THEY ARE STILL MAD AS FUCK
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/19/fashion/ghostbusters-internet-attacks.html?_r=0
>“I refuse to watch it,” he said, sitting with his rimless glasses amid a gumball machine, “Star Trek” memorabilia and bookcases stacked with old VHS tapes.
>Next, I sent him an email. I wanted to know what he made of the furor. His response was astonishing. He was offended by some of the blowback — because, as he wrote in an email, it seemed to him that those angry over his video “have not watched it, or have been misquoting me or twisting my words.”
>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
>When finally coaxed to the phone, Mr. Rolfe, who works from his East Coast home, did not want to talk about his “Ghostbusters” video, saying he thought it spoke for itself, and he didn’t want to address the fallout. “When people attack me, it’s always about trying to get a reaction,” he said.
Even James isn't falling for this liberal crap.
I like how they think rimless glasses is an insult now. Like you must wear thick-rimmed hipster glass to be cool as shit.
>>77348738
>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
Watching ~15min video on youtube = going to cinema and paying to watch 2h overhyped garbage.
>>77348738
>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
What utter cunts.
>people not spending money on something they don't like is now cause for controversy
CURRENT YEAR
>>77348738
>>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
The entire video was that he wasnt interested in seeing it and wouldnt be judging it.
What the retarded fuck is wrong with people? Maybe the muslims should win
i guess if the media has to defend a movie it must be really good
>>77348738
>this article was worthy of being published in the New York Times
>Without so much as pressing play, I decided that his position was garbage and that he represented the worst about geek culture and the internet. I considered leaving a hissy comment on his site: Somebody’s mom apparently forgot to teach the judging-books-by-their-covers lesson.
o I am laffin
do these clickbait writers get paid by the word? the entire article is "I didn't want to watch the video but I did, then he didn't want to talk and I convinced him, and he said that people are too eager to judge based on other people reactions (author unaware that is exactly what he did)"
>giving jewyorktimes clicks
HOW DO I TRIGGER PROGRESSIVE NEWS OUTLETS INTO GIVING ME ATTENTION BY WATCHING MY ANTI-GIRL GAMER TERRORIST INTIMIDATION VIDEO I'M SICK OF BEING IGNORED
>>77350335
Yeah, I also guess if the media attacks Hitler, he must be bad.
>>77348738
news about spergs
interesting
not
>>77348738
>not just ignoring them
fucking amateur move james
>>77350383
The NYT website is just a glorified blog site like Gawker or Buzzfeed, you won't see garbage like this in the actual paper.
Not that there isn't plenty of garbage in the paper too but still.
>>77349145
>2016
>not wearing problem glasses
>>77348738
he got cucked, what can we say, you don't stand in line with the Progressive Party? we will stab you in the dick, just like Will Wheaton.
Also didn't the Stormweenies complain about the AVGN movie about the black guy and the NRRRRRD GRRRRRL?
>>77348738
Why. Are. They. Still. Writing. About. This. Shit.
Some guy who makes nostalgia porn said he didn't want to watch a fucking movie.
They are literally angrier about this than a fucking Muslim SJW mowing down 50 homo's.
What the fuck is wrong with the left?
>>77350422
Challenge one of the progressive darlings to a street race.
>someone had an opinion on the Internet
Is now good enough for a ny times article
>>77350755
marx is a helluva drug
>>77348738
Gib archive link
>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
>Without so much as pressing play, I decided that his position was garbage and that he represented the worst about geek culture and the internet. I considered leaving a hissy comment on his site: Somebody’s mom apparently forgot to teach the judging-books-by-their-covers lesson.
Has this movie even come out yet?
How are they mad at people for not liking a movie no one has seen?
It must REALLY suck if they are this mad about it.
Sony is shilling hard for their movie
>>77350755
AVGN has a huge Tumblr following. Since his wife is just another fat feminist, they probably expected him to have the same views as her.
Surpriiiise, the guy is his own person with his own opinions. A straight white male is thinking for himself! OH THE HORROR
>>77348799
He knew
Hell the trailer itself was shit and executed poorly.
If they did it like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IDXpOX0Cp0
The movie wouldn't have gotten negative Rep as it did. The original Ghostbusters movie was a comedy, and they should stick to the formula.
The article is so poorly written, it's like reading someones diary entry.
>by brooke
Oh...
>>77350627
>just like Will Wheaton.
What happened to Will Wheaton, Piotr?
So if Shillbusters bombs at the box office, will it be rape?
