[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
I'm tired of hearing about this fucking guy, it's turning
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 146
Thread images: 21
File: 1457317675119.png (662 KB, 709x572) Image search: [Google]
1457317675119.png
662 KB, 709x572
I'm tired of hearing about this fucking guy, it's turning everyone I know into raging leftists and it's sickening.

Is he finally going to be BTFO in Cali this tuesday and resign?

How long do I have to put up with this before his insane supporters admit defeat.

Also Bernie sanders is a warmongering sociopath that voted with Hillary Clinton 93% of the time and completely destroyed the audit the fed bill. I hope he fucking dies.
>>
bump

Can someone give a clear answer as to this guys chances in Cali and when it will be over for him?
>>
Memes aside, he would be way better than Hillary. He's against the trade deals. He claims he would create 13 million jobs rebuilding the infrastructure. No idea if he can really do it though.

People are turning into raging leftists because they gave up on capitalism being fixed. Doesn't help that /pol/ has fallen for the lolbertarian memes and don't even admit that there is a problem. Only Trump *MAY* be able to rescue capitalism, but desu I doubt it.
>>
He could actually win California. It'll be +/- 5%
>>
>>76096644
>believeing what a jew says
>>
File: 1456750601319.png (791 KB, 960x933) Image search: [Google]
1456750601319.png
791 KB, 960x933
>>76096644
>lolbertarian memes
Please kill yourself son.
Nobody wants to live in a shitty authoritarian "social democracy".
>>
>>76096734
Even if he wins by 5%, that wont be nearly enough. He needs a landslide to stay in it.
>>
>>76096759
But he keeps criticizing the banks. I think he may have been kicked out of jewry by the other jews a long time ago?
>>
>>76096161
What's important is to use the time we have left to drive a wedge further between (((Bernie))) and Clinton supporters so the berners just sit out the general election.
>>
>>76096947
He voted with Hillary 93% of the time.
He supported like a million wars.
He supports the federal reserve.
He supports corporate welfare.

I hope he dies.
>>
>>76096870
No, lol. If he win's California then Hilldawg super delegates "should" switch to him because it would expose massive problems in her support. California is HUGE.
>>
>>76096161
>Is he finally going to be BTFO in Cali this tuesday and resign?

Demographics are against him but due to how open the primary is in California (same day registration for independents) he can actually win the state, though I doubt he would win it in the margin he needs to cockblock shillary from getting the nomination.
>>
>>76097050
Also he wants to raise taxes on the middle class and poor.
>>
>>76096531
Here's 538 to win. But take it with a grain of salt, because it is Nate Silver we're talking about

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/california-democratic/
>>
>it's turning everyone I know into raging leftists and it's sickening.
Its working and its super effective!
>>
I get if you don't like his policies or whatever.

But can anyone really explain to me the vitriol behind him? He's the most tame fucking candidate ever, he never laid a glove on Hillary.

Seriously, why is he so hated?
>>
>>76097309
But the only people I know are college kids and homosexuals.
Everyone else is turning away from the left.

Also kill yourself you delusional leftist fincuck.
>>
>>76096161
>Is he finally going to be BTFO in Cali this tuesday

Yes, absolutely.

>and resign?

No, absolutely not. He won't quit. Even 1000 years from now descendants of his supporters will be convinced he still has a shot.
>>
>>76096161
They need to raise Taxes to keep dem programs afloat.
>>
File: 1456072740760.png (643 KB, 801x1091) Image search: [Google]
1456072740760.png
643 KB, 801x1091
>>76096161
Just few more days, he will get rekt on Tuesday and tears will be delicious.
>>
>>76097378
His policies are idiotic.
His supporters are largely comprised of complete morons who don't know the issues.
>>
>>76097070
>>76096870
>>76096734
>>76097504
Clinton is going to secure the nomination the second polls close in New Jersey on Tuesday. California is irrelevant.

