Explain how these bottom sections of the towers also came down, even if the top parts had melted.
>>75575203
Maybe because half the buildings landed on them
>>75575451
FPBP
BTFO Conspiritard!!
>>75575203
Because when the supports failed the tops of the buildings fell through empty space before slamming into the ceiling of the intact parts of the tower. Shit's pretty heavy.
>>75575203
Jet fuel, bro. Jet fuel.
>>75575203
>>75575591
Earth is flat.
Jesus. /pol/ really has become full of bootlickers in the past few months. Are you sure you all know what you're doing, voting for Trump? It sounds like Hilldawg or the Berniebro will be more your speed. Americans voting for Trump prefer FREEDOM, particularly to investigate the truth, no matter its source.
>>75575203
Gravity.
>>75575203
Explain how the bottom half of the snow fell down, even if the top half was disturbed
>>75575451
>>75575758
>>75575885
seems unlikely
>>75575203
Because it was in the script
>>75576486
Snow isn't made of reinforced steel.
>>75577315
Steel that is set to hold a certain amount of force coming from straight above it doesn't do so well when yanked sideways and then hit with a stronger vertical force.
>>75576594
buildings are heavy you limey bastard
>>75575203
I dunno britbonger, why not take an engineering class and learn the basics of thermodynamics? Oh right, because you're an idiot, nevermind.
They were barely designed well enough to withstand normal wind load. Why do you think Lucky Larry never visited his towers on windy days like 9/11?
>pointless tinfoil-tier bickering
why do you bother with these threads?
>>75577315
But it`s also not reinforced steel, that falls on snow.
>>75578718
correct. whats your point, neanderthal?
and no the building did not fall due to a pancake effect snowballing effect as the floors fell one by one. dont .even . just
>>75579292
Because he was not just "jew", but an anglo fabian "jew".
>>75575950
mfw they designed and created them from day one to collapse one day when required to easily.
>open thread
>literally everyou response is retarded
Wow pol has been surrendered to the absolute lowest tier of intelligence.
>people trying to justify the laughable official story
>20fucking16
>>75579906
Official version of the structure fall is technically accurate. The shit storm is made to cover up the backstory.
> alquaeda created by USA and anglo
> anglo jews where not present on the job during the collapse
> the war costed trillion dollars and did not solved anything
> the only proofs of osama dead is poorly made photoshop and obamas administration claims
You can actually see the top of one tower tipping over radically, right at the start of it's collapse. But then it decides to stop doing that,and instead falls straight down into it's own footprint, through the path of greatest resistance.
Just like the other tower.
And building 7.
Government asskissers are so fucking stupid. You'd have better luck trying to talk sense into a creationist.
>>75575203
gravity
u fucking retard
>>75580658
>and instead falls straight down into it's own footprint
no it didnt.
how did debris get all over the city?
>Official version of the structure fall is technically accurate.
>>75580628
No it isnt. Not by a long shot. If a relatively mild fire is able to fully collapse a structure like a twin tower, not a single high floor structure could still be considered or deemed safe.
It's absolutely ridiculous that the fires that raged at the twin towers are claimed to have brought down not one but BOTH towers in such a way a professional demolition team would pat themselves on the back.
And thats not even mentioning WTC7.
>>75581159
Please show me the devastation caused by 15 floors of skyscraper falling almost a thousand feet and wiping out a section of Manhattan NEXT to the world trade centre.
I'll wait.
>>75581159
it didn't
there should have been something like a million tonnes of rubble but we did not see this..
(please dont post pic of rubble)
some videos even show what 'appears' to be a steel girder turn to dust in mid air
most of the building blew away in dust form by the looks of it.
>>75581486
World Trade Center 7
>>75581159
Wind Hello!
>>75576486
>being this fucking retarded
>>75577315
Neither was the WTC flooring. Each floor could only hold the furniture and people.
>>75580628
The Taliban were created in 1994, so how could Reagan have met them in 1985?
Also, two of the men in that picture were assassinated by the Taliban (one on Sept. 10th 2001). The woman on the extreme right was forced into exile and the guy in the middle in white is an ethnic Uzbek leader who spent most of the 1990s and early 2000s leading Northern Alliance forces against the Taliban. The guy second from the right is a Tajik who died in combat in the late 1990s in Pul-i Khumri trying to stop a Taliban advance.
So, yeah. Not really seeing what you're hoping to gain by posting lies.
>>75581299
>a million pounds crashing into the side of it at hundreds of miles an hour
>mild fire
>>75581299
>Relatively mild fire
>Relatively mild fire
>Discounting location of fire and thus heat gradients
>Discounting heat related fatigue and yield level stress
>Demo teams would pat themselves on the back for a job like this!
>A fall that threw rubble and asbestos several blocks away
Mmm yes good goy, keep falling for the poisoned water of the well, ignoring the relevance of an attack on the towers, the pentagon, and numerous other planned attacks by the israelis, just to focus on the fall of the towers.
