>Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton has opened up a double-digit lead over Republican rival Donald Trump, regaining ground after the New York billionaire briefly tied her last month, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Friday.
>Some 46 percent of likely voters said they supported Clinton, while 35 percent said they supported Trump, and another 19 percent said they would not support either, according to the survey of 1,421 people conducted between May 30 and June 3.
>Trump had briefly tied Clinton in support among likely U.S. voters in May, raising expectations for a tight race between the two likely contenders in November's presidential election.
>http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll-idUSKCN0YP2EX
I told /pol/ he was leading because he became the nominee and he will eventually lose the lead. I was called a shill. Now this happens.
I'm convinced this is the first election for everyone on /pol/
nice
I'm convinced the election's in November and common sense would indicate that's a long way away.
It'll be a big wall!
>one poll out of hundreds
And that's what you call a dirty poll/outlier poll
>>76003145
That could be said about any poll that shows Trump leading Clinton.
double-digit lead WITH Sanders still in the race?
>>76002913
Makes you think huh...
I'm #withher now
>>76003297
No shit. One poll proves nothing. All the polls said Donald wouldn't make it to the nomination yet here we are. You have to look at trends. Not just a single one-off poll that's likely poorly distributed anyway t b h
>>76003145
>>76003281
kek
Do you remember 2012 when the polls were wrong about Romney cuz pollsters didn't call cell phones?
does this mean that that French guy took 10 points from Trump?
>survey of 1,421 people conducted between May 30 and June 3
>>76003281
Except the same poll showed them tied a month ago and people here had no problem with it then. Reuters/Ipsos is also the poll Trump liked to cite the most during the primaries.
Hope you fags enjoyed that small lead while it lasted. You can't even say "Trump hasn't even started on Clinton!" anymore because he's been attacking her for over a month as Crooked Hillary and bringing up her past scandals.
>>76003702
do you understand how polling works, moron?
1400 is actually larger than the sample size for most national polls.
>>76003578
Damn.
The political parties do their own statistically valid polling themselves and don't share the results. It has become extremely complex, so they're keeping it for themselves. They need it to know which district to focus on and allocate their spending optimally. They can't win without it.
Supposedly the democrats are in panic mode because (taking electoral colleges into consideration), Hillary probably will not win the GE. And their establishment do not want Sanders. They may just bring up Biden at their convention.
>>76003578
I don't remember that. That's pretty funny though. I never trust polls. They're too easily manipulated and twisted. Which is I guess why the media loves them.
>>76003948
>he thinks a poll of 1421 people is an accurate representation of 319 million
>>76003948
I bet all 1400 came from Detroit as well
Fucking sage this motherfucking shill thread and ban the op permanently.
You fucking leaf nigger.
Picture related you.
>>76004187
>>76004207
I bet you two would be singing hymns if the poll showed Trump winning. You guys are pathetic t.b.h
>>76004434
Just like youre doing right now?
>>76002913
I will loan you this gun and one bullet to use on yourself.
Fucking Shill kill yourself.
Trump has it in the bag faggot.
>>76004483
What am I doing right now?
>>76004602
>I bet you would be singing hymns if the poll showed Hillary winning. You guys are pathetic t.b.h
Polls before GE and Debate are retarded either way
>>76004695
Who said I was for Hillary?
>>76004788
Fuck off Bernout.
Op kill yourself faggot.
>>76004434
You dont get it it was alwasy polls favoring clinton was the major talking point you all had from the beginging as you can see yoh lost that talking point a long time ago and now are literally playing with the idea these are valid some times but not others
You all started with polls first since it favored you all and now you lost that talking point its that simple
>>76004788
Have you donated your $27 today cuck?
>>76002913
It's true that demographics don't exactly favor Trump, but it's still very early. Those polls also don't factor in Johnson or Stein.
Plenty of other polls have a much closer race than Reuters. In fact, Reuters seems to be a real outlier.
>>76004788
Well you sure dont relize all this meana is hillarys camp loses a talking point they have relied on first and the longest
>>76004855
Who said I was for Bernie?
>you have to be for one or the other!
>>76004434
not an argument
>>76005004
Oh so you're one of those faggots who denies voting for anyone?
Well, that tears it. I'm a #ClintonCuckold now.
