Listen to the first 45 seconds, faggot.
This was recorded 3 years ago.
https://youtu.be/a0oRoRWbpTk?list=PLMNj_r5bccUyiOU9Gg2KddpGb9xHhzSdg
>>76717892
argumentum non
based mollynew
>>76717971
the defool reduces everything until they are non-arguments. it is literally the cheapest and easiest trick you learn in debate club.
also, proof
> he debated in the same debate club of the school im going to and this is his wife. the man is a stay at home cucked dad while his woman wins the bread. all he has is his utube audience this is why his tone always changes.
>>76718294
How is he cucked though? that;s literally not an argument
>>76717892
>first 45 seconds
>Blames jew for communsim
U WOT MATE?
>>76717892
Wow, he really BTFO'd Jews there.
>>76717892
wth, he had cancer?
>>76717892
This guy is cancerous as fuck.
>>76720116
>cucked
Man spends his time playing on youtube, appealing and appeasing the autists as a talking head. He advocates to these desperate betacucks how to live life, to neets who do not know better, to betacucks who do not know that he has to collect good boy points from his waifu. He does this all the while being a huge neet, man baby, whose wife is the breadwinner and has a real career. How sad is this: his sole professional existence is running a youtube channel and web forum for neet aspies to sperg on.
He is the equivalent of a 16 year old bored cunt looking for affirmation and attention online form lesser orbiters. Shit, his 'arguments' hold no sway in any circles of learned folks.
also,
>not an argument
is not a rebuttal to an argument. it is just plain dismissal. you don't get how pathetic he is because you never had been in debate club. The shit he says would have his side penalized by a trillion points. He can't debate for shit.
>>76721581
Yep, and he looked pretty awful during that time.
>>76720241
>I'm 12 and what is history
This board is 18+
>>76722458
>debate club
>"Uhh like... uhh.. fuckin crackazz... yeah u's b killin niggaz... uhhh.... uh.. yeah ... uhh... crackas! kill whitey uhhh...."
That's your debate club, you beta cuckold who lives under a faggot, anti-white boypresident
>>76724013
>muh looks
>>76725604
By awful I meant very unhealthy.
>>76725867
>had cancer
>looked very unhealthy
it really makes you think huh?
>>76725981
What's your problem, dude?
>>76717892
>"stefan is jewish shill"
>post vid before his nazi days
>>76722458
this post sounds like it was written by a WAGEKEK
>>76717892
>>76717971
>>76718108
>>76718294
>>76720116
>>76720241
>>76720519
>>76721581
>>76721857
>>76722458
>>76725450
>>76725584
>>76725604
>>76725867
>>76725981
>>76726038
>>76726191
>>76726423
Not a single argument in sight.
>>76717892
wtf
I'm a #whittlemissile now
>>76722458
>wife is the breadwinner and has a real career.
one of his middle age latina garage groupies actually married Stefo?
Moly the Cunt Destroyer
>>76726692
>mfw its all arguments
does anyone on pol know what an actual argument is?
>>76717892
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91YLkT2I66E
Hes actually jewish, in his own words.
>>76717892
>Hello fellow goys, this goy doesn't pass an anti-Semetic purity test, us goys should drop him
>>76727802
behind the le merchant meme is a big moobed neetbro
more you know folks.
>>76717892
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQq_kkdAMy4
>>76728379
Stop posting this fucking retard autist that couldn't make an engaging video even if he DeFOO'd his mother.
>>76722458
>is not a rebuttal to an argument. it is just plain dismissal.
You do not have to refute something that is not an argument, so saying "x is not an argument" is same as saying "I am not gonna waste time refuting your non argument".
>>76728379
Thulean
LOLOL
>rich, better off countries flooded with eastern european immigrants
>poor soviet countries, everyone is leaving
fucking retard.
Redpill me on spongebob is it degenerate?
>>76728602
>not an argument
right, but the problem is that these things in it of itself is an argument. defool was a shitty debater. he lasted just a single year in debate club. his strategy is simply to reduce any argument into pure nothingness and substitute what you are saying with basically what he wants you to say.