He explains very clearly in this video his feelings on ghostbusters https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nnLzz_hxzxo
I'm really starting to get pissed at journalists lack of professionalism and ethics these days.
Funny how just saying you don't want to go see a movie because X reasons immediately gets you crucified by the SJW crowd and the complicit PC media.
The internet was a mistake
>>77351116
>Sony is shilling hard for their movie
Bingo. They know they have a lemon on their hands and they're trying desperately to get their money back out of it by guilting people into seeing the thing.
archive link please
>>77348738
>fashion/ghostbusters-internet-attacks
>fashion
What the actual fuck?
Also the coordinated kike attack on James was fucking atrocious. Journalism is a lefty SJW cesspool of collaborated attack memes. I hope they all enjoy competing with blogs.
>>77350383
it's just one of those days
>>77351190
he got chased of twitter by some mad SJWs off of twitter because of some of hand sexist comment.
Several months before stormweeners and gaymergaytors called him a SJW for some reason. Irony.
>>77351204
>current year
>professionalism
choose one
>>77350919
has nothing to do with this
read what he wrote about marx you idiot
>>77348799
literal cuck by a nigger and his wife.
>>77351178
its a guy
https://twitter.com/brooksbarnesNYT
>>77351358
about women, either way
>>77350917
meanwhile some mudslime guns down 50 people and everyone falls over each other defending Islam, suddenly some fat atheist degenerate tumblr lesbian with weird colored hair is an expert on the Islamic faith and knows that all these heinous attacks, executed in the name of the religion, by extremists of the religion have actually nothing to do with said religion and in fact, it's yet again, white conservative racists fault, but don't ask how, because, I mean come on, it's 2016 you FUCKING WHITE MALE.
We live in very sad times
>say you don't wanna see a movie
>vocal minority goes apeshit
archive link?
>>77351204
>really starting to
>>77351204
still believing even a single word that comes out of their lying kike mouths.
Fuck I love James. He's such a level-headed guy. It's almost like he's too good for the internet.
>>77350943
>AVGN is the worst about geek culture
This man was a geek before it was cool to be. Shit, I don't even like his content that much anymore but he just got loads of respect from me by not changing his opinion.
>>77351311
WHERE THERE'S SMOKE
This part gets me this most:
>“My good deeds go largely unknown,” he said in an email. “I just had a charity event, auctioning items/props/memorabilia from my show.” The auction, which concluded on May 6, raised about $20,000 for Shriners Hospitals for Children.
>Hmm.
>guy raises 20K for childrens hospital
>"Hmm"
>>77350755
>Why. Are. They. Still. Writing. About. This. Shit.
He fell for the trap. The marketers for the film and their allies are framing this as an empowering girl film. They were looking for a guy to shit on the film because of women. Then they can attack him. What he should have done is just ignored the film, as it would crash and burn and then be forgotten about.
The narrative is:
>white geeks are sexist
Pop-culture nonsense is irrelevant and mostly driven by big business anyways.
>>77351814
What point is he trying to make with the hmmm? It's a whole paragraph, just hmmm. Why?
Is he saying that's good or bad?
The article doesn't really make any point. "I called the sexist troll and like he talked about his childhood and stuff....someone said something in twitter...end of article"
This guy is paid money for this?
>>77348738
This isn't even newsworthy.
>GUY DOESN'T LIKE SOMETHING ON INTERNET; INTERNET IN UPROAR
Holy fucking shit.
>>77352170
>What point is he trying to make with the hmmm? It's a whole paragraph, just hmmm. Why?
>>77348799
based nerd!
James did literally nothing wrong, and by literally I mean really literally and not meme literally. All he did was an announcement to his fans that he's not going to review the new Ghostbusters because he's sick of shitty remakes, and he did the video because his fans know he's a die hard Ghostbusters fan and has been one since the original movies came out.
He didn't say anything about the manufactured gender "outrage", race, or anything else he was accused of.
>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
What in the absolute fuck. Judging a movie by its trailer (which is the fucking reason to the trailer to exist in the first place; for people to judge if the movie is worth seeing) is not comparable to misquoting someone and sending angry people to dogpile him. That's called slander, and is just all around manipulative bullshit.
He didn't do anything wrong, and he's getting mobbed my social justice warriors. I refuse to believe I share the same planet with these malicious ass clowns. They're just not assholes, they're evil. And the worst part is that they think they're the good guys, they think they're doing good by mobbing on someone because they refuse to watch a movie.
I could understand if these were just some internet trolls being trolls, but these are people in high and important positions in media. These are grownup men and women who have dedicated their lives on bullying people who don't think exactly like them, and they're using their high positions as soapboxes.