>>76004695
>implying there will be a debate
she'll just say that she won't debate thugs and bullies and that'll increase her popularity another 10 points
I was a Trump supporter, but after this I'm a #shill4thehill
>>76004014
I think they are more concerned about Bernie pissing on their parade and making Hillary look like shit.
The electoral map does not look good for Trump (or any R). If he doesn't win FL, he is fucked.
LOL all this denial from trumpkins.
I will bathe in your tears when Hillary is announced the winner.
>he's got plenty a time
>hasn't even started on her
>polls don't even matter anyway, but remember when he was beating her in one irrelevant poll by .5 of a percent.
>white rights
>reverse racism
>muh feelings
>>76005006
Neither are the posts I replied to.
>>76005072
Yeah, why would I vote in the Presidential election when my state isn't a swing state?
I'm only voting on the state level because state elections are more important for my well being and everyone else's.
>>76004434
I've already posted in this thread that I don't bother paying attention to polls.
>survey of 1,421 people conducted between May 30 and June 3
Polls like this are shit.
Well... It was nice while it lasted, /pol/. Niether Bernie or Trump could defeat the establishment. The oligarchy lives on...
I-I'm r-ready for H-Hillary....
>>76005294
I hope you've stocked up on fresh clean towels to catch your brain once you blow it out come election night.
>>76005215
>surely this wont backfire and show everyone im just a literal pussy
>>76005294
You are bad at this, go back a month earlier and you'd get better replies
>>76002913
Warning about this poll, this reuters/ipsos poll was the only one to show hillary beating kasich by 10 points, when all the other polls had kasich up by 7.
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/polls/ipsos-reuters-24278
>THE POLLS ARE PREDICTING....
Weird how those polls have been wrong this entire election cycle.
>>76005520
Sounds like a realistic poll because there was no way Kasich would have won the election.
>>76005479
>>surely this wont backfire and show everyone im just a literal pussy
if people made up their minds and support her, then why debate and risk it?
>>76003391
>All the polls said Donald wouldn't make it to the nomination yet here we are
This isn't fucking true at all though. Trump lead the polls in the GOP primaries within weeks of announcing his campaign and never lost it.
I am honestly curious, do people deep down really seriously think that Trump will win the election and be the president? I would love for it to happen, but I would bet my house on Hillary winning.
>>76005655
>skipping debates in a President Elections
>not the most retarded fucking decision
Just shows you cant debate for shit and would like the biggest pussy if you cant even argue against said bully
>>76003948
There are tons of polls done, the vast majority of which are worthless, so you are probably right -- but its irrelevant. Easy way to gauge whether a poll is meaningful -- Real Clear Politics does a good job of aggregating the polls that have a chance at being representative.
>>76002913
/pol/ BTFO!
>>76004187
Do you even know what a representative sample is?
Learn statistics you dumb fuck.
>>76005856
I believe Clinton will win. Trump is too disliked to win
>>76006010
if Trump remains at 35% or lower then why debate ?
I'm sure they'll focus group the shit out of it before deciding but I can see it happening
>>76005589
Honestly this, I don't believe any of these damned polls, so far as I'm concerned the nation supports Trump and Hillary 50/50 at the moment. Remember when Hillary was going to win Michigan in a landslide?
This election season is completely abnormal, I'll trust the polls that give the right results when it's November 3rd.
>>76005589
Huh? They've been mostly right.
>>76006195
He's not wrong though. You would need multiple representative samples stacked against one another for it to even begin to be a meaningful poll. This poll is the literal equivalent of you walking outside and asking random people what they thought about something and just doing that around 1400 times... the idea that that would be reflective of anything solid, especially from a national standpoint, is laughable.
REMINDER!
note: This was after Republitards were more unified than ever against Obama, and Romney wasn't a universally despised candidate.
>>76005856
You'd be on the street.
>>76006556
And the final results
>>76002913
Woah, that dirty poll makes me feel hopeless. Guess I'll vote Hilary now.
>>76006513
If the polls were right Trump would have dropped out before any of the debates.
>>76006327
They both have high unfavorables so it doesn't really matter. Plus plenty of elections, national and otherwise, aren't decided by favorables. Take the sample size of one single issue voter -- they'll pick based on that issue and not how much they "like" the candidate. Most voters have something they'll vote based on -- security, ideology, whatever -- but likability? Much less common.
