The main problem of capitalism is that you will NEVER get rich by working hard, only by exploring people and making them work hard for you.
>The main problem of capitalism is that you will NEVER get rich by being a work-obsessed aspie, only my having social skills and making connections
How is this a problem?
Humans are a social species. If you aren't good at socializing, you aren't good at living.
>>76186203
Basically. For all the time Capitalist-fags spend lambasting Socialism for catering to the dregs of society, that's what the entirety of Capitalism is based on. Beethoven can't compete with Lil' John.
>>76186466
People are less motivated to actually do the hard work and research if they know they won't be the ones profiting from it, but someone else who is more social.
No its by exploiting people into making them give you money, which typically requires free exchange.
There's literally nothing wrong with exploring people.
>>76186203
>only the best and brightest
Yes, the best and brightest at appealing to what people want.
>>76186203
Capitalism is literally freedom.
>>76186203
>Because of Capitalism people from the past died poor while people of today live in prosperity.
Yes and by todays standards we live the life of luxury when you compare it to back then.
>We have food, heat, air conditioning, light, water, health care, transportation, airplanes.
>>76186203
What do you have against Paris Hilton?
She's actually worth more than Donald Trump in liquid assets and runs a successful clothing/fragrance line.
>>76186203
Nikola Tesla was paid huge amounts of wealth for his inventions.
He was just shit with money, and misinvested it all.
Tesla was legit crazy and wasn't even trying to earn any money.
Also, capitalism isn't about handing money to people because they're intelligent. It's about earning money, about bringing something to the table that makes other people give you money for it.
>Hilton
Nothing wrong in giving your money to your kids. It's your money, you can give it to whoever to want.
>>76186203
>The main problem of capitalism is that you will NEVER get rich by working hard, only by exploring people and making them work hard for you.
This is plainly false
I started several businesses before one made me real money
Know other entrepreneurs who were also succesful
The ones who made money have all paid top shelf salaries to their staff to motivate them to grow their business
Only a commie retard like you thinks giving people a great job where they make excellent money doing something they love is exploiting them
Does exploitation happen? Sure.
But usually it's being done by third rate hacks who can't make a buck without cutting corners
Usually those same idiots would be more profitable if they took better care of their people too
Exploiting workers isn't a feature of capitalism, it's a feature of stupid management regardless of system
A failing common to socialist nations
>>76186203
Socialism makes sure no one becomes rich and successful
>>76186203
Tesla didn't care about money and he's more influential than Paris Hilton will ever be.
Faggot.
>>76186203
If Tesla would have just accepted the contracts the government was offering him he would have died a millionaire, but
>muh morals
>muh feelings
Making them WANT to work for you.
main problem with capitalism is that you need to make profit for your capital, otherwise you won't even put it to any use.
>>76186203
WTF? Paris Hilton comes from the HILTON HOTELS family.
If anybody fell for this bait, they are fucking retarded.
Not to mention she actually made about $100 million on her own, by crafting a personal brand, and not by taking daddy's cash.
Nikola Tesla made tons of money off of his one or two good inventions, he was just a fucking idiot that wasted it because he was batshit insane.
Tesla is literally the fedora of scientists. He was weird as fuck, and 99% of his inventions were retardedly impractical, and in some cases, he flat out lied about the capability of his machines (earthquake machine, death ray, etc).
i'm fuckin rich because i work hard and smart
i make more money than i know what to do with
my only problem is i'm not sure if i should retire earlier or buy bigger and better things
only losers support socialism
winners support capitalism
That is true to some extent in modern nations, however the cause isn't capitalism.
>>76186203
paris hilton runs a successful fashion business and has done more work than every brazilian to have ever lived combined
>>76186203
Nikola Tesla earned millions, problem is he was so comically bad with his money.
Brilliant engineer, but guy was also a basket case who had terrible business sense.
>>76186203
Literally the dumbest strawman argument.. Paris hilton squandered her familys fortune http://www.celebritynetworth.com/articles/entertainment-articles/paris-hilton-isnt-really-much-heiress/
Her dad worked hard, she just squandered so much of it that he decided to give 97% of the 4.3 billion to charity.. and only 3% to her heirs because he DIDN'T FEEL that she EARNED IT..
By using the paris hilton as an example OP literally checkmates himself. Because her dad did work hard to create the Hilton brand, but she didn't and therefore stands to inherit next to nothing.
>>76186203
>What is demand?
>>76187750
So people should be punished if they're not good at something? What's the point in that?
Tesla is an awful example because he could've been rich as fuck and he almost literally refused to.
>>76188056
How is it punishment? You make it sound like someone else is doing this to them and keeping it down.
It was his own naivete to blame.
>>76188056
They shouldn't be rewarded for not doing anything.
The point is not rewarding bad behaviour. Explain why others should work hard to pay for free stuff for a whole bunch of people.. when without having to pay for that they could have far more to spend on themselves..
It's fine to help the needy but when you have an entire class of entitled parasites that think they can simply just select not doing a damn thing and expect others to recieve less in order to keep paying for their life anyways. That's when you have to pull the brakes..
>>76188056
>Bill is clumsy
>Bill falls down the stairs
>this Irishman walks up to the doctor and asks what happened
>doctor says Bill fell down the stairs and hurt himself
>so people should be punished if they're not good at something? what's the point in that?
>>76188225
Capitalism actively prevents people from living as they wish. Tesla was unable to go places he wanted to and pick food from the trees. How is this not actively keeping someone down when it's literally doing it by force?
>>76186203
Let me chime in on something
Tesla was not a capitalist. He did not do the science he did to make money and be rich and famous - he did it because he craved knowledge and improvement. (He certainly did get paid for a lot of his inventions though. He was just a basket case as a lot of other anons said)
And there is nothing wrong with that.
>>76186203
This is absolutely true tbdesu
Which is why I literally just hired my first 3 dumb niggers to work in my company.
Feels good paying them 2,100 bucks per month while they make me get around 12,250 bucks.
Top cucks.
Capitalism is only "bad" because it's a hard game to play, and one that only a few people will ever even understand the rules.
Paris Hilton was born rich. She did nothing good or bad. This comparison is fucking dumb.
>>76188405
You have the illusion that ressources are infinite that's why you believe that everything should just get everything for free..
So if i go pick your tree clean in your garden.. Would you be ok with that? Afterall why would you be so evil to keep me down...
Ofcourse now you're going to have to wait another season till the apples or whatever grow out again.. Tough luck for you i guess..
