[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Feminists make better mates
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 64
Thread images: 9
File: image.jpg (112 KB, 509x640) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
112 KB, 509x640
>Contrary to popular opinion, feminism and romance are not incompatible and feminism may actually improve the quality of heterosexual relationships, according to Laurie Rudman and Julie Phelan, from Rutgers University in the US. Their study* also shows that unflattering feminist stereotypes, that tend to stigmatize feminists as unattractive and sexually unappealing, are unsupported.
>It is generally perceived that feminism and romance are in direct conflict. Rudman and Phelan’s work challenges this perception. They carried out both a laboratory survey of 242 American undergraduates and an online survey including 289 older adults, more likely to have had longer relationships and greater life experience. They looked at men’s and women’s perception of their own feminism and its link to relationship health, measured by a combination of overall relationship quality, agreement about gender equality, relationship stability and sexual satisfaction.
>They found that having a feminist partner was linked to healthier heterosexual relationships for women. Men with feminist partners also reported both more stable relationships and greater sexual satisfaction. According to these results, feminism does not predict poor romantic relationships, in fact quite the opposite.
>The authors also tested the validity of feminist stereotypical beliefs amongst their two samples, based on the hypothesis that if feminist stereotypes are accurate, then feminist women should be more likely to report themselves as being single, lesbian, or sexually unattractive, compared with non-feminist women.
>Rudman and Phelan found no support for this hypothesis amongst their study participants. In fact, feminist women were more likely to be in a heterosexual romantic relationship than non-feminist women. The authors conclude that feminist stereotypes appear to be inaccurate, and therefore their unfavorable implications for relationships are also likely to be unfounded.
>>
File: image.jpg (49 KB, 600x399) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
49 KB, 600x399
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/10/071015102856.htm
>>
Yeap. All you have to do is give them your balls!
>>
>>75831599
no they dont, latina sluts do

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozMuy_k4Nrg

https://soundcloud.com/couchtruthing/take-back-our-cities
>>
Everyone I know who's dated a feminist said they made their lives hell.
>>
>BREAKING NEWS: feminism good, feminists find
>>
File: marriage.jpg (56 KB, 633x360) Image search: [Google]
marriage.jpg
56 KB, 633x360
>>75831599
I wonder how many feminists are also virgins?
>>
Reminded me of a time a girl started talking to me about feminism and I just walked away from her in a club lol
>>
>>75831599
In my experience self-describing feminists are much more likely to do anal.
>>
>>75831599
You know I just realized Emma Watson didn't become a feminist until she went to an Ivy League college and got brainwashed
>>
>>75831599
Dated a hardcore SJW feminist for 3 months. I'm sure you don't need a random anon on a Polynesian image board to tell you, but don't you dare fucking do this.

Worst part is when her equally bad SJW friends were over telling me I have it made for being a white straight guy for like three solid hours.
>>
Can't trust social sciences.
Confirmation bias.
Bad sampling.
Etc.
>>
File: Cute Tank Adventures.jpg (593 KB, 1300x919) Image search: [Google]
Cute Tank Adventures.jpg
593 KB, 1300x919
>>75832102
This.
I laughed.
>>
>>75831599
Whores make better mates

Yeah

k..keep me posted
>>
>>75832294
I just find that shit so boring. Makes your balls go back inside you
>>
>>75832094
yes. I dated a tumblr feminist before I knew what tumblr even was. it was probably the worst point in my life.
>>
>>75831599
>feminism may actually improve the quality of heterosexual relationships, according to Laurie Rudman and Julie Phelan
*according to feminists
>unflattering feminist stereotypes, that tend to stigmatize feminists as unattractive and sexually unappealing, are unsupported
*according to feminists
>According to these results, feminism does not predict poor romantic relationships, in fact quite the opposite
*according to feminists
>The authors conclude that feminist stereotypes appear to be inaccurate, and therefore their unfavorable implications for relationships are also likely to be unfounded
*the feminists conclude
>>
File: rudman.jpg (13 KB, 150x198) Image search: [Google]
rudman.jpg
13 KB, 150x198
>Laurie Rudman
>Rudman
".Jewish (eastern Ashkenazic): metronymic from the Yiddish female personal name Rude (variant of Rode used in Poland and Ukraine; compare Ratkovich) + Yiddish man ‘man’, in the sense ‘husband’."
>>
>>75832294
>Dated a hardcore SJW feminist for 3 months.

but why? was it because of lack of options otherwise? if yes, I don't really blame you because we all know it's not as easy to get some cunt interested in you but if you're on /pol/ and consider dating a tumblrina SJW sheboon then you must be really fucking lonely.
>>
>survey

fuck off idiot
>>
>>75831599
>an online survey including 289 ...
survey data is almost always useless, even in person it's bad because people say what they wish was true
>>
>>75831599
Women smell good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNgbH6gli2Q
>>
>>75832094
>>75832590

Same here. One guy I know actually got cucked by one, he didn't wanna have sex with her in the first week of knowing her so she offered the alternative of "we're still together, but I might see other people."

They're awful people and no article is gonna tell me otherwise.
>>
>>75831599
Wow they're getting desperate now. I think they're beginning to feel their very existence threatened. Dated 2 college feminists. Both were horrible experiences, anecdotal or not.
>>
>>75832972
their whole ideology is literally everyone but me is a piece of shit and I do nothing wrong
>>
File: download.jpg (23 KB, 342x400) Image search: [Google]
download.jpg
23 KB, 342x400
>>75832382
>>
>>75831599
>Women defending feminism

WoooooW
>>
studies!
>>
>>75832342
>Can't trust social sciences.