>>76006399
>if Trump remains
>remains
He literally just closed a massive fucking gap where everyone claimed he wont even close it since his announcement of candidacy. I think that shows his shit is fluid and polls are fucking retarded before GE
I dont think you understand how absolutely retarded it would be for Hillary to decline debating in the GE
Does anyone else remember a time traveller thread a couple of years ago where they guy said Hillary would win and be assassinated in 2017?
There was a few other things that were said, and I'm gonna take them as fact if she gets shot.
>>76006813
>>76006813
Trump doesn't have the demographics to win. He isn't liked at all
>>76006556
>>76006640
>Mittens beating Obongo
Wow, really makes you think... I am now feeling #shillary4hillary
>>76006915
Did he say that Trump would run against her? Also the timeline might diverge enough to stop her getting assassinated now.
>>76006327
> Trump is too disliked to win
I think it's not that, Trump hasn't shown that he's competent
all the people he hired suck
Please be an outlier.
Does anyone have a detailed breakdown of the poll anywhere? I can't seem to find it.
>>76004268
>waah ban this person because their words hurt my fee fees
There's literally no difference between /pol/ and SJWs except which side you fight on.
>>76007016
This chart is all about favorables. As I just said: most voters do not make their selection based on favorability. Lemme clarify my example: say you have a voter, call him Steve, and Steve thinks that national security is the most important issue -- Steve likes Kerry more, in terms of favorability he will answer to a pollster that he "likes" Kerry more -- but Steve will actually vote for Bush because Steve perceives Bush as being stronger on national security. You can move the dial around all you want, from national security, to the economy, to single issues, etc... those are the things that voters actually vote on -- it is very rare that someone votes based on favorability.
>muh victimize
>>76007223
Which ones suck?
>>76007347
Excellent job about forgetting literally everyone else on the thread anon, you have truly exposed this place
>>76007556
his natsec team is a bunch of random nobodies
his campaign manager has deep ties to the Russian mob
>>76002913
>I'm convinced this is the first election for everyone on /pol/
no shit
>>76007076
Exactly
>>76007935
Thought you meant his businesses.
his national security team includes a sitting United States Senator -- how would you qualify "nobody"?
Do you have any evidence that Manafort has ties to the Russian mob? My understanding is that he has done work outside of the state, mostly helping establish regimes that are useful to American interest.
>>76007084
I don't think so. I never saved the thread, but I can remember them saying there was never a 3rd world war but a 2nd cold war. And something about nukes in the middle east.
>>76002913
>its a thread about myself because im a narcissist
>i look for any reason i can to claim i am superior to everyone below me
>i am not a reliable or credible person
>>76008260
> his national security team includes a sitting United States Senator -- how would you qualify "nobody"?
okay a senator who's not really an expert and has other stuff to do, and some people freshly from college, etc.
> My understanding is that he has done work outside of the state, mostly helping establish regimes that are useful to American interest.
he did the exact opposite, helping russian puppets to win
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/04/paul_manafort_isn_t_a_gop_retread_he_s_made_a_career_of_reinventing_tyrants.html
>ITT
>All these retards who think their 2 Trump polls where he is tied mean anything when there's 20 other polls showing Hillary leading by 10%
Fuck off retards, work harder for Trump, or lose.
>>76008971
>a slate article
Fucking kill yourself.
>>76009123
don't confuse it with salon you retard
it's quality journalism
>>76002913
The game runs until the month of November. It's not over until it's over.
>13% other
Wew lad not a outliner poll at all lol. Get real cucky
Uh, this actually is bad.
>>76008971
Sessions has sat on the relevant committee, is a long time Senator... outside of being a former general or something to that extent I'm not sure how you could increase the level of expertise. Hadn't heard about the fresh out of college people -- if true then I agree, that's dumb.
American interests as defined by the actor, in this case Manafort. In his mind, he was making the "right" move. But even if we grant that he was just motivated by money -- why is this bad? Are we saying that Trump has hired a guy who is motivated by profit? Isnt that most jobs? We could say that it shows a lack of character but thats a pretty subjective argument.
>>76009054
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
She is not even +10% in the ipsos poll what the fuck are you talking about?
>>76002913
A few points to address:
First, the Reuters poll has been reporting Trump at a 10-point loss throughout the second half of the month of May, even as EVERY OTHER reputable polling group found Trump and Clinton in a dead tie.
