, Wiemar conditions, etc.
If the majority of men agreed to take away women's right to vote, there's nothing they can fucking do about it. And they'd be better off too. There's a reason they're trying to import a patriarchy, because subconsciously they wish to be dominated.
>>77481776
>ywn see those sweet baps uncovered
yes, women vote with their emotions not their brains the opposite if for men
>>77483822
And then some cunt shuts it down for being sexist.
>>77482116
I'd give her a right and then a left
and then another right
if you have never punched a boob in your life you are gay
Do women build civilizations? Why should they have a say in it then? Maybe give them control over women issues and that should be it.
>>77483797
Well in the us it started to going to shit almost immediately
>>77481776
Women should have gotten voting rights only after they got drafted. Like it was happening for the men.
Feminists just earned an unmerited privilege without offering something in exchange in society.
No wonder they keep voting mostly leftist trash.
>>77483532
Any justification for removing women's voting rights would inevitably be accompanied by removal of rights from many other groups. Woman as beneath man makes sense in the context of monarchy, where society as a whole is hierarchical. In the context of liberalism (I use the broad sense of the term, not the 20th century American definition), it doesn't really make sense to speak of the rights of man and then go "but not for cunts lol." "Patriarchal egalitarianism" is an oxymoron, after all.
You could more easily overturn civil rights by considering races as different people/nations, but such a distinction is obviously impossible with sex.
>>77483990
woop I'm not gay!
>>77483209
source? Need to see the video.
>>77483848
>big tits
>beat face
People have such garbage tastes.
>>77481867
this
Yes. My girlfriend even agrees. I have been redpilling her but stayed away from the really stingy statements like women's voting rights, and one day she surprised me with that statement herself.
>>77484112
it was great, wasnt it?
>>77481776
I think it began when we allowed them to leave the house unaccompanied by a male relative.
>>77482419
Actually the way they deal with women make their men rapists, child abusers and goatfuckers.
It's mandatory for every society to keep women on control but muslims go full retard.
>>77484244
Eh, my sister yelled at me and told me to never punch girls in the chest.
>>77484243
>Women are so gullible they can be taught to think their own right to vote is a mistake
kek
>>77481776
Can you give me one example of a long-lived successful civilization where men and women had equal rights?
>>77484122
Just type in youtube "Spooky scary skeletons"
>>77482811
>Jews dindu nuffin dei gud bois
>>77484243
She's a keeper.
>>77484087
How about only allowing taxpayers to vote? Or people who contribute more than they take.
It would effectively end women and blacks' right to vote.
>>77484465
kek!...no
>>77481776
Yes.
the worst mistake
>>77484526
Nope, can't find it.
The muslims are right on this one.
>>77484402
No, she rather believes that most women today are indeed immature cunts, that gladly swallow everything the media says. She's told me of friends of her that voted socialist because a) they didn't really care about politics, but it's 'hip' to have an opinion b) the only acceptable opinions are the ones on Facebook and c) because it makes it easier for them to stay at home and study longer with all the benefits they are promised, even if they technically 'know' and agree that immigration isn't that good anymore.
>>77484548
Lol, she's even a bit more extreme than me. I'm still not sure on voting rights, as I believe there are women that are reasonable and rational and capable of carrying that right (as well as men that are just as retarded). She's also a lot more racist than I am.
>>77484552
That's the beautiful thing; there'd still be blacks and women who could vote, but the taxpayer requirement would filter for the responsible ones. When you think "woman voters screwing us over," you don't think of a stern, responsible matron.
>>77481776
was going to happen anyway
you can't deny a female CEO the vote but give it to a male burger flipper
>>77484465
Equal rights, perhaps, but equal duties, tasks and expectations? No
>>77483179
Check your ID
>>77484851
LOL, I was joking because she's so thin as an skeleton, just type Eugenia Cooney, that's the name of her channel, I bet you can find the video over there.
>>77485171
hehehe
>>77481867
Can't believe I'm agreeing with a fucking paki, but he is right.
