You manbabies need to grow up. This movie isn't for you white 30-40 year old nostalgia fags. It's for the little girls out there that need female role models.
[spoiler] how does this justification make you feel? [/spoiler]
>>75068845
yeah black girls need a fembeast with intricate knowledge of new york as a role model?
>old
>fat
>sjw
>black that acts like she's from the guetto
nice role models
I don't discuss this movie and I don't acknowledge its existence.
If anyone asks me to go, I'll leave it at "I'm not interested" and say I have other stuff to do.
Pretty hilarious that you look to female role models in a movie riding the past achievements of men.
>>75068845
I'm actually hyped about this movie. The three whites are sensible scientists and the negro Is a loud, uneducated hamplanet. This is the close hollywood has ever gotten to the truth about race.
This movie is /pol/ through and through.
>>75069297
"Closest"
>Women are so useless their only role models are fake and fight ghosts
>>75069297
How the fuck do you convince yourself to shill this hard for just .10 per post
>>75069433
I'm getting .35 per post. George Soros honestly doesn't pay that much
>>75068845
Not seeing it, don't give a fuck
>>75068845
>obnoxious fat lady
>obnoxious stupid hair cut lady
>unfunny Kristen Wig
>obnoxious, stereotypical black lady
"role models"
>>75068845
I think people wouldn't be so against an all female cast if it was a completely new story/idea. Remaking an old movie and changing the characters in the name of equality is not entertainment, it's politics.
I hope that black lady gets a degree by the end of the movie, or at least it turns out she's really a genius and solves a math problem the other scientists can't.
>>75068845
I have a little girl.
I will not be taking her to see this movie.
Ever.
All it teaches girls is:
>be an insufferable cunt
>if people don't like it they're misogynistic
>and racist
>and I am never the problem
Fuck that.
>>75068845
A movie I have no interest in was made for another audience?
I don't feel anything about it. Why should I?
Stop being such a manbaby.
>>75068845
>Can't even spoiler
>>>>>out
I probably wouldn't watch this movie if they substituted with male characters. This franchise died with Harold Ramis desu ... Sick of this remake garbage made to pander to nostalgia cucks...
The blew it by not getting it done before HR died
>>75069565
>she's not even a scientist
And here I thought it was 2016
>>75068845
Thats right!
You fucking sexist pigs, this movie isn't for you cis males. Now stop complaining about it and buy your ticket already!
>>75068845
If the movie were legitimately good it might have a leg to stand on.
If they didn't play the all-female angle so blatantly try-hard and if it doesnt revolve around "loo, we're women" jokes to really hldrive it home, it might be an argument.
But it's not gonna do any of that...
Jesus fucking Christ they could not have picked a more ugly gorilla of a woman to be the token black character
>>75068845
>1 post by this ID
Typical shill procedure/forum sliding. Fuck off shill.
Showed my Grandmother (First Generation Feminist) that trailer recently.
She seems to have lost the last bit of faith in humanity she had.
>>75068845
First post best post, >>75068990
I wouldn't want any little girl to view Leslie Jones as a role model. Kristen Wiig is ok though.
>>75068845
WARNING: THIS IS BAIT
>>75068845
I have no problem with them making this movie but it doesn't look funny to me going off of trailers, so I won't see it. "Don't like it, don't watch it" goes both ways. There is no reason to be upset over this, just don't go see it.
At least Hi-C Ecto Cooler is coming back though.
Dont cuntsplain to me on this movie and what I should and should not like, you twat.
>yfw you notice the kid is actually flat-lining
>>75068845
So we get to have 90% of Western films without token "ethnic minorities" and gender/sexuality swapped roles because these movies are for us, the Europeans! I'll accept their logic if we can use it too.
>>75071628
Obligatory follow up
>>75068845
No one cares and feminists are mad because they aren't getting the attention they crave. Useless women whining about inane stuff. Truly groundbreaking stuff here, should we also apologize because they had a dream that we cheated on them?
>>75071628
>>75071741
These pics dropped first week of august 2015, they are ridiculous
>some pr manager thought sending characters that exhume dead spirits into a terminal patient medical ward was a good idea
top kek
So who's ready for all the "What 'Ghostbusters' flopping says about the state of western men" articles?