Not to mention she's going to win our primary here in PR tomorrow, likely by ~40%. She needs 69 to win, we've got 62.
>>
File: 1453747301494.jpg (417 KB, 1024x1102) Image search: [Google]
1453747301494.jpg
417 KB, 1024x1102
>>76097378
>He's the most tame fucking candidate ever
Because of his policies.
see:
>>76097050
>>76097237
>>
>>76097113
IIUC though, the democratic nomination elections really are JUST a suggestion. The democrats can pick anyone; it's not against any rules. The democrats know he has a better chance of winning against Trump than Hillary, so they will be conflicted.
Trump vs Bernie in the general elections would be the greatest thing ever. I'm pretty sure Trump would beat Hillary easily (all he has to do is make people see through her lies; she's completely terrible). But against Bernie, they would both really have to make a case for themselves.
>>
>>76097525
I agree that some of his supporters are uninformed.

But what of the informed ones? Who agree with his policies?

They aren't idiotic, they are basically FDR.

I would be happy to have a calm discussion about what you think is idiotic and why people may disagree.
>>
>>76096161
15 trillion... you mean like, per year? Because that's 47 grand for every man, woman and child in the country.
>>
File: r.jpg (32 KB, 625x400) Image search: [Google]
r.jpg
32 KB, 625x400
>>76097692
>They aren't idiotic, they are basically FDR.
So you want the united states to be plunged into a great depression with economic controls far worse than most socialist shitholes today?
>>
>>76097836
No man, come on. You know full well nobody wants that.

Why do we have to talk to one another this way?
>>
File: 1462918158819.gif (891 KB, 325x252) Image search: [Google]
1462918158819.gif
891 KB, 325x252
>>76097692

>They aren't idiotic, they are basically FDR.
>>
>>76097987
Because that's what FDR did.

You said his policies are basically FDR.

Anyone who supports policies like that needs a violent revolution against them thb senpai
>>
>>76097836
Didn't he become president DURING the great depression and was trying to fix it? The great projects and getting people to work at least alleviated the most damaging effects of the depression on common people (even if the economy is still shit). In the end, it seems that the war fixed the depression (which involves a very authoritarian control over the economy).
>>
>>76097634
Yeah but the superdelegates are in place to protect the establishment of the Democratic party not to establish the best candidate to win.

I agree that Trump against Shilldog would have an easier time since he could sell himself as the anti establishment candidate, something that against Sanders wouldn't be so effective.

The reality is though that the Superdelegates will support shilldog no matter what and Sanders only hopes of winning the nomination is basically Shillary getting an indictment, which most likely never going to happen.

>>76097525
Is fun that you say that, because as a neutral observer I see both camps saying the same thing, here the liberals are the ones that don't know anything while for the liberals the conservatives are all white rednecks that believe the earth is 5000 year old and that god came down from the heavens and wrote the constitution and all that jazz and accuse Donald Trump and his supporters of not knowing anything about the issues as well.
>>
>>76098062
You're a fucking idiot, dude. You have no idea what you are talking about. Wow, bro.

>>76097987
Don't listen to him, he is just a leaf.
>>
>>76096868

>suicide rates

Nordics kill themselves because they're drunk northeners with shit winters, not taxes... Also it's currently about 8/100k, similar to the rest of Western Europe while America's is 50% higher.

>Everyone wants the American dream

Kek.
>>
>>76096644

>create 13 million jobs rebuilding the infrastructure
>sucking TRILLIONS of dollars out of the private sector to "create" temporary government labor jobs

What about people who want CAREERS?
>>
>>76098093
Yea.
>>
>>76098093
>Didn't he become president DURING the great depression and was trying to fix it?
Correct.

>In the end, it seems that the war fixed the depression (which involves a very authoritarian control over the economy).
Correct.

>Is fun that you say that, because as a neutral observer I see both camps saying the same thing, here the liberals are the ones that don't know anything while for the liberals the conservatives are all white rednecks that believe the earth is 5000 year old and that god came down from the heavens and wrote the constitution and all that jazz and accuse Donald Trump and his supporters of not knowing anything about the issues as well.

Never said Trump was immune to this. There are tons of moronic Trump supporters as well. Many in this very thread.
>>
File: 1350963827845.jpg (69 KB, 400x398) Image search: [Google]
1350963827845.jpg
69 KB, 400x398
>>76098093
>Didn't he become president DURING the great depression
Yes, at the start.
Hoover started with the massive government intervention which then made the economy worse, then FDR came along and created even more authoritarian economic controls and turned the economy into a shithole.

