is he gonna be ok, bros? ;__;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uq-i2iWVsF8
It's a good thing he hasn't got a gun to shoot himself with!
>>76384151
why do tumblr autists always have ridiculously retarded long-distance relationships?
Who is this autist and why should I care?
>>76384151
he is gay (looooser)
>>76384359
It's not just tumblr autists, all of them do it.
Just look at steam, fuckloads of weebs, bronies, and other autists have online relationships with people they hardly know.
>>76384151
Poor guy.
>>76384488
My best mate has done it twice.
First time was a fucking disaster. We were all 15 and it nearly destroyed our friendship group. We were all horny and jealous and she was good at manipulation.
The second one has gone great. They've been dating for 2 years and she's moving in with him now from Germany. It can work but in general it doesn't.
I swear he wasn't gay when this started
why do leftists always go fag?
>>76384151
>dumped
>by a guy
Makes sense, this guy literally has less test than a woman.
Then again this guy is a fucking CWC level lolcow so I'm assuming he was trolled by someone in order to get this crying video out.
kek
just when you thought fatgordon could not sink any lower
>>76384151
I can't wait for the day that he suddenly just stops uploading.
>>76384639
fucking look at him
I mean I don't like his political views, but he makes a decent point here. I can sympathize with him because I was in the same situation a month ago. I don't understand the point you are trying to convey, OP.
>>76384719
But even the fags don't want him
I've noticed the leftist pattern is
Normal>bi>full gay>tranny>suicide
I have a few friends on various stages of that
>>76384359
Look at him... Did you think he can have a real relationship?
>>76384151
So this guy is now confirmed to be a faggot?
>>76384829
>I've noticed the leftist pattern is
>Normal>bi>full gay>tranny>suicide
Y'know..
Again, using CWC as a template, this is pretty accurate.
Leftism is powered by self hatred.
I can't watch it fully, its too painful, tldw?
>>76384151
designated snack trays
>>76384938
I know it's accurate because I've seen it happen, the first sign is sharing a shitload of leftie stuff on facebook, then in a few months they start sucking dick
from there it's a few years to an hero or crippling addiction
What the fuck is this why does he have two fish eyes. Is he ill
>>76384151
Too much estrogen in the water supply in England.
reeeeeee
How far is too far?
My current gf is 2:45 away, we see eachother about every week or so.
>>76384151
This guy is destined to commit suicide in the near future.
no way he would act like this if he wasn't so fucking ugly
>>76385121
She's fucking everyone around her, every week she gets to have you buy her dinner to get the taste of stale Chad cum out of her mouth.
>>76384151
I didn't think this was a real person
Fucking Britbongs, can't stand them
>>76385030
>What the fuck is this why does he have two fish eyes. Is he ill
Yes he's ill.
>>76384151
>tfw I talked to Gordon once
I still feel star struck.
>>76384151
lmaoooooooooooooooooo
>>76384938
CWC will never commit suicide. He's too powerful.
If there were ever a poster-boy for the untermensch, this is him
>>76384151
No, he looks like a lesbian.
>>76384151
Hahahaha he's a faggot? Who saw that coming?!
>>76384938
As a bi conservative and past lefty, you're talking shit.
>>76384359
They can't interact with people in person so can only form relationships online. Also long distance means they don't have to spend much time together, so neither one realises what a gimp their partner is
Gordon is actually an intelligent guy, he just cucks out on every single fucking issue because his body is so pumped with estrogen that he has a psychic feminine aversion to violence, conflict and all forms of right-wing politics.
>GREETINGS VARIOUS PEOPLE ACROSS THE GRAND SPECTRUMS OF TIIIIME AND THE MULTIVERSE
>>76385479
>cuckservative
>not just blue lefties
>>76385224
Go back to Germany then.
>>76385479
Man i sometimes wish i was bi. Would be nice to be attracted to the same sex when youre tired of womens shit after a while.
lol, I love that the guy clearly rejected Gordon because he's a freak and then told him "yeah sorry it's because of the distance :("
>>76385510
He's moderately above average and too arrogant to assume the left-wing papers can lie too, like most lefties
>>76385479
>as a faggot
FTFY
>>76384151
So someone talked to him for a while and led him on and asked him out then said " wait we live far away nevermind" and broke off contact?