>>76728379
stop shilling yourself Varg
>>76728740
He is anything but degenerate. He escapes the filth through his idealism.
>>76728379
is he right, >>76728805
varg?
>>76728740
Yes, unless your penis is so big it puts Donald Trump on hold.
>>76728932
Lol no just see his vid today. Don't really know who is molyneux.
>>76728792
Where the fuck are you getting this from? Debate shouldn't be an art anyway. People that professionally debate are professional lairs. Debate isn't about winning, it's about learning, and when you are taught how to deconstruct the points of your opposition you are not in it to learn from them.
>>76728999
nice digits but you are wrong
sponge bob represents he who escapes the dialectic. he represents the ubermensch. full empathy but transcends the mere struggle.
>>76717892
wtf anon
he calls out the kikes
>>76727710
What you just said is not an argument.
>>76729267
Debate club is about learning the rules of rhetoric and using those rules to better make your point while denying the validity of the opposing point.
also wtf
> Debate isn't about winning,
> it's about learning
> when you are taught how to deconstruct the points of your opposition you are not in it to learn from them.
> People that professionally debate are professional lairs.
So what is it? Is debate about winning or learning? Because in debate club you are taught how to deconstruct the reasoning behind the points of your opposition to dispute them and you use those skills to affirm your position. It is literally an activity pre-law fags do to like get good at the skill of convincing people.
>>76729405
You clearly do not know what an argument is.
>>76729611
Not an argument.
>>76729672
>[ahr-gyuh-muh nt]
>1. an oral disagreement; verbal opposition; contention; altercation
>2. a discussion involving differing points of view; debate
LOL
>>76730045
pic related
>>76729396
Read the subject again. He's attacking the notion that Molyneux is a Jewish shill, not saying he is a Jewish shill.
That's right, mine's bigger than the Eiffel Tower.
>>76730154
>fucked up the transparency
J U S T
>>76730101
I guess the defool man doesn't even agree with what the dictionary says and prefers to make up his own meanings as he goes.
>>76730353
that face between the legs of
this bat >>76718294
pic related: the manchild's breadwinner. the guy is stuck at home with a child while she is making herself a career and sucking all the cock she wants while he changes diapers and go on youtube to feel good about himself.
there was also once a comment made by stefan where he said jews never intergrated into european culture even tho they lived among us for centuries , why do you think the migrants would , ? stop this muhh everything is a jewish conspiracy fucking cuck
>>76730418
>argument
>ˈɑːɡjʊm(ə)nt/
>noun
>1.not your post
>>76730418
Who would have thought that the colloquial meaning and logical definition of argument are different.
>>76730644
U saying the dictionary is lying?
>>76730623
LOL, as if Straya isn't kept afloat because of chan and park from china and korea respectively.
>>76717892
Billy Corgan always struck me as an anti-Semite
>>76731264
Not an argument.
>>76731463
Ok Ahmed
>>76732135
Let's compare the pair, leaf.
Australia
>92% white
>Stops the boats
>Smashes lebos
Canada:
>75% white
>DUDE REFUGEES LMAO
>Gets cucked
>THREE YEARS AGO
He no longer believes in ethnic egalitarianism. Thanks for playing. #Not an argument
>>76732506
LOL
2.2% slav
>>76732561
he believes whatever gets him views. ask his wife, she will tell you that this is an argument.
>>76732753
Not an argument.
>>76732753
>15% french
No wonder you bend over backwards for Ahmed's cock so easily
>>76732950
>>76732950
>>76732950
That's quebec, but you emufuckers love getting over run by asians...
>>76733030
Not an argument.
Is it just me or does everyone on the Internet call themselves alternative media/independent thinker, while repeating what everyone else says? lol.
>>76733056
>>76733151
Not an argument.
he even made sure to be extra bald. just so everyone knows he's a neo nazi.
>>76729574
>Debate club
How are your spreading skills?