>>77352170
The 'hmm' is supposed to be 'hmm, maybe there's more to this problematic shitlord than I am willing to admit, but I cannot condone his vaguely sexist behavior.'
>>77348738
>nytimes talking about AVGN
Liberal media is really worthless.
>>77348738
Why the fuck did the nytimes cover this?>
why would they care about a youtuber? He is not even of the really big ones
why is new york times doing investigative journalism on the ghost buster movie reviews
>>77348738
heres another one
opened up TIME and see
>http://time.com/4358061/ghostbusters-paul-feig/
>Why Ghostbusters Is the Must-See Movie of the Summer Season
>The misogynist outrage over the Ghostbusters remake has made it essential viewing
>>77349249
>>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
also you can watch his video on youtube but theres no way to watch ghostbusters
argh
>>77350593
>you won't see garbage like this in the actual paper.
are you implying the paper isn't also garbage because I can assure you it is
>>77352822
It's the
>CURRENT YEAR
>>77348738
Damn. Say what you want about James but he handled that perfectly.
I really hope this movie fails and sony has a great loss of money for being so stupid and arrogant with this shitty remake.
>>77352613
>They're just not assholes, they're evil. And the worst part is that they think they're the good guys, they think they're doing good by mobbing on someone because they refuse to watch a movie.
This exemplifies what social justice is.
The best part? NO ONE has refuted this.
>>77348799
>Even James isn't falling for this liberal crap
He will submit eventually. Or his SJW wife will accuse him of something (like, for arguing with his wife and winning the argument, which is a form of rape). Then she will divorce him and take half of his shit.
It's cheaper for him to submit.
>>77352699
>He is not even of the really big ones
He's an OG. Nigga he's THE OG. He was getting drunk and playing shitty games before PewDieFudgePacker was a twinkle in the moderate muslim's eye.
>>77348738
For fuck's sake, he literally said he won't watch because he knows he'll be unfair to it.
Why ? Why are they bitching it ? I don't understand, my level in liberal thought is far too low for this shit.
>>77353300
He is not even top 300 most subscribed
This is not normal
>>77352968
James truly has unJUSTed himself.
>publicly announce his refusal to watch the Ghostbusters reboot
>SJWs go and shit on themselves
>James slowly gains his hair back
>seems to be getting more muscular
>jawline getting more defined
>he grew 2 inches overnight
>his jokes seem a tad more fresh
>charisma +6
>his shows feel more comfier than before
Now if only Spoony could follow James' example.
>>77348738
Why did everyone call this guy a cuck, anyway? I always avoided that kind of eceleb drama, but it seems to live on to this day.
>this is what has become of the new york times
>>77352955
Well there you have it, this is what we call a marketing campaign
>>77353458
>not even top 300
It's not my fault that Jewtubers have shit taste.
>>77353512
Maybe James did take all that cuck talk to heart. I mean James is about my age, so right outside of that millennial range, so he definitely grew up in a time before the country went full SJW faggotry, you have to assume some of this rubbed off on him.
>>77353512
Spoony is pretty much out of the business at this point, he just puts out a video every full moon to justify his patreon bucks.
>>77353524
His wife wrote a post on cinemassacre while James was making the movie, she had a sarcastic line about "bringing some diversity" to the site(because she's a woman on a male dominated channel).
4chan, being autistic, couldn't tell it was sarcasm and immediately accused her of being an SJW that was cucking James
>>77348738
>>77350926
>>77348799
>>77349145
>>77349249
>>77349480
>>77349814
please use an archive.is link, do not give leftist media clicks for these kind of articles, or at least screenshot the article.
>>77348738
when is it out?
just so I can stay away
maybe call the cinema and make sure no shady looking brown people are around
if you know what I mean
>>77351319
This is an actor/"voice actor" and the same faggot that wrote Anita Sarkeesian's influential person piece on TIME magazine. He is clearly an SJW.
And he's being eaten alive by other SJWs.
>>77353562
That has nothing to do with NYtimes dedicating an article to something irrelevant
i doubt those faggots need clickbait articles
>>77351319
Beause he is a fucking beta cuck faggot. Just because SJWs turn on someone does not mean they arent still an insufferable faggot.
>>77353878
Shitty clickbait articles on the site are the only thing keeping the actual NYT newspaper alive
>>77351922
100 TIMES THIS
I know this won't get noticed, but they do this everytime, without viral SJW marketing these shit movies would flop every time.