>>76385613
Its gr8, cuddles with your best buddy is pure
>>76384151
maybe you shouldnt have been a fat fuck communist.
>>76384151
He has a sword on the wall.
Someone call the police on him. He didn't bin that knife and now he needs to face the BBC in jail. I'm sure his scent alone will even disgust the niggers in jail so he will be alright.
>>76385665
>Trudeauistan
>Calling anyone faggot
>>76385928
Why are hamsters so violent and politicly vocal?
>>76385972
>being a faggot
>>76385613
it's a pain, mate
especially when the fags are as bad as the women.
t. bifag
>>76385972
You're a faggot, lad.
A dick sucking faggot.
>>76386157
>>76386229
>being this butthurt
>>76386516
>being a faggot
>>76386567
>being a canadian
>>76386831
>sucking emu dicks
>>76387006
well lad, got me there.
>>76386516
This is how much a delusional waste of breath you are.
You are literally a dick sucking faggot and are trying to defend it.
>>76384938
CWC never went full gay
even as a tranny he still wants women, which makes him biologically straight
Gordo's a catch, he will have another CWC-tier boyfriend soon.
https://youtu.be/9vIMshdTH8E
>>76385843
I hug my friends platonically
>>76387309
>he mentioned us
that bedside table is fucking filthy
>>76385286
Storytime?
Has anyone got the posts where he says his cum doesn't come out properly because of all the estrogen?
>>76387173
You are the delusional one here, faggot. You are seriously getting pissed off at my lifestyle that harms literally no one and is totally healthy, on an anonymous board full of circle-jerking alt-right faggots who can't hold a real conversation for the life of them, situated in a niche part of the internet for echo-chamber teens. It's really pathetic, anon, because chances are we agree on most things.
I bet it boils your piss to know that Trump said he'd let Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner use whatever bathroom he wanted in Trump Tower.
>>76387556
he cant ejaculate because his fat rolls cover his knob end, mate
I'm happy for him. This is a redpilled moment for him. You know this is how 90% of /pol/ Got redpilled.
Except for being a fag.
>>76384829
Ha I have a very lefty friend who entered the "Maybe Im bi" stage. He went on grindr and went on a date with a guy even. They didn't fuck though. But he recently met this girl (3 weeks) who he's already in love with...Hopefully this girl will knock the gay stage out of him. Though honestly if it ends up being a bad breakup I could for sure see him go full gay.
>>76387609
you new here mate?
shit nigger, just close the laptop and walk away.
>>76387609
>. You are seriously getting pissed off at my lifestyle that harms literally no one and is totally healthy
Uh well, that's not true. Gay have a significantly higher rate of STD's, and something like 1 in 5 have HIV. You guys are a fucking receptacle for diseases. Healthy is one of the last things I would call gays. Even worse that you guys are demanding to be allowed to donate blood now.
He's gonna starve bros
>>76387756
Triggering stormweenies is fun though. Half of /pol/ is smart and the other half is dumb as a Berniecuck.
>>76387766
S'a good thing I ain't gay then. I'm not even promiscuous about it, I think it's degenerate.
>>76387766
you're completely right, mate.
the faggots are cancerous aids riddled sub humans who have fucked us on poltical shit for too long by making their marraige shit not a non-issue.
i for one do enjoy having sex with men and women, and i am aware of the dangers it presents.
im not prideful, but im not self hating
>>76387609
>my lifestyle that harms literally no one
>epidemic level STDS
>significantly more likely to abuse children
>significantly more likely to abuse drugs or alcohol
>makes children think it's okay to be a disgusting pervert
>further destroys the family unit
Stop being a disgusting pervert if you don't want to be treated like one. It's as simple as that. You're a suck fucking pervert. Your lifestyle is not legitimate
>>76387998
>stormweenies
Always a sure sign of a dumb-as-fuck post from a dumb-as-fuck poster.