We only got out of the depression AFTER WW2 when the government eliminated most of these economic controls.
The year that happened, the united states had the most productive year in it's history.

>The great projects and getting people to work
lmao they were mostly a waste of resources that made people poorer
How is paying people to destroy food productive? How is digging holes and filling them back up productive?
Should have just gave people money and said they didn't have to work, it would have been pretty much the same thing.

>it seems that the war fixed the depression
>le war fixed the economy meme
This isn't true at all and makes ABSOLUTELY no sense whatsoever. Stop believing this massive turd of a lie. Holy shit, just think about it for 2 seconds.
>>
>>76098031
>>76097836
>>76097692
The problem is from idiologies. One camp wants a the estate to be the last safety net for the ones that fail at capitalism and that net will be paid by everyone in the game in the case you may need it (some will argue that the ones with larger amount of capital should pay more but that is another issue) while others want the estate to not intervene on the behalf on anyone (LOL because that never actually happen since the government usually never bothers when poor people lose money but do come to the rescue when it is the rich people losing their money) which would mean they wouldn't have to pay for a safety net they don't feel the need to have because they don't see themselves in a position where they would actually need it.
>>
>>76098276
>no argument

Wow I love this.

Seriously though FUCK FDR and anyone who has policies even closely resembling his.

Nobody wants to live in poverty.

>>76098286
>Nordics kill themselves because they're drunk northeners with shit winters, not taxes
Bro, that was only one argument in that image. Continue reading.
>>
Here's him gaining more supporters

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svaGiSj8Pdo
>>
>>76098303
Yea, dude. Fuck infrastructure. Why do we even need it? Huh? Take my money for infrastructure?! Communism!
>>
>>76098303
>tfw you apply the same exact logic to Trump's wall idea, not to mention the Keystone Pipeline

you're a delusional hypocrite.
>>
>>76098434
How retarded are you? The Great Depression started 4 years before FDR took office. The New Deal lifted millions out of poverty. Stop. You don't know what you are talking about. Is this Molymeow? Kys.
>>
>>76096868
>authoritarian
wew lad
>>
>>76098434
>that was only one argument in that image

It was THE argument.. Danes are miserable people that kill themselves because of high taxes on income, cars and houses causing nobody to accomplish anything.

That's some meme-tier bs m8...
>>
File: 1438423874224.jpg (9 KB, 201x251) Image search: [Google]
1438423874224.jpg
9 KB, 201x251
>>76097070
Clinton is focused on the GE because she's already won the nomination. Bernie is just being sour grapes.

Also funny that Bernie wants to abuse superdelegates after spending his entire campaign bitching about how "corrupt" they are.

Going against the will of the voters and all that jazz, right? That's Bernie now.
>>
File: china-ghost-town[1].jpg (133 KB, 950x599) Image search: [Google]
china-ghost-town[1].jpg
133 KB, 950x599
>>76098525
>DUDE WE SHOULD LIKE PUT EVERY LAST PENNY INTO INFRASTRUCTURE JUST LIKE CHINA DOES

>WHO NEEDS A PRIVATE ECONOMY WHEN WE CAN HAVE LIKE INFRASTRUCTURE BRO
>>
>>76098434
You're a fucking moron. Jesus fuck.
>>
>>76096644
/pol/ was libertarian for the most part before Trump
>>
>>76098525

But he was talking about job creation, not the infrastructure itself. Rebuilding bridges, roads and shit is all very much needed, but pretending that it will lead to a lasting improvement in the number of jobs available is dishonest.
>>
>>76098303
Yeah, it's all going to have consequences I'm sure. Maybe he can actually make things work out OK.

That's the thing that worries me about Sanders. The government is so broken, corrupt and inefficient. Sometimes seems like he's just going to keep on feeding the beast, and not fix it.
>>
>>76098525
it's funny these Trump supporters are so hung up over this communism while their God Emperor is proposing the same thing
>>
>>76098652
>The Great Depression started 4 years before FDR took office.