>>76733138
Molyneux is worser than that. His views shifts with his audience. If he thinks he found a new audience, he will pander to them. He isn't really smart. He just knows a few tricks from his debate club experience, which is reducing the opposing view to nothing and claiming it is nothing.
>>76733030
Canada:
>15% Asian
Australia
>7% Asian
I was told there would be arguments.
>>76722458
Nice buzzwords, kid.
>muh debate club
Nobody cares.
>>76733316
Debate club? Apparently he went to my university, and there is a a debate club that is registered as a student club and its pretty old and you practice and develop skills and shit. its sophist shit. you also exercise these skills in tutorial trying to argue against your peers in class.
>>76733261
kek
>>76733321
25% is not 7%
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_Australians
>>76733498
>A gun is not an argument
i guess the teenagers like him
>>76733629
>that statistic isn't anywhere on the page
leaf """"education"""
>inb4 Bill Whittle
I mean yeah he's excellent but he's the milhouse of /pol/ at this point
>>76733819
>20% of all Australian doctors are Asian
>Parramatta 132,663 33.61% asians
eternal anglo you are not, plus Australia is like literally touching asia. The koreans and chinese keep you emufuckers afloat.
>>76729574
>denying the validity of the opposing point
You shouldn't need to do that. Sure, call out fallacies and non-sequitur, but learning how to superficially decompose the structure of your opponents argument isn't fair.
It shouldn't be you versus them, it should be ideas killing other ideas. When you loose the debate, are you not the true winner? Are you not the one who has adopted the truth?
I understand it isn't that simple, but making the whole process mechanical robs the passion and the righteousness from any cause. When I was doing debating in my younger years, I always had trouble with the whole partisan thing. I would find myself arguing with those who I was instructed to debate with more than my opponents.
The Greeks would always debate eager to extract knowledge and wisdom from each other, as well as stroke their own egos. I feel as if that is diminished when you are debating for the sake of debating. Learning public speaking, reading Aristotle, and a passion for a cause is all that should be needed to debate.
>>76734199
>moving the goalposts this hard
Not an argument.
>>76734199
>Mentions two areas in which is a dense population of Asians
>Therefore Australia has more Asians, countering the statistic based on nation wide demographics.
Is this debating class? Twisting the truth? Not being a dumb cunt is another way to win debates.
>>76734230
You don't get it. Decomposing an argument is fundamental to understand where the the links in reasoning are and what is the next thing you are trying to invalidate.
>winning
Winners of debates get trophies and cups and certificates.
>greeks
no, the greeks debated for the same same shit. It was to convince the masses, debating and logic and argumentation became a skill separate and detached from philosophy. That's what you get when you put too much power to the persuasiveness of reasoning and logic, a class of people who can exploit it (lawyers, sjw-fucks).
>>76734353
Goal post wasn't even moved. Your population consist of 20% asians. Your suburbs have some areas with 33% asian. 132K asians for a single suburb. No where in canada do we have that, not even in hongcouver.
>>76734455
Debate club (not class) is about understanding how truth and logic works to beat the competition. Reason is constructed, the tools to understand how and why reason is compelling are the very tools that let you traffic in it.
it's shit lawyers, theologians, politicians, sjws, anyone use.
Spongebob Squarepants is pretty hot, c'mon guys. Who wouldn't?
>>76734558
What the fuck is a trophy compared to the truth? That literally provides and intensive for skilled deceit, and fosters and ability to lie to the masses.
And I'm pretty sure your wrong. The Greeks would most often discuss amount themselves until it came time to sway the masses. Their philosophical doctrines were also hotly debated, but were not issues broadcasted to the masses until such time as they were accredited.
The lawyers and sjws don't use logic, they sue persuasiveness. Why is that hard to understand. Their position is not reasonable or logical. The downplaying of reason and logic, and the superficial art of the lie is not only what organized and aggrandizing debate encourages, but also what feeds these people and has resulted int eh death of reason and logic.
What the fuck are words spoken for a trophy? What honor binds the greedy and shallow to the truth?