>tfw read it mannabies
>tfw its a actually nice neologism to classify these specimen
Man-wannabies with appearence of a manatee
>>75071628
Seriously who the fuck thought this was a good idea
>movie praised for all female leads
>all their characters are different stereotypes for different women
Top kek
>Happy Stem Cell Day Jordan
>>75068845
Yeah, then maybe little cunts can pay for their own tickets.
By the way my tip for first vagina joke is five minutes.
>>75072296
To be fair, the originals had stereotypes strewn about
>womanizer
>manchild
>brainiac
>street smart black
The difference is that NuBusters doesn't look funny. Feig is a shit director and caster.
>>75071628
>>75071741
>>75072061
Whats with the spawn camping? Bunch of filthy casuals
Movies with a blatant agenda are usually unpopular and positive discrimination in general doesn't always work.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/aug/26/army-stats-show-that-women-are-injured-twice-as-of/?page=all
>>75072296
>Implying women aren't stereotypes
Seriously they aren't individuals, they are all playing 1 of a handful of archetypal characters
>>75068845
Why should my daughter have to sit through some pandering piece of shit movie using feminism instead of talent to sell it?
>>75069563
>tfw because this is a reboot, the first two movies never happened
All that matters is this is going to flop spectacularly and there's nothing you can do to stop it, even with al the shaming tactics in the world.
Hollywood's SJW phase is going to die a death after this proves it unprofitable.
>>75069723
>>75069565
Shut the fuck up. Maybe she identifies as a scientist.
>>75068845
>It's for the little girls out there that need female role models.
OK than try not to piggy back off the success of a movie that was made for manchildren. maybe manbabies won't care as much then [Spoiler] just a thought [/Spoiler]
>Black person is made out to be racist caricature of black woman with street smarts, the bulk of who's punchlines will invariably consist of "DAYMN" or "AW HELL NAW"
Rev up those troll twitter accounts, boiis. We've got some subverting to do.
>>75073455
>pic
I can imagine the PR person posting that was trying to send the message: "hey kids, Hillary is cool and hip , she eats pizza just like you!" and failed spectacularly. Because even mentally challenged tween Bernouts can spot a lying corrupt cunt when they see one.
>>75068845
impossibly late sequels are always better than the originals, i make sure to spend a months salary on erry one
>>75074292
Why the fuck is there a nigger on that movie poster?
>implying young woman will care about ghostbusters
>>75073455
wish my campaign was powered by pizza and anal
>>75068845
Little girls have plenty of heroes it's just that cucks and feminazis swoop in with misplaced intentions and make them horrendous.
Also taking male heroes and gender-swapping them or replacing them with women is lazy. Women want girls to have heroes make some.
And finally children should be using fictional characters as role models. That's what parents are for and if these mothers are such loser that they need make believe surrogates to fill in the gap they are shit and should be ashamed of themselves.
>>75068845
more like indocrinating a generation to feminism.
And Betty Crocker isn't a role model?
I DONT KNOW IF THIS IS A RACE THING OR A LADY THING
>>75068845
The only role model my daughter needs is her mum.
>>75068845
I'm actually fine with that, but it's still a pretty bad movie.
>>75068845
>This movie isn't for you white 30-40 year old nostalgia fags. It's for the little girls out there that need female role models.
It's a GHOSTBUSTERS remake for god sakes! a movie made in 1984, that was 32 years ago!
so you're saying they are making a sequel of a movie that came out 32 years ago. And they're NOT making it for its original fanbase?
Sound more like the filmmakers have turned their back on those who enjoyed the original Ghostbusters to profit on another demographic.
Holly in Nice Guys is a way better role model for girls if you want a recent movie and Holly is like 12. Hell, I could make a pretty nice list of actually good female role models from recent movies. What a shitty excuse to try to make this movie worth something.
>>75068845
Aren't you setting little girls up for a huge fall by saying essentially, "Girls are equal to boys just like on TV and all those movies you watch."
Then they get to the real world and "Oh my God, they're fucking huge" becomes a reality for the nearly total majority of them.
Now grown up Suzie is too scared to leave the house without an escort and even then she trembles inside at the sight of all the men that she was taught she was equal or superior to.
You are going to do some permeant psychological damage to women when they realize they are not equipped for any genuinely dangerous tasks.
>>75068845
Create a new IP then.
Don't shit up an old one that everyone holds dear.
>>75068845
>1 post by this ID
>>75068845
It's spelt manatees.