But we can trust anecdotal evidence on /pol/
>>
File: studies!.jpg (13 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]
studies!.jpg
13 KB, 480x360
>>75833340
sorry I meant studies!
>>
>>75833470
you're a fucking tumblr-tier idiot if you trust anything you read here.
>>
>>75833470
Trusting anything on pol lmao.
I'm here for the lulz, this not being funny I give my piece of opinion.
>>
>>75831599
Ok guys here's the deal.

I'm dating a feminist myself. But I believe totally redpilled women are a damn rarity, most of them are at some portion feminists and I think it's normal (stick to your kind and what suits you) but how much is too much?

The good thing is she's not trying to reeducate me or push her own believes into my throat, we are completely oposite in terms of women rights, women impact, gays, socialism etc..
And usually I am the one who tries to push my believes into her.

How fucked I am?

>inb4 just dump her
Sex is great, we laugh, we enjoy each other, but I'm affraid if this belief difference evolves in the future.
>>
>>75831726
>2007

So since almost everyone ignored your post in the "GOTTA GO" SJW thread, you had to make your own thread?

Tl;dr and I still ain't clicking that shit
>>
>>75831599
>Feminists make better mates
>for everyone
>at the same time

whores are good at fucking news at 11
>>
I'll take "effects that go away once you control for wealth" for 500, Alex.
>>
>>75831599
>In fact, feminist women were more likely to be in a heterosexual romantic relationship
>more likely

yes, because they have more partners
>>
>>75832771
She constantly wanted to fuck
>>
>>75831599
>Rudman
>Jewish name
Everytime.
>>
>according to Laurie Rudman and Julie Phelan
Stopped reading there
>>
>>75834674
My libertardian, anti BLM and anti feminist friend was in a relationship with a socialist feminist with a slight white guilt complex for two and a half years. She ended the relationship and went on a Twitter rant for a week, claiming that he was emotionally abusive. (He wasn't)

Just know that dating a feminist increases the chance of this (or something worse) happening by a great deal
>>
>Laurie A. Rudman is a social psychology feminist professor as well as the Director of the
>Rutgers University

Its not even like this shit if full of confirmation bias and dishonesty.
>>
>>75831599
>Honestly guys, you should want an entitled prissy bitch who you can't disagree with
>Guys,seriously, feminists are soooooo much better
>Why are you ignoring me
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Also stereotypes that are apolitical have a correlation of +0.81.
>>
>>75835709
Yeah I have this in my mind. But honestly speaking, almost always I'm the one starting arguments as I simply can't stand her point of view, in such an important matter, is different than mine. So I'm the jerk.

We agreed to avoid these topics, after couple of fights. The only thing i managed to redpill her about is the European immigrants, and the fail of multiculti (swedish rape statistics made a miracle as they hit the vulnerable point I guess)
>>
>feminism is good
>t. feminist

yah, no
>>
>>75836851
>Global warming bad
>t. weather scientists

>Smoking is good
>t. Smoke concerns

>Trump is great
>t. Trump supporters

It's always like this, no matter the side.
>>
>>75831599
>University
>Woman

Pick one.
>>
>>75832094
I was getting close to one myself. Luckily it fell through:

>Her mother married a retarded man from a wealthy family to get in the family's pockets
>Fucked a black dude she didn't even like just because a couple of britbongs she met on vacation in the UK dared her to
>Couldn't make any jokes that were "offensive" or else she'd blow up
>Wants her future kids to be weak, beanstalk vegans
>Logic for forcing them to be vegans is that she wants to show them that they have "choices"
>In the end tells me we can't be together because she's Britbongophile who wants to live in London
>Despite previous greentext, she gets up in my face for changing a profile picture on social media thinking I was doing it for another girl

Glad I didn't touch that. Now she's your problem, Britbongs.

Funny thing is she was initially attracted to me for being so stereotypically (as a man) forward for a quiet guy. So much for feminism trying to recondition men to their liking.
>>
Yeah, a survey really trumps all the data showing that virgin wives (i.e. likely not feminists) have better marriages by far. I'm a #shillforhill now
>>
>>75832670

Aussie post underrated post
>>
>no mention of children whatsoever, which is what a sexual relationship should be about

Also this
>>75838102
>>
>>75831599
>242
>289
How are we supposed to take them seriously?
>>
>>75836054

Literally

>>75832102
>>
>>75831599
>/pol/ BTFO by science for all enternity
>>
>>75832102
I don't know which number post this is, but it's best


My friend dated a Polish girl for 3 years but she went away to a liberal school in NYC and went fucking feminist crazy. He had to cut off the diseased limb.
>>
>>75831599

She looks like an AIDS filled gutter trap
>>
>>75831599
> measured by a combination of overall relationship quality, agreement about gender equality, relationship stability and sexual satisfaction.
> measured by... agreement about gender equality

Breaking news: feminists are feminists!

Weak tautology proves nothing; back to shitposting.
>>
File: Feminist supremacy.png (218 KB, 694x254) Image search: [Google]
Feminist supremacy.png
218 KB, 694x254
>>75831599
>Tfw no hot feminist gf dominating and punishing you for being a racist, sexist cis male pig.
>>
>>75832173
Good luck finding a woman above the age 16 (legal in most states) whose still a virgin. Hell, even if you're a pedo, the odds of you finding a girl 12 or older whose still a virgin is slim at best but I digress.
>>
>>75831726
You can see the high maintenance tag oozing out of her pores.
>>
>242
>249
Oh wow look at those sample sizes!
>>
>>75840968
Also having one of their samples be from a fucking university biases things so much, universities are about the only places now where being a feminist is actually a common thing, they're the most normal feminists you could possibly find.
>>
>>75832342
Also they hardly ever reproduce their results, they just do the experiment once and move on, that's not how science works.
>>
>>75834920
underequator post
Thread replies: 64
Thread images: 9

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.