It's the same reason Zoe Quinn and Anita Sarkeesian became successful and spoke at the UN, because they lured neckbeards into attacking them for their bullshit to create the illusion that they actually were oppressed in society and legitimize their ideology.
It's the same with these SJW films, stop taking the bait from these sociopaths wow.
>>77353395
I think it's because he's popular.
Dude kinda pioneered the "angry video review" genre on the internet. He's got over 2 Million subscribers on YT.
But I think what gets people the most is this:
"Anti-feminist" Youtubers are kind of a niche, so them saying they don't want to Watch the new GB movie is not that big a deal since they're telling it to their echo-chamber
AVGN is another deal; if you look at the whole Channel Awesome gang for example, they stay in line and avoid controvercy. AVGN is in the same genre but he's one of the biggest; so him telling it like it is and not giving a fuck brings the message to +1Mil people who aren't necessairly anti-feminist
>>77348738
This is the problem. The time for them to begin to burst the bubble on misogyny and sexism garbage is now if they wanted it to guarantee them ticket sales and good reviews. They popped it too early and now they are trying to keep it relevant but the SJW crowd that eats this trash can't stand to listen to the same topic for more than a week and moves on to the next headline of the week to spew their shit rhetoric on.
>>77351381
Pretty much what I expected. The rimless glasses part irks me the most. I expected the SJW whinging but to go straight bitch and make a snide remark about what he's wearing demonstrates what a worthless 'journalist' he is.
here's a better version of the trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0d2bRaFcCb4
>>77354025
Thats bullshit
Even if this was paid by the jews to promote the movie its still too weird
The general populace don't even know he xist specially the target audience of the shit movie
>>77353512
Spoony would turn into a brunette version of pic related.
>>77353826
>maybe call the cinema and make sure no shady looking brown people are around
If you try that in London there will be no one left to watch the movie.
>>77354282
Those aren't rimless glasses.
>>77350383
It's thing like this that are why Andrew Klavan calls it a former newspaper whenever he mentions it.
>>77351116
>>77351288
This is nothing new for Sony. They really have no shame.
>paying a hipster Millennial at the NYT to write a snarky article framing the consumption of entertainment from a major multinational corporation as a social justice issue
And the NYT is supposed to be one of the more reputable newspapers. Can you imagine that this glorified advertisement passes as "journalism"? Truly sick times we live in.
>>77351204
>journalists
>ethics
what? that's like saying water is dry.
>>77351319
Leftists eat their own. Lurk more.
>>77350422
lmao is this you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nM7kw2YP-rY
>>77354447
Read the thread and article stupid frog
For a bonus to anyone else ITT, here is a clip from a thread yesterday. In it you can laugh uproariously at the antics of the wacky new ghostbusters movie, as well as watch Bill Murray question his life.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ0YexsRCPc
>dat facepalm
>dem bitches know it
>but they don;t say anything to BM because they can't
He was blackmailed into supporting this trash, it was in the wikileaks
>yfw all the arguments against Ghosbusters fans like James is "NEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRDDDSSSS!!!!"
And they think "nerd culture" is not inclusive enough, yet they're the ones who push nerds into these corners. They are the bullies.
>>77348738
Well to be honest the movie does look like it's gonna be shit.
But you're not allowed to say it, because it's a female cast. And there's a black "woman" too. It's actually pretty smart on Sony's part.
>>77351368
Where is the proofs
>>77350593
> you won't see garbage like this in the actual paper.
there's not a newspaper in the world that's worth dogshit anymore
Modern "journalists" are some of the most evil people in existence.
>>77350383
Does this honestly surprise you though?
The NYT is fucking tripe at this point
>>77348738
HE'S GONNA TAKE YOU BACK TO THE PAST
>>77351204
It's sad when a fucking youtuber who makes nostalgia videos semi-professionally has more composure and professionalism when discussing a fucking children's movie than so called professional journalists do.
>>77350786
Wasn't he an actor tho? He tricked a whole bunch of kiwis for years too
>>77352170
>Guy
The author is a woman.
So the "hmm" makes sense.
>>77351204
Journalism is dead, it's all activism now.
>>77353253
The best part?
I checked in on the twitters of the journalists who attacked him today after looking at that article.
>We're not bullies
>You can't bully someone if they're a public figure
>He IS a public figure because he has more views than I do
>If he doesn't want his wife and child to be getting rape/death threats then maybe he shouldn't voice his opinion in public
These are the people who were comparing Gamergate trolls to Neo Nazis, ISIS and literally identifying them as a Violent Extremists Hate Movement for criticizing feminist rants about video games.
