Is BLM the new KKK?
Would you rather have 60's hippies or current SJW's?
60's hippies were kind people who stood for freedom.
>>76076670
hippies>SJW's at least they fought for something reasonable n not their self indulging sel rightous autistic egocentric bullshit and they smoked weed
>>76076670
who has blm lynched and terrorized and told them do blm have sun down towns?
>>76080269
They've killed a few cops at least. A lot of major cities are sun down towns because of niggers as well.
>>76080269
They would if they could.
>>76076670
>>76076670
Neither? If pressed I'd take BLM but only because Boomers still love to tout how they stopped a war and changed the world despite neither being true, at least not during the 60s.
BLM will be just as meaningless but millennials have the attention span of a goldfish. So they'll forget it as soon as they get bored just like they did with Kony.
I'll take whatever I don't have to hear self-fellating about for 50 fucking years.
its become a really fucking weird world where Hippies are held as gold compared to what we have today
>>76076670
>Is BLM the new KKK?
Ohh, I hadn't thought of that, but it actually fits pretty well.
>Would you rather have 60's hippies or current SJW's?
Hippies any day. The misguided are correctable, the purely evil are not.
>>76076670
Would rather have stormtroopers.
They were both really stupid. Listen to the lyrics in this hippy song...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYsBDmqJfjQ
But at least they had some degree of artistic ability even if the message was crap. SJWs contribute nothing of value.
>>76080523
[Citation needed]
