writing a paper on Anarchism. Need to draw some parallels.
>Does EVERY species have a leader, hierarchy, pecking order?
Have you never seen a nature documentary ever? Of course not, that's fucking retarded.
>>76440480
I'm a lone wolf. Fuck off.
Yes it has been observed in nature do you own fucking research.
>>76440480
Do your homework, you fucking degenerate.
>>76440872
...says the beaner
Anarchy never will and never would work.
Literally 13-year old's edgy dream.
Only thing it will accomplish is destroy itself.
Getting that out of the way, the hierarchy/pecking order of Anarchy is and isn't.
It can't be there due to it being contradicting the whole point of anarchy, but it is there because the people who have the biggest means of power (guns, people, money, etc). become the movers and hence become higher in the order.
Which is why Anarchy is literally retarded and only complete idiots believe it works.
herbivores which is a fitting comparison
>>76442364
Even among herbivores, there's the alphas who lead and dominate the herd.
So, anarchy... Maybe jellyfish? Sponges? Something that can't really "think".
>>76440715
Are you literally brain-dead? There's always an alpha who rules through sheer strength and combat prowess.
>>76440480
Here's your whole paper.... We live in anarchy. The fact that there are consequences for our actions doesn't stop them from happening. If you went on a killing spree right now, do you think you'd kill more or less people than in a society with no government?
>>76442584
Seems you're right for sheep though giraffes might be more apt and theres always flies.
>>76440480
If you're talking about humans, literally every society in human history has established some sort of social hierarchy.
This is not the case for other species.
>>76442004
its like libertarianism that somehow humans will sift out into a peaceful pecking order.naive bullshit.
brute force wins and essentially that is what even democratic nations are.weilders of brute force to knock down any that want to get uppity.
>>76440480
Coral.
>>76440480
no ..
>>76440480
>>76441761
>>76442584
>>76442707
>>76442004
>Anarchy never will and never would work.
>Literally 13-year old's edgy dream.
>Anarchy is literally retarded and only complete idiots believe it works.
So much this. Never met an anarchist who would survive even a day of actual anarchy. Luckily they all grow out of it by the time they hit voting age.
>>76442707
No...there isn't. Wolves don't have that shit outside of captivity. Outside of captivity their order is a breeding pair and then their kids. They don't really tend to clump up in the wild like they do on reserves where size is limited.
>>76442707
>every animal is a pack animal
>portuguese intellectuals
Op are you retarded? Basically in nature there is big and small or collective.
Hierarchy really only comes into play among mammalian pack animals like lions or wolves, and monkeys.
This is stuff you should have learned in elementary school.
Anyways the most interesting form of socialization in the animal kingdom is eu-social animals such as bees or ants.
With humans we are a bit of both, we have the father / alpha but we also work together to build stuff like ants.
Basically it works like this, if animals are smart they will co-operate, if they are dumb they will function as predators. A shark would be an example of a dumb animal.
Read Mutal Aid by Kropotkin. It's on this exact subject.