>http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13/filters/LIKELY:1/type/smallest/dates/20160401-20160603/collapsed/true/spotlight/1
Furthermore, the Quinnipiac poll conducted at the same time indicates that Trump and Hillary have a 1-point difference between the two of them:
>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
It should be noted that RCP has never used the Reuters/Ipsos poll in its aggregate, probably because it has the strongest liberal leaning of any pool RCP currently uses.
It should also be noted that the article you have given has been repeated in its exact form throughout different mass media sites.
>http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/clinton-opens-up-double-digit-lead-over-trump-nationwide-reuters-ipsos-poll/ar-BBtQ0Y0
>http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll-idUSKCN0YP2EX
>>76009054
>ITT
>All these retards who think their 2 Trump polls where he is tied mean anything when there's 20 other polls showing Hillary leading by 10%
>Fuck off retards, work harder for Trump, or lose
The average is Clinton +1.5, retard.Where the duck is she leading by 10?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
>>76007321
It is see
There is no way 13% of the vote is going to outsiders. This is simply the highest hilldog poll so shills are latching onto it
>>76009325
>>76009581
>>76009759
Even on huffpost her average is less than 5% and that is with vox polling and this poll that wants you to believe third parties have a realistic shot at getting more than 5%
>>76009581
>>76009759
I have already spread word on Trump and converted several people by myself on the matter. Seems Hillary keeps coming back and leading by 10% over and over every time Trump closes the distance.
>>76010174
There is not one poll since april where she is leading over 10%. Once again you are pulling that out of your ass .
>>76010337
In first 2 weeks of May she lead by ~7% in most polls, stop deluding yourself.
>>76010174
>i have no argument
>let me start talking about random shit to refute
>>76009572
> Sessions has sat on the relevant committee, is a long time Senator...
foreign relations committee would be more relevant and he's busy being a senator
presidential candidates usually hire a bunch of seasoned experts that instantly reassure people that they're competent and give a clue what they're up to
> But even if we grant that he was just motivated by money -- why is this bad?
because he'll be one of the top guys in the next administration? you don't want somebody selling US interests for personal gain
that article covers his business dealings with known top tier mobsters, not just campaign work. it's worth reading.
>>76005463
This.
The question is why though?
What did she do to merit such a fantastic rise in the polls?
Changing the minds of a significant number of 300 million people is a monumental task that requires billions of advertising dollars
How did this happen?
>>76010579
First it is
>most polls have her over 10%
Now it is >7% in may
You are full of shit shill
By the end of may it was barely more than 6%
Get rekt
>>76002913
That's cool but I'm still voting for Trump over the Democrats.
>>76011203
>>76005655
Because it makes her look weak, and unfit to lead
>>76011328
>>76011203
>>76002913
>a poll says "Trump is LOSING and has NO CHANCE!!!1
yawn... I remember many such polls such as:
>Trump has a 1% chance of staying in the race for more than a week after the first debate
>polls show that 95% of voters believe Trump is a spoiler for Hillary
>polls show Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz with 56% & 34% to Donald Trump's 10% chance of becoming Republican Nominee!
etc etc etc.
The election's not for a few months buddy.
Shit can turn on a dime dozens of times in either direction between now and then.
>>76011411
hillary doesn't think in those terms
she's all about playing it safe according to focus groups
>Implying any judgment can be made this early on in an elction cycle this random and volitile.
Wew lads. Trump nor Hillary have it in the bag yet. WAY too much stuff can happen between now and November to make such a judgment.
I saw Hillary Clinton at a grocery store in Arkansas two years ago. I told her how cool it was to meet her in person, but I didn’t want to be a douche and bother her and ask her for photos or anything.
She said, “Oh, like you’re doing now?”
I was taken aback, and all I could say was “Huh?” but she kept cutting me off and going “huh? huh? huh?” and closing her hand shut in front of my face. I walked away and continued with my shopping, and I heard her chuckle as I walked off. When I came to pay for my stuff up front I saw her trying to walk out the doors with like a hundred cans of soup in her cart without paying.
The man at the counter was very nice about it and professional, and was like “Ma'am, you need to pay for those first.” At first she kept pretending to be tired and not hear him, but eventually turned back around and brought them to the counter.
When he took one of the bars and started scanning it multiple times, she stopped him and told him to scan them each individually “to prevent any electrical infetterence,” and then turned around and winked at me. I don’t even think that’s a word. After he scanned each bar and put them in a bag and started to say the price, she kept interrupting him by yawning really loudly.