Giving women the right to vote is like giving children dynamite. (no pun intended)
>>77485171
I was 007 some days ago. Don't fuck with me.
>>77485171
kek
>>77481776
Yes
>>77481776
yes. Women should not have rights. Women are the property of men.
>>77485176
Mexico you sick little fuck.
tyvm
>>77482657
>lesbian feminists
The LGBT meme and it's dispersion was a recent Jewish construct, thus, that meme, along with the aid of Feminism (another fundamentally Jewish meme, on which Jews had and will always have a central role in [pic related and >>77484548]), consequently also lead to the creation of so many » beta numales.
>>77485106
yes we can, because in the end, what are they gonna do about it?
we could fix civilization overnight with millions of firm backhands
>>77481776
YOU FELL FOR IT AGAIN, faggots.
>1 post by this ID!!!
>1 post by this ID!!
>1 post by this ID!!
I REPEAT! ONE POST BY THIS ID!!! ONE FUCKING POST. YOU FAGS FELL FOR THE JEWISH MEME AGAIN. When will you fucking learn???
>>77485809
Step 1: Bring more Muslims in
Step 2: Lean back watching those mindfucked trulls get mass-raped
Step 3: Women trade their "freedoms" for the security of being protected by white men
Step 4: Get rid of all Muslims
Step 5: White lands saved.
>>77485650
>The LGBT meme and it's dispersion was a recent Jewish construct
There have always been homosexuals.
>>77481776
>Was giving Women the right to vote a mistake?
no that was not a mistake.. the mistake was you beta faggots letting women walk all over you.
Now they have no respect for men and vote for what is best for women and muh Vagina only.
>>77481776
You being able to vote is clearly a mistake chauvinist.
>>77483187
>Hamilton was absolutely right, and Jackson was a backwoods swill-drinking idiot.
So, do you know anything about the Scottish Free banking era, the Swedish free banking era or about the South Seas bubble?
It is all about incitaments, if you have taken a basic economics course, you should have heard about something called game theory.
>>77482584
What did you mean by that?
>>77486307
>> Implying whites are the only people that don't want ISIS running shit.
>>77481776
doesn't matter, women should be exterminated altogether
>>77481776
Yes, but giving men voting rights was also a mistake.
>>77486534
That was not the argument, my friend.
The current societal climate emphasises the promotion of every facet of the LGBT meme, that is: it seeks to create an optimal environment to "recruit" more and more people into such movements; and that climate did not just spontaneously came about due to magic.
Feminists and LGBT individuals are ultimately just useful idiots literally practising glorified forms of suicide, as demonstrated with the recent shooting.
>>77487305
Allowing democracy to even exist was a mistake.
>>77486168
Nigga, I'm at work. Ain't shitposting on the clock.
>>77481776
Giving them the right to vote was not a mistake. Women are not too dumb to understand political statements, although they are biased towards collective thinking and social confirmation, they put feelings over facts on some issues and so on. Men have their own biases too.
No scientifically advanced democracy would deny women's right to vote forever, or revoke it once it is in place. There is no basis for it, apart from "women like the wrong things".
The problem with women's vote is that the equilibrium has been lost. The traditional family and gender roles have a strong biological basis. Women should be free to vote for whoever they prefer, but not actively encouraged to be "free womynn smash the patriarchy" retards. Women in general want a strong male to follow and respect. In politics, this means most women would naturally tend to copy their husband's opinions.
Of course, women are no longer behaving naturally, because they have to be strong, ass-kicking freethinkers with strong opinions. Staying at home, taking care of children and wanting a man to lead is sooooo sexist.
All of that bullshit is what fucks up the balance in everything, politics included.
>>77481776
nice 1776 gets
but
>one post by this ID
sage
>1 post by this ID
it does seem that giving women the right to vote was a bad idea
>>77488327
I enjoy this new meme
>>77481919
>>77482349
>>77483155
>>77483217
>fpbp
you guys taking this frog meme too far. now youre starting to sound like one.
