If all Muslims are bad, how come Muslims barely did any terrorist attacks in the US before 9/11?
Obviously, the religion didn't change, something else did...
Saudis increased the Foreign Ministry's budget.
>>77022548
>ricans
Just another reason we should use the island for bombing practice.
>>77022548
They got bored of only ever bombing each other
The USA barely had any Muslims before that?
>>77022548
Not all Muslims are bad. Really only like 20% have what we would consider to be extremist ideas.
Unfortunately that's like 500 million people.
its clearly an organized crusade to get westerners to hate muslims
don't let the enemy win
>1982-92
>>77022548
chemtrails son
>>77022548
If white supremacy and the KKK are the real threat, why was most domestic terrorism done by Left groups and Puerto Ricans?
>>77022548
the internet. since 1996 muslims started using the internet to spread islamist propaganda.
The answer is, as always, the jews.
there were plenty faggot. wasn't even the first time the WTC was attacked
>>77024001
Okay, how about before the 1990s, then?
>>77022548
Because in the 80s based Reagan protected us.
>>77022548
TRUMP WAS RIGHT
>TRUMP WAS RIGHT
TRUMP WAS RIGHT
TRUMP WAS RIGHT
>TRUMP WAS RIGHT
TRUMP WAS RIGHT
TRUMP WAS RIGHT
>TRUMP WAS RIGHT
TRUMP WAS RIGHT
>>77022548
>Obviously, the religion didn't change, something else did...
Yes, obviously. Their strategy changed.
>>77024001
That was in 93 the picture is showing to 92.
The answer for this, though is most likely because the country hardly had any Muslim population.
The Muslim population is about 1% currently after taking in loads of Muslim refugees from Palestine, Alabania, Iraq, and now Syria.
I am from NYC and the last time I went back a few months ago I noticed way more Muslims then before.
Keep in mind that Muslims reproduce at a very fast rate so if they are 1% now after a generation to reproduce and more refugees and immigration Muslims were probably like 0.5% at best in the 1980's.
Because there were almost none in the US.
>>77025435
It doesn't even need to be that. The Islamic population in the USA was probably so small in the 1980's that most Muslims at the time wouldn't have had a network to pull off any good attacks and they wouldn't have had a PC climate or culture to protect themselves.
Also, most Muslim immigrants back then probably came from Turkey and were vetted thoroughly and were actually somewhat intelligent and worked.
>>77025457
>That was in 93 the picture is showing to 92.
I love the meme of limiting data to make Muslims look better
>after 9/11, Muslims only killed x number of people in America!
yeah? How about we include 9/11 and all the shit everywhere else on earth, they don't look so good now do they?
>>77022548
Goddamn long-legged pissed off Puerto Ricans always committing terrorist attacks
<1% of the population is Muslim, yet it's the highest its ever been. We'll see more of this.
Sincerely,
BTFO.
>>77024358
Because that's when all of these organizations were created and organized.
>>77025457
where does it say that?
>>77025883
Yeah it's annoying, those people also never look into comparing the populations.
They will compare a 1% Muslim population to a 70% Christian population and ignore whichever attacks they want to create a narrative that Islamic terrorism is not a legitimate thing.
>>77026416
Look at the picture it says 1982 to 1992.
>>77025704
Yeah, you're probably on the nose over the population increase, though PC culture dates back at least to the 60's and its original advocates.
>Also, most Muslim immigrants back then probably came from Turkey and were vetted thoroughly and were actually somewhat intelligent and worked.
Lebanese, I should think; a formerly modernistic country and people subject to having interest groups from the region's various camps giving it all sorts of trouble, leading to emigration.
>>77022548
>If all Muslims are bad, how come Muslims barely did any terrorist attacks in the US before 9/11?
If Lee Harvey Oswald was bad, how come he barely shot anyone before John F Kennedy?
If OJ Simpson was bad, how come he barely murdered anyone before his wife?
If JJ Abrams was bad, how come he barely made any shit movies before he started making shit movies?
Checkmate.
>>77026537
>They will compare a 1% Muslim population to a 70% Christian population
the radical equalization of groups by leftists is obnoxious and dishonest as fuck. They act like every group has the same number of people so it's ok if one is statistically bad. It's like trying to excuse terrorism with the Crusades because they see 1:1 and don't realize that they're basically legitimizing acting like it's 700 fucking years ago
>>77022548
we let it out of the mideast
>>77026693
Yeah but PC culture didn't start protecting Islam until recently.
I remember when I was a kid growing up in NYC that people openly made fun of Islam for a few years. Even South Park started to make fun of them.
It wasn't until after the Iraq war and liberals started to cry about Islamic oppression and that war became looked at as bad that people started to feel bad for Muslims and sympathize with them.
>>77026615
Only year I see is 1998
>>77026230
So why were "all of these organizations" suddenly created then?
>>77022548
Too busy dying to the Soviets
If leftists are supposed to be smart how come they don't know any history? I guess the news doesn't cover that.
>>77022548
I guess they dont teach you about the barbary wars in the US?
>>77027133
The roots of Hamas started in 1980/81 with the creation of the IAPNA in the US. Then a bunch of other organizations replicated that until Hamas was formally created in the late 80's. Even parts of their official charter were written on our soil.
The catalyst of all this was a series of events that occurred in the 80's that occurred in the middle east. Iranian revolution, the assassination of Sadat, and the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan, etc.
