Turkey Turks mixed of Turanid - Iranid race. Some idiots say we are assimilation anatolians. Its not true.
A young Uzbek man. This man looks very Caucasian like Turkey Turk because mixed Iranid, other than the slight Asian eyes.
Look this Uyghur man, This man from CHINA ! but like a Turkey Turk well.because relatives.
Another Uyghur from China
Are you retarded?
Why would you be proud of that? My mother is an inland Sicilian and besides the higher MS risk she's assured her ancestors have lived on that island for at least 4000 years, likely avoiding the Greeks and north Africans who were habitually too afraid to go inland and get fucked up by the unspoken patriarchs (actually matriarchs, but that's another discussion).
Yours invaded a rich cultural land of 10,000 years of history only 1000 years ago. How is that destruction not anything but shameful?
>Turks look like other Turkic peoples
Stop the fucking presses
>>76603561
thats not topic man. slander the demography of a nation It should not be so easy. When he called assimilation You will not feel good. We are not native Anatolian. We are from Steppe.
>>76603865
Then why don't you return to the steppe, mother Russia has heaps of ghost cities in the steppe land.
Anatolia was Greek/Armenoid/Galatian before the Turks. 10,000 years of history and culture...
>>76604066
Well, According to your logic, Let us all africa.
WTF ?
Turkmenistan people are good example.
There is no "Turkic race" just like there is no "Slavic" or "Germanic" race. These are linguistic classifications, and do not necessitate any significant genetic association.
(unless you are understanding the term "race" as more a matter of culture and ethos, but then linguistic similarity alone isn't enough, as you could still have separate "races" speaking similar languages).
Short version: This thread is stupid, /pol/ is stupid, you should all kill yourselves.
>>76604281
Europeans migrated away from Africa between 120,000 to 70,000 years ago and spent a considerable time in west Asia where they developed considerable changes.
The same cannot be said about any people within only 1000 years, at least not to any intellectually honest comparison.
>>76604465
You speak as it comes to your business. in this case there is just Turks ? Italians come from Anatolia. You are not Australian native ? America kill a millions of Red indians. you doing this because we are Muslim.
>>76604749
Australia was undeveloped, as was America and I'm doing it because prior to their invasion the Turks were those nomads who had a habit of not developing the land or building civilisations.
So we replace a less developed people, you replaced a more developed people.
And don't bring islamophobia into this, it's clearly a non sequitur to my point.
>>76603865
The majority of Turkish genetic ancestry is indigenous
Probably something like 70% native, 15% Greek/Balkanoid, 15% Chink/Iranic (from the original Turkmen)
>>76605379
Look this undeveloped nomads.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dardanelles_Gun
Turks are taking civilization of the they going places. build a unprecedented production in history.
If you doing its name Civilazition. If we doing its name Barbarism ?
>>76605853
>like 70% native, 15% Greek/Balkanoid
Greek / Balkanoid = Anatolian Native already.
Aren't nowadays Turks are Turkic people who invaded Anatolia and mixed with whites there ?
>>76606495
Anatolians not white, darker caucosoid. Eastmed + Armenoid = Anadolid.
Yeah but how much of you are Turkic in things other than name? You don't look very Turkic to me if you compare yourself to people of Central Asia.