>>77351809
THEY PINCH BACK
>>77355501
How the fuck am I living in this world
What the fuck happened to 10 years ago when sane people existed
>>77353796
That wasn't it at all.
She not only wrote about Muh Womenz and diversity on cinemassacre, he then added a black lead to his movie so he could make out with a white chick while James watched.
Which led to /tv/ doing what they always do, and autistically spamming KEK memes for months on end.
>>77354134
Hilariously the same works for Trump and the MSM. They take the bait every time.
>>77348738
>Guy says he's not gonna watch movie because it looks shit
>SJW universe implodes
>he was right tho.
>>77355501
WAKE ME UP
>>77354233
It's also a whole bunch of supposed movie "journalists" who claim they have no idea who James is, but are clearly attacking a far more popular person in their field to get attention for themselves.
Some of the Jounralists were literally just posting stuff like;
>Fucking retard
>Look at this fucking limp dicked loser
Basically trying to piggyback on attention.
>>77350627
>using stormweenie unironically
You have to go back
I think the New York Times needs to have it's shit ruined.
>>77354282
The funniest part about the twitter debacle was seeing the pictures of the guys calling James a pathetic nerd.
I'm not even /pol/ing here - to a man they were either malnourished or obese, all severely ugly, had neckbeards or bad facial hair, goofy glasses...Like the EXTREME version of James's fictional character. And they ALL WRITE ABOUT CHILDREN'S ENTERTAINMENT FOR A LIVING.
It was the most stunning lack of self awareness I've seen.
I don't even recall the supposed misogynists attacking Anita like this. Remember the time when multiple big news outlets bonded to bully Anita for her glasses, clothes, her home decoration, her partner and child, belittled her charity events, and called her a disgusting nerd because she voiced her opinion?
Because I sure don't, because that never happened. This makes me so mad in so many levels.
>>77355078
Murdoch is literally hiring young girls off twitter with no journalistic experience to write for his companies down here, and the most insane part is that while 50% of their output is gossip, the other 50% is opinion laden news reports. Like serious, important news. Covered by girls whose only experience is snide remarks about other girls on twitter. It's a race to the very, very, very bottom.
>>77350943
Isn't that what movie trailers are for? So you can judge what the movie will be like and decide whether or not to go.
Well, all the trailers for dickbusters have sucked (unsurprisingly). If it were any other movie, no one would say "well, looks like shit...but I'll still give it a chance." The only people who think it will be good are lows brows and diversity pushers. And the original ghostbusters wasn't "high brow" in any sense, except in comparison to this uninspired drivel.
>>77350593
A major Swiss newspaper had a bit of the NYT delivered with it for a while, and judging by those bits it was horribly overdramatic and biased to me.
Perhaps Swiss papers are just written in a colder tone, but I certainly didn't get a good impression of the NYT from those segments. It didn't feel impartial or factual at all.
>>77356131
>Anita can't speak at Universities because White Male Supremacists will murder her (OF COURSE the evil white police deny any threats, of course they would!)
Meanwhile Milo literally has people scream and rant and physically threaten him and shut down his speeches and phone in bomb threats to the authorities.
It's hilarious.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3ugHP-yZXw
>movie trailer
>200.000 likes
>800.000 dislikes
Yea, gonna be a real blockbuster...
>>77355099
TO PLAY THE SHITTY GAMES THAT SUCK ASS
>>77348738
>>77353813
http://pastebin.com/Ax4DsYnB
>>77355099
BEFORE WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE
>>77355514
> IF WE PERSUADE HIM
>>77348738
>"internet attacks"
really? What kind of injury do you get from an "internet attack" especially one amounting someone saying "I don't like this".
>>77351368
except that isn't his wife in the movie and his wife told him he couldn't kiss the girl in the movie, so they had the black guy do it. cuck, but marital reasons.
>>77356406
It won't bomb because a lot of people will pay to watch how shitty it is. Even if everybody hates it, it'll probably be profitable.
>>77348738
He was gonna get cucked in the past.
He was cleaning his wife's BBC creampied ass.
>>77349145
>Like you must wear thick-rimmed hipster glass to be cool as shit.
They want everyone to wear "Terry Richards" sex-offender-style glasses like Uncle Terry made his under dressed, underage models wear.
>>77352480
is it that hard to understand that people don't want to watch movies they're not interested in ?
It looks like a witch hunt t b h
>>77351149
hell, my interest is piqued now. too bad I already know the truth.
>>77351204
Freedom of the press was a mistake.
