My guess: by 2030 at the latest.
>>75832321
The sooner, the better
>>75832383
Why?
>>75832321
Why not repeal the 19th
>>75832411
Leftism needs to be violently punished. Its pseudoscience and falsehood pushed as science,
My guess is never, besides what private companies want, senpai.
>>75833271
Leave this country
>>75832321
>repealed?
Probably never.
Completely ignored? Matter of time. Nothing needs to be repealed or amended if the people just don't give a shit.
>>75833271
>Implying the left aren't going to do this to the right first
>>75832321
It's really only a matter of time. As of right now the only people who are ensuring its existence are middle aged white men. In 20 years when the current college generation that needs safe spaces is in positions of political power you will see a push for its removal.
Hillary already said she wants to do something about all of this "hateful rhetoric". Trump is temporary bandaid. Even if he gets elected, in 2024 the pendulum will swing far left and we'll end up with a commie president.
>>75833491
Hillary will move against free speech for SJW reasons, and Trump will do so in order to expand libel laws. He already said so.
To be fair, the First Amendment is an 18th century construct. I'm not sure that in its current form it fits a the internet age. Not saying it should be repealed of course, only that I understand why some people think it should be revised.
>>75832321
It won't ever be. Corporations will just take over all public spaces and discourse then ban it, then conservakikes will defend them because it's a "private, not public decision".
>>75833991
Agreed, past the memes. There is a clear difference between saying what you want, and yelling "fire" in a theatre, or whatnot.
Trumpkins are controllable and "meme-happy", but we must respect our laws as the Founders intended. Technology will make empty threats obsolete very soon, but yeah or somethi