I don't know how Rueters does there polling. They were the same guys who had Cruz ahead of Trump sometime in February or March which was a somewhat big story and had Trump tie with Clinton multiple times the whole primary when the other polls had him actually losing by 10%.
They oversampled democrats
Look at the cross tabs
>Clinton opens up double-digit lead over Trump nationwide
??????????????????????????????
>>76012297
Like I said in my previous statments no one is denying she has the current edge but shills are blowing up these outliner polls pretty hard. Any poll that has others listed above 10% should be taken witha grain of salt and barely be taken serious that includes rasmussen and Ipos rueters.
I would bet against johnson getting above 5% considering he can't even get his party to rally around him. And jill stein ia not getting more than 1% without bernies help which isn't happening
>>76012471
Just shilling
I've noticed a HUGE amount of eastern bloc shitheads shilling for HilLIARy recently. (and Canadifags, but they're just doing it because they think they are better than Aussies at the whole "trolling thing")
There are two reasons for this:
1.) They are poor as fuck and that $0,05 per post in USD is akin to 1/4 a days wages for them.
and
2.) A lot of them are anti-Putin like a motherfucker... therefore they will try to influence shit in favor of HilLIARy because they hope we blow up Russia under her watch.
Ignore Pro-HilLIARy posts from 3rd world commie bloc shithole "nations"
Bunch of fucking bydlo scum and gypsies.
>>76005294
I will bathe in your tears when Sanders gets the nomination and the crowd cheers on Hillary being lead out in chains.
>>76007473
Women vote like 95% on favorability.
>>76013375
Woah woah woah. So you is sayin we wuz a fucking leaf n shiet?
>>76006556
reminder that if not for a fucking natural disaster and chris christie praising obama, mittens would have taken this one
>>76006195
Maybe if we were all as simple as fish.
R8 my OC
>>76002913
trumpletons on suicide watch
>>76003769
He's barely attacking her, he has to wait until Hillary is officially the nominee or risk her being replaced
I refuse to believe anyone unironically supports Hillary. No one who posts on a site like 4chan stands to gain anything from her winning the presidency. She's not a meme factory. It'll be 8 years of no real happenings while shitskins continue to replace western demographics.
>>76016601
Just to put this in context
>>76002913
TRUMPFAGS ON FUCKING SUICIDE WATCH
>>76018390
>>76016601
Actually this chart is better.
According to Reuters:
>44% of voters are Democrats
>34% are Republicans
>11% are Independents
According to reality:
>30% of voters are Democrats
>26% are Republicans
>43% are Independents
Notice that Trump is leading with Independents.
This Hillary lead only exists because Reuters massively oversampled Democrats
>>76002913
Always the Reuters/Ipsos poll showing these huge leads.. I wonder why.. :^)
>>76006556
>Romney wasn't a universally despised candidate.
Universally disliked though.
He didn't have anything like the fervent support Trump has.
>>76020948
If you look at the polls, most Republicans are only voting AGAINST Hillary, not because they're enthusiastic about Trump. Enthusiastic Trump supporters are a small minority of voters.
>>76002913
What a crap article. The polls they use say it's a nine point lead, and then call it double digit lead.
With a 3.3 percent margin of error.
How do people that fail this bad, end up writing for Reuters?
>>76003769
>bringing up her past scandals.
Oh boy he really hasn't even started. He and Roger Stne have hard evidence of Hillary's gangster days in Arkansas.
>>76018352
>It'll be 8 years of no real happenings
Except mass gun confiscations and kicking off a civil war, or an economic collapse because she wants to grant amnesty to all 30 million illegals.
>>76021317
>most Republicans are only voting AGAINST Hillary, not because they're enthusiastic about Trump
This is impossible to infer from a poll, and its the literal opposite. Hillary's entire campaign so far has been "I'm not donald Trump" and "I'm gonna keep doing everything Obama is doing". Meanwhile Trump has simple yet innovative solutions to every single one of our major problems.
>>76002913
Sign the petition to make sure shillary docent win
https://www.change.org/p/president-of-the-united-states-put-hillary-clinton-in-jail
I'm not throwing support one way or the other, but Hillary doesn't win debates and Trump removes the competition in debates regularly.
>>76021930
No, it's not shithead. Many polls have the question "Are you voting for Donald Trump or against Hillary Clinton?" or something along those lines if worded differently. Most Republicans are voting against Hillary.