Hamas was funded by there organizations and wealthy Mulisms in the US, like Marzook. Most of this militancy/terrorism was carried out in gaza, israel, bank etc.
Right before the turn of the decade it was discovered that the UASR (islamic "think tank") was acting as a terror cell in planning and funding attacks. The US was essentially a safe haven for them.
Leaving out a lot of details, and it's not the greatest timeline, but there weren't attacks because things were relatively stable at the time.
That was the time when We/Russia/Israel/Egypt started to stir the pot in the Middle East. So yes, meddling in the region is tied to contemporary attacks.
>>77022548
Just because there aren't terrorist attacks every day doesn't mean that they don't want attacks to happen. Most of them are either too cowardly to conduct the attacks themselves or have obligations that make committing terrorism inconvenient for them. 'Peaceful' Muslims are just like Christians that don't go to church or read the bible; they are Muslim only by association. Their holy book literally says to commit war against non-believers.
>>77022548
Funding.
>1992
heh
>>77024822
By funding Al Qaeda loll
>>77022548
Fair point. It's because technology (fast global spread of information) and immigration has brought us all together and cultures are clashing harder than ever.
Muslims care about their faith and political might more so than before. The religion hasn't changed, it's just become a more powerful meme.
>>77027133
In 1979 reactionary Islamism took hold on the anti imperialist movement sweeping Iran and created the first modern Islamic state. Soon, the ayatollah began influencing politics in small weak states in the Levant and created groups like Hezbollah to fight against Israel under the guise of Palestinian freedom. After this, more radical sunni groups based on the hanbali ideology took root in historically oppressed nations. When America launched a campaign against Iraq to free OPEC and secure Saudi hegemony, hard line sunni Islamist groups saw this as a travesty against the holy land and became radicalized against the west. (Shiite groups historically have only opposed Israeli policies). So when America moved to prop up their Saudi oil interests they opened a can of worms so to speak and unleashed the demon of the east. Now with the capitulation of strong authoritarian Arab socialist states post Arab spring, middle easterners are losing national and institutional identity and are turning towards political Islam to fill that power vaccine. Thus the radical ideologues use Islam as a stepping stone to launch legitimate terrorism against their religious/political enemies.
So in essence, its not Islamic terrorism, but Islam'ist' terrorism. This wave of political Islam was started in the 80s from the roots of secular anti western nationalism, is exasperated by the fall of Arab socialist states, and will only end when middle eastern states can reform and repair their national identities.
>>77023106
More like 70%. Check the global pew polls. Sharia law is extreme.
>>77022548
>barely did any terrorist attacks in the US before 9/11?
kek
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks
they where doing this shit since forever, remember Munich Olympia attacks, OPEC assault in Vienna? Thats just one of the more well known ones.
The reason is as follows:
In the past there were less muslims attacks because
>Iran was ruled by the shah and wasn't a muslim shithole.
>Iraq was ruled by saddam and wasn't a muslim shothole
>Egypt was ruled by Anwar el sadat and wasn't a muslim shithole
>Syria was stable and wasn't a muslim shithole
>The gulf states, which are the biggest sponsor of terrorists, didn't really find out the full potential of their oil money until the 90s
>There wasn't a fucking PC culture importing toxic savages all over the country.
>There wasn't the internet back then, where people could be easily brainwashed.
>>77030458
I think that the US' unconditional support to Israel had a lot to do with radicalization of Islam.
>>77022548
1) what is the definition of terrorism according to the FBI?
2) how many muzzies were there from 82-92 in america? I'd say fucking CLOSE TO NONE
>>77031480
I don't think it had much to do with it. Honestly, the palestinian issue wasn't that bad in israel until the 90s. Yes they had multiple wars with arab countries, but there werent that many terrorist attacks on until the 90s. I still believe everything went to shit ever since the shah got overthrown. It's what caused everything. After the overthrow of the shah, iraq attacked iran, a year later, egypt's president got assasinated, and the war between lebanon and israel started. The united states helped saddam by selling him weapons, the same weapons which he later used to attack kuwait and caused the gulf war in the 90s. Then later on the united states went and overthrew saddam, and currently try to overthrown assad. This all started with the fall of iran. Saddam was kept in line by the shah, israel was an ally. Once the shah was gone, everything went to shit.
>>77032411
Iraq was a soviet satellite state, dude. He attacked Kuwait with T54 and MiGs.
>>77026878
underrated post
>>77032411
Still, if the US forced Israel to negotiate with Palestinians and stopped them from expanding their territory into occupied lands, it would be seen as a gesture of good will.
Islam has been at war with everyone else for 1400 years.
>>77026878
Irrelevant post. Can't compare the acts of individuals to those of an entire religion.
>>77022548
>cherry picking the time frame
>not taking subpopulation weights into account
>>77022849
As a 'rican, I completely agree with you. This place is like a shittier version of the US. We don't even have any culture anymore. Just people moving out of here to different parts, primarily New York and Florida.
Fucking useless place. It amazes me the people here still feel some "pride" for being part of this shit island.
>>77022548
Didn't they get banned by Jimmy Carter?
>>77022548
>>77033426
You could be like Haiti... At least Haiti has some culture left.
I remember visiting NYC in the 70's. 'ricans were the shit.
>>77030458
this desu
>1982-1992
You're not that stupid, right?
>>77033426
RARE
>>77033648
