Why is /pol/ so:
-neo-reactionary
-militaristic
-authoritarian
-imperialist
-racialist
Is this really the world you polfags want to live in? Constant imperialistic warfare and brutal subjugation? It seems like you people would have liked the middle ages better.
>>75669601
yes and shut the fuck up.
We have seen a lot of war and subjugation under so-called democracy. Just look at US history for the past 150 years...pretty much non-stop war and subjugation.
>>75669601
because weak men want others to die for their ideas and are afraid of accepting women as equals.
>>75669601
Yes
>racialist
>>75670419
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racialism
>>75669601
It's only natural anon, we as humans have always wanted power, so much so that just boasting about it makes us feel good.
>>75670322
thanks for that vivid insight australia
>>75670585
There is nothing wrong with acknowledging the reality of human biodiversity.
>>75670896
You left out one...
5. The guy who owns the factory that sells the red pills to everyone else.
>>75669601
>neo-reactionary
Because the status quo is shit
>militaristic
Because war is a necessarily, unavoidable evil. Kill or be killed.
>authoritarian
Because it's the only way to get any results and preserve a society, also too much freedom is a terrible thing for man.
>imperialist
There is a finite amount of resources in this world and a leader must do what's right for his people even if it's at the cost of others.
>racialist
Because we are all different and it is naive to believe we can all live in the same place in harmony unless we are all worshiping the same God and holding the same traditions.
Any other questions OP?
>>75670094
First post best post
>>75669601
I just want to be left alone in my country, surrounded by my people, without the world fucking with my shit.
If people have to die for that to happen, then so be it.
>>75669601
I love the smell of napalm in the morning