He's got better luck being a fag. Fags will fuck anything, unlike women.
>>76388144
mmm... really makes u think
>>76388053
>>epidemic level STDS
>>significantly more likely to abuse children
>>significantly more likely to abuse drugs or alcohol
>>makes children think it's okay to be a disgusting pervert
>>further destroys the family unit
Did you not read the part about me being conservative or are you gonna continue this cancer?
>>76388276
Did you not read the part where I called you a disgusting faggot? What's that have to do with being conservative? conservative fags are immune to disease and aren't pedophiles on level exponentially higher than straight men?
>>76387998
>stormweenies
you have to go back
>>76388403
>faggot
#notanargument
>>76388053
You need to learn how statistics work.
Let's say we have statistics that show people who are A do activity B at twice the rate of the general population. This doesn't necessarily lead to the conclusion that people A are more likely to do activity B because B inherently follows A. It's equally possible that wanting to do B is and being A is caused by unrelated factor C, and B and A are both symptoms of C rather than A causing B. Or, it's possible that A tends to make people want to do B, but there is a subsection (A2) that bucks this trend and is no more likely to engage in B than the general population - so A is in fact split into A1 and A2. Perhaps people who are A do activity D at a higher rate, which causes activity C - so the correct thing to target then would be activity D, not people A.
The simple fact that people who are gay are more likely to abuse children does not logically lead to the conclusion that homosexuality causes child abuse. That's not to say that your statistics are wrong. If you grab any random homosexual the probability is higher that he abuses children than any random heterosexual. However, the conclusion that because of this statistic homosexuality causes child abuse is wrong. Homosexuality and child abuse might both be caused by something else, both being symptoms of the same problem. Maybe homosexuals have liberal sexual philosophies, which eventually leads to child abuse, meaning that child abuse can be curbed by targeting the intermediate (direct) cause, rather than merely the demographic of offender.
Etc. etc.
Basically, statistics is a multi-billion dollar field for a reason.
>>76388702
>gays significantly more likely to abuse children
>children who were abused significantly more likely to be gay
>children who were abused significantly more likely to abuse children when they grow up
Pretty safe to spot the trend here friendo. The "correlation doesn't equal causation" argument is a cop out when you've got such a significant trend and can't argue anything different.
>>76388120
how can a roach be so cute?
>>76388962
>"correlation doesn't equal causation" argument
It's not an argument. It's a fact.
Correlation does not equal causation.
Unless you can show the mechanism in reproducible experimental conditions, you have no evidence. Only aspersions. I don't concern myself with aspersions.
didn't know he was a fag, expected i guess
>>76384151
He's close to the edge.
>>76384938
Chris was never gay nor bi and even as a tranny hes a 'lesbian'
>>76389127
>Unless you can show the mechanism in reproducible experimental conditions
You can. As I said. A child who was abused is more likely to be gay. A child who is abused is more likely to abuse children. These are observed consistently.
but still
>implying constant correlation isn't evidence. >Implying consistantly made observations are useless
Might as well start accepting blood donations from fags too since it's just correlation they have significantly higher aids rates
>>76389471
>You can.
Then why haven't you?
>Might as well start accepting blood donations from fags too since it's just correlation they have significantly higher aids rates
This just shows the depth of your ignorance.
Refusing gay blood is a matter of probabilities, not empirical fact.
Discrimination against homosexuals ought to be a matter of empirical fact. If you discriminate based on probability you really do enter a slippery slope. Today - gays. Tomorrow - anime fans. Thursday? It might even be Canadians.
>>76389780
>Then why haven't you?
Because that's not my job. The people who's job it is are doing it for my by constantly collecting data that supports everything I said and never showing anything other than that trend.
>If you discriminate based on probability you really do enter a slippery slope.
Did I discriminate? Pretty sure I just pointed out you're disgusting faggots who have a sick perversion which can be influenced by trauma in your past, making it completely illegitimate as "just a different lifestyle" and nothing more than a dangerous and culturally damaging fetish. I don't believe I ever tried to take away your right to vote or something like that.