I know.
see:
>>76098357

>The New Deal lifted millions out of poverty.
AHAHAHAHAHA
Holy shit, it plunged millions into poverty.
FDR's economic controls basically destroyed the economy and violently kept it down for over a decade.
Then he comes along with the new deal which, destroys the economy even more but gives people crumbs to live off of.
If your slavemaster gives you bread is he really helping you out?

>>76098654
>it's not authoritarian because I said so
You have no argument.
>>
File: 1-67.jpg (29 KB, 600x338) Image search: [Google]
1-67.jpg
29 KB, 600x338
>>76096161
Why would he drop out when he has all those ledditor commie clowns donating their entire paychecks to him?
>>
>>76098705
So you are retarded? Our infrastructure is falling apart.-- I can't believe that I have top explain something so simple to you, Jesus fuck.--
Our bridges are falling apart, retard. Mind your own leaf business.

Those cities that China are building are for the millions who live in the country. Million and millions are going to be moved onto those cities. Go to school, nigger.

Again, you are a moron.
>>
>>76098669
Bro, it was one argument in the image.
Look at the other shit about debt levels and taxes.

Damn you're slow.

>>76098760
>u-ur dum
No argument.
>>
>>76098357
The destroying food wasn't just wasting things. It was a response to the price balance being upset earlier IIRC.
>>
>>76096161
>Bernie promises free shit.
Yay.
>Bernie promises $15 min wage.
Yay.
>Bernie has to tax people to pay for it.
THATS OK IM MAKING MORE MONEY NOW!
>You make $15.00 an hour but get taxed so hard you are back to making $6.50 an hour but there are no more full time jobs its only part time.
>>
>>76098894
Fuck off molymeow. You're an idiot. ONE DOLLAR.
>>
>>76098894
>it's authoritarian because I said so
Not an argument.
>>
>>76098486
Excellent video to trick people.
>>
>>76096161
no need to resign after tuesday. I think the only primary after that is DC, which obviously hillary will dominate since DC is like 90% black
>>
>>76098971
>So you are retarded?
You're basically saying we should do what china does yet you call me retarded.

>Our infrastructure is falling apart.
Yes and we should rebuild it over time. Not take trillions out of the private economy to create these temporary labour jobs.

>Million and millions are going to be moved onto those cities.
LMAO
You're ACTUALLY defending ghost cities.
Nobody is going to move into those places.
They cannot afford it.

HAHAHA Holy shit
>>
>>76098357
Fuck you are stupid. There is no arguing this, you live in an alternate world. Where facts aren't facts.
>>
>>76096644
>Memes aside, he would be way better than Hillary.
You are a fucking idiot if you believe that. Bernie's plans would destroy this country.
>>
File: 1353378464032.jpg (281 KB, 748x992) Image search: [Google]
1353378464032.jpg
281 KB, 748x992
>>76099015
>defending the destruction of food

You keynesian retards are actually this fucking delusional I swear.

Doing this to manipulate prices STILL didn't even help anything or fix the depression.

What fixed the depression was getting rid of all of these economic controls.

Learn basic history.
>>
>>76098895
Was this confirmed him?
>>
>>76099060
>I STILL have no argument.
You're pathetic.

>>76099065
You didn't have an argument in the first place. I was simply mocking you.
>>
>>76097692
He voted against auditing the fed. Thats everything i need to know about him.
>>
>>76098357
Meh, they still built nice things.
>We only got out of the depression AFTER WW2 when the government eliminated most of these economic controls.
Frankly I doubt that.
The idea that that the great depression was just going to fix itself in a few years (or maybe it needed more deregulation even then?) but the attempted fixes prolonged it by nearly a decade seems pretty naive to me.
The war had a huge impact on the economy. War isn't good, but it's a way to have temporary fascism and have the government do things they couldn't normally do.
After WW2, the US came out as the only one with industries still standing, and demand was high. So who knows what would have happened after that.
One of the most downbeat theory I ever heard was that lowering the population had a good effect.
>>
File: 1392598444984.jpg (70 KB, 720x442) Image search: [Google]
1392598444984.jpg
70 KB, 720x442
>>76099153
>no argument

damn I thought I came here for an argument
>>
>our MUH ROOOOADS are cracking and filled with potholes and shit
>majority of bridges in the USA are in dire need of repair if not outright replacement
>places like New Orleans which have dikes and shit desperately need to repair and upgrade them as flooding protection
>rail lines are old shit

Infrastructure is one good thing the government could be spending on
but instead of spending it on the US, we're spending trillions to pay fucking war profiteer thieves for "building" fake roads and bridges in Muslimstan. And by building I mean filing paperwork saying they did a job when they most likely didn't.
>>
>>76096161

>our economy should be more like countries where the median person has much less purchasing power than us!