>>76186203
This is not capitalism. His competition used government regulation to destroy everything Tesla came up with. Had the government gotten out of the way, Tesla's models and ideas would have had an actual chance of success.
>>76186203
>The main problem of capitalism is that you will NEVER get rich by working hard, only by exploring people and making them work hard for you.
>>76188615
Paris Hilton has made positive contributions to society, else she wouldnt have made a fortune off her product lines. This is where marxist logic falls apart, they can't accept that the labor theory of value simply isn't true. People paid for Paris(tm) perfume, shampoo, and lingerie because they personally find it valuable - it brings the consumer pleasure and enjoyment, even if the Paris brand is a useless widget on generic clothes.
Value in capitalism is all about pleasure and enjoyment, not "hard work".
>>76188437
>doesn't understand the difference in risk between being an employer and an employee
Being an employee is literally risk free, if the business fucks up somehow they just lose their job but can always get a new one.. the business owner stands to lose massively in comparison.. and facilitates the entire environment.. the employee literally just have to work in a small part of it and get payed every month.
You're actually suggesting that any business should exist solely to employ people and for no other reason. How selfish are you man?
>>76186673
>against capitalism
>uses iPhone
>>76188437
You are the first HUE I agree with
>When leftist scum think every form of capitalism is Pure Capitalism.
>>76188900
>iPhone is bad
I will never understand this meme. How is apple more capitalist than any other company?
>>76189060
Pic related
>>76186203
>outliers
waaaaah but muh marx waaaaah
>>76189060
Apple products are worse than others in almost every metric other than security, and they charge 2x/3x just for the bitten apple mark on the phone
>>76186203
bait much?
>>76186787
Yup, this is the reason I dont do shit
>>76188619
>You have the illusion that ressources are infinite that's why you believe that everything should just get everything for free..
I don't have any illusion, scarcity today is all either 1) artificial and 2) because of overpopulation. My family or I never participated in overpopulation.
Resources are infinite for how much humans need them. Food grows by itself, water is there itself. No need for anyone else to bring it to us.
>So if i go pick your tree clean in your garden.. Would you be ok with that? Afterall why would you be so evil to keep me down...
Because I need the fruit in my garden to eat myself. It's different to a farmer or corporation who owns millions of acres, and you have to ask why the government will fight off anyone who tries to take any amount of it even if they're starving. Because someone in history said it was theirs and papers were signed. It's ridiculous.
>>76189254
>Apple products are worse than others in almost every metric
No its not and you pay more for their OS. Which is wayyy better than Android and Windows
>>76186787
So you would be more motivated by state driven bureaucracy which will make it nearly impossible to get any funding or recognition?
Unless, wait for it... you socialize and make connections.
>>76186203
oh don't give me that bullshit, he had EVERY opportunity to become rich and actively chose to become a reclusive weirdo who jerked off to pigeons
meanwhile as vapid and shallow as paris hilton is she's entertaining and she knows it and she fucking sells herself. She aint got much but she sure knows how to market it
>>76189515
>Which is wayyy better than Android and Windows
>south american commie
We all know how it ends
>>76186203
>tesla was a poor autist
guy threw more parties than paris hilton
>>76189373
Is it ridiculous..
The reason they are starving in africa is because they are completely incompetent in farming and even the most basic things in society.. this is also the general cause of starvation..
Ironically the places that have massive food shortages and these things are the ones that have adapted socialist/communist tendencies and have thus crashed or do terribly as a result.
Ah.. you need the fruit in your garden to eat yourself.. are you claiming you're now self reliant? ofcourse you're not you're more than likely a clueless urban dweller.
>A farmer or corporation who owns millions of acres..
Yes because surely they're not selling to locals or exporting any of it or anything of that sort right, no they're just keeping it to myself and forcing others to starve..
JUST....
Please realize that you can't feed the entire fucking africa and your own countinent and lots of other places, at the same time and the rest of the world if africa decides not to do a damn thing themselves..
You have some pretty wild misunderstandings about delayed gratification necessary for farming and all these kinds of things. And it's just like pop pop pop and the entire world is fed..
Listen if people as nations were more self reliant.. it would be fantastic.. They're not starving because someone is holding them down they're starving because they are incompetent at doing the necessary things to feed themselves.
>>76187585
>paris hilton runs a successful fashion business and has done more work than every brazilian to have ever lived combined
If by more work you mean "sucked far more black cocks than all of your country combined" then yes, she sure did a lot more work than us.
Now stfu you britcuck, go prep the bull for your muslin overlords and remember: We will be remembering every single insult you fucktards threw on us all these years the next time the krauts decide to go anschluss up your asses and your allies come begging us for the only resource we have, manpower to fight the war.
Never forget that you english cucks can't even fight your own world wars, needing to call for help in order not to get crushed.
>>76189863
Also they have way more kids than they should, so it's actually both things.. too many kids than they can feed per family, and lack the motivaton and the know how etc. to feed their own people..
You can't neither financially or ressource wise feed an entire continent of people and others.. and yourself at the same time.. Nor should you expect to do so they should learn to take care of themselves. And this is exactly the same problem with having many people on welfare and few working in comparison.. It crashes the entire system.. too few putting something in, too many taking something out. Which is precisely part of why socialism/communism fails eventually.
Tesla was also fucking insane and thought extraterrestrials gave him some of his ideas
>>76186203
The solution is Nazism. State Capitalism and an Anti-Degenerate agenda will annihilate these "popstars" and instead glorify talented hard working people and soldiers.
Both Communism and Capitalism are faulty retarded ideologies.
>>76187202
what businesses do you own?
>>76189213
Liberal capitalism does not exclude voluntary communist societies.
>>76189851
The fuck?
No he didn't.
>>76190045
The Hilton family made their fortune legally and through hard work.
If they feel good spending it on a vapid whore, so be it. It is their hard earned money, you commie.
It all boils down to individual property rights. Do you recognize a man can own property and the fruits of his labor or not?
Should be limited or all go to the "collective". If yes, then what is the collective but a set of individuals? Because the properties of a set do not transcend the properties of its members that what is good for the community should be good for the individual. Marxism is irrational in that it promotes mysticism and transcendentalism.
>>76190367
This.
We need to combine the meritocratic hierarchy of capitalism with authoritarian social rigidity to ensure that it is efficient. Also, we can have welfare programs and spending on national works (art, architecture, monuments, etc. that promote the nation's heritage and culture); as long as they aren't excessive. Welfare should be to help workers that actually need it, not as a free "be a NEET" check.