>>76387833
>What starving looks like in America
>>76389780
>Refusing gay blood is a matter of probabilities, not empirical fact.
>Discrimination against homosexuals ought to be a matter of empirical fact.
Wow I just realized you're actually defending fags giving blood despite the enormous increase in aids that would spread just it might hurt someones feelings. Jesus Christ. Should heroin addicts who self confess using random syringes off the ground be allowed too since it should be about fact not probabilities? You're a sickness of society.
>>76390291
>I just realized you're actually defending fags giving blood
Re-read the post you stupid fuck, I did no such thing. Medical care is about balancing probabilities. The probability of contracting a life-threatening infection is much, much higher in hospital. How do you balance this against the probability of a patient dying without appropriate care? That's what doctors do. Differential diagnosis is literally probability.
Discrimination as a matter of public policy - as opposed to healthcare - is not a matter of probability. Rather, it ought not be.
I can see why you struggle with basic statistics. God forbid I ask what makes a histogram different from a bar graph.
>tfw we're the only ones who really watch his videos
It's fascinating watching this fuck hell he even knows and admits hardly any lefties watch his videos. I just can't help but to watch, it's like watching a car crash.
>>76390101
>that's not my job
Then why do you expect anyone to be convinced by your baseless ramblings?
>Did I discriminate?
>followed by an entire sentence of pure bigotry
Yes, you did discriminate. You are continuing to do so. You are assigning fault to an entire demographic without any empirical mechanism that shows the fault is all theirs. That is not good policy.
>>76390649
>an entire sentence of pure bigotry
>wahhh someone doesn't accept my perverted fetish
Go post on tumblr faggot, you'll have plenty of people to reassure you you're being brave and revolutionary by sucking dicks and shaming your family
>>76390550
>Medical care is about balancing probabilities
Great. So the fact a Fag has a much higher probability of having aids, a much higher probability of abusing children, a much higher probability of being abused themselves in the past, and a much higher probability of abusing drugs and alcohol makes them a concern to the medical industry.
>>76390923
You asked if you had discriminated. I replied. If you don't think you'll like the answers I'm sure you'll find it very easy to avoid asking the questions. It seems to be something you're good at.
But you do like the answer. You want to play the victim. You love complaining about how you're bullied at work by filthy leftists and how mum doesn't share your right-wing views. It's like virtue-signalling for the nu-right - basically oppression olympics, where he who has suffered the most at the hands of 'cultural marxism' and 'perverts' gets to claim some ancient and noble title.
>So the fact a Fag has a much higher probability of having aids, a much higher probability of abusing children, a much higher probability of being abused themselves in the past, and a much higher probability of abusing drugs and alcohol makes them a concern to the medical industry.
Correct. This is why most governments have specific public health policies targeting men who have sex with men.
Congratulations, anon. You are slowly learning how to govern.
>>76391214
>I'm being playing the victim
I'm calling fags disgusting a perverts while they cry "leave me alone" and "discrimination" I'm not the victim of anything.
Glad you've abandoned your point that fags are less harmful than normal people and have admitted they're higher probability of all those problems though.
>>76384151
Yes, it's the distance.
>>76391447
>Glad you've abandoned your point that fags are less harmful than normal people and have admitted they're higher probability of all those problems though.
Let's backtrack to my first post in this very thread:
"That's not to say that your statistics are wrong. If you grab any random homosexual the probability is higher that he abuses children than any random heterosexual."
(>>76388702)
As you can see, my original point was never that your statistics were wrong, only that your statistical illiteracy was leading you to a conclusion that they didn't support. You're not looking very bright tonight, Canuck. Maybe it's time to go to bed.
>I'm calling fags disgusting a perverts while they cry "leave me alone" and "discrimination"
I've never asked you to leave me alone, and my only comments about discrimination were in response to your whinging about it.
You love to play the victim. That's why you're here. You love to have a whine about things on a website with incredibly low posting standards and general apathy - at best - towards the blatantly incorrect. How many times have you been objectively wrong this thread alone? At least once in just your last post, as shown above. Here you feel like you can bitch and moan without real challenge. /pol/ is your "safe space" where you can have a teary over how hard it is to be part of the out-group, surrounded by degeneracy, perverts, and lefties. However, I completely agree with you on one issue:
You aren't the victim of anything.