This is what Bernouts actually think. You would be giving up significant quality of life so that Jerome can get a free ride for his African Studies degree.

There's a reason why nearly all innovation comes from the US and why the per capita median household disposable income is nearly 30% higher than the highest in Europe. Our economic system works. Left-populism does not. It fucking destroys countries. Argentinians, Brazilians and Greeks can tell you all about that.
>>
>>76099221
I'm not a Keynesian.
>>
>>76098357
>>it seems that the war fixed the depression
>>le war fixed the economy meme
>This isn't true at all and makes ABSOLUTELY no sense whatsoever. Stop believing this massive turd of a lie. Holy shit, just think about it for 2 seconds.


thank you. I can't believe people still believe this.
>>
File: WWIIchart-580[1].png (101 KB, 580x357) Image search: [Google]
WWIIchart-580[1].png
101 KB, 580x357
>>76099329
>Frankly I doubt that.
http://mercatus.org/publication/economic-recovery-lessons-post-world-war-ii-period

>The idea that that the great depression was just going to fix itself in a few years
This is how america solved it's(government created) recessions and panics for over 100 years prior to this.

In fact there was a large recession in 1920 and the government did absolutely nothing and it was OVER in 6 months time.

>but the attempted fixes prolonged it by nearly a decade seems pretty naive to me.
The economic controls lasted for over a decade and got even more powerful over time.
There was basically ZERO private economy at the time because the government controlled and manipulated fucking everything.

>The war had a huge impact on the economy.
Yes by destroying resources and making people poorer.

Once we ended the war we stopped the government spending, then these resources we spent making CONSUMER GOODS instead of war goods and the economy flourished.
>>
>>76099574
>le ebin nigger meme
>le ebin useless shitty obscure degrees meme
Not an argument.
>>
File: 1454547415932.jpg (401 KB, 1040x990) Image search: [Google]
1454547415932.jpg
401 KB, 1040x990
>>76096644
what is a a republican majority congress?
>>
>>76099659

>war fixed the depression

Holy fuck there's people that still believe this? People that are able to use a computer are this fucking stupid?

Go read Midas Paradox by Sumner you morons
>>
>>76099608
Yet you take your ideas and opinions from what keynesians have been saying for decades.
>>
Why are lolbertarians such pussies? We need a good war once in a while. A real one. Not just bombing brown people for more than a decade and policing them hoping they eventually become civilized. North Korea seems like it would be a fun place to visit. Think of all the memes we would encounter!
>>
>>76096161
Who's better for /pol/acks, Bernie or Hillary?
>>
>>76098971
>So you are retarded? Our infrastructure is falling apart.-- I can't believe that I have top explain something so simple to you, Jesus fuck.--


If our infrastructure was so bad, why did barely any of the $1 trillion stimulus package work to fix the infrastructure? that's what was sold as to the public.
>>
>>76099221
The problem you have is that Keynesianism and the New deal actually worked. If you look at the data during the 50's up to the 60's the american middle class was living the "American dream" at the 70's is when shit started to get south when mom need to work as well to pay the bills and since then every middle class household needed both parents to work to live by.

One of the reasons Americans are coming out to vote for Trump is because Trump is speaking to this people that remember a better time and see themselves in poverty or close to it because of the state of their country and don't see a single politician speaking against it.

