Well /pol/?
>>75599194
because liberals decided to kill the coal industry with the EPA
>>75599262
Yes we know Canada is full of black people
>>75599194
Because the money in those states goes further
dont confuse deflation with poverty
I'm trying to make a link between the two statements and it doesn't make sense
what does "poorest state" even mean?
maybe the population is on average poorer but they mostly live and work comfortably whereas some liberal areas have some very rich people and a bunch of welfare college students
it's easy to make statistics say things that don't actually mean anything
>>75599194
moreover, cost of living is different between states.
A general measurement of income is a terrible metric to define poor.
For example the cost of living in Jew York City is severely different than the cost of living in Oklahoma. Where in Oklahoma you can survive with a $10 hr job with a nice condo, In California you are sharing a room to rent with 6 other roommates.
>>75599194
They've got the most niggers and mexicans.
>>75599194
So the states with the least amount of welfare spending have, on average, the poorest people? Well color me suprised
>>75599194
because the niggers make everyone vote republican when they live near their democrat welfare compounds
>>75599194
i don't know, but neither do you apparently.
i'm guessing though that things are more nuanced than "red policies make states poorer than blue policies"
so why even make that dumbass graphic? why even talk about this when neither of us know what's going on?
>>75599262
those black people sure as hell aren't voting republican though
>>75600828
>implying they're voting at all
>>75600828
Doesnt matter. They are blue voters living in primarily red states, and they make up a large portion of the population of those red states. Move them to blue states and you'll get the same in the states they were moved to.
>>75599194
niggers and beaners
You know those red-states are under a Democrat president. Wouldn't it be the Democrats' fault?
>>75599194
The short answer is that Southern culture is less productive and the long answer is Celtic history.
>>75599583
i have 1000$ total of living expenses every month in upstate new york. While I lived in new york that was half my rent.
>>75599262
What do you call your sub-states, counties?
Gee wonder why?
>>75599194
If democratic economic policies are so great for the poor, how come ...
>>75602315
Yes actually
>>75602315
State>county>township>town
>>75602845
>>75599262
/thread
>>75599194
Illinois here. You must be smoking something. Come to my state and see what the Democrats did to it.
>>75599194
"How come" lol
>>75600828
.. and? the states are poor because they have niggers, not because the whites vote republican
>>75602845
now show one with mexicans, asians, jews, whoever else you like to pin all the blame on
>>75602845
>Gee wonder why?
please add the sources to this data, otherwise the liberals will go apeshit because nobody taught them the basics of scientific research.
>>75600828
there's poll taxes in those states and red states are more heavily gerrymandered than blue
>>75599194
Every single quip the left makes against "red states" can be explained by their black demographic
>>75599383
This. Blue states have absurd cost of living, always.
>>75599194
This is an easy out, leeches don't stick to just blue states.
>>75599194
Damn, made me go mhhhhm, #ImWithHerpes nao
>>75602315
federal>state>county>municipal
>>75604444
Oh kek blessed this thread with quads
>>75599194
Not all opportunities are evenly distributed. There has been more capital in Massachusetts compared to Kentucky since its inception. There are more ports and wealthy people prefer the area in Massachusetts compared to Kentucky.
Whether an area is rich or poor has little to do with its political affiliation. Some of the poorest ghettos vote democrat while some of the richest counties vote Republican.