You just like to pretend that you are. Now, if you've got nothing else to say I think we're done here.
>>76392163
Alright so you're point is that
>yes gays are more probable to abuse children
>yes gays are more probable to have been abused by children in their past
>yes if you've been abused as a child in your past you're more probable to abuse children in your adulthood
>but despite what all those statistics say when they're all put together it's not ~~technically~~ proof so you can't say it nah nah nah
Great contribution there friend. You sure won a victory for aids ridden pedophile faggots everywhere. Your kind will all be very proud of you!
>>76392506
How do you know that there aren't a group of abusing homosexuals and non-abusing homosexuals? How do you know that child abuse is consistent across all homosexuals, and that every homosexual is just waiting for an opportunity? How do you know whether or not the statistics reflect 1,000 homosexuals abusing one child, or 10 homosexuals abusing 100 children each and 990 homosexuals abusing 0? Or is it "not your job" to know the answers to these questions?
Gays are more probable to have been abused as children - okay, but this means some gays weren't. Do these gays also abuse children? If not, then how do you justify discrimination against them on the basis of child safety when we've actually removed them as a child safety concern?
How can you know the answers to any of these questions, or the thousands more that I could ask, if you cannot explain the mechanism by which your supposed links work?
What you have is a solid basis for further research. What you do not have is an all-powerful magic bullet that defeats all opposing arguments. Sit down and think about your position before jumping up and down on the internet and you might be able to avoid embarrassments like this one in the future.
>>76387492
nothing interesting, I just talked to him about immigration on the internet some time, I tried explaining to him in a calm and reasonable manner that immigration is bad for the working classes such as himself. He was fairly civil and said we would just have to agree to disagree.
>>76393001
So basically my argument is that faggots are bad for society based on the fact they're drastically more likely than a normal person to have all these problems and do all these bad things, which you've agreed with
my other argument is that they're disgusting perverts not a legitimate lifestyle based on the fact they're not born that way and their sexuality can be influenced by trauma in their past, and that it's literally just a sexual fetish.
And your argument is that #notallgays just because they're drastically more likely too. Basically that you admit the medical field should discriminate against them for their statistically increased probability in all those things, but to have a personal disgust for them because of all these things is wrong because not every single one is like that so its not fair and hurts your feelings
I'm not the one embarrassing myself here.
>>76384726
This pictures name triggered me.
>>76385613
It's pretty gud
>>76393478
>the medical field should discriminate against them
Discrimination is lawful where it is reasonable. Airlines discriminate against pilots with heart conditions, and blood wagons discriminate against men who have sex with men. I have no objections to discrimination based on probability when probability matters.
However, I have a problem with discrimination when it is nonsensical or unnecessary. Let's have a look at this sentence:
>faggots are bad for society based on the fact they're drastically more likely than a normal person to have all these problems and do all these bad things
You've shown that homosexuals are more likely to have problems and do bad things, but you haven't shown that it's due to their homosexuality. I will not condone discrimination against homosexuals when you have not shown that homosexuality is the problem. How can you know that A and B aren't both symptoms of C, rather than A causing B and C not existing, if you don't know the mechanism by which this whole system works?
I do not agree with your argument because your argument is not supported with evidence. You have spent the last 45 minutes trying to argue your way around this fact, but nothing you say will change the fact that I require evidence for you to weasel an agreement out of me, and you have no evidence. You can sit here for another 45 minutes and keep going if you like but it'll be as futile as your last attempt.
Your other argument is "muh feels" and semantics, and I don't deign to respond to it.
My argument is that to discriminate against an entire demographic as a matter of general public policy you must have a compelling reason to do so, and this reason must apply universally to the entire demographic.
I particularly enjoy how you say "it's not fair" with the same amount of distaste as "and it hurts your feelings", as though fairness - which is roughly synonymous with justice - is not something we ought to be striving for.