>>77487446
What exactly is your point? Suffragists were closet dykes.
>>77489710
The point was that the number of dykes back then was far much smaller, per capita, than today, and that fact was due to no spontaneous occurrence.
>>77489668
First Pepe best Pepe
>>77481776
>1 post
>Giving right
>Voting is a right
Wow, you faggot!
The only reasons why women are allowed to vote are these:
1) To dilute the vote so blacks and opposition party voters are weaker. Mainly to keep blacks politically weak.
2) To make urban areas more politically powerful.
3) To make poll violence more effective for opposition groups.
It literally has nothing to do with rights, freedom, or feelings. Its all about "hurr durr, lets keep them darkies from challenging our status quo"
The blacks must be armed and they MUST understand that violence, or the threat of violence, are the only means to political, and physical, survival.
>>77490140
I agree. That's because lesbianism isn't real. Women are fluid in their sexuality. They are driven by social trends and social acceptance.
You all saw those voting statistics on the Austrian presidentian election with your own eyes. Austrian men voted for the nationalist guy, women and shitskins voted for the green party guy. This pattern repeats itself in every single place women can vote.
Anyone who still thinks women should be allowed to vote in the long run is just a RP'ing faggot and not really serious about this whole thing.
>>77490606
However, the bubble is very much finite, as perfectly demonstrated by the recent shooting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLqHv0xgOlc
>>77481776
Mos fucking def, and these past 100 years taught us that, it was like a gigantic slap in the face.
>>77491031
What does the gif mean?
watching the video now
>>77481776
>1776
Noice. Giving non-landowners the right to vote was the mistake. Why else would socialism and marxism become so prevalent in democratic countries? Once the working classes in the cities and factories oculd vote it meant ideas like communism could spread by word of mouth whereas rural landowners don't fall for such jewish trickery.
>>77481776
Yes but it goes further than that.
Women should have never have the vote as it is now because women generally consume more than they create - they always vote for more benefits for themselves at the expense of others. The right to vote should be given by the income tax contributed minus the benefits gathered regardless of gender. For example an employed woman should be allowed to vote, but a single mother that pulls in hundreds in benefits shouldn't be. A married couple that contributes enough tax should get a combined vote.
Likewise people on welfare shouldn't be allowed to vote because they will only vote for more welfare. They do not contribute to a society so they should have no say over how tax payer's money is spent.
People working in the public sector ( getting paid by tax money one way or the other ) should not have the right to vote unless they contribute more tax money than earnings received from the government to prevent conflicts of interests.
Immigrants should never have the vote. They do not know the values of a country and do not have the necessary perspective naturally. They are easily influenced with benefits by crooked politicians. They also provide incentive for politicians to mass import voters. A person should have at least 4 - 5 upwards generations in a country to get the vote.
Also politics should be a lot different. A presidential candidate should put on a paper the exact terms he pledges to accomplish. This may not be everything the candidate wants to do, but these are the things that the president strictly will do. For each candidate a list must be compiled and must be made available to anyone openly. After being submitted this list may no longer be changed. If the president takes contradictionary action compared to the pledge he / she made then the president will be put out of power and a new election will take place. This enforces direct democracy preventing most of the cronyism and minimizes behind the curtain actions.
>>77485357
Don't worry I'm not GaY like you m8.
>>77484548
The jews would have no power if our women weren't so god damn stupid and manipulable.
>>77481776
They're worse than men, but democracy always fails and should never have been implemented.
>>77481776
probably the worst mistake ever made. a war kills people but life goes on. but the damage from allowing women to make decisions is practically irreversible.
>>77493365
>Jews dindu nuffin dei gud bois
>>77491623
>What does the gif mean?
It basically means that our current Western Civilization is not viable, and that memes such as Feminism, LGBT and so many others were never meant to go anywhere in the medium to long run - that is, they were simply means to an end (the destabilization of our societies).
>The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation
http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html