I AM ENTITLED TO YOUR MONEY IN EXCHANGE FOR THIS AWFUL MOVIE YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE
-t. feminist studies major (who also hasn't gone to see the movie, because it's shit)
>>77351116
It's so obvious at this point, it's honestly insulting.
>>77348738
>>>“I refuse to watch it,” he said, sitting with his rimless glasses amid a gumball machine, “Star Trek” memorabilia and bookcases stacked with old VHS tapes.
I always love when these tolerant shitlibs take snide "lol look at this LOSER I bet he lives in his mom's basement!" potshots
> Donald Trump is racist
> White geeks are sexist
Enter The Gods of the Copybook Headings, with the usual terror and slaughter
> only racists and sexists can protect us from terrorism, or even admit it exists
> why does this keep happening.swf
>>77354233
>AVGN is another deal; if you look at the whole Channel Awesome gang for example, they stay in line and avoid controvercy. AVGN is in the same genre but he's one of the biggest; so him telling it like it is and not giving a fuck brings the message to +1Mil people who aren't necessairly anti-feminist
Actually, the Critic made a video about how whitewashing is bullshit a few weeks ago.
>>77348738
>>77356506
This article was either written by a woman or a numale footstool.
it's so scathing and full of vitriol because a large group of people don't want this movie and one man openly says he won't be seeing it.
I love the pot shots at nerd/geek culture too. That'll help your argument.
>>77355501
So Patton Oswalt is a bully because he's a public figure with a wider audience than James.
>>77357427
And it is. Did you have a point?
> inb4 "please just act like my strawman and stop thinking for yourself"
>>77356436
HE'D RATHER HAVE
>>77356970
BAN ASSAULT INTERNETS
>>77354373
Nah, history has taught us that Spoony is a reverse-Samson. If he wants to un-JUST himself, he needs to cut the mane.
>starting with a petty insult about his appearance
are we fucking back to bully people with glasses
>>77354881
>He was blackmailed into supporting this trash,
>Don't believe it
>Read the mails
>From: Steinberg, David
EVERY TIME
>>77350573
He did ? He just made a video because his fan wanted a girl buster review, he said how he won't watch and why. That video triggered the libs and that's it, he didn't respond.
>>77354282
>>77357598
He looks like he enjoys taking it up the ass.
>>77357685
Patton Oswalt feels like he has to chime in on everything and is on the "right side" like most SJWs.
>>77357702
A POZ LOAD
BE DEPOSITED INTO HIS ASS
Do you guys think James is secretly voting for Trump?
It's possible. Mike probably is.
>the new york times published this crap
pls no
>>77350755
Sony pays people to write about their films. That's literally it.
>>77355306
No, it's a guy with the girls name of Brook.
>>77348738
Anyone else find it funny that he was attacked by a fake journalist who covers fucking shoes. I think someone needs to remind the retard that she is a nobody journalist who wouldn't know quality if it drop kicked a high heels in her pussy.
>>77355645
Obama. Literally and unironically. This is all his fault.
>>77351381
LOL I can usualy tell when a post or an article is written by a female, and this one read 99% female.
>>77351255
Enjoy discussing that fact while you still can, dubfriend.
>>77357685
> The reason Patton Oswalt is shilling the new Ghostbusters flick so hard is because his wife has a cameo in it.
had*
*had
>The new “Ghostbusters,” which, by the way, has been generating positive reactions in test screenings, according to Sony executives, finally gave him his wish.
>according to Sony executives
>the same people who were going to sue Bill Murray into making a cameo
>trusting what they say
>ever
>>77355078
breitbart is good
>>77348738
Just realized the author is a dude.
Honestly nothing is worse than a white liberal racing to show how progressive they are by jumping on the SJW outrage train.
It's almost obvious that this article itself is another marketing ploy to drum up conversation about this movie. It's sad that the news has come to this. Like the NYT or not they were at one time respected for having stellar journalists.
now it's buzzfeed for the ivory tower dwellers.
>>77348738
>This article, written by an embittered cunt, is of lower quality than the shit I read in my social media feeds
Journalism, another job women are significantly worse at then men
>>77357737
Not pithy enough, Gotta punch that up if you want it to be a meme.
>>77357685
S A V A G E
>>77357694
? I was arguing with the switz about Channel awesome avoidness of controvercity, what the fuck are you talking about?
>>77348738
this isn't politics
>>77359409
The writer is a very man. A very emasculated dorky man.
Let that sink in.
>>77359409
It's a man tho
Allegedly
>>77359409
the author of this article is a dude, not sure if he has a penis
>>77351149
>tfw a jobless fan does your job better than a paid proffesional
I got to admit i kinda want to see it now
>>77359490
Look at the authors Twitter page, he says that the dislike of this movie has to deal with gender politics.
