http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/10/google-denies-burying-bad-hillary-clinton-stories/
“Google Autocomplete does not favor any candidate or cause,” said a Google spokesperson in an email to the Washington Times.
“Claims to the contrary simply misunderstand how Autocomplete works. Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name. More generally, our autocomplete predictions are produced based on a number of factors including the popularity of search terms,” said the statement.
>>76915206
They're lying desu
>>76915206
This video already disproved what this spokesman was fed.
>>76915206
>Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name.
they are fine with leaving "trump racist" etc in their auto complete though
>>76915206
>Google denies manipulating search results for Hillary Clinton
i'm sure it does.
pic related - try this for yourself
>>76915598
oy vey
>>76915206
>Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name.
>>76915206
> Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name.
>>76915206
>Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction
>Jeb is a
>>76915206
>“Google Autocomplete does not favor any candidate or cause,” said a Google spokesperson in an email to the Washington Times.
distributed hate and media bias go a long way on their own. companies have been gaming search since before google existed
just imagine how wonderful the clinton results would look without the loud bernie supporters pounding out articles.
>>76915915
Holy shit
>>76915709
>Our algorithm incorporates "several factors", namely the ones that you just debunked
>We won't let it say anything bad about Hillary
Nice response Google, you really clarified the situation by saying nothing
>>76915206
Why the fuck would they even omit disparaging terms? If it's searched a lot, isn't there a reason for that? Barring some type of search bomb shit going on, like how miserable failure linked to George Bush's wiki for years.
Hillary Clinton could very well indeed be indicted for being a corrupt piece of shit, and Trump can't seem to avoid verbal gaffes. Both should be represented, as they are important events pertaining to those individuals. Stop whitewashing shit.
>>76917612
Plausible deniability. The response they gave is completely predictable.
>>76915915
Jesus fucking christ
![images[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ZIohCxx.jpg "images[1].jpg")
>>76915206
>>76915915
That's pretty fucked.i fucking hate the Jews so much
Tried using "Hillary Clinton tells " and it suggested "the truth", but said nothing for Trump.
>>76915206
The fact that autocomplete censors what Google considers offensive is already ridiculous...
You can't even type in most Red Pill things without it coming up blank and trying to feed you articles with feminist agendas.
>>76915915
Just typed this in... looks like they're covering their tracks.
>>76915206
Lies.
>>76918477
It is literally being changed as we speak. It's hilarious how obvious it is too. They are in full fucking panic mode. People who were doing their own testing like /pol/ are seeing the shilled suggestions get scrubbed in front of their eyes.
>>76918548
lost one of those in a tree when I was younger... it stayed up there for a while
>we would never do something like discourage free speech or political opinion
except they already have shown they're on board with this, already fuck over youtube channels, china censorship, etc.
Google is shit tier at this point.
>>76915206
Here's a thought for you.
If they actually did that at least some right wing fag would leak it. But they don't,
So why is that. Is it because google doesn't do that or because google is completely leftist. Think carefully before you answer.
>>76918477
>>76915915
the algorithm takes account of your browsing history, so if you browse and search for trump related shit alot you will get alot of trump related shit in other searches too.
>>76915206
We gotta tweet this to the Trump people
>>76916867
>>76918815
>If they actually did that at least some right wing fag would leak it.
non sequitur
>>76918548
Damn, I had one of those when I was a kid. I got it stuck on my roof for a years before I finally decided to get it down.
>>76918815
>If they actually did that at least some right wing fag would leak it.
Lol, okay buddy
>>76918477
haha holy fuck. Yes they are. That one with Trump in it was one I did a few days ago
>>76917404
>>76918477
This still works at least.
>>76919054
>charlie chaplin is just 4 days older than Hitler
Very amusing.
What about this manipulation?
>>76918821
I search a lot of trump related shit...
OP of pic concurs with my results showing that Google is indeed covering their tracks.
>>76918821
I'm aware of the algorithm but..
see
>>76919054
Both were searches by me on the same desktop.
They already explained they won't autocomplete with searches on criminal history if you use a person's full name. Try "OJ Simpson cri" or "Richard Nixon cri"
Also if you search "Hillary Clinton rac" you still get racism results.
>>76915206
lmao, it's so obvious that they censor hillarys search. Even bing and yahoo show criminal if you enter hillary clinton cri while google does not. What a joke
>>76915206
kicked google to curb when they started putting trends on my phone when I went opened search. I don't find (((sharyl sandberg))) inspirational and never will you fucking kikes.
All search now is shitty anyway. Switched to bing and duck duck go even though MS killed tay.
>>76919462
Try Yandex. I am unable to get an English interface tho.
>>76918943
I buried a time capsule when I was a kid. My childhood home got sold and the spot where i buried it doesn't exist any more
>>76918815
>san fransisco tech
>right wing anything
anyone right of the margin cashed out when google decided they were too white and started their own internal AA for pure diversity reasons.
http://www.vox.com/2016/6/10/11903028/hillary-clinton-google-debunked
checkmate trumpets
>>76918815
>they hire right wing fags
good one
>>76915598
>>76919849
Excellent meme sir. My compliments
>>76919855
>vox
>>76919855
>vox.com
shills defending the shills
>>76920033
>>76920108
whats wrong with vox?
I just found the article.
>>76919968
This is pretty fun actually.
"white people are"
>
"asians are"
>
"black people are"
>rude
"mexicans are"
>rapists
Only a complete fool would question which side of the political spectrum the corporate titan Google lies on by looking at a history of their homepage doodles, which are always propping up no-name "historical figures" that are always not white males, and never giving doodles to white males which were actual historic figures, unless they were complete liberal blowhards.
>>76917404
wtf those search results are real, wow, google is fucking rigged against trump
>>76919855
>Google is shilling for shillary
>no we're not -t. shill (proceeds to backpedal)
TRUMP BTFO, DEBUNKED, IMWITHHER, MENTALLYHILL
>>76915206
Did expect them saying: "Yes, we do manipulate".
Come on!
>>76919855
Except it still works
>>76915206
Of course they will deny
>>76919948
>donald trump is adolf hitle--
>suprised when search engine auto completes
I hate(((google))) as much as anyone but tghat example is shit
Hmm, they recently adjusted the Donald Trump autocomplete so "Donald Trump racist" isn't as direct of a disparagement.
They are clearly covering their tracks.
>>76921389
Except that's not what I typed you daffy cunt
>>76921794
based bing
y r u so gud 4 porn?
>>76916086
I've seen this gif plenty of times, but I've never noticed the "HELP ME PLEASE"
>sides have left orbit