>>76022429
Huh? Trump's debate performances were usually terrible and he loses his temper quickly.
>>76022823
Trump still managed to come out on top after most debates, even when he didn't even mention the issues and just made personal attacks.
Hillary's surefire nomination is largely because she stopped doing debates.
>>76012225
Exactly. If there's any kind of terror attack on US soil between now and November, it goes overwhelmingly to Trump. Even if there's a serious one overseas it could influence polls substantially.
>Clinton does a series of fuck ups
>rises in polls
Wtf
This reminds me of when Cruz had all those scandals going but in the polls he started rising
Maybe Trump University is finally hurting Trump
>>76002913
So how much does shitlary pay you per shitpost?
>>76016601
>adds up to 89%
>>76023020
No, she trounced Bernie in New York right after debating him there. That was Bernie's last serious chance at getting the nomination.
>>76003578
>Do you remember 2012 when the polls were wrong about Romney cuz pollsters didn't call cell phones?
Do you remember when Nate Silver has been increasingly nervous this entire election cycle?
clinton is at +2.4% average vs trump, 1% in most recent poll.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson-5949.html
This is bad news. I think we need to regroup because there is no doubt that Trump is losing steam this week. The media has been relentless.
This is not the GOP primary anymore.
>inb4 shill
>>76025535
bernie "only white people vote for me" sanders never stood a chance in the Democrat primary
I'm a #shillforhill now. I only vote for the candidate leading in the polls sorry faggots.
we'll see in November, faggots
>>76005761
that isnt true at all. polls came out all the time with trump behind other candidates and he would go on to win that state
>>76002913
Wow, I'm a #HillyBilly now.
Who cares?
Trump is simply the last opportunity for America to resolve it's differences amicably. If he loses then it simply means that the forces of reaction who have thus far been held in check by the belief that change can be wrought from within the system will be let loose.
If you are a moderate or a leftist you should be praying for a Trump victory as it will be the only event capable of forestalling the well-memed "Day of the Rope", when lists are made and faces remembered, and the left is dragged out into the street and shot.
I don't get the point of these polls.
Shouldn't they break it down by state? Isn't that what actually matters?
>>76027390
>that isnt true at all. polls came out all the time with trump behind other candidates and he would go on to win that state
Cite specific examples of this occurring, moron. It didn't. Trump only won the states the polls predicted him to win. Why are Trumpfags so goddamn retarded and wrong all the time?
>>76028141
Shouldn't you be at your gay pride parade?
And to answer your question, electoral college votes are based on popular votes. Every now and then you get some inconsistencies, but, for the most part, popular vote is accurate.
Trump supporters in San Jose attacked by terrorists and nothing was done.
Now reverse the races.
What if the woman who got assaulted with eggs were black?
What if the terrorists were white and the people attacked were black?
Prison for all. 30 years at least.
But the attackers were brown, waving a Mexican flag.
So the San Jose leadership blames (wait for it) the TRUMP supporters and Trump himself for having political views that the terrorists didn't like.
What the FUCK, America?
What happened?
It will only get worse unless we get Trump elected and the illegals deported the hell out of here.
Build the wall.
Please build that wall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rux-g-xmvUs
>>76026193
This.
/bernie/ here, don't go to pol, but i saw this and was really suspicious, wanted to see if there was a thread here.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html#!
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-general-election-trump-vs-clinton
None of the other top polls even come close to this margin. Huffington post was updated yesterday, and the cnn poll was updated june 1st. Apparently hillary jumped anywhere from 9 to 5 points in a day and a half. Is this just an outlier or is something going on?
>>76028305
This is why I support the Jeffersonian seperatist movement. Basically, Northern California should become its own state. There are millions of Republicans who's votes are subverted by the big blue cities like LA and San Francisco.
>>76003297
Or Clinton leading Trump
>>76002913
I can not fucking wait till killary officially seals the nomination, trump is going to obliterate her. even fucking jeb is gonna go into hiding from this one.
>>76002913
And all the recent polls with Trump in the lead or beating Clinton everyone was saying it's too early
>>76003297
Except when multiple polls have Trump leading and only one has Clinton leading.
>>76003769
>Except the same poll showed them tied a month ago and people here had no problem with it then. Reuters/Ipsos is also the poll Trump liked to cite the most during the primaries.
Which one? I can't find it
I'm going to guess this is an outlier, Rasmussen put Trump and Hillary 38-37.