Although I agree that this shouldn't be politics, but we live in a fucked up world where people care about this shit.
>>77351319
>because the people who don't even know the word 'loyalty' jumped on this guy, we shouldn't dislike him
his entire career is being the annoying shit in TNG and then saying "lol jk i'm not that annoying IRL worship me please". And so they did.
>>77354968
>And they think "nerd culture" is not inclusive enough, yet they're the ones who push nerds into these corners. They are the bullies.
holy fuck this. get trained to hide your geeky hobbies lest you be crucified as a kid at school, get crucified anyways for hiding your hobby and not wanting to share it, and then get crucified for being a 'nerd' anyways
i'm damn near done with this planet. going to sink a few dozen hours into VR in the next year or so and then pull the trigger while immersed in an entirely different world
>>77353276
She fucked him over by SJWing his AVGN movie, no telling how mad she is that he's not worshiping this movie like a good boy should.
Maybe James learned how to pass shit-tests and she's his quiet sex toy now.
>>77348738
>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
give me free tickets to the new Fembusters movie and then i'll judge weather I pay to see it again.
>>77358813
The joke went so far over your head it entered low orbit
>writers
>berg
>Cohen
Watch the movie goy, you're not sexist are you?
>But he is also a husband and a father; his daughter, Darcy, now a toddler, was injured at birth.
why do they mention his daughter's injury?
how rude
>>77351288
Is no one else gonna discuss this RARE?
>>77359760
If it was gender politics, feminists made the first attack, not us.
>>77351381
>https://twitter.com/brooksbarnesNYT
a ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' guy '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>>77348738
My swift reaction to Mr. Rolfe’s video was similarly severe. Without so much as pressing play, I decided that his position was garbage and that he represented the worst about geek culture and the internet. I considered leaving a hissy comment on his site: Somebody’s mom apparently forgot to teach the judging-books-by-their-covers lesson.
The liberals first instinct: Shutting down their brain
>>77363020
>Gawker outed a gay millionaire and told him to toughen up and deal with it
>he bankrolled Hulk Hogans legal fees and they destroyed Gawker
>>77360634
I have a full-year season ticket to the cinema. I can go to any movies any time I want for free (excluding that one-time season ticket price) and I'm still not going to see that piece of shit.
>>77358615
Proof?
>>77348738
>You can't use a trailer to judge a movie but you can use other people's reactions to judge a person's controversial YouTube video
>Not seeing how stupid that is
>Thinks James is being a hypocrite for thinking trailers are meant to give an honest impression, while thinking gossiping cunts don't
>>77363962
Chris Evans is so patriotic he put his right hand over his heart every time he laughs in America.
>>77357685
>Patton Oswalt being a cuck after putting out that 43-tweet superjoke about inclusivity
JUST
>>77357296
Propane
>>77349145
Non-ironically, they are trying to make problem glasses unironic.
>>77348738
>literally harassing people in real life over a fucking youtube video of nerdy opinions
what the fuck
>>77366511
If you did the same you're a white terrorist and a rapist
>>77348738
>the new york fucking times is running articles on angry video game nerd videos
Holy Christ
What does /pol/ think of this shit?
https://youtu.be/TQ85g2Al1ZA
>>77366997
Oy VEY goys are saying nasty things about our latest film quick get to the newspapers Moshe! Focus on the white males!!!
>>77367105
The two in the middle are so fat they're about to crush the dyke on the left end.
>>77351116
wasn't it sony that guilted people into seeing that north korean "comedy" movie about assassinating kim jung derp?
and then it came out in their emails that it was one of the worst movies they ever made and were terrified they would be in the hole millions.
Kikes trying to make it your civic duty to see a lazy fucking remake. This movie is going to be absolute trash and they know they have a fucking stinker on their hands so they are pushing the agenda instead. Why is it going to be trash? Not because of the female cast. Because its fucking lazy as shit. It is the exact same movie as the original. The exact fucking same plot, story, some of the scenes are the fucking same.
This is not new to hollywood either. Look at the new star wars compared to the original. They switched around the genders and skin colors and called it a new film.
>>77351288
>>77362234
dont worry i got this.
What are /pol/'s thoughts on Latza?
>>77353529
Thread/
>ASTONISHING
>SHOCKING
>INCREDULOUS
>WIDE-EYED GASPING
>HOLY MOLY
what a bunch of faggots
>>77367105
It's not about them being women. The new movie looks terrible and that's it.
