>Biggest shooting in American history occurs
>It was the muzzlims this time
>Alt-right cucked neckbeards still defending current gun laws
MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH
Who here thinks this is a shill?
>>76979226
i second that
>gun laws would stop terrorists from getting guns
fuck, if only merican made it illegal to fly planes into buildings BEFORE 9/11
Bump for butthurt conservashits
>>76979226
>>76979326
not an argument
>>76979226
>>76979326
Dumb fucking brainlets
Was the gay club a gun free zone?
Faggots are usually progressive liberals, most of them support a gun grab, they deserve to be fucking massacred
Burn in hell, cocksuckers, burn in hell
>>76978849
French gun laws didn't prevent Bataclan. Don't be so naive
>>76979438
Why aren't these kinds of shootings happening in the UK or Japan?
Why would criminals follow stricter gun laws if they don't follow what we have now?
>>76978849
>>76979226
It's a troll, Jesus, just ignore it
>>76979810
Because they're too busy happening in France?
>>76978849
and if you're black, ya better stay strapped nigga, fuck tha world
>>76979810
Because there are barely any guns in the UK or Japan. There's nearly one for every person in the US.
It's just more difficult to find a gun there, gun control really has little to do with it.
>>76979810
You're right countries with gun control don't have terrorists getting guns like France, oh wait.
But to answer your question properly it's because they are smaller countries without any guns.
Unless you're suggesting a legislation that will not only control how guns are sold but also remove all the guns from the current gun owners it won't change anything.
Also good luck removing all guns from gun owners.
also it had to be FUCKING LEAF
>>76979810
UK has less guns, but more mudslimes raping and murdering.
Japan has less guns AND less mudslimes. Little to no murder. Japanese don't need guns because they aren't in a """"""peaceful multicultural diverse"""""" society.
ITT the triggering
>>76978849
Alright listen up. Banning guns would be symptom of the much larger problem of islamist extremists. Criminals still get guns and bombs. This guy would have had guns and bombs regardless of country laws thanks to his extremist ties. His guns being purchased legally or not is not the issue that we should be talking about. If we want to discuss the legal ramification of guns, not guns being used in crimes by criminals, we can talk about how guns equalize the weak and the strong, bring up figures about percentages of women who get raped that have a CCW, density of legally owned firearms affecting crime rates, etc, etc. That would be a good discussion.
This is just "hurr hurr guns 'merica dum get rid of guns" and it's fucking stupid. You've already started the argument with a strawman and it's impossible to argue when the whole premise is wrong. Fuck off and shill somewhere else. MY cousin stopped a home invasion with his CCW registered gun when him and his family came home to nogs in his house. They had duct tape, zip ties, and guns of their own. In a physical fight we wouldn't have standed a chance, but with his gun he killed all three. Thanks to my state law he was a hero instead of going to trial for killing intruders. This is the power of guns used legally for protection.
>>76978849
HERE WE GO GOYS
#NotAllGunOwners
>>76982703
You're wrong
>>76984422
Wow. gottem.
>>76982703
"liberals, socialists, communists, big government types and anti-gun people will see the light if we argue the correct way with facts and figures and truth."
Yeah nah you're retarded.
>>76984703
I never said they would. I said a discussion like that would be good, meaning not one-sided. There are pros and cons to widespread gun ownership.
Now go pay your loans before you become Greece 2