The real manner here is that high taxes and government protectionism of the middle class created that middle class and see it thrive. Eisenhower marginal taxes were as high as 91% for the biggest earners (over 200K for single people and over 400K for married people which adjusted for inflation it means basically 1.7M for single people and over 3.4M for a couple).
>>
>>76099742

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income

Go down to Luxembourg study and weep you fucking socialist fucktard
>>
>>76099999
FUCKIN' CHECKED AND WITNESSED
>>
We need him to split the Democratic vote you idiots, you should be shilling for bernie
>>
when America was "great" the rich paid high taxes and the poor paid low taxes. It only makes sense to re-enact this. Fuck off
>>
>>76100014
>The real manner here is that high taxes and government protectionism of the middle class created that middle class and see it thrive

This sentence makes no sense. I know English isn't your first language but at least try

>Eisenhower marginal tax rate

This meme again. That tax rate was irrelevant because tax dodging was a sport back then. Government tax receipts were much much much lower than they were now.

Left-populism destroyed your fucking country, stop trying to push it on to us you fucking darkie
>>
Reality will hit them soon. Unless they start shilling for Jill Stein or something, but that would mean that Trump would win.

Unless they fall in line with Pocahontas as her VP.
>>
File: image.gif (62 KB, 825x506) Image search: [Google]
image.gif
62 KB, 825x506
>>76100014

>Left-populist economics works guys, trust me, we experienced it first hand here
>>
>>76097045
The "berners" were never in the election to begin with. They're illegals and underage tards who could never have voted, which is why they resort to chimping out.
>>
>>76100014
>Keynesianism
Seems to have failed when "stagflation" happened. But it doesn't mean it couldn't have been made to work. There are infinite ways to "implement" it, the government can screw it up for sure (corruption or incompetence).

My understanding is that the US had a shift in priority. Protecting their currency's value internationally became more important than managing the employment situation. The task kept getting ever more difficult.

I think they were just claiming to be stupefied by the situation. They knew what they were doing.
>>
>>76099875
meme war with best Korea!
It has been foretold!
>>
>>76100536
Sounds like something a clinton sleeper agent would say?
>>
File: 1353293346090.png (95 KB, 537x2414) Image search: [Google]
1353293346090.png
95 KB, 537x2414
>>76100014
That period of time wasn't actually keynesianism, in fact keynesianism wasn't even used that much. We were still on a semi gold standard at the time. The time we got off the gold standard and REAL keynesianism was actually tried it was a fucking disaster, look at 70s stagflation.

>Eisenhower marginal taxes were as high as 91% for the biggest earners
Except the fact they were NOT actually that high.

The reason the 50s was so productive was because taxes were relativity LOW and people had a lot a economic freedom.
>>
>>76098641
Walls aren't human workers, and the amount of tax money going to illegal aliens' healthcare that will be removed will pay for the wall ten times over.
>>
>>76100014
>The problem you have is that Keynesianism and the New deal actually worked

[source]
>>
>>76100139
>the rich paid high taxes
Except that's not what happened at all.

Few people actually paid those taxes.
see:
>>76100828
>>
>>76100029
>implying the average couldn't be skewed by the obscene amounts of wealth a few people have
>>
>>76100139
the rich have always paid high taxes and the poor paid low taxes though
>>
File: 33333333333.png (660 KB, 680x712) Image search: [Google]
33333333333.png
660 KB, 680x712
>>76099999
Checked
>>
>>76100738
100% Trump but I do admit I'd prefer Clinton over Bernie.

Clinton's America will just be more of the same, and I can survive that. Bernie would bring about the apocalypse.
>>
>>76100910
Wait are you actually this retarded?

Do you think if the super rich gave ALL their money to the poor and middle class, people would benefit?

Basically everyone would get $1000 and prices would rise.
That's what would happen, you would be hardly better off.
>>
If I force myself to believe he's genuine I don't dislike him but, he's a pie in the sky retard in that case. I just want him to go away so Trump can bury the Clintons once and for all.
>>
>>76099999
>>
>>76101133
Isn't he helping Trump right now?
>>
>>76101108
Nice strawman.
I never said that. I was just pointing out that the average household wealth in the USA is probably skewed.
>>
>>76101219
How so? Has he stopped playing softball with Hillary?
>>
>>76096161
I hope he gets 60% in cali, not enough to win, but enough to keep going.
>>
>>76101065
Just wait until millions of illegals get amnesty under Clinton. Bernie Sanders is only a taste of what's to come.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/398677/after-obamas-amnesty-illegal-aliens-could-decide-us-elections-peter-kirsanow
>>
>>76096161
Hillary is like 60 delegates away from being nominated. It's over for Bernie srsly.
>>
Whenever we try to have a reasonable discussion on what the government should do to improve the situation, the lolbertarians always barge in and try to swerve the debate because "government is bad". I always wonder if they aren't controlled opposition of some kind. All we can really do is vote for a large-government president with slightly different policies than the other. Your lolbertarian utopia is never going to happen; please go LARP somewhere else if you really need to get it out of your system. It doesn't really make sense for modern, complex societies with the high standards of living dependent technology anyway, and you know it.
>>
>>76096531

