What's your religion and ideology? Be as detailed as you want
Religious view: Atheism
Ideology: Business conservative
Explanation (optional):
Social issues: socially conservative in general. Against discrimination, but homosexuality and transgenderism should be discouraged. Promote family and childbearing as a cultural norm.Separate church from state, but don't go overboard. Keep church relevant for charity and to give the poor hope and morality.
Economy: Low taxes, terminate welfare and instead take about 20% of income from paycheck and put in savings account that can only be used for essentials (e.g. healthcare, housing, etc), moderate regulation on businesses to preserve environment and honest business, low minimum wage, free trade.
Foreign policy: Non-interventionist, bomb ISIS, stop giving foreign aid to Israel, disaster relief foreign aid, invest in 3rd world businesses rather than giving free clothes and food, make friends, avoid globalism unless it benefits the common man.
Feel free to criticize my views.
Okay, i'll bite, Hiro. Enjoy the few cents you get from my mined data.
>Religious view: Transcendental Alchemy
>Ideology: Classical Liberal
>Explanation (optional):
>Social issues: again, classically liberal. People should be free to do as they please, within the framework of a morally and ethically considered rule of law that is logically fair. Trying to push ethics on others, or to mob them into changing viewpoints can get to fuck.
>Economy: Actually don't care. That and I am not informed enough on the subject of economics to give anything but a shitty opinion.
>
>Foreign policy: isolation on all affairs not regarding trade and immigration. Fuck wars on foreign clay. Same immigration system as China. No visa, no job to sponsor you, no entry for longer than a month's holiday. No exceptions other than diplomats, and even then only in their city of residence.
>
>Feel free to criticize my views.
>>76239022
Should people be allowed to sell cocaine? We already see the damaging effects it has had on countless people and how it has destroyed families (especially in the majority black poor communities). Why should we allow something so harmful to be bought and sold to everyone. In my opinion, drug traffickers should get the death penalty and dealers either life in prison or death. Why should law be primarily based on morality? Isn't consequence more important? Shouldn't the government so people from doing harmful things to themselves when it can? It can't with cigarettes and alcohol since they're so ready to get and ingrained into our culture. Same with weed to a lesser degree. What makes you think a libertarian society will stand the test of time if emphasis is not put on reproducing and the people are allowed to do such harmful things to themselves?
>>76237364
This comic is great
>>76237364
Religious views: Deus vult.
Political views: center-fascist
t. my jewbook page
>>76239900
Selling drugs is pretty much the same as murder
>>76239900
>Should people be allowed to sell cocaine?
Why even ask? Of course not?
>Why should law be primarily based on morality? Isn't consequence more important?
Consequence is a vital part of morality eg. selling cocaine is immoral because it's harmful.
>What makes you think a libertarian society will stand the test of time?
Don't care, not a libertarian, so why would I answer for them?
>>76237364
>Religious view: Prophetic
>Ideology: Facism
>Explanation (optional): I'll bash your head in, m8. Its been written I would
>>76237364
Pinochet. Basic bitch fascist
>>76237364
who is making these based comics?
>>76237364
Atheist economic libertarian with older socially liberal views such as gay equal rights, but I still think blacks need to go back to Africa.
My ideal economic system is one where we expand on the ideas of state-run businesses that were created when alternatives were not found and use the profits to replace a chunk of taxes for everyone indiscriminately. These would not be to drive others out of the market through either a change in laws or a undercutting via the reduced overhead they would inevitably incur thanks to any taxes they pay being funneled to their owner, but to provide competition for a healthier market without the need for trust-busters, regulations, or other things financial leftists typically call for. They should all still be subjected to the same laws, particularly those instilled to reduce environmental impact.
What lead me to this idea is how profitable the United State Postal Service was before conservatives sought to disband it and lead to further privatization, and how Ten (I believe it was state wide, might have been one city) had an instance where their internet was atrocious in many areas, so they formed their own ISP that blew other ISPs the fuck out, is profitable, and is/was fighting being sued because of how threatening it was to companies that could have easily done better for the same costs.
I want to be absolutely clear, this wouldn't be an industry take over, rather more companies entering into markets.
>>76240771
redpanels.com I think.
>>76237364
Religion: agnostic
Ideology: Nationalist Isolationist Individualist
Atheist ancap
Just fuck everyone's shit up.
Hungover from needing to drink after contact with a black supremacist last night. I won't be very sprightly in any debate.
>>76239022
Fleeing the British thought crime police for nasty things you said on twitter? How far off am I?
>>76237364
>Religious view: something between deism/pantheism and Catholicism with questionable views on the divinity of Christ.
>Ideology: Libertarian, but fine with the classical liberal label if it annoys regressives.
>Explanation (optional):
>Social issues: against legislated morality in either direction, although I feel the government should take a more proactive role ensuring equal opportunities over corporate socialist policies that seek equal representation. This is important to me because I hate being NEET. I flip flop on abortion and the environment.
>Economy: create incentives for startups and lower taxes for poor/startups, in fact eliminate all taxation of people earning less than the cost of living with the difference made up in tariffs on luxury items and on imports for some protectionism. Since I believe low wage earners have disposable incomes, I imagine this to increase government income despite equalizing on paper.