>>76189863
>The reason they are starving in africa is because they are completely incompetent in farming and even the most basic things in society.. this is also the general cause of starvation..
Sure, let them starve if that's what they choose and if they're overpopulating themselves, there is no solution. I'm not some nicey-nice guy at all, I can do cut-throat just fine. But it has to be fair. What I'm talking about is the idea of capitalism that some guy own millions of acres and it's all protected by force BECAUSE DEMS THE RULEZ.
>Yes because surely they're not selling to locals or exporting any of it or anything of that sort right, no they're just keeping it to myself and forcing others to starve..
I don't give a shit who they're selling to, I'm saying they are not entitled to own it and have no right to prevent other people from taking some to feed themselves.
>Listen if people as nations were more self reliant.. it would be fantastic.. They're not starving because someone is holding them down they're starving because they are incompetent at doing the necessary things to feed themselves.
>Listen if people as nations were more self reliant.. it would be fantastic.. They're not starving because someone is holding them down they're starving because they are incompetent at doing the necessary things to feed themselves.
In western countries they often are. Anyone who is able to pick food and lie down can support themselves and it is only by force of others that they struggle to.
just working hard didn't get people rich. Mexicans picking berries on a farm probably work way harder than any successful businessman.
>>76189373
There are laws in my country that protect you id you are indeed starving to death.
I could club a panda to death but if eat it all i wont be any trouble, if i can prove i need it for survival. There are infinite cases like that in the usa. If you starve to death in my country its your own damn pathetic fault.
>>76186203
Literally all of the west has been forced under a soft form of socialism for more than 50 years. The welfare state, escalation of federal income tax with higher profit, etc. is communist derived trash. Capitalism died in 1920s America.
>>76187105
Because she would never have been capable of that if she was not born into wealth.
Do you think she actually know shit about cllothing, the lining, the sewing, the fabric or do you think she actually knows about chemestry enough to make perfume?
No she does not, without being born into money at best she would be a semi successfull porn actress, since US fags seems to like that worthless body type of unatractiveness.
>>76189373
>Food grows by itself, water is there itself.
Uhhh, no it doesn't, idiot. Without our current level of industrial and technological investment in farming, half the world would likely starve. If people actually followed your idea of a free "paradise" would be a bunch of hippies starving innawoods and coming back to society occasionally to shit in the streets like Indians and beg people for manufactured goods and food. We developed our technology for a reason; because living like Survivor Man is hard.
>>76191232
>What I'm talking about is the idea of capitalism that some guy own millions of acres and it's all protected by force BECAUSE DEMS THE RULEZ.
I don't think people actually own millions of acres. If they do, it's because they're some oil sheik. Some people own a few thousand acres, such as my family. We own 5,000 acres and use it for cattle ranching, and growing soy beans, corn, and wheat. The world is bigger than you think it is. The US hasn't even used 20% of its landmass for human settlements.
All leftist movements tend to lead to totalitarian statism; where the unaccountable politicians rule over people like gods anyway (pic related). At least in a mostly-free market, people have the choice of denying service to dissidents, or not giving their service to a business owner they don't like.
>>76187335
sure she did and without her families money to get even the funding for starting she would surely have achievemed the same
dream on
>>76186203
Work smarter, not harder.
>>76191127
>Do you recognize a man can own property and the fruits of his labor or not?
I don't.
Capitalism is slightly less grossly inefficient than all the other economic systems, and I appreciate it for that, but I don't think it's necessarily MORALLY RIGHT or however you would put it. Personal ownership isn't the end goal, it's the means to the end of facilitating everyone's wellbeing, including the moochers.
Capitalism is okay since it generates enough overhead to feed the poor. If there was a way to get the same performance out of a planned economy without the system turning evil and choking to death on its own bureaucracy, I'd probably support that.
>>76186203
I get the point but using Paris Hilton as an example is dumb idea
She's the grand daughter of a billionaire
>>76191127
>If they feel good spending it on a vapid whore, so be it. It is their hard earned money, you commie.
Except that the guy who did all the hard work does not feel good at all about spending it on a vapid whore, to the pojnt of donating most of her inheritance to charity just to prevent her from getting it:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-504577/Bad-heir-day-Paris-Hilton-inherit-just-2-5million-grandfather-pledges-bulk-fortune-charity.html
>>76191127
>It all boils down to individual property rights. Do you recognize a man can own property and the fruits of his labor or not?
Of course, still do not agree with capitalist pigs making a shitload of money while the common worker has to work his ass off just to barely survive with whatever meager living conditions he can afford.
>>76191127
>Marxism is irrational in that it promotes mysticism and transcendentalism.
Agreed, marxism is just plain stupid, but I believe a new and fair system is possible, the only thing preventing such a system to exist is the rich 1% that does not feel like earning slightly less to be able to give their workers decent wages.
>>76188056
Because they will keep doing it again and again.
Excessive, blind egalitarianism promotes inefficiency. Are you saying it's better to waste resources and labor, because that's the "nice" thing to do?
Would you not fire a doctor who keeps killing people on the operating table?
>>76186466
This.
>>76186203
> autist dies poor and alone
wew
>>76192653
she inherited her wealth without ever having to work hard or live up to a higher standard..its a great fucking example
>>76192252
are you implying that
I shouldn't be able to pass my wealth onto my children?
this is the last bastion of family and freedom. Once you can no longer pass your wealth onto your children, there is literally zero incentives to have children in the west (other than the emotional ones)
I work my whole life and I can't even give my kids an edge??
>>76193422
>overrated genius
i think he's overrated for that exact reason. If he made such great inventions, and wasn't able to leverage those inventions, he was missing a crucial part of being a genius: hedging your bets
>>76186203
It seems like Brazilian folks are the main shitposters here.
1) First of all, Paris is a granddaughter of a billionaire, so using her as an example of failed capitalism is the definition of stupidity.
2) Secondly, she happened to be in the right place, in the right time. I still remember her MTV 00s shows, she was really hot and entertaining. I am not saying that I am fan of her, but still she EARNED this money fairly.
As it was stated before, you have to run your business smartly. Being intelligent is't equal being rich.
>>76186931
>this philly phag again
>>76186927
underrated for sure
>>76193679
> she was really hot
For a Turk rape baby like yourself maybe
![934Hm7B[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/zy8ZECK.png "934Hm7B[1].png")
>this thread
>>76186203
> never get rich by working harder
> instead of working smarter
> for some reason this is considered a flaw
It's reality. You're trying to make an imaginary social construct (the economy) violate the laws of physics, and can't understand why it gets rekt every time.