He probably will win in California, but don't worry because he still has no chance of winning the primary. The closer he gets the uglier the convention will be.
>>
>>76096161
A
>>
>>76101722
So when she hits 2383 is she automatically the nominee?
>>
is there anything worse than a canadian libertarian?
>>
>>76101219
>Isn't he helping Trump right now?

his supporters certainly are by rioting like rabid animals every time trump tries to hold a rally. Regular people see that as the left turning far from what they thought liberals stood for
>>
>>76101722
>counting superdelegates

baka desu senpai
>>
>>76101722
this is including super delegates
>>
>>76102048
IIUC, no. The democratic nominee elections are just a suggestion. They pick whomever they want at the convention. The superdelegates thing is just do make things look better for the establishment (it's bad if they pick someone that didn't appear to win with the population (hurts them in the GE too)).
>>
>>76102048
nah because that total counts superdelegates, which don't count untill the convention.
>>
>>76099999
who sold it to you as that? the big push was aid to people below the poverty line
>>
File: 1343357489594.png (41 KB, 480x400) Image search: [Google]
1343357489594.png
41 KB, 480x400
>>76101949
>the lolbertarians always barge in
Awwww are you going to cry?

Can't handle people questioning your delusional opinions?

We already won the thread, like holy shit I had time to take a shower and go do laundry even.

You people have no argument left and it makes you upset.
>>
>>76096161
>Is he finally going to be BTFO in Cali this tuesday and resign?

He will get BTFO in Cali but he's not going away until late July.
>>
>>76097378
>He's the most tame fucking candidate ever

people love a soft target and hate a weak bitch
>>
>>76102431
They couldn't have built bridges and roads why exactly?
>>
>>76101949
>All we can really do is vote for a large-government president with slightly different policies than the other.


You are cancer. I agree we cant get the federal government down to the level an average libertarian would like, but it certainly isn't bad to try. There is so much money flowing into the federal government that is absolutely pointless. There are whole departments that are pointless. We should strive towards a libertarian form of government knowing it will never happen. rather than an ever growing commie/facist who knows what form of government where the feds control more and more
>>
>>76102113
Yes, a salty butthurt lefttard american who just got BTFO and for some strange reason, continues to post.
>>
Why do so many idiots want Bernie to lose? If he sweeps the primaries this Tuesday, but the super delegates stick with Hillery and hand her the nomination, it would obliterate the democratic party, especially if Bernie decides to run third party as a result, and it would basically hand the election to Trump. Hillery is the worst neoliberal globalist kike currently in existence and has the support of all the other globalist kikes, we do not want her anywhere near the presidency whatsoever she will drag this country into the ground.
>>
>>76102487
>We already won the thread
Oh ok. Whatever makes you happy.
kek, I've never been able to take you guys seriously. You try to BTFO everyone but you just come out as silly and intellectually dishonest (I mostly never trust the technical information you spurt out now because of this in particular, every time I give it any attention it ends up being misleading and a waste of time).
>your delusional opinions
Yeah ok. Keep trying to "win" every thread you can if you want. That's all you'll ever "win". lolbertarianism will never happen. NEVER. You're more delusional if you think otherwise, you're straight up retarded. You guys are controlled opposition (whether you know it or not).
>>
>>76096161
WTF. USA only has ~$16T in GDP!!!
He's such a commie kike wtf.
>>
>>76102431
All I remember from the news is about "shovel ready jobs". I think most people thought just about all the money would go to infrastructure. That ABSOLUTELY is what is was sold as. Hell I remember driving on a highway near my house that would have been repaved anyways, with a big sign saying something like"This was paid for with the stimulus package". It was pathetic.