>>75581975
RT fags btfo
>>75578621
Does it then collapse at freefall too?
>>75575203
7-11 was a part time job
>>75580628
it isn't accurate in the slightest and anyone with a basic understanding of metallurgy and gravity should have no question that there was other forces at work on those buildings than the plane impacts
>>75579688
>>75582145
Either twin tower was designed to receive MULTIPLE 'million pounds @ hundreds m/ph'...nor does the official report even mention the plane crash to be the catalytic factor in the collapse of EITHER tower... what are you talking about?
>>75582217
>Relatively mild fire
Yes... it was by any standard really mild considering what other buildings have endured.
>Discounting location of fire and thus heat gradients
>Discounting heat related fatigue and yield level stress
AHA, These factors you can't really justifiably argue for the simple fact that if you would actually take them into consideration you would inevitably expose the ridiculousness of both towers collapsing in a almost identical way when both towers sustained completely different damage.
What i'm trying to say is, is that when you want to try to bring technical correctness into your camp you're gonna have the explain that shit as well...
good luck with that...
>A fall that threw rubble and asbestos several blocks away
Yeah... how the fuck do you explain that shit by just the building collapsing?
It literally pulverized nearly all the asbestos and concrete in either towers.
>>75581729
sort your life out. I'll wait
>>75578925
>the basics of thermodynamics
That's a weird way of saying statics.
>>75579688
they were design to withstand the forces of an airplane crash actually
>>75575203
Dude WEED, lmao
>>75580658
>You can actually see the top of one tower tipping over radically, right at the start of it's collapse. But then it decides to stop doing that,and instead falls straight down into it's own footprint, through the path of greatest resistance.
So much this
Welp I'm gonna go ahead and slide off the building to the right.
Nah, just kidding. I'm going straight down.
>>75583720
>the ridiculousness of both towers collapsing in a almost identical way
But they didn't collapse in an almost identical way, you doofus. You're trying to extrapolate from pushing down your block towers to pushing down a tower that is hundreds of feet tall. No matter what the horizontal velocity of such a tall tower is, it will end up falling straight down in a "pancake" fashion from the perspective of the observer.
Many "truthers" seem to be morons who unironically believe, just like the Al-Qaeda goons apparently did, that you could get skyscrapers to fall over domino-style. Calculate how fast the top story of the building would have to be moving horizontally in order to move the same distance horizontally and vertically.
>>75575203
It was the power of the memes
>>75585349
Even ignoring the fact that the FBI rented hotel rooms to the hijackers and were followed by the CIA for years , Even ignoring the fact that even Clinton was warned about this during his presidency how do you explain them falling at the rate they did? Falling down in a "pancake" fashion from 1 plane is unlikley not to mention it happened twice.
When a statics problem becomes a dynamics problem, bad shit happens.
>>75575203
Thermite.
>>75575950
>built to fall
>>75575451
let me state an obvious. Any section of any building is strong enough to support the rest of the building above it. Even if it has some momentum.
>>75575451
The building took onl~9 seconds to fall.
Acoording to kinematics, that is only possibly through the accelaration of gravity, meaning that no speed had to be lost.
D = vi(t) + (1/2)(a)(t)^2
D = displacement (m)
vi = initial velocity (mps)
a = accelaration (mps^2)
t = time (s)
D = 0mps(~9s) + (1/2)(-9.8mps^2)(~9s)^2= ~-396.9m
The tower was 415m tall. This equation proves that the top of the tower had to take only ~9 seconds to go from its maximum height to the ground, since the only force acting on it is the force of gravity.
If what you said were true, the building would take over 1min to fall. Too much speed would be lost if the floor would collapse under the weight of the floors above it.
Only way the towers falling was possible is if the building collapsed as a whole. In controlled demolitions, the bottom of the tower is blown up so that the direction of the blast can be better controlled. If the bottom is destroyed, the tower is in free fall, and thus the only force acting upon it is the force of gravity.
>>75576486
because they're not connected together with steel bolts and welding?
https://youtu.be/mNlG-HMEBGI
Minoru Yamasaki, the architect of the buildings, was scared of heights. There was a secret clause in his will that required the twin towers to be destroyed so future generations wouldn't be burdened with a fear of heights.
>>75579292
>barely designed well enough to withstand normal wind load.
>windy days like 9/11?
where do you even get crazy shit like this?
>in hurricane alley, and video of smoke barely moving.
>>75581909
>the floors were too weak to stay connected to the walls
>they were connected so well they pulled the supporting structure down
>wipes brow
>>75579292
They were designed to withstand small plane crashes.
>>75586400
>Even if it has some momentum.
>some
>.....??????????????????????
>>75575203
>>75575203
EXPLAIN HOW THE ENTIRE FUCKING WTC7 BUILDING LITERALLY IMPLODED WHEN IT WASN'T EVEN TOUCHED BY AN AIRPLANE OR FALLING DEBRIS.
>>75575203
people are still arguing about this? hasn't it been established for 10 years that it was a controlled demolition?