>>76193886
Please explain this cryptic /v/ meme.
You mean the main benefit, not problem.
>>76194003
This thread is about exploring other people, right?
Here's an exploring red barrel.
>>76191232
So you're clearly against private property but want to keep your own apple tree cause you need the apples for yourself..
Please stop being a hypocrite.. the only difference between having your own tree on your own property being protected and private property of a corporation is that they're actually selling it and thus need to stop people from stealing it and these things or it will hurt their business and their investment in ressources and machinery and all kinds of things in order to do the farming..
You need private property or people will steal stuff that don't belong to them.. you can't just do the "first come first serve" because without private property and proper barter, some people will help themselves to more than they deserve..
And ironically you are arguing against this protection mechanism of private property and trade.. By claiming it's immoral that people aren't able to basically steal from others what they feel they require. So you want people who didn't plant any tree or didn't nurture any field to basically just swipe the stuff after a farmer has spent his due time producing crops..
>sure let them starve if that's what they choose
I never said i preferred for them to starve, i'm just pointing out why that is, you can't just remove moral agency from people who do not do well and pretend it's always somebody elses fault. Which is basically what you are doing.
>In western countries they often are. Anyone who is able to pick food and lie down can support themselves and it is only by force of others that they struggle to.
I don't know how it's like in ireland but you can't just run around on peoples private property and take stuff down from their trees in general in europe.. There's forests and stuff like this which are not privately owned where you can maybe forage for some berries and stuff like that.. But the whole idea of having private property and growing stuff on them is that you put in the effort to cultivate them.
>>76194003
> red barrels are an iconic video game feature, that explode when shot
> except when they explore instead
>>76186203
>exploring people and making them work hard for you
You don't have to work for me if you don't want to. I won't make you.
>>76194096
Fuck, my mind was on autocorrect when I read that.
>>76194227
I've known about red barrels since Goldeneye.
>>76186203
The problem with a lot of entrepreneurs who tell people to just get out there and work hard are they often came from money themselves. Just a few examples:
Paris Hilton: The hotels, already from money.
Trump: "My father gave me a small loan of a million dollars"
Elon Musk: His father gave him about $25k for his first venture.
Howard Hughes: His father was a great industrialist.
There are countless examples like this.
It's easier to make money if you already have money.
But few people will ever give you that vital leg up if you come from nothing.
Entrepreneurs often have the ideas AND the money and connections to get there. They are also the people who are one of the first adopters of a new idea, and so get to reap the rewards when it reaches the rest of society.
They can do this because they have the means to do it.
If you come from nothing and live in a shithole, you really are limited, no matter what these aspirational people tell you.
It's not impossible for the poor to rise, but the odds are stacked even more heavily against them than it is for the comfy middle class.
>>76193679
>It seems like Brazilian folks are the main shitposters here.
Every australian would be offended by that statement, but do go on.
>>76193679
>1) First of all, Paris is a granddaughter of a billionaire, so using her as an example of failed capitalism is the definition of stupidity.
If only she was the exception, but sadly this is what the decendents of most billionaires fail to live up to their ancestors expectations.
>>76193679
>2) Secondly, she happened to be in the right place, in the right time. I still remember her MTV 00s shows, she was really hot and entertaining. I am not saying that I am fan of her, but still she EARNED this money fairly.
Giving women money over the fact they are pretty is the reason why current western society is doomed.
>>76193679
>As it was stated before, you have to run your business smartly. Being intelligent is't equal being rich.
Completly agree with you there mate, no arguments there. The problem is that the intelligent people usually get hindered by the stupid rich people who only fucks everything up.
>>76193811
Sorry, I am not into lollies like the pedophiles your country is famous for.
>>76194214
Because my apple tree isn't private property, it's personnel property
> teleports beheind you
>>76186203
Nikolai Tesla
>raped pigeons
>claimed he visited aliens
>embezzled funds from his investors
>stile money from his investors
He was an asshole and crazy
Paris Hilton at least is only fucking humans. Also she got cut from her granddad's will. They are both worthless trash. The only good Tesla did was AC current and even that was because Edison commissioned him to do so
He couldn't adjust to the theory of relativity etc either.
Retarded op who has no knowledge of any real history or real people shouldn't make shitty threads based on his internet meme knowledge.
Capitalism is the best system we have right now.
>inb4 poo in loo
>>76193566
>I shouldn't be able to pass my wealth onto my children?
Absolutely. Inheritance tax should be 100%. Either everyone should have the same opportunities to become wealthy meritocratically or capitalism is admitted to be a fraud that only encourages fossilization of power.
>>76194214
(cont) Also you're not able to do whatever you want in a forest, there's strict rules for what you can and can't do especially in some places.
Including the public forest some plant those tree and maintain them aswell and all kinds of things.. you can't just chop down huge portions of the forest because you think you need wood.. I don't understand this hippie oriented fantasy that you're even talking about..
Weither it is public or private property it is maintained by someone and you can't just do with it what you want, if that was the case you'd have very frigging little of it left.. You seem to have very little understanding of what it takes to maintain these kinds of things.. You must be a really deluded urban dweller..
>>76194870
poo in the loo cuck
Fight the power with your autism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmYbN57hoK8
>>76194922
fuck off fag
that is dehumanizing as fuck. All you're asking for is to be replaced by people and cultures who have no empathy for their children
>>76186203
Wrong, capitalism isn't about working harder, it's about working smarter.
I wouldn't expect someone living in favela filth to comprehend this
>>76194214
Clearly we're not going to agree here. But you should be aware that there is ZERO hypocrisy in what I'm saying. No, one person owning a small bit of property is NOT the same as someone (or even worse, a corporation) owning millions of acres of land. A small bit of land/territory is okay, huge, vast amounts is not.
It's like how in nature a dog will defend his bone or his territorial patch. It's a small, finite region that a person can claim as their own. The animal can't just take a zillion acres as their own because they could never defend it all, so you get the government to do it for you. The idea that you can just multiply by a billion and all the same rules apply is artificial and contrived. So even though you may not agree with me, despite what you claim there is ZERO hypocrisy in what I'm saying.... got it? Good.
>>76195425
Be careful when running around in swedish forests, you might touch a tree that this weird swede have been sexually molesting..