>>76735122
MY ANACONDA DON'T WANT NONE
UNLESS YOU GOT SPONGE, HUN
>>76734849
>I claim Australia is 7% Asian
>You say its 25% and provide statistics on specific suburbs
>You're now claiming its 20% and saying "B-b-but our Asians are spread out!"
You're embarrassing yourself leaf, run back to your meme prime minister and have a cry.
>>76734849
Reason based on logic isn't constructed. Have you read Aristotle? Or even Plato? Even a student of Stirner or Neiszche (however the fuck you spell his name) can't deny the rock solid precepts of Greek logic, or as it is know to anyone who desires results from their reason, universal logic.
And whats with this obsession with beating the competition? Does truth even matter? Is truth just a spook to you, because if it is, you really are just in it for shinny baubles.
You can make a perfectly persuasive argument based on logic and a ready knowledge of fallacies. Everything you have learn't is simply how to circumvent these pesky barriers to make what is unreasonable appear reasonable.
Also stop fucking lying about the Asians. You mention two specific areas in which Asians dominate, and you expand that to somehow correlate with the population of Asians versus the overall demographic. We have 7% Asians, and they are mostly in the city.
>>76735289
Nice. Nice.
>>76735146
My mom gives me love if I get a cup or trophy.
>greeks, philosophy
Philosophy was something the rich could only afford. They sent their kids to academies and in those academics the rich kids, a neet, follow around the wise ones to learn their ways of thinking. Philosophy wasn't written or spread by books or even accepted outside of your specific school
Philosophy was the only facet, and math, of greek society that sought the pursuit of truth without power and influence. The desire for power and influence corrupts it.
I think you seriously do not understand what logic is. Logic isn't truth. Logic is based on a collection of assumptions. There is something more to truth than mere predication on logic. Math is funny.
Look, you don't get it. It's fine. The greeks had sophists, sophists were rich, they taught the political elite how to use logic to persuade the voting masses. I mean, after all, what was socrates accused of it?
But seriously, SJWs, lawyers, they use logic. SJWs also know how to criticize the system using the same tools of sophistry that you would need to maintain reasonable doubt in order to defend the pedophile.
>>76735122
he is a qt.
>>76735146
>>76735560
Blease ignore my spelling mistakes and my lack of any wordsmithery and decor. I'm tired.
>>76735816
>Trophies
>Love from mum
And hence why your kind are more than useless, if not a cancer. The same breed as lawyers and sjws.
None of these people actually use logic. You can pick out their arguments and explain why they are illogical. The truth based on logic can only feasibly break down in the realms of hyperbole, metaphoric scenarios, and prediction based on statistics or history. Good solutions can be contrived based on logic, but not necessarily the best ones, as a truly logical statement will require all variables to have been aught out. You were right to make the connection between maths and logic. Like in maths, one set of facts and a question involving them, assuming tat the facts encompass all that is relevant, will only produce one truth, or answer. There can, however, be two logical answers in logic, or even more, just like in math. Ultimately it depends on the intended solution as to which you pick. Just like in math, the two answers can be narrowed to one assuming you are dealing with something for which their can only be a magnitude, not a vector like positive or negative.
Logic is absolute by any non-laughable interpretation. When logic isn't absolute, it isn't logic. Yes, a logical statement can be made in lieu of some variables, in which case the statement will not be definitive, nor will it appear to be.
>Math is funny
It is if you don't understand it. Math actually ins't very funny at all. Even in it's most seemingly chaotic facets, it isn't random, it isn't silly, it is math.
As for sophists, yes, they were cunts. As for Socrates, he was accused of it, yes. No conclusions were found. And if I know Greek logic, they'd be able to prove it if he did.
You are also right on philosophy. Which is why I am not knowledgeable in Greek sophistry and only cared about what was pursued for the truth. Sophistry is such a fickle and sickly invention that it need not be studied to be defeated. Is shrivels and dies near logic.