It's not fair, and that's wrong.
>>76384151
Holy shit he's a fag too, I thought he just an awkward wizard like I used to be.
While I don't like this guy's political opinions he does like Babylon 5 which means he can't be all bad, even though he's a libcuck rump ranger.
>>76384151
>Anglo genetics
WE WUZ EMPIRE
>>76384359
>>76384151
I feel autistic and stupid just by watching at this, its just too much cringe
>>76393969>>76393969
>You've shown that homosexuals are more likely to have problems and do bad things, but you haven't shown that it's due to their homosexuality.
A homosexual is more likely to abuse children - you've agreed
an abused child is more likely to be homosexual - you've agreed
an abused child is more likely to abuse a new child - you've agreed
that child is now more likely to be homosexual
that child is now more likely to abuse a new child
that child is now more likely to be homosexual
See the connection here? This is all just coincidence? You're saying none of that has to do with each other? That these are totally unrelated to homsexuality, despite it being not only a common factor, but a clear instigator into the next point?
>My argument is that to discriminate against an entire demographic as a matter of general public policy you must have a compelling reason to do so, and this reason must apply universally to the entire demographic.
Alright. And what public policy am I preaching that hurts your feelings so bad? The public policy that fags are degenerate perverts? I don't think that's a policy m8. You're just literally whining that someone thinks a man sucking dicks is shameful instead of empowering and brave and maybe your Dad was right
>>76394042
source?
>>76384151
I fucking love British people
>>76394298
>See the connection here? This is all just coincidence? You're saying none of that has to do with each other? That these are totally unrelated to homsexuality, despite it being not only a common factor, but a clear instigator into the next point?
Without results that are reproducible in an experimental environment all you have are vague aspersions.
I do not concern myself with aspersions.
>what public policy am I preaching that hurts your feelings so bad
You aren't, and hence my feelings are not hurt. You can think whatever you like, m8. You live an entire world away, in a different country, and your opinions have no effect whatsoever on my country or its laws. You could wholeheartedly believe in gassing every last homosexual on Earth and it would not bother me at all because it is an impotent fantasy that will never affect me.
>>76384151
>>76394563
>Without results that are reproducible in an experimental environment all you have are vague aspersions.
Except they are consistent trends that the date has literally never contradicted
>I do not concern myself with aspersions.
so literally "NAH NAH NAH NAH NAH" basically you came here to not counter any of my points at all and just have a long winded conversation about semantics and how you won't accept a single statement on human behavior because human behavior cannot be mathematically proven. That's essentially your whole contribution to this. You've come in to tell us that any statement on human nature or human nature doesn't interest you.
I'll try to save you some time here and just respond to that directly:
oh. okay.
>>76394642
>leftist
>fat
>gay
>beta
>likes cats
he literally is everything that could be wrong with a man
>>76384151
I did not know he was a literal faggot.
>>76394245
>Negative gains
>>76385659
>above average
Jesus Christ, I'm not gay but he looks like a fat train wreck.
>>76394828
>Except they are consistent trends that the date has literally never contradicted
Cool. Then it should be relatively easy for you to identify some reproducible results under laboratory conditions.
>you won't accept a single statement on human behavior because human behavior cannot be mathematically proven
And now, having realised that you actually don't have any evidence to present, you launch into the only other strategy available to you - claiming that even if you did have compelling evidence it wouldn't matter because I'm just too unreasonable to accept it!
Well, I'm sure we'll be able to judge that more clearly when you present the evidence you've got. We can concern ourselves with my impartiality and reason after we've finished concerning ourselves with this evidential drought.
What you have is a single statistic, and a desire that something be true. You will use any leap of logic - any rhetorical trick - to make that single statistic prove what you want to be true. It doesn't matter that there is a huge number of viable alternative explanations, all just as possible - maybe even just as probable - as the one you want to be true. You've already decided what the truth is, and you don't need evidence to prove it because if you just believe hard enough that will reshape the world to fit what you want it to be.
I accept innumerable facts about humans. Blood clots. Fingernails grow. Workplace aggression is a result of fatigue and perceived injustice. I accept these things because I know two things about all of them:
1. I know that they are true
2. I know why they are true.
>>76394245
huAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>>76395576
Intelligence, not looks traffic lights
>>76385613
Finding a decent guy is harder than finding a decent woman. Most just want sex, or will cheat as soon as you look the other way, or will just use you for company and cuddles to get their self esteem back up before they find another woman who'd lower her standards enough for them. Just go on >>>/lgbt/ and see how much everyone hates biscum.
t. Bi but now determinedly straight guy
And OP he'll be fine. He's already blaming the other guy, the distance, the mathematics of it, etc. Whenever he gets close to confronting the issue is when he breaks off, head in hands, and then changes subject if what he's bitching about.
He's lying to himself already and it's unhealthy, but will also stop him from killing himself.
>>76384645
Dude is on testosterone replacement therapy because /pol/ actually adviced him to go to the doctor.
>>76394642
He has definitely fucked that cat
I finally unsubscribed to him the other day
All of his videos are so long and hes so unbearable
CAT SEX CONFIRMED ABSOLUTE MADMAN
M
A
D
M
A
N
>>76384151
tl;dw please im not watching that human frog turd
>>76399492
Is it working?
>>76394042
Even today with it's PS2 level CGI, it's still great.
>>76400982
Honestly, what would you guys rate Gordon out of 10?
I would go 4 personally. Nice tits to play with, good bouncy ass.
why the fuck is he even on estrogen?
would love to have a go on his tits
would suck and lick them and then suck his lil pecker off
>>76402383
I wish you German Nazi pigs had one the war. This scumcunt would have been long since holocausted by now
>>76390283
topkek
Is there any way we can get Gordon here to ask him a few questions?
>>76384639
Huge tits. Got confused for a transitioning sperglord.
Tumblr wants to motorboat those moobs.
>>76400593
>>76403890
>>76403912
>>76384151
Was he dumped because he refuses to leave his commune to live closer together?
>>76403949
>>76404005
>>76384151
im going on a fucking diet
actually im just going to starve myself
Questions for Gordon:
How old was the man?
Would Gordon consider himself more attractive?
How far was the distance of travel?
Would Gordon top or bottom this guy?
Would Gordon be willing to sick this guys dick (serious)?
What will Gordon do now for love?
>>76384151
Hope he dies
>>76394409
Hop on akhis we got a cat to rescue.
>british people
>>76404586
Catfucking confirmed
What a fine specimen of the classical British male.
>>76387833
>$5 a month
I guess that buys enough food to maintain living as an obese disgusting fuck
>>76394245
If this guy started lifting he'd be a fucking tank.
>>76405031
His face would still be toothless and thinlipped; his dick would still be 3 inches; his life would still be as tragic
>>76405172
None of that matters when there's rape anon.
This autist is so fucking disgusting. Physically and mentally.
He is so pathetic that pol won't even bully or meme him.
>>76384151
this is pure cancer
>obese
>liberal beyond help
>awkward and probably autistic
>fucking toilet paper rolls in his room
and now I find out he's gay before eating breakfast, thanks lads
I have a lazy eye and compared to me this guy still looks like the hunchback of notre dame
>>76394245
He's a big guy
>>76384151
I don't know if he's going to be alright. I can smell his sweaty fat person stench from here.
>>76384726
>london.jpg
is that a joke or are you retarded?
>>76384829
I knew two guys who went down that exact path. One of them's now obsessed with buying corsets and going to gay bars, and the other I haven't spoken to in years. It's a scary, scary thing to see happen.
>>76394409
Is that the first course of his three-course dinner?
>>76406744
With a catcum starter
I'm supposed to feel sorry for him but I genuinely am very happy to never have gotten involved with girls and have no desire to. The idea of a relationship and giving up my time and freedoms just for vagina or "love" seems like a nightmare, and that's before you even include their families in the picture.
t. Wizard man with fat bank account and a life of leisure
who is this middle aged lesbian
>>76384726
he is a loser
your different political views
dont not make you a shitty loser