>>76195327
>that is dehumanizing as fuck
>Being poor isn't
Oh what's the matter? All you have to do is work hard and stay in school to get it all back, right? Do you support laziness or something? What are you, a communist?
>All you're asking for is to be replaced by people and cultures who have no empathy for their children
No, I'm DEMANDING people ACTUALLY earn their money, instead of just mouthing propaganda that they do like you faggots do 24/7.
>>76186203
I explored your mom and she liked it
>>76186691
>t.nigger
>>76194491
We just can't judge who earns money fairly and who doesn't in a capitalistic world. For example, not a long time ago the internet was furious about PewDiePie who earns 12M a year basically sitting on his butt, playing video games and screaming while there so many firemen who risk their lives and can't manage to get 100K a year. Once again, I am not a fan of him (I find his videos extremely degrading), but he has his viewers, his fans and he sticks to his niche and earns money fairly. What is wrong with it? Same as Paris was the main MTV star of the 00's.
I think the problem is that we compare completely different spheres. There are a lot of rich and successful scientists as well, but somehow celebrities (singers, actors and other entertainers) are always in the spotlight and people think that they don't deserve their money. As long as there is a demand, they will be getting richer. Plus, these are just few separate individuals out of millions who struggle to become famous and successful in entertaining industry.
>>76195485
absolute kek.
>>76194922
Okay then. The rich folk would give their kids the best education, introduce them to all the right people and generally give them a leg up. Parents die. Rich kid has already started accumulating wealth and goes on with his life and the poor kid loses his parent's home and a small savings account they worked all their life to obtain and has to start his life even deeper in the dirt.
Welcome to your socialist utopia.
>>76195485
i wish swedish forests had rattle snakes
Tesla is quietly one of the biggest memes of all time.
>he invented unlimited free energy but da corporations are hiding the technology!
>>76186203
>celebrities
>capitalism
wew
>>76195696
>Pedopipper or something does videos
>people pay him money for them
>other people get mad about it
In the end, it's all about people wanting to control what you do with your money. They can't stand that you are free to spend it on what you want. It drives them insane.
>>76195696
Well mate, I will give it to you straight, inheritance tax should be 100% as said by >>76194922
If people managed to make their money while having the same start I would agree with it, but Paris Hilton just became the main MTV star of the 00's BECAUSE of her rich family, not because of her own merit.
>>76195801
You're right, the connections would still bail them out. The 100% inheritance tax will never happen obviously because the rich would never let it. But the fact that capitalists don't support it reveals that every soundbite they use to argue in favor of the rich are complete and utter propagandistic LIES.
>>76195516
>No, I'm DEMANDING people ACTUALLY earn their money, instead of just mouthing propaganda that they do like you faggots do 24/7.
Implying anyone actually EARNS what they niggardly manage to siphon into their account in current times (apart from the odd individual who just happens to by chance).
If you lived during nicholas tesla's time, there wouldn't be people like paris hilton
OP is a fag
>>76195696
Well that's because the more that use your product or service, the higher likelyhood is you'll make a lot of money and cover your initial expenses for providing the service/product.. so it's also with regards to accessibility of for instance entertainment..
Any moron with an internet connection can access pewdiepie's service and it doesn't cost anything, which actualy uses youtube, and then earns money via them due to add revenue, and youtube pays the cost of storing his videos and these things and they also recieve money for the adds etc. So it's a win win for them.
whereas something that costs money instantly, people consider a bit more to use before they purchase it. So using pewdiepie as an example is perhaps a bad example in this case.
So no it's not always fair in the sense that those who do the most crucial job is most rewarded, because it depends on how many like your product essentially, unless you land some kind of whale accounts that cover large organizations, but that's the same principle..
>>76195516
Well enjoy having your incredibly unreasonable demands, which go against all historical legal precedence, forever ignored as they should be cucktard. Your fee fees just exploded at the concept of humans freely exchanging wealth and providing for their offspring instead of being forced to give it all up the state for your personal version of equality, and you call someone else a commie? KEK
>>76196181
>But the fact that capitalists don't support it reveals that every soundbite they use to argue in favor of the rich are complete and utter propagandistic LIES.
No, it doesn't. You're just insanely mad that creating wealth is quite hard and ultimately a multi-generational effort and your ancestors gave you a shitty start.
>>76187171
He was a genius. Way ahead of his time. The quote "smart people seem like crazy people to dumb people" applies so appropriately right now. Good luck with that
>>76186673
Not an argument.
I like how these leftiecuck threads are outright lying from the very beginning.
In capitalist society you CAN get rich if you're hardworking, which quite frankly, is the opposite of a commie era. Edgy lefty teenagers don't realize that some of us have lived long enough to remember that brilliant professors and scholars who spoke more than 8 languages made less than 10$/month in their socialist utopia. And they have the audacity to bring up hard work? In commie times you could do absolutely NOTHING at work and earn as much as someone who worked their ass off.
>>76195485
fuggen saved
>>76186466
>Paris Holton
>Social skills
Bitch is dumb as fuck, and is only a tier above /r9kuck/ posters in terms of socialising. Se either that K Kardashian slag.
Being a whore or sucking black dick on camera, us not a social skill, but rather selling yourself out.
I do half agree with your point though.
But I do know many people with great social skills and are fucked with money.
>>76190583
He doesn't own shit. He's probably an assistant fluffer at "Brian's burgers and blowjobs bath house".
The freshest meat this side of the Mississippi I tell you what!
>>76196487
I agree with you on that, but still his second line has you covered; intelligence != valuable necessarily; you have to apply it in a way which is oriented towards making money by providing a good or service to others in exchange for currency if you want money (Unless you're the federal reserve).
>>76196422
>Well enjoy having your incredibly unreasonable demands, which go against all historical legal precedence
That isn't the point, you stupid faggot, and I just got done explaining that. The point is you're a hypocrite and a liar. Either people "earn" their wealth or they don't. Either you hold people to that standard or you just believe in a landed dynastic gentry. You don't get both.
>freely exchanging wealth
This is a meme and a lie. Capitalism is NOT the free exchange of goods and services, because the poor only have the choice of survival or death, not the option to disassemble the wealth of their corporate masters. People created a monopoly out of Walmart not because they CHOSE to, but because Walmart had the capital to exploit a financially difficult situation and give people the choice to buy cheaper or go without, which isn't a real choice.
And while we're on the topic of choice, why do you whiny shits complain about taxation all the time when you voluntarily agree to it?