>>77369682
No, it is about being women because women aren't funny, and if they're ugly (which the hogs in Fembusters all are) , nobody wants to look at them, much less have them be the stars of a summer blockbuster.
>>77368862
>>77357125
I fucking hate that guy. he takes pictures in front of a white wall with a 10 dollar 35mm point and shoot. he is a mockery of photographers.
>>77352480
>If you don't pay to see a movie starring women and minorities you are a racist and a misogynist
>If the marketing for the movie fails and people aren't interested in seeing it, it is the public's fault
>>77357685
>Patton Oswalt is an SJW
Isn't Patton Oswalt exclusively cast as morbidly obese, manlet betas?
>>77370789
You just described numale SJWs. Because they side with shrill women doesn't make them less beta.
>>77371179
No I mean he exclusively plays bumbling caricatures of numales for a laugh making him a massive hypocrite.
>>77370789
He played it pretty well in the KOQ, I thought he was pretty funny. I just hate when actors feel like reading lines off a script makes them qualified to speak for public opinion.
Dont let the leftists take you down bro, you're almost completely uncuckd!
>>77359453
The fact that "avoidiness of controversy" isn't countered by "telling lies just to make people mad."
AVGN made an accurate statement about whitewashing. It's also not controversial. Nothing is proven except your total lack of critical thinking skills.
>>77370244
He's also pigfuck disgusting as a person.
How can liberals bully James like this for months and still look in the mirror and say they are the "good guys" and they are anti-harassment?
Has anyone ever called them out on their hypocrisy?
>>77357125
Terry is the illuminati.
Think about it.
>>77351922
Close. James slowly and thoroughly explained why he thinks this film will be shit, but not once did he mention the female cast.
That's why they are going after him. Say one thing about the cast and you are sexist and written off. James was careful not to mention it, so there is no "-ist" they can call him.
Now they are trying to goad him into saying something offensive ao they can take the moral stance against his review of the trailer.
>>77376000
The facade of liberals being good people is crumbling. I use to believe it subconsciously but I don't any more. The left is in fact nothing but a bunch of psychopaths who have lost all humanity.
Goddamn I loved his videos back then
I remember sending him fan art, and the very next day he'd write a blog post urging people to stop sending him crappy fan art. Good times.
>>77352613
When you grow up maybe youll understand
>>77360412
>No proof, but I'll spout it anyway
>>77351288
Wut da fook?
Haven't seen this flag yet.
>>77352613
Underrated, someone cap for posterity.
>>77354319
>>77355645
>>77358813
I'll help. His wife is a ghost now.
>>77348738
(((nytimes)))
>>77351288
You said that you're gonna get a different rare flag soon :c
#IStandWithRolfe
that article is bullfuck
>>77355078
>Modern "journalists" are some of the most evil people in existence.
"I loathe journalism as a profession: a claque of careerist whores, half-educated back-slappers and propagandists for the oligarchical lizard people who are ruining civilization. I loathe “science journalism” particularly, as they’re generally talking about something I know about, and so their numerous impostures are more obvious."
Scott Locklin
Journalism has always been a dubious profession, although it's more obvious now than ever. Even the height of Yellow Journalism in the early 20th century wasn't that horrible.
This movie looks shitty
>>77350943
>geek culture
>geek
>culture
why does everybody need a culture now
i thought geek was something defined by removal from the mainstream culture
>>77351319
"GaymerGaters" were completely vindicated when Wheaton and Joss Whedon supported aGGros only to get mobbed of Twitter by batshit rabid feminecromorphs. Maybe they learned something.
>>77367105
jesus christ
>>77385223
Normalshits are braindead parasites and will glom onto, exploit and destroy the thing they hated a few years ago.
We need to bring back religion to wrangle their tardery and be an outlet for their obsessive normie tendencies.
>>77348738
>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
>direct fucking quote from the article
So talking like a child and being so openly biased is now considered "journalism"?
>>77367105
>2,000 likes vs. 19,000 dislikes
JIMMIE BTFO, his own audience destroying him in the comments
>>77353512
james is probably having an affair
this happens all the time
>man marries woman
>woman becomes hambeast
>man becomes cuck and loses confidence
>man realizes what he's become
>seeks out alternate female companionship
>begins to better himself again
clockwork
>>77354528
educate yourself, NYT is basically Pravda for USA
One of Brooke's coworkers from the NYT called James's wife a gold-digger.
These people are fucking bullies.
>>77348738
who is this douche and why does anyone care if he watches a movie or not? people need to get a life
