I guarantee every one of you that within the next two decades the republican party will become the party of Nationalist working class (large "S") Socialism and the democratic party will become the party of social justice capitalistic globalism.
Don't believe me? Just look at these headlines:
http://www.thomhartmann.com/blog/2016/04/democratic-party-danger-losing-next-generation-voters
>Is the democratic party in danger of losing the next generation of voters.
Basically, the Sanders camp is split into two groups. Working class whites who are fed up with the status quo and SJW's who jumped on the Sanders bandwagon later on. The latter group will stick with the democrats and inevitably vote for Hillary. The former group will switch to Trump to spite the democratic establishment.
On top of that we're seeing headlines like this:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trump-gop-workers-party
>Trump: If I’m Elected, GOP Will Become A 'Worker’s Party'
Honestly, considering the fact that Trump is now taking money from Sheldon Adelson, I don't think he'll follow through on his promises to build a wall and I don't think he'll follow through on his labor promises. However, assuming I'm correct, there will be a nationalistic backlash consisting of the people who wanted a border wall. There will also be a labor backlash from white Sanders supporters who decided to support Trump because they saw him as the second best alternative.
These people will lead a primarily white labor oriented nationalist movement within the republican party. This is partly due to Sanders' rebellion within the democratic party that's occurring within this election cycle. Trumps pro worker, anti immigrant (immigrants are basically scabs) rhetoric and a universal hatred of the bourgeois establishment.
This new movement won't be like the old internationalist Marxist labor movements but it will be socialistic and nationalistic. Within 20 years the people who make up this movement will be a major political force to be reckoned with. Especially with the rise of automation and increasingly large wealth gap between the extremely rich and very poor.
>>75251767
>I guarantee every one of you that within the next two decades the republican party will become the party of Nationalist working class (large "S") Socialism and the democratic party will become the party of social justice capitalistic globalism.
I actually can see this happening. In Europe, we have this trend already.
France: Front National is necessarily nationalist and socialist. The PS on the other hand is pushing for economic liberalism.
Austria: The FPÖ candidate for president was mainly supported by workers and farmers, while the capitalists united behind a Green candidate.
Germany: The AfD which was founded as a neoconservative party has been shifting to right-wing populism and welfare politics.
Poland: PiS is economically socialist and deeply conservative.
It's been a theme in Europe for a long time. The former labor parties no longer care abut the labor force, which leaves bitter, angry people. Anyway what Trump said Republican party will become worker's party in "5 to 10 years", it's obvious that the party will change in some way. And same happened with Britain's Labor after Thatcher, because it had to change.
>Late in 2002 Lady Thatcher came to Hampshire to speak at a dinner for me. Taking her round at the reception one of the guests asked her what was her greatest achievement. She replied, "Tony Blair and New Labour. We forced our opponents to change their minds."
>>75252036
Europe is always a little bit ahead of the United States politically. What you're describing is essentially a precursor of what is going to take place here.
>>75252097
This too.
>>75251797
I'm tired.
Wrote:
>This is partly due to Sanders' rebellion within the democratic party that's occurring within this election cycle. Trumps pro worker, anti immigrant (immigrants are basically scabs) rhetoric and a universal hatred of the bourgeois establishment.
Meant to write:
>This is partly due to Sanders' rebellion within the democratic party that's occurring within this election cycle and Trumps pro worker, anti immigrant (immigrants are basically scabs) rhetoric along with a universal hatred of the bourgeois establishment.
Basically, what I was getting at is that labor is becoming an increasingly prevalent topic within American politics. Not to mention, globalism is increasingly despised. It's all fanning the flames for a socialist movement with a heavy emphasis on nationalism.
>>75251767
National capitalists buddy. Your pic is the lefthand side of the spectrum only!
>>75253368
Good luck with that. We'll see how it works out when you've been replaced by a robot. They're even replacing the cheap Chinese labor. It won't be long before you're next.
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36376966
>Foxconn replaces '60,000 factory workers with robots'
>>75253368
Capitalism is all fine and dandy but people don't want to vote for that.
>>75251767
>soviet communism
>parked right next to national socialism
You realize the USSR was spelled "United Soviet Socialist Republics" right?
Judeo-bolshevism is internationalist.
>>75253539
They are. Socialism is shit.
>>75254058
>What is the national socialist german workers party.
>>75254247
What about the NSDAP?
Their ideology was meant to be adapted to the country it was going to be used in. It was not going to impose itself on someone else, as it aimed to exaggerate the differences between cultures, not mix them all up and make them all "equal".
Is this bait?
>>75254375
What I'm talking about has nothing to do with neoliberal ideas of equality, diversity, multiculturalism, etc...
The sorts of people I'm talking about will want absolutely nothing to do with the illegal invaders entering into the United States and they will most likely see blacks as lumpen-proletariat political enemies who generally vote in favor of the globalist establishment. (just as they are doing now.)
>>75254623
..you didn't respond to me.
You insinuated the NSDAP had a similar ideology to bolshevism (which is simply a fabrication), and I asked what you meant.
I don't know what that spur of words you produced means, are you saying that people who vote for immigration generally don't live near immigrants (which is true)?
>>75251767
yes and water is wet.. dude you are a couple of years late to your "awesome" prediction what took you so long? The fpö right wing party in austria has around 75% of the workers vote in austria for example.
>>75254889
My apologies. I'm quite tired.
With that said, just check the official 25 point programme of the national socialist party.
http://www.johndclare.net/Weimar_25_point_programme.htm
>Citizens are entitled to a job and a decent standard of living. If this cannot be achieved, foreigners (with no rights as citizens) should be expelled.
>Nationalisation of public industries*.
>Large companies must share their profits.
>Pensions must be improved.
>An all-out battle against criminals, profiteers, etc., who must be punished by death.
>Improve education so that all Germans can get a job.
>Abolition of the Army, and a new People’s Army in its place.
That's just a few. I didn't even post all of them.
>>75254889
>who vote for immigration generally don't live near immigrants
No, I was saying that minorities will continue to be the democratic base that the establishment can rely upon. Demographically speaking, that's part of the reason Hillary Clinton has managed to win the primary as a matter of fact.
>>75255346
It's easy to see in Europe. Not quite as easy to see in the United States when you factor in the ideological predictions with regards to economics.
>>75255427
>Nationalization of public industries*
This is talking about infrastructure and utilities, which I agree with.
>Large companies must share their profits.
Prevents monopolies and provides the state with lots of cash, seeing as how huge companies turn much more money than their employee salaries in a given period of time.
>Social programs to increase the quality of the average German
Nothing wrong here.
Let's agree that the core elements of communism (in theory anyway) is that the citizen owns nothing, he only partakes in what is shared with him by the community (the government). Let's extrapolate onto private industry (forcibly nationalized under communism), and we arrive in a situation where the government allocates the human capital as it sees fit.
The NSDAP has absolutely no traces of this thinking. This part of their program was aimed at subsidizing and directly increasing the quality of life of each individual German, not reallocating everything the nation had to make every German "equal".
I still don't see what you're trying to get at. Hitler absolutely hated communism.
>>75255562
I see now, and that is in fact correct (funny how American blacks are voting Trump..)
>>75252036
yup. Same as here in Italy with Lega Nord
>>75251767
Your picture is retarded bullshit.