>>76196449
Yeah, it does. You're just an insufferably sociopathic piece of shit who can't see his own hypocrisy.
>creating wealth
Yet another lie. The rich do not "create wealth". They steal it from the Earth. There is only a finite amount of resources.
>your ancestors gave you a shitty start.
You're right, and EVERYONE should either be held to the same standard or you're a liar and a hypocrite. After all, if it's so easy to work hard and stay in school to become wealthy, why don't you agree with me? Could it be that even you know that you're completely and utterly full of shit and know that capitalism is a rigged system?
>>76188296
>not doing anything
>bad behavior
The problem with this is how subjective these statements are. And the value of their meaning is entirely superficial. That's a pretty stupid way to judge someone doing something from this mindset, honestly. Who are you to decide what people deserve or not?
If someone is using their mind for critical thinking, but physically appear lazy, do you consider that "not doing anything"? I guess mathematicians don't deserve to get payed for their hard work and contributions to civilization.
>bad behavior
I'm guessing this includes a lot of harmless stuff too. The way you think is toxic, because you're someone who let's their insecurities grt the better of the direction of your own thinking.
>I don't like it so they shouldn't do it. Period.
Stop.
>>76186466
*MAXIMUM OVERTIP*
being social is all that matters xD
kim kardashian and paris hilton are treasures to society
jesus christ. go suck chad's cock, you worthless self-hating beta
>>76197083
When did i even say that.. Ofcourse they deserve to get paid for that..
Not doing anything, i define by like sitting on welfare or these things and literally not having any occupation whatsoever or even attempting to get a job or improve your competences/skillsets.. and just expecting others to finance your life.. And having nothing physical or mental problem whatsoever.
Are you even seriously trying to say that i would argue that say a theoretical mathematician etc. should not get paid whatsoever?
Weither the work is physical in nature or intellectual in nature or both.. they're both obviously doing something productive or worthwhile..
What i'm against is things like UBI or financing migrants on welfare or allowing many people to be on welfare instead of working, thus draining taxpayer money. And being completely ok with this..
>>76186466
You should watch Varg Vikernes videos. There is the answer to your quetions.
>>76194870
>The only good Tesla did was AC current and even that was because Edison commissioned him to do so
Pretty sure Edison was against A.C as far as i know, Ayush. Are you sure? Also, i don't think Tesla invented the A.C.
>>76186203
I like the mental gymnastics Liberals have when defending millionaire athletes and actors, "They worked hard for their money"
>>76186203
If communism works so well why is south america a shithole?
>>76186203
You should add Beethoven and other musicians to the right side as well
Why not use Alfred Nobel as an example?
Michael Dell started his company in his parent's garage by himself.
>>76196119
>If people managed to make their money while having the same start I would agree with it, but Paris Hilton just became the main MTV star of the 00's BECAUSE of her rich family, not because of her own merit.
I would disagree with you on that because I am familiar with entertaining industry and I can say that there were many cases when rich daddy just couldn't buy a "star" for his daughter. Believe it or not, but Paris actually made it herself (if we don't include the black guy from "One Night in Paris). Sure, her famous name gave a certain boost to her career, but she took a lot of pains in order to get famous. Moreover, I don't think that she is that stupid. She is not Tesla, but, at least, not that ignorant as she wants people to think. She just created a popular image of a dumb blonde girl (like Marlin Monroe) and a lot of people bought into it.
Plus, I've heard that her family despises her for discrediting their famous and honorable name, so I don't think that her grandpa's money had something to do with her celebrity status.
>>76186466
Not necessarily
I know of extroverts who cannot cook/prepare their own food
These people suck at living, they will die in any situation where they are beyond their parents/restaurants
>>76197660
Are you really so stupid that you can't even Google this shit?
Muslim nigger detected. Go fuck a goat and pray to your pedophile prophet. Or rape your sister. Or burn random women's face with acid or something.
>>76194870
>>76197660
>>76197997
What about Tesla Turbine? What about the Works preparing the scenario for radio frequency? What about...everything?
What the fuck? Tesla only invented AC, really?
>>76197902
>I don't think that her grandpa's money had something to do with her celebrity status.
It had everything to do with it, you are kidding yourself if you think Paris Hilton has any talent or that she is not that dumb, she is every bit as spoiled and white trash as they get, the ultimate curse upon her grandfather who worked his ass off to build his empire, just to see it wasted on a stupid spoiled whore like her.
>>76186203
You stupid fuck. Just because someone is a genius doesn't mean they managed their finances properly.
Not to mention that under a socialist system they would both be poor and live at the whim of the mob.
>>76197969
Every single one of them will die when civilization collapses. Those skills are of no use in real world (living outside civilization)
>>76197997
I can Google but i know you're wrong, Ayush. Why the hate? Out of beer?
>>76186203
>>76186203
Exactly
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaCHBmGWcBc
>>76198364
>Alc 7.2%
That must taste good, definitely
>>76198182
Absolutely he invented and improved other stuff. He was a genius. No doubt. More to the point, he was getting paid huge sums of money for his patents. He just kept funding his research and ended up living in a hotel, He could've easily retired a wealthy man but he chose to experiment. Not Paris' fault is it now?
>>76196487
You're right. Having sex with pigeons is something people just don't understand yet. He was way ahead of his time in terms of inter-species romance.
>>76192252
>You shouldnt be able to pass your wealth to your children
What's the point of being wealthy then? Its not my fault your parents were trash.
>>76198541
?
7.2 isn't weird
>>76198541
I've never had "elephant" but as a rule I enjoy carlsberg, although 7+% alcohol is kind of pushing what I like my beer to be, I'm happy with Molson dry at 5.5.
guys please.. you don't have to be a die hard capitalism to have conservative values..
both capitalism and communism are shit, period. both exploit the labor of others and both assume earth resources are infinite.
liberalism doesn't mean communism, and conservatism does not mean capitalism so stop being such nerd fanboys and just admit the obvious.
>>76198541
>>76198939
>>76199004
This is my "make me feel worthless again tonight" beer. Tastes like cow piss desu but i've fucked up so many choices in my life so what's one more eh :/
>>76196990
>They steal it from the Earth.
Ok. Have the Earth get in contact with me. We'll talk.
>your ancestors gave you a shitty start.
>You're right, and EVERYONE should either be held to the same standard or you're a liar and a hypocrite.
Why am I a liar and a hypocrite? Why should everyone start at the exact same place? If my ancestors worked smart and made a good living and yours didn't then why should their progeny be brought down to the level of the random drunk that birthed you. Just because you're triggered?
