Well, 2A-fags? How can you tell who's a mass killer and who's not?
The silence proves my point :^)
>>76795139
None, none of them are in combat stance, or ready to open fire.
If they're brown, they go down.
If they're yellow, let them mellow
If they're white, they're alright
If they're red, they're good as dead.
>>76795139
>not understanding the purpose of the 2nd amendment
it has nothing to do with crazies getting their hands on a gun
>It is impossible to be a "mass killer" with a small blade, a blunt object, or your own fists
We need to ban assault reality
>>76795139
Did the cartoonist post how to tell the difference between an unarmed black teen and a military-age youth killing elderly men by suckerpunching them?
>>76795867
Except it enables crazies to get their hands on guns? It literally has everything to do with crazies getting their hands on a gun. If we didn't have the Second Amendment, I guarantee you mass shootings would go down.
>>76795139
You tell me. You're the one who's worried and defenseless, not me.
>>76796096
Is this supposed to be an argument? I genuinely can't tell what point you're trying to make.
>>76796031
Which is worse, violent crime or mass shootings?
>>76796599
Err... mass shootings? Am I being baited or are you genuinely confused as to which one is worse?
>>76796031
then how do crazy people get their hands on guns in every other nation that isn't the US just as often?
>>76795139
hey look a retarded cuckifornia fag, what part of shall not be infringed do you not understand?
>>76796031
why are crazy people doing exactly what the law allows them to -- and then committing murder, which it doesn't allow? explain what you think you mean by that
>>76796774
The part where it says 'militia.' Liberals tend to stop reading from there
>>76797010
well they need to read what that means
>>76796726
Maybe examine the scale of each of those and try again.
>>76796599
Those aren't mutually exclusive terms you retarded fucks.
>>76796726
Was a trick question and you fell for it.
>>76796746
>just as often
The total homicide rate in the United States is 3.02 per 100k. The total homicide rate in Australia is 1.1 per 100k. The total homicide rate in the UK is 1 per 100k. The total homicide rate in Spain is 0.8 per 100k.
>>76797170
Oh, gee, you sure got me! Instead of actually being retarded, you simply pretended to be retarded.
>>76795139
The ones not shooting?
>>76796726
>He thinks the highly publicized crime is necessarily worse
Please consider learning about issues before you develop your opinion on them.
No amount of people could possibly die to warrant getting rid of the 2nd Amendment.
If you disagree, remember that we have guns, that everyone you would order to disarm us also has guns and that they like us more than you.
>>76796031
Mass shootings make up such a small percentage of murders that they are literally a non issue. Your shit posting is more likely to kill people by reducing the IQ of everyone in the room to dangerously low levels.
Open carry with assault rifles is just fucking stupid.
Good open carry is a pistol in a holster.
Bad open carry is any gun that's overkill. You wouldn't open carry a bazooka, would you?
>>76797325
Now exclude all homicides that involve niggers.
>>76797607
How ironic that you hide behind a snarky demeanor to attack my snarky demeanor.
>>76797708
Last I heard, gun violence drops down to the same as the Netherlands in that case, or at least if we quantify it as actual murder and not self defense or suicide.
>>76795853
Tppgp (third post pretty good post)
>>76797708
Actually, I already did!
>>76797983
Still not reason enough to restrict the rights of citizens.
>>76797654
>You wouldn't open carry a bazooka, would you?
Yes, but it would be difficult. I would be painfully erect while doing so.
>>76797467
>they like us more than you
Says who?
>>76797996
kek, I literally posted the counterpoint at >>76797983 before you posted the original point
>>76798132
>I would be painfully erect while doing so
Not like it would make a difference.
>>76797479
I doubt that any amount of shitposting could bring your IQ down any lower than it already is.
SHALL
NOT
BE
INFRINGED
>>76798106
If you get shot to death, wouldn't you say that your right to life is being infringed?
>>76798875
Yes, and the person who shot me probably used an illegally obtained weapon. We should target crime and its causes instead of stripping rights away. Once they take one they won't ever stop. Every totalitarian regime has taught us this.
>>76795139
The mass killer would have already started shooting and been put down by someone else carrying
>>76799353
>probably used an illegally obtained weapon
Except the Second Amendment guarantees that your right to buy guns can't be infringed?
>>76799523
So your solution to people being shot by guns is to give more people guns?
>>76797983
If you think 3 per 100,000 is a high homicide rate, post the figures from Mexico and Brazil which have far stricter gun control laws.
>>76799770
>So your solution to people being shot by guns is to give more people guns?
Is that your solution as well? After all, you rely on a well-armed police force to suppress any shooters, "mass" or otherwise.
>>76799770
I don't understand your reply. There are plenty of ways to fail the background check when buying from a store, and when buying privately it is still illegal in many cases to buy or sell to certain individuals. There are plenty of ways that a citizens ability to keep arms is infringed upon in this country. I just want it to stop going further.
>>76795867
And it has everything to do with resisting British colonialism. And modern Britain is cucked on the level of Germany and Sweden. Do you really want to be afraid of SWEDEN?
>>76799353
>Once they take one they won't ever stop. Every totalitarian regime has taught us this.
Don't be silly citizen, just because more than 200 million people have been murdered by their own governments over the past century is no reason to think that governments can't be trusted to guarantee your safety! What are you, a "gun nut" or something?
>>76800424
And general tyranny.
>>76797983
He asked for the rate excluding Blacks. So no you haven't "already did".
>>76796031
Like in Brazil?
>>76799901
>>76800557
Mexico and Brazil are uncivilized third-world shitholes. It's apples and oranges.
>>76800266
Clearly background checks haven't gone far enough, seeing as how mass shootings are still relatively common.
>>76800549
I excluded gang-related deaths. Blacks = gangs, goyim.
>>76800557
hey!
:(
>>76801357
Blacks do not equal gangs. They are more than the number of just gangs.
>>76801357
>Mexico and Brazil are uncivilized third-world shitholes. It's apples and oranges.
Black America is an uncivilized third-world shithole, which is why it accounts for the vast majority of your gun crime. Crime is almost always a function of racial demographics.
>>76801357 You say background checks don't go far enough, what should they check for?
>>76802019
>You say background checks don't go far enough, what should they check for?
White skin colour and conservative political sympathies of course, bigot.