>>76735560
>Plato and Aristotle logic
see Church-Turing thesis
>Truth
After seeing Church-Turning thesis, please recognize that the most empowering truths of today doesn't stem from logic. What are the epistemological giants of our day (ps it isn't given to us by the greeks, the greeks were a curse in this respects) replaced the abstract.
This is where your ignorance of greek history is showing. Philosophy ≠ logic.
> Competition
I don't want to get too deep into philosophy, but ask yourself what truth brings, what are the consequences. You have a huge whole in your historical knowledge of the greeks, specifically the sociological features of academies. Only the rich, back then, could send their kids to learn the truth for its pure glory and even then, they pension their seeds to learn that truth in hopes the utility transfer elsewhere.
> You can make a perfectly persuasive argument based on logic and a ready knowledge of fallacies. Everything you have learn't is simply how to circumvent these pesky barriers to make what is unreasonable appear reasonable.
Right, so if the two can produce like effects, and are appreciated for those effects, then what is really the difference between them? This is what the greeks wondered, this is why they have cultivated these skills. It is just solely because the effects of the truth happen to be more important and more lucrative than the truth itself. If you want to idealize greek society, you are worshiping a false god. The greeks depended too much on logic and persuasiveness as an impetus to act politically, and they foolishly believed that truth was righteous and they fell for shit because of it.
What was socrates accused of?
>>76736924
>You can pick out their arguments and explain why they are illogical
No, this is not how debate club works. It isn't the gay shouting of why things are fallacies. it's about recognizing what logic works, and how to assert something opposite of wha it is being stated to bring doubt.
>Logic is absolute by any non-laughable interpretation. When logic isn't absolute, it isn't logic. Yes, a logical statement can be made in lieu of some variables, in which case the statement will not be definitive, nor will it appear to be.
High school level of understanding of what logic is. Where does assumptions play in this? Logic is deceiving because it compels the truth through derivation. This is why science has suffered.
>Math is funny
Oh know, I understand math. But I can tell that totally do not understand it. See church-turing.
>Logic is absolute by any non-laughable interpretation. When logic isn't absolute, it isn't logic. Yes, a logical statement can be made in lieu of some variables, in which case the statement will not be definitive, nor will it appear to be.
If logic is absolute in its certainty, then how can general claims be made? Or, how can claims about non-existent things be made? Or how can claims that follow assumptions be wrong?
>>76727620
>mfw I've actually been following your molyneux fanfic
>>76737601
His wife is greek, but where is the fanfic?
>>76736982
Not sure what this church-turning thesis is and I am too out of it to read the wiki on it.
The most empowering truths of this day don't stem from logic? Like what? Are they really truths?
I don't have a gap in my knowledge of the Greeks. And I don't idolize them. As fat as I care, they could be complete savages. The works of Aristotle specifically, however, are flawless in regards to his understanding of logic, which consequently developed our scientific method.
>Right, so if the two can produce like effects
>Like effects
I'd depute the circumvention of logic having the like effects of not doing so, even if the same conclusion is reached. Logic being the equation that it is can be solved backwards, a conclusion based on fuck all can't be. With the slippery version we follow a truth that we don't understand.
Two means aren't equal just because they arrive at a similar end, irrespective of what was done to get there.
>>76718294
>all he has
Yeah, half a million subscribers is nothing and he surely isn't generating any money.
>>76737761
I'm a philosoph and cs major. Your conception of logic is laughable. Where does assumptions fit into it? Where does derivation?
>scientific method
nope. This is historically really wrong. our scientific method did not stem from the greeks. You need to look at the empiricists.
> Logic being the equation that it is can be solved backwards, a conclusion based on fuck all can't be.
You don't get it. If you are going to traffic in logic, you have to create claims which can fulfill that requirement of logic. This is really really easy for many claims. I think you need an education in how assumptions in greek logic works. You have serious gaps in your knowledge of the greeks.
>>76737865
He begs for donations.
>>76737592
Debate club can suck a fat one mate. Why you need to assert something for the simple reason of bringing doubt to the argument of the opposition. Debate club can't teach you anything that a healthy and knowledgeable mind ins't already equipped with that isn't sweetening turds for to earn shinny things.