It was only that one sign, on something that would have been done anyways.
>>
>>76097272
538 has been pretty accurate with the dem primaries

Trump is a wild card and no one realized it until he already won
>>
>>76102487
lel. 10/10 pic. haven;t seen that before
>>
>>76103017
>Whatever makes you happy.
kek we completely destroyed your arguments and then you didn't reply for like 20-30 minutes.
You're STILL not responding to any arguments that were put forth.

Ya, bro, you weren't btfo. Riiight.

>just come out as silly and intellectually dishonest
Then EXPLAIN where and why we were intellectually dishonest instead of making butthurt posts like these with no substance.

>lolbertarianism will never happen.
Wrong, once the economy collapses people will look to alternatives.
Something like it will occur probably in our lifetimes no matter how asspained you get over it.
>>
>>76102660
>I agree we cant get the federal government down to the level an average libertarian would like, but it certainly isn't bad to try.
Heh, yeah... It's the level the lolbertarians seem to be striving for that is absurd to me.
There is an INSANE amount of money in the US government, and very little to show for it it seems. The US probably already could have the best public services and infrastructure in the world if corruption and incompetence weren't so high. I don't know if Sanders can fix it desu (and he would HAVE to). Trump seems more likely to be able to fix things since he'll be willing and able to starve the beast if needed. I just really wish the next president would fight off corruption. It would make the most difference.
>>
>>76097272
I thought sanders was way closer than that. I mean he's been basically over since early march, but I thought i heard in the news that is was a toss up in california.
>>
>>76103911
You REALLY have no argument here. If I were you I would just give up.

> the best public services and infrastructure in the world
These things are overrated and should be privatized
>>
>>76096161
>OP is Canadian
>Says everyone he knows is a raging leftist
>Doesn't realize the Canada is raging leftist America
>Canadian PM apologizes on TV 5 times for bumping into a bitch
>Export is pancake topping
>Police want to be centaurs
>Half of country swears allegiance to tiny, frail old biddy
>Other half of country swears allegiance to un baguette
>Welcomes countless refugees in from America's mistakes overseas
Go home OP, you're drunk
>>
File: 1459807873866.gif (1002 KB, 500x255) Image search: [Google]
1459807873866.gif
1002 KB, 500x255
>>76096161

Mathematically Eliminated

Won't Become Dem Nominee

People Still Give Him Their Paychecks
>>
>>76104031
>>76103449
>Not an argument! WEE!
I don't take lolbertarianists any more seriously than communists. I could argue all day with communists too and they would claim they're BTFO'ing everyone and winning every threads.
You are demanding too much time and attention and are arguing in debate from instead of having discussions and trying to CONVINCE people of your ideas.
You're not convincing me. You never did. I guess you would have to start at the very beginning to make me see your ideas make any sense to begin with, but I don't generally agree with the premises (the complete or almost complete laissez-faire particularly). I do believe government intervention can be for the best (but I really wouldn't want too much of it). We have a large government now anyway, and it's not going away, so the question is what should it be doing?
If you truly believe in your thing, then that's pretty cute, but yeah, only a collapse would make it happen. So.. who cares. Happens when it happens I guess. And that's taking us backwards for sure.
>>
File: 1432248736226.gif (3 MB, 367x206) Image search: [Google]
1432248736226.gif
3 MB, 367x206
>>76102487
>my bias is confirming so hard right now
Lolbertarians are mostly soft middle-upper middle class folk who don't really understand how societies work and are mostly on interested in themselves. It is the ideology of "fuck you got mine" and mostly they just spew memes and dogma. Really the exact opposite of rationality.

Not that it matters /pol/ is 99% far right circle jerk anyway.
>>
>>76105337
>Not that it matters /pol/ is 99% far right circle jerk anyway.
kek, I'm just here for the memes and Trump's antics (and the stormfags always make me giggle). Trump was NOT supposed to be there and he is going rogue! It's beautiful to watch.
>>
>>76099779
A fat sack of shit that gets paid to do nothing
Thread replies: 146
Thread images: 21

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.