>After all, if it's so easy to work hard and stay in school to become wealthy, why don't you agree with me?
It's not easy at all. I don't agree with you because you're absolutely mental and don't justify any of your assertions, you just keep calling me hypocrite without explaining why.
I understand you're mad about being poor but that doesn't mean you get my money. Try to leave some wealth for your kids so they don't end up like you.
>>76186203
>implying running a corporation isn't hard work
FUN FACT: the classic "Mad Scientist" was patterned off of Nicola Tesla, whose public statements later in life we seen as eccentric.
>>76198182
Look where you are, you're on 4chan. You should never, ever expect people here to get anything right, as you can see a lot are literally just making things up as they fancy as they go with occasionally the slightest thing that is right (eg. Tesla having something to do with electricity) here and there.
You are doing things the very, very wrong way if you take anything someone says here as information about anything.
>>76199004
Dunno about Canadian beer, but when I tried Quebecois shit like belle guielle it tasted like piss. I'd say 8% is as high as beer should go.
>>76199069
I'm not a fan of capitalism, I just think it's worth pointing out that OP is full of shit, cause you can, in fact, get rich by working hard in capitalism.
>>76198319
Well, I am not sure about its credibility, but I've heard that she hasn't actually got any money from her family yet. Rumor has it that she is not even considered as a heiress of the Hilton Empire. Nevertheless, now she has 100M net worth and built her own fashion business (pretty successful), became a huge super star.
Pal, I think it would be better if there was an example with somebody initially poor and unknown in the first picture - it would be more debatable as if we could avoid daddy's money talk. For example, Britney Spears fits into this category and she is still incredibly dumb (as we see this), can't sing (that's a fact, she has been always using pre-record) and incredibly rich (about 300M net worth and it is without the money that were spent on court procedures). What can you say about that?
>>76186203
Hilton didn't earn any money, her family worked tirelessly to get where they were. Unfortunately their hard work did not pay off because they were cursed with this attention whore as an heiress.
Tesla was an autist that could barely acknowledge menial life. He allowed himself to be swept away by whichever current would fund his passions.
Neither have anything to do with capitalism.
>>76196487
it's a strict democracy capitalism
why do you hate freedom?
are you a terrorist?
go be a fat commie in some other country
>>76199484
>What can you say about that?
I say that is what happens when some stupid blond bimbo decides to suck the right cocks of the people in the show business and get them to pay for her boob job, let's face it all she ever had going for her is her body, basically the same thing as a striper or a prostitute. Who also get payed outrageously well for their services might I add.
>>76196990
Nice straw-manning me as a lolbertarian.
>Survival or death
Not in the modern system; I've never advocated for strictly puritanical capitalism. As it is, there's so much support, dying in poverty meant you didn't realize there was such a huge safety net you could reach out to whatever your issue, or actively avoided it; if I have any complaint it's simply that this is abused and leads to complacency in some people (personal experience mostly here) and I'd like to see measures taken against that abuse of the system, and focus shifting from supporting people to actually getting them back on their feet (when possible) to take some of the burden off of the system. Taxation isn't voluntary; opting out means prison. I still recognize it's necessity on a national level, but it's not something I'll pretend is noble as a means of supporting those who are struggling when compared to voluntary exchanges.
Passing something onto your children is entirely voluntary and is a free exchange of wealth. There's no legal requirement to help a child beyond raising them until they are 18, but to do otherwise in our system is really a dick move considering your part in their existence, but still it's up to the parent. It's still a choice, and where choice is viable, it should be preferred.
Function>Ideology
>creating wealth is a lie
When new technology is created and a company manages to make it affordable, they receive money and you receive the new technology; you valued the technology more than the money and they valued the money more than the piece of tech. Everybody wins. That type of exchange creates wealth; it doesn't distribute existing wealth since you certainly wouldn't have paid the price they did for raw materials. Labor is quiet literally the act of creating wealth in the form of material goods and services. Employment is the voluntary exchange of using another's means to create wealth for a portion of that wealth as cash.
>>76186203
>After the presidency of a lifetime, I've been... busy
>>76196990
What communists really believe, folks.
Everyone point and laugh.
>>76199355
That's a micro brewed beer so you can't really judge standard Canadian beer by it, and I've never had it so I won't comment. But generally to a Canadian, american beer tastes like watered down piss, and to a European, Canadian beer tastes like watered down piss.
Funny somewhat relevant story, I used to work in an "eastern European" neighborhood in Mississauga. A fair size group of poles would hang out outside the beer store squatting in the early am waiting for it to open (and asking people for change) and then go hang out at the park across the street and drink their beer, then come back outside of the beer store and squat and ask for change until they had more beer money, then take their beer to the park across the street etc...
I asked the people at the beer store why they allowed it, and they said since the poles never really seemed to be "intoxicated" there was nothing they could do about it.
With that said, I've also worked closely with many poles and enjoyed my experience with them, so I'm not suggesting you're all like this, every ethnicity has winners and losers.
Hardly a problem considering the risk involved, you fucking communist monkey.
>>76186203
Though charismatic, Nicola Tesla was an eccentric recluse. The reason Edison came out on top, was because he knew how to work with people, come up with functional products and was far better at promoting himself.
While Tesla was a genius with a photographic memory, he's not as influential and amazing as people would have it. The internet has made him into some kind of mythical, mad genius when he was rediscored some time ago, and they like to pit him up against the evil villain they've made Edison out to be.
Tesla came up with a lot of innovations, but a lot of it was impractical or ahead of its time. Some of it would be too expensive to implement, wouldn't be practical for decades, or had no practical purpose.
Also, working hard is the best way to get rich, because not working hard will get you nowhere. My own father is a good example. He came from a middle class family, and after highschool, he was drafted into the Navy. When he left, he started in a dead end job working for his uncle. He saved up some money, and started a business with some friends of his where he sold boats and outboard engines (he was a passionate hobby sailor, and won pretty much every race he was in). He left after a decade, though the store is still thriving today. He invested the money into a business that sold and repaired umbrellas (this was in the 60s). When mass produced umbrellas started to become the norm, he shifted his focus over to clothes. He had the first store in my town that sold the wildly popular Levi's 501 jeans (late 60s, early 70s), and he supplemented them with dirt cheap clothes he imported from India and Afghanistan (right in the hippie era). This made him a fortune. In the 80s, he sold it all off, as fashion started to change, so he went into real estate and owned two restaurants, including our town's first hamburger restaurant, where he earned about $350k a year. When he retired, he sold it all off for $4 million, leaving him a moderately wealthy man.