>High school level of understanding of what logic is. Where does assumptions play in this?
The assumptions would be that the precepts of your deduction are valid.
>Logic is deceiving because it compels the truth through derivation.
>This is why science has suffered.
Lol what? The scientific method IS logic. This is why reading Aristotle and understanding his significance in science is important. The role of experimentation is simple to validate the precepts of logical deduction. A point of data or a recorded phenomena needs to be logically connected to other things.It is also very important for making decisions on what experiments should further be conducted. Science only suffers when people run with illogical conclusion derived from an incomplete set of variables. You can be given all of the data in the world, and none of it would mean anything unless you can deduce causation and trends, which is where logic and math come in.
>If logic is absolute in its certainty, then how can general claims be made?
By making a logical statement on that general claim. So long as it's nature as a generalization is considered there is no problem with this
>Or, how can claims about non-existent things be made?
It's difficult if not impossible to logically claim that something doesn't exist. It is perfectly consistent to say that within our realms of understanding it doesn't exist, or that it doesn't exist within our vicinity.
>Or how can claims that follow assumptions be wrong?
A claim based on an assumption can be logical, but it would only be a logical assumption Consider things like generalizations and assumptions as unsolved coefficients.
>>76738697
You can spin it however you want but he is generating more than enough money with his channel.
If he truly wanted to e-beg he'd have a patreon by now.
Stay retarded you fucking leaf.
>>76717892
Based NatSoc Molymeme will bring forth the Fourth Reich
>>76738656
The understanding of logic gave us science, not the Greeks. I should have specified.
I mention assumption in the post before this. I also fail to separate Aristotle himself with science. However the scientific method is linked to him.
Current;y studying physics in uni actually. Logic and maths are the most important parts. The experimentation can be done by a careful monkey, at least the classical stuff can.
>>76738656
Also
>philosoph and cs major
What's cs?
And why did you take a meme course like philosophy? Didn't think I was dealing with a colossal faggot.
>>76739428
logic is an intricate part of computer science
>>76738826
>Scientific method
you need to read some history of science. Science is a beast of its own. History of science has also shown us that Aristotle held science back. He was wrong on a lot of things.
>Science only suffers when people run with illogical conclusion derived from an incomplete set of variables.
wrong. Science is wrong when people believe logical conclusions are more valid than observed phenomenon and interpret the real, the truth, through the distortion of what is logical.
>all the data in the world, and deduce causations
wrong. you don't deduce causations. you want to observe causation.
You have a serious misunderstanding of the greeks. You are talking about greek logic with the mechanicalism of newton. You failed to acknowledge how the practice of philosophy existed in ancient greece, what the greeks aspired with their knowledge, why the greeks aspired to that, and how that aspiration is reflected in how they organized their society. You also fail to understand how logic compels, or why it compels, and you fail to distinguish logic with philosophy.
Socrates was accused of something...
The greeks never considered assumptions and generalizations as unsolved coefficients.
tell me what year you are in.
>>76728379
This guy was my first red pill back in 2010.
Now there is no doubt in my mind that he is an ignorable retard
>>76728379
Hey Varg
>>76739280
you gotta be first year physics. you don't have an awareness of the history of science. The scientific method is linked to him because it was developed in spite of him.
CS is computer science. Philosophy
>>76739549
True but we ain't dealing with primitive logic of the 'greek' kind. Church-Turing is very important. My main man >>76739428 can't tell me anything about axioms and assumptions, except as unsolved thangs to have things inserted into them.
>>76739280
Look, in physics you have constants that stem from experimentations. You know that if you change those constants, your model of the physical universe and what it asserts becomes totally different. This is where debate club plays in, asserting something different, brining contestation in these assumptions that the virtue of logic has to carry us to its conclusion. When the value to traffic in this area extends beyond finding the best assumptions/axioms because there is more value ($$$, power, whatever) to achieve other conclusions, you find those 'constants' that best work for your needs.
this is reflected in greek history.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91YLkT2I66E
pic related, Alt-Right is jew'd. First you niggers started worshipping Milo a literal Kike Faggot, Now you're riding Stefani's kosher cock.
