[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
what is the most intellectual news source? I tried npr but its
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 34
Thread images: 8
File: frog.jpg (9 KB, 284x178) Image search: [Google]
frog.jpg
9 KB, 284x178
what is the most intellectual news source? I tried npr but its not that intellectual. also tried new york times which is meh
>>
worldstarhiphop
>>
>>75760672
Buzzfeed....I get their snapchats all the time
>>
>>75760672

you should be reading multiple sources. i read everything from breitbart/drudge to NPR/atlantic/WaPo and everything in between when i can.

though NPR is noticeably better than drivel like breitbart.

there is no such thing as unbiased news.
>>
>>75760672
>what is the most intellectual news source? I tried npr but its not that intellectual. also tried new york times which is meh

There are none.

The only orgs who have journalists on staff at all are just a handful. The Economist is one of those.

You could read Foreign Affairs. Any high end and expensive magazine focused on politics really.

Nobody does "news" anymore, it's all just regurgitated press releases or even reporting on things from Twitter.
>>
NPR is the absolute worst. State propaganda and race/gender victimhood non-stop.

NYT/WaPo/NPR/Atlantic/Guardian (etc) are HuffPost pretending to be more intellectual.

Traditional publications are dead. Terrible. Read AP for more straight news (still leftwing journalists but less editoralizing) and Breitbart for everything the mainstream and "GOPe" media (national review, fox news, etc.) doesn't publish.
>>
File: foxnews.png (95 KB, 932x1068) Image search: [Google]
foxnews.png
95 KB, 932x1068
>>75761680

summer is here in force i see

http://publicmind.fdu.edu/2012/confirmed/final.pdf
>>
>>75761680
Breitbart is fucking trash bro. Just preying on stupid people.
>>
File: image.jpg (182 KB, 1242x1152) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
182 KB, 1242x1152
InfoWars Nightly News with your host Alex Jones
>>
>>75761904
What did he mean by this?
>>
File: 1464283091896.jpg (79 KB, 500x494) Image search: [Google]
1464283091896.jpg
79 KB, 500x494
>>75760672
Haaretz
>>
Reuters always seems like a safe bet

Then again what the fuck do I know
>>
>>75760672
revolutionnews
>>
>>75760672
Breitbart
InfoWars
Fox News
follow Alex Jones
>>
>>75761860
npr is shit tier

what the fuck are you on, they're just the people i use for my radio station connected to my iPod to use music, that's all they're good for.
>>
>>75763621
I thought that for a long time. But these last days, with the bias they openly show in news relating Trump and, concretely, the interview with the Dalai Lama, kinda stoked my doubts once again
>>
File: Jamesbottomtooth3.png (439 KB, 720x540) Image search: [Google]
Jamesbottomtooth3.png
439 KB, 720x540
>>75760672
The New Yorker
>>
One America News
>>
File: image.jpg (59 KB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
59 KB, 1280x720
>>75762302
>>
>>75760672
/pol/
>>
>>75760672
Moon of Alabama
>>
>>75760672
FOX NEWS
>>
>>75765105
fucking lolled so hard.
>>
File: 1452047376934.jpg (141 KB, 1046x502) Image search: [Google]
1452047376934.jpg
141 KB, 1046x502
>>75760672
If you read all the Greek Classics and have a full understanding of Biological and Physical Sciences you know enough. Then you just take in news from wherever and filter it through that lens.
>>
>>75760672
/pol/ is a credible source
>>
>>75760672
The economist is pretty good famalan

For domestic and international I go

>The economist
>The Atlantic (a lot of leftist fuckery but the quality is generally good, the content is updated frequently and there's no paywall)
>The NYT
>Foreign Policy
>National Review
>The Federalist

I'm NEET right now inbetween employment contracts so I can afford to indulge in numerous news sources. If you're limited on time I would start with the economist- here they explain their ideological precepts

http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/09/economist-explains-itself-0
>>
>>75765697

Interesting. I've thought of doing this too.

I've taken a couple ancient civ courses..and from my very ignorant knowledge - there seems to be a fuck ton of material. Niggas be writing in volumes about daily life and shit.

Any recommendations? Plato's Republic? Vergil's Aeneid...
Avoid the mythological shit or read that too ?
>>
>>75767607

Some dude on here. I know..................

Was recommending the New York Post.

Thoughts ?
>>
>>75760672
I have not been able to find a single "intellectual" news source. All of them are horribly biased and have shit tier articles more often than not. Actually the least retarded news sources are usually Indian, because they literally do not give a single fuck.

I follow WSJ (shit), FT (shit; obvious left wing shills that explain everything using dodgy finance and hoping no one notices) and Forbes (can be okay but more often than not leans very left).
>>
>>75768136
Never read it.
>>
RT, The Independent UK and zerohedge
>>
PBS
the economist
>>
File: 1443703897616.jpg (7 KB, 208x243) Image search: [Google]
1443703897616.jpg
7 KB, 208x243
>>75767607
>>75768984
>Reading the electronic jew
>>
>>75760672
>>>/news/
Thread replies: 34
Thread images: 8

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.