>>76199928
So, it's seems like you are against sexual liberation? Do you think that all pop musicians should be like Adele or Celine Dion? That would be boring, in my opinion. It is absolutely ok to sell you body and pretty face in 21th century.
Those chicks just happened to be in the right hands and in the right time. It is the same as winning a lottery. We can be extremely demagogic about how many cocked they served, but there is an undeniable fact that they are popular, famous and rich, so just deal with it.
>>76187529
Share your secrets please
>>76199999
MOTHER FUCKIG 5 REPATEING DEGITS
WUT HAS HAPENED HEAR!?
>>76199999
Surprised more people aren't fawning at the get.
Maybe because no one wants to read your 30 page blog FGT
>>76200472
Yep, that sounds like Poland, alright.
>>76199484
>>76200706
>>76197902
>>76195696
>>76193679
Sorry if i misunderstood you as I am drunk but Ukrobro, why did you write so many words and posts if you had to concede that she's a "superstar" and she "earned" it and that she is actually "smart" and that we should "deal with it"? I don't understand your attention whoring first by disagreeing with Brazil and then samefagging in every post.
I propose Gordon Ramsay to replace Paris Hilton. I just watched Top Gear and he has a La Ferrari.
Why are anti-capitalists almost always unkempt and ugly? Most typically suffer from autism and aren't employable.
>>76200723
HAHA FUCKING LEAF
Buy low, sell high
offer a service in a weak market
import / export
create or supply a need or strong desire
>>76201085
>someone strawmans
>clarify positions in response
>Kek agrees
>Leaf unhappy and gives a (you)
It's a good day.
>>76199355
> I'd say 8% is as high as beer should go.
I am not sure but I think I drank a 10% once, and it was god tier.
>>76200706
>Do you think that all pop musicians should be like Adele or Celine Dion?
No, I think they should be like beethoven or Johann Sebastian Bach, I think pop music is literal cancer and should be outlawed.
>>76200706
>So, it's seems like you are against sexual liberation?
I am not against sexual liberation at all, friend. Im against stupid women using their bodies to leverage their way into riches, it is stupid and degrading and only a stupid fuck would say otherwise, the first wave feminists as a whole are likely rolling on their graves over this.
>>76200706
>That would be boring, in my opinion.
That is ok, you don't have to like it if you don't want to.
>>76200706
>It is absolutely ok to sell you body and pretty face in 21th century.
Which is exactly why western culture is doomed.
>>76200706
>Those chicks just happened to be in the right hands and in the right time. It is the same as winning a lottery.
It really is not, and you know that.
>>76200706
>so just deal with it.
I can hardly wait for the day of the rope, when we will finally deal with it for good.
>>76201240
two words for my not-pooing-in-a-loo-bro:
sex sells
>>76191075
>>76200549
Tesla threw the craziest parties in Manhattan, was friends with a lot of important people from that era and even held a press conference every year on his birthday.
This whole "Tesla is le autist" meme is just some shit started by the the western beta faggot virgins who need to lie to themselves in order to feel better. Believe me, no Serb from Lika is a beta or an autist, it's literally not possible genetically.
>It's capitalism's fault that a brilliant inventor was terrible with money
How exactly would Communism fix this? Would Communism force people to give Tesla millions of dollars and have him blow it on shit constantly just so he wouldn't die poor or is there a limit to the amount "shared" by the Commies? What happens when you pass those limits over and over again and use up all those resources that were handed to you? Do you have to wait a period of time before you get more?
>>76201918
Are you illiterate? I say he was charismatic in the very first sentence. However, that has no impact on his ability or willingness to work with people, or his ability to promote his work.
>>76186203
I can't think of a reason why capitalism keeps getting screwed and parasitic creatures rise to the top of finance media and government.
I read a forgery about this somewhere, the plan was spelled right out.
Tell you what lefty friend, we will happily accept socialism if you will reciprocate with a little nationalism. they work better together!
>>76195485
that must be satire
>>76202250
>his ability to promote his work
Just go to his wikipedia page and see the amount of medals and honors he received during his lifetime. The guy worked for some of the biggest companies and got paid millions to work on amazing projects. This doesn't happen unless you know how to promote yourself.
>>76201612
So, when did feminist movement turn into degeneracy, in your opinion? Merlin Monroe also used her prettiness to get profit. She was dumb and talentless, everybody knows that, but modern society idolizes her. Madonna (80s,90s) also was an immense whore. I am just curious about the specific time. It seems like women have always been using their sexuality in modern era.
>>76202926
In that case, he was just shit at handling his economy.
>>76199999
>Speaking about technology
Did you ever think why is there a patent expiration, but not ownership expiration? Infinite lifetime for patents would actually increase pace of technological progress as everyone would be racing to get there.Think about it. Unlike Earth, technological potential may be infinite. Me presonally would rather live in a world dominated by scientists as they usually tend to give world something rather than syphon it out for themselves as our current masters.
>>76203010
you're just assuming he died broke, that might not be true though.
>>76202937
>when did feminist movement turn into degeneracy
Anything beyond first wave feminism is degenerate.
>>76202937
>modern society idolizes her
Again, this is why modern society is doomed to fail.
Face it, the modern feminism movement is not about women wanting equal rights at all, it is about women wanting an easy ride on the expense of men.
>>76198364
>Ayush
Y-yes?
>>76195485
kek fucking hippie scum
Paris was smart to capitalize on that inheritance after being cut off
Meanwhile people here worship trump's """""""success"""""""
>>76186203
>Tesla fell for the STEM meme
>>76189022
Come now, this is the same as commies saying that the USSR wasn't real communism.
>>76186203
>one of the most important inventors in history
LOL
O
L
>>76202471
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsyM-lqQKyA
>>76186203
No, idiots like Paris Hilton got rich because there are another hundreds of millions of idiots out there who think that those people are gods.
>>76203543
Jha, i am watching you.
>>76202937
You sound like an aspiring writer. Please give up. You have no sense of economy of words. Wait ....that flag...economy..checks out.
>>76186203
Didn't she become rich because her dad was smart and hard working? I've stayed in a Hilton hotel before, but never a Tesla hotel.
>>76206002
Or, you know, she was born into the fucking Hilton family. If you're rich, it's not hard to get on TV.