There's no escape from them. Kikes are everywhere. Facebook,YouTube,Google+, etc
Now even 4chan ;_;
Ich kann das nicht mehr mein Kamerad
>Mfw /pol/ is becoming pro-Israel
>Mfw watching new fags agreeing with Kikes here that the holocaust was real
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khWSuMqnj5c&list=WL&index=19 [Embed] [Embed]
Auf Wiedersehen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91YLkT2I66E [Embed]
pic related, Alt-Right is jew'd. First you niggers started worshipping Milo a literal Kike Faggot, Now you're riding Stefani's kosher cock.
There's no escape from them. Kikes are everywhere. Facebook,YouTube,Google+, etc
Now even 4chan ;_;
Ich kann das nicht mehr mein Kamerad
>Mfw /pol/ is becoming pro-Israel
>Mfw watching new fags agreeing with Kikes here that the holocaust was real
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khWSuMqnj5c&list=WL&index=19 [Embed] [Embed] [Embed]
Auf Wiedersehen
>MFW Most of you trap fucking faggots didn't even watch the videos.
IDK why I even fucking bother anymore
>>76739671
>History of science has also shown us that Aristotle held science back.
History of science hasn't show that at all...
>You also fail to understand how logic compels, or why it compels
How it compels people? Results really.
>Science is a beast of its own.
The scientific method is a logical progression. I don't see why you take issue with this. Any professor will tell you that it is logical, at least the physicists do. The social scientists are useless tools, and chemists are a scattered lot.
>Science is wrong when people believe logical conclusions are more valid than observed phenomenon and interpret the real, the truth, through the distortion of what is logical.
When you get a result, you need to decide what it means. That's just how it works. And a logical conclusion taken above variables observed, has never really held science back in any major way. in fact, ignoring those variables is illogical. You need the full picture before you can decide what it means. Michals and Morley (however you spell their names) were and example of a lot that made illogical conclusions, based on what they thought to be fact at the time. We did however learn quite a lot from them. Namely that their wasn't an aether. Or at least it wasn't measurable. A similar setup to their experiment was also used to detect gravity waves. Not quite sure how they did it considering they didn't know the direction of the waves, which is important in getting data from their superposition onto detectable waves. Or maybe they did... Could have been from a binary system. Not sure. I should really go to bed.
I don't even know where I was...
I don't give a fuck about how Greeks organize their society by the way. History is more of a light on the side hobby than it is a compulsion for me. I simply couldn't care less if I tried. I do know their were quite a lot of gay cunts in Greece. It is said that homosexuals have higher IQs on average. I hit the word limit,
>>76740381
You loosing me with this traffic bullshit. And the history of science isn't taught in physics, hardly at all at any rate. That's a completely different course.
Second year actually. And your little debating club doesn't come into play at all. Everything I do is logical. Also stop relating it to power and money. It doesn't matter to me. I probably won't even get a job with my degree.
Don't tell me how science is done, and I won't tell you how being brainwashed into becoming a professional Jew is done.
>Primitive Greek logic
This is some kind of memery, surely.
>>76741467
Fuck you
>>76717892
>ANACONDA DON'T!
What a bellend this man has become.
>>76741565
wot. Dude I need sleep. I spent more time thinking about that image then I did making my responses.My priorities are not straight and I am probably making an idiot of myself. Definitely not subjecting myself to cognitive dissonance like the leaf. The funny thing about cognitive dissonance is that it's basically a spook and I can arbitrarily declare that I am right and you are wrong. I must say, I've been reading some Stirner, and it's pretty solid shit. Wouldn't say I'm an expert though.
>>76722458
>has cancer
>can't work because cancer
>HURR BETA LOL, UR WIFE IS BREADWINNER
Fuck off
>>76717892
Dumb. He made "Truth About Israel and Palestine" video and it was very partial to Palestinians. No Jewish shill would have made it.
