BERNIE IS DONE
ITS OVER
TRUMP PRESIDENCY NOW
Venezuela's president that single-handedly destroyed his country's economy with his failed socialist policies is now supporting Bernie Sanders. The literal proof that socialism doesn't work is now supporting another socialist. Not to mention, almost everyone in Venezuela hates him. Fucking phenomenal.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-usa-idUSKCN0YN32Q
It doesn't matter
Sanders has been an open communist for decades, yet whenever his past is brought up no one seems to care.
Sanders saying deodorant choices cause poverty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8hAJ2IdNDE
Sanders supporting Breadlines
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJBjjP8WSbc
Sanders supporting Castro
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E14lsC4WLV0
>>75916079
Seriously that interview of him talking about good breadlines are shows how retarded he is.
DO YOU THINK THE RICH ARE AFFECTED BY BREADLINES YOU OLD KIKE? WHERE DO YOU THINK THE 1% WILL GET THEIR FOOD FROM?
>>75916416
When there's not enough of a resource to go around, and that resource is an essential resource, then rationing is desirable.
Obviously it's preferable to produce enough bread, though.
>>75916683
We will only produce enough and even more if we have companies competing in a free market though.
>>75916988
Cool, but that has nothing to do with rationing.
If the free market fails to produce enough of a good, and the good is an essential good, then rationing is desirable.
If the centrally planned economy fails to produce enough of a good, and the good is an essential good, then rationing is desirable.
>>75917157
>If the free market fails to produce enough of a good, and the good is an essential good, then rationing is desirable
no, if the free market fails to produce enough of a good to meet demand, then either production will rise, or the price will rise, or likely both, until the demand is met. In a free market society (in the long term) there are no bread lines
>>75915784
Can we add Venezuela to the Clinton body count?
>>75919302
Rationing of an essential good is more desirable than a price rise, because a price rise necessarily excludes people from access to the good which, the good being an essential good, is not desirable.
Rationing is still desirable even in a free market.
>>75915784
If Nicolas "Christ multiplied penises" Maduro endorses a candidate, the opposite one will win. That's what happened here at least
>>75915784
You serious?
And you think an endorsement from Putin and NORTH FUCKING KOREA are good for Trump?
Reality check you fucking idiot - no one who's voting for either gives a fuck. And those that are moderate aren't going to care much more either.
>>75919907
reddit shill identified
this is not your board
leave please
