What's the biggest lie that people have been fed?
I'd say pic related
>>75818895
That Trickle Down Economics was ever a thing.
>>75818895
The Federal Reserve is federal.
>>75818895
capitalist pigs amiright
>>75818895
Diversity is a strength
>>75818895
Yes that pic is the biggest lie you have been fed. The lie was that any Republican or economist ever advocated it.
>>75818895
Everyone dies.
nobody on the right has ever suggested trickle down economics
>>75818895
>trickle down economics
You keep using those words. I do not think they mean what you think they mean.
>>75818895
That corporations don't pay taxes. It's so rage-inducing.
>>75818997
This
> While there have been all too many lies told in politics, most have some little, tiny fraction of truth in them, to make them seem plausible. But the “trickle-down” lie is 100 percent lie. It should win the contest both because of its purity — no contaminating speck of truth — and because of how many people have repeated it over the years, without any evidence being asked for or given. Years ago, this column challenged anybody to quote any economist outside of an insane asylum who had ever advocated this “trickle-down” theory. Some readers said that somebody said that somebody else had advocated a “trickle-down” policy. But they could never name that somebody else and quote them.
t Thomas Sowell
>>75818895
>Humans have souls
Why do we need them? We need something nobody can explain to feel good about ourselves? The soul was God's way of explaining above animal intelligence to retards in the middle east 2,000years ago
>>75818895
I think it's the holocaust
>>75820204
>>75818997
>>75819591
Um, it refers to using low tax rates and less regulations to stimulate businesses.
>>75819807
How does the bottom row of glasses get any overflow when the row above it isn't overflowing?
>Repubtards
>>75820407
I'd say yes regarding the 20th century
>>75820560
>Um, it refers to using low tax rates and less regulations to stimulate businesses
No it doesn't.
Reading any leftist rag regarding it disproves this assertion.
>>75820204
Reagan and Thatcher reduced taxes on the uber rich people, the rational was that they would spend it. They don't. They invest it in usury and other people spend it who cannot afford it.
>>75820691
I don't see what a "leftist rag" has to do with this. It's quite clearly defined on Wikipedia, investopedia, Webster's and so on.