>Foreign policy: Non-interventionist, cease aid as it makes nations dependent on the west (thinking prime directive). As before, I'd like to see some protectionism and efforts to ensure jobs for locals, which after creating penalties for hiring policies that take into account race might not even be necessary.
>Feel free to criticize my views.
>>76239900
No cocaine or heroin or any overly addictive drug, since such can lead to abuse. That being said, any drug as harmful or less so than MDMA and alcohol should be legal and heavily taxed with the resultant money going into anti drug education and medical fields. Legalizing MDMA will result in fewer ""ecstasy"" overdoses, since they usually actually overdose on meth.
>>76240386
Do you believe there's a difference between libertarianism and classical liberalism?
>>76240792
Why should blacks go "back" to Africa if they have nothing to do with Africa anymore. Do you expect them to speak the African languages or contribute there? Where in Africa?
Also if gays get married, are they entitled to financial benefits by the government? These benefits are given to married couples because they are expected to (for the most part) have kids.
>Business Conservative
MMM... THAT JEW, CANT'CHA SMELL THAT JEW?
Anyway, memes aside, here's mine.
Religion: Positive Christian/Esoteric Hitlerist (Deutsche Christen)
Ideology: Free Enterprise National Socialist (with some Strasserist sympathies, although I think they did cozy up too close to the commies)
Basically I believe in a healthy combination of Capitalism and Socialism that will be beneficial to the Nation above all. I don't believe in foreign aid whatsoever and I think we should adopt an isolationist/expansionist foreign policy (i.e. we either take it or leave it alone), while still building a powerful military in case of attack. I believe National homogeneity is something we should strive for, and that all non-whites should be deported (with compensation) to their countries of ethnic origin. Alot else, too, but I'm sure this ideology isn't unique to me.
>>76241036
Why are you an ancap? Do you really expect corporations to treat people better than governments? What's the point?
>>76237364
>What's your religion and ideology?
nothing
opportunism if anything
>>76237364
Religious view: Nominally Christian
Ideology: National Socialist
Social issues: Socially conservative, as long as it benefits the nation. Against homofaggotry. God, leader/nation, family, not always in that order.
Economy: more or less Keynesian-supporting, but I'm generally flexible with whatever supports the state.
Foreign policy: BTFO kebab, let Israel do its thing, have strong military, I favor a sort of Wilsonian ideal for nationalism, so long as they are capable of wise government.
>>76241271
What do Africans have to do with Africa.
Gee, idk. What do Europeans have to do with Europe. I am sick of taking care of them. At this point we have spent trillions on them and they are nothing but a negative influence on society with the best of them being like average whites.
It was a mistake to bring them here. Time for them to go back. Start a new colony in Africa just for them. Give them a bunch of money out of their welfare costs to start it up. There you go. Who fives a shit how it performs. Our investment in them is a sunk cost, it does not justify further investment. They have failed to produce for generations. They are a liability we have to cut off. Maybe they will be more motivated in their own land. Not the point, they need to stop wrecking ours.
>>76241271
I just said "go back to Africa" to mean get the fuck away from us... pretty much everyone else. I have no issues with non-gang banging Mexicans, Asians that aren't actually in china are cool, and us whites are the guys that made this place.
I don't really think there should be financial benefits for marriage in the first place.
Religious view: Episcopal, however separation of church and state and secular education
Ideology: Authoritarian Nationalist
Social Issues: Equal rights, except for non-citizens (you are not granted citizen ship by birth), Homosexuals deserve equal rights, transgenders do not ad there are two genders with the sexes
Economy: Moderate(?) Socialist, heavy taxes and government benefits, centralization of state and funds, not one class but a rubber banding to ensure all can eat.
Foreign policy: Heavy Handed Interventionist, borderline Imperialism, it is our duty to spread our success to others, and provide satellites to protect ourselves.
>>76237364
>Religious view
Universal agnosticism
>Ideology
I guess you could call me a Libertarian. I like the general idea, but I don't agree with everything they say.
>Explanation
>Social:
People should be allowed to do whatever they want, as long as it doesn't harm anyone else. I really don't care if you waste your entire income on drugs, as long as you pay your taxes and don't hurt anyone else. Incentivize charity through tax write-offs. Public schools should exist to give everyone a fair chance, but eliminate all arts, sports, and after school programs and increase the pay of the teachers who teach real subjects. Any art or sport a child wants to do should be an after-school club funded by the students.
>Economy
Lower taxes. Ditch unemployment pay, ditch foodstamps. Implement program like WIC in place of foodstamps, and it should provide a person with just enough food to survive. I'm still not sure how I feel about the kids though. I'd love to just have them taken away from unfit parents, but they'd probably be worse off as wards of the state. Not to mention that foster care is riddled with problems. I'd just love a system where everyone is responsible for their actions, but kids aren't given the shit end of the stick because they have awful parents.
>Foreign policy
Try to be friends with everybody. Try to do what's best for all countries. Be a bro.
>>76237364
OP, I like you.
>10/10 world view.
>>76241218
>Implying I don't have a naughty-thought-self-reporty chip lodged in my anus
I'm quintessentially British, after all.
>>76241218
>Do you believe there's a difference between libertarianism and classical liberalism?
Don't know. Don't know much about libertarianism. Seems to be about free markets and economic freedom. I see classical liberalism to be more about freedom of thought and action within a loose civil